Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Simposio ” as Want to Read:
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
read book* *Different edition


3.99 of 5 stars 3.99  ·  rating details  ·  20,215 ratings  ·  558 reviews

Se esiste il testo sull'amore nella nostra civiltà, a cui ogni testo successivo non può che ricondursi, questo è il Simposio, il dialogo di Platone che più di ogni altro ha mantenuto intatto il fiore della gioventù e ci si offre naturalmente non già come una disputa filosofica, ma come una lunga conversazione - forse la più bella conversazione della letteratura - fra spiri

Paperback, Piccola Biblioteca #81, 108 pages
Published April 1st 1979 by Adelphi (first published -385)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Simposio, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Simposio

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Richard Reviles Censorship Always in All Ways
Rating: 2* of five, all for Aristophanes's way trippy remix of the Book of Genesis

While perusing a review of Death in Venice (dreadful tale, yet another fag-must-die-rather-than-love piece of normative propaganda) written by my good friend Stephen, he expressed a desire to read The Symposium before he eventually re-reads this crapulous homophobic maundering deathless work of art. As I have read The Symposium with less than stellar results, I warned him off. Well, see below for what happened next
OPRAH: Good evening and welcome to What's the Most Spiritual Book of All Time? For people who missed last week's exciting semi-final round, The Sermon on the Mount beat The Bhagavad Gita 4-1 while Jonathan Livingston Seagull unexpectedly lost 3-2 to outsider The Symposium. Let's all welcome our finalists!

[Applause. Enter JESUS CHRIST and SOCRATES, both wearing tuxedos. They shake hands. More applause.]

OPRAH: And now let me introduce our jury. I'm thrilled to have with us living legend Paul McCar
Riku Sayuj

“It’s been less than three years that I’ve been Socrates’ companion and made it my job to know exactly what he says and does each day. Before that, I simply drifted aimlessly. Of course, I used to think that what I was doing was important, but in fact I was the most worthless man on earth—as bad as you are this very moment: I used to think philosophy was the last thing a man should do.”

In Praise of Love: An Encore

This is a dialogue about the human aspiration towards happiness, and how that
Ian Pagan-Szary
I Never Met a Physician Who Wasn’t Descended from a Greek

This might just be the work that put the "meta-" (at least the "metafiction") in "metaphysics".

Plato’s name is attached to it, but its principal focus is Socrates. And guess what? Socrates doesn’t so much elaborate on his own views as (1) recount the views of others (especially those of the female philosopher Diotima) and (2) indirectly reveal his views by his conduct and his responses to the views of others (especially the taunts of Alcib
After a night at a drinking party (a symposium), the participants challenge each other to focus on one subject for sober It is agreed that love may begin with feelings for only one other person. Cuddled with the beloved, one learns to define the associated feelings, benefits, and additions to one's self-esteem.

Progression may continue to include love of one's city, state and country. As the circle enlarges from the core relationship to other loyalties and preferences, the ape
And Agathon said, It is probable, Socrates, that I knew nothing of what I had said.
And yet spoke you beautifully, Agathon, he said.

Back in the late 1990s a cowpunk band named The Meat Purveyors had a song, Why Does There Have To Be A Morning After? It detailed stumbling around in the cruel light of day, sipping on backwash beer from the night before and attempting to reconstruct what at best remains a blur.

The event depicted here is a hungover quest for certainty. The old hands in Athens have b
HEADLINE: This is priceless!

When I was a young man, I and my friends certainly had some strange conversations, possibly aided by some substances of questionable legality in certain countries, but we never quite managed to attain the heights of strangeness reached at this banquet/drinking party(*) held in 416 BCE when Socrates was approximately 53 years old, once again the principal figure in this "dialogue" written by Plato between 12 and 15 years after Socrates' death by poisoning in 399 BCE. P
The nature of eros is discussed in this famous dialogue by Plato. Symposium literally means "drinking party" in ancient Greek and this was one well-attended party with the likes of Alcibiades, Aristophanes, Agathon, Pausanias, Eryximachus and Socrates. A variety of views are put forward by the participants during the witty dialog that befits a drinking party. Some believe that eros is a somewhat shadowy thing, neither beautiful nor ugly, good nor bad. The most famous view is Aristophanes myth of ...more
Jul 07, 2007 Trevor rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: everyone
Shelves: philosophy
In this book Socrates argues that it is not always a good idea to have sex with boys and Aristophanes explains we were once co-joined creatures of three sexes - either male/female, male/male or female/female and were shaped like balls. How could anyone not find this a book worth reading?
Sam Quixote
I'm not a philosophy or ancient history student, I picked up Plato's "Symposium" to challenge myself and see if I could understand it. The "Symposium" is a gathering of Greek thinkers who sit around and give speeches about love.

Phaedrus talks about the greatness of love and how those who have it achieve great things. Pausanias talks of the merits of boy/man love where the boy pleasures the man while the man passes on his wisdom to the boy and that this is the best kind of love, not the lesser l
Angel Vanstark
I am outraged after reading this. First, the approach that was taken (multiple layers of theory of mind) opposed the main topic, love. How the fuck do you expect to talk about love if you don't even have the balls to honor it enough at a close degree. Why the hell am I, as the reader, supposed to believe what comes from the grapevine; Plato and his crew were sketchy mother fuckers. The second and third issue I had with this piece of literature are more pertinent to culture and how the academic w ...more
Azar Hoseininejad

ما وجود یک موجود زنده ای را از کودکی تا پیری همیشه به یک نام می خوانیم و آن ها را همانند یکدیگر می شماریم.
در حالی که او هرگز همان نیست که پیش از آن بوده است. بلکه مدام در حال تغییر و دگرسانی است. یعنی مو گوشت و استخوان و خون و خلاصه همه ی اعضای بدنش دائماً در حال تغییر و دگرگونی است و این تغییر و دگرسانی، نه تنها در بدن، بلکه در روان ما نیز جاری و ساری است.
یعنی در بدن ما مدام کار فرسودگی و رویش دوباره ادامه دارد و همچنین در جان و روان ما.
در همه ی وجود ما حتی اخلاق و آرزوها و پندارها و شادی ها و
Clif Hostetler
I suppose one should read some Plato to be considered an educated person. I really want to be an educated person, but this is an example of a book I would never get around to reading if I weren't pushed by some situation outside of myself. In this case the push came from a book group of which I am co-organizer. I am fortunate that the group has attracted participants with knowledge of the classics that exceeds my own. Therefore, my rough impressions from reading the material have a chance to be ...more
I love Plato—platonically, of course.

Plato could have staked his reputation on being an enormously talented writer, and he would have secured immortal fame. But no, he had to add brilliance to style.

What Plato had that almost all of his successors lacked was a genuine love for the pursuit of knowledge, irrespective of the possibility of its attainment.The Symposium is a perfect monument to this idea. The guests all have different ideas, different styles, and different sensibilities, and all work
Jan 25, 2010 Dusty rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Dusty by: Elizabeth Richmond-Garza
A curious coincidence: It's 2010, and the debate over Proposition 8, which disallows state recognition of same-sex unions, has invited court testimony on the "nature" of homosexuals -- as politically unimportant, as sexually deviant, as likely sexual predators. That's in California. Here in Texas, for my graduate course on critical theory, we've just read Plato's "Symposium", which Edith Hamilton (the translator of my edition) says is one of the man's two best dialogues. Its chief topic is love ...more
Naile Berna
It's quite an experience to read the myths of thousands of years, (such as one's other half by Aristophanes) from the person who told them. I've learned that the setting and sequence of the dialogue also carries utmost importance. We haven't changed much I see.. The thoughts about spritiual love we've come to conclude among friends were recited by Socrates thousands of years ago, a revelation
Matthew Gallaway
The Symposium itself is a short series of after-dinner speeches (as written by Plato) on the topic of Eros, given by a group of ancient Greeks, including (most memorably) Socrates and Aristophanes. You probably knew that already! I recommend this edition for Allan Bloom's long, thought-provoking essay, which offers much insight into the complexities and flaws of the speeches; Aristophanes is the most romantic -- he describes the myth in which humans are filled with longing because we are always ...more
Jody Mena
The Symposium was like a very filling snack - small, but potent. The Socratic method is always a treat when put into play, and I was fascinated by the way stories went into fourth- and fifth-hand accounts, rather a direct presentation - it added another dimension to the tale. I think anyone looking to read, and more, to understand the Symposium would need to know a little something about the history and society it's set in, as the topics the party-goers discuss, such as pederasty or the baseness ...more
Erik Graff
Jul 21, 2009 Erik Graff rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: everyone
Recommended to Erik by: no one
Shelves: philosophy
Although I read the Symposium for the first time long ago, I reread the thing a couple of years ago in the Jowett translation with a friend who was finishing up a Ph.D. in Classics at Loyola University Chicago. He had come over for dinner and we read the thing aloud to one another afterwards with both the translation and the Greek text at hand.

The Symposium is often the first of Plato's texts read by students and it is a good choice because readily accessible to the beginner. Further, for a stud
David S. T.
With this I read the Hackett edition and I was pleased with it. Unlike many of their other Plato editions, this one had a decent amount of footnotes and a great introduction, with an easy to read translation.

I knew beforehand that this book contained dialogues about Euros, but I didn't realize that with many of the dialogues the love is referring to pederasty, I should have guessed from some of the interactions with other Plato dialogues. To someone like myself from a different time and culture
Daphne Reed
Jan 30, 2013 Daphne Reed rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Those who have interest in the intersectionality of lit and philosophy
Recommended to Daphne by: Literature and Philosophy Class
Obviously thought-provoking -- coming from a feminist perspective, I especially enjoy the speeches of Socrates and Diotima. Especially worthwhile read -- this translation is quite lucid, and reading the notes I gained respect for the translators which seem to have conquered the task of Plato's dialogues with finesse and intuition. It is a particularly striking read for the speeches presented by the individuals irony and humor artfully and somewhat subtextually, mingles with the more serious or e ...more
Non avendo avuto la fortuna di studiare filosofia alle superiori, nè di essermi interessata ad essa dopo, ignara totalmente del greco, mi son trovata davanti la sfida a leggere questo testo. Possedevo già 2 volumi con l'opera completa di Platone. Ovviamente mai letto nulla perchè, come al solito, compro per il piacere di comprare libri e spero un giorno di avere tempo di leggerli tutti.
Il testo che ho letto, però, mi è stato donato da una persona che riteneva avessi bisogno di lezioni d'amore. I
I am just beginning to read Plato so I believe my current thoughts will sound novice to those more familiar with him. The beginning pieces I've read are his accounts of the dialogues of Socrates, so one is becoming familiar more with Socrates - or the idea of Socrates - through works like these, and perhaps less with Plato. The rhetoric takes some getting used to, but there is a noticeable difference in style between Socrates and others who speak in The Symposium. Unlike others of the Socratic d ...more
It is well known how ancient Greeks captured the inner dynamics and struggles of spirit with ever known poetry and analytical depth, anticipating what some thousands of years later would have become the pillars of psychoanalytic theories. Among the many dialogues I’ve read, I think Plato’s Symposium represents the peak of this poetic and, at the same time, deeply investigative thinking. Its reading is an inexhaustible source of reflection. You can read it wearing the lenses of (his) philosophy, ...more
Eyad Abu-Zaid
هذا الكتاب مُغايرٌ لما قد قرأته من قبل في الفلسفة - لأفلاطون تحديداً -
فهو قد بلغ من السهولة مبلغ كتابٌ ضحلٌ لا يمت للفلسفة بصلة ، وغلب عليه ذكر الأساطير الإغريقية - والتي لا أخفي ولعي بها إذ أري فيها عمق كبير -

يقول أفلاطون علي لسان هلبوزنياس أن الحب الدنيء هو الحب من أجل غرض كالمال أو الولد أو أي من الأغراض الحسية ، وهذا مما لا اعتراض عليه ، أما الاعتراض هو أن الحب السماوي - المنسوب الي أفروديت السماوية بنت أورانوس - هو الحب الذي يهدف الي تثقيف الذات أو تحصيل الفضيلة والحكمة ، وقد أتجاوز وأقول
I was required to read this for ENG150Y1Y, The Literary Tradition. That's right: a philosophical text in an English setting. I don't know why, either, since lectures haven't started yet.

So, the Symposium, the apparent start of the concept of 'Platonic love', even though it's never referred to, though I guess it's implied. The story's framed by a guy answering a question (again, apparently) and so telling the story of the time Socrates went to a party, didn't drink at all, and got everyone to mak
There are many things that are admirable about this work that Plato may not have meant to touch upon, but then again maybe he did. Like the fact that it contains the ONLY passage from Classical Athens that recognizes the existence of homosexuality amongst females. There's more than one view in here that defies convention, and I can appreciate such diversity.

Anyway, most of the first half is just Plato setting things up for Socrates' turn in which he dissects his fellows' eulogies, so there's a g
Starts out slow, with mostly irrelevant speeches on the nature of Love. The first half or so is remarkable just for the interesting description it gives of Ancient Greek homosexual practices. It gets much more interesting once Socrates takes the floor, immediately ripping the false rhetoric of the hypocritical sophists in favor of Truth. His theory of love is interesting but is not at all what we think of as romantic love. . . it is more like love of truth/beauty/god and culminates in a mystical ...more
Don't read this if you're a woman. Though, of course I didn't expect anything other than blatant sexism from men living in Athens, in Ancient Greece. Women are not capable of true love, only vulgar love. Only men can feel any kind of honourable and virtuous love, obviously. Unfortunately this trumped any interest I would have otherwise had in any of the speeches. This is what they make you read when you take the wrong elective courses in college.
My Dad always used to make jokes about the pretentious idiots who lug books like this around for show. So, understandably, i was a little put off reading anything of Plato's, i thought it would be far too difficult and quite frankly, perfect ammunition for bullies.Yet i've finally finished Symposium!

As it turns out, i thoroughly enjoyed this book. It was fascinating to start with, but also easy to read. I've already bought Republic and are trying to get my hands on Phaedrus.

The one downside, is
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
greatest parties in literature 2 32 Jan 15, 2013 10:42PM  
به دنبال عشق گمشده 1 33 Mar 13, 2009 03:50AM  
  • Poetics
  • Fragments
  • Conversations of Socrates
  • Early Greek Philosophy
  • Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy
  • An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
  • The Art of Living: The Classical Manual on Virtue, Happiness and Effectiveness
  • The Way Things Are: The De Rerum Natura
  • The Consolation of Philosophy
  • Twilight of the Idols/The Anti-Christ
  • Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy)
  • Philosophical Fragments (Writings, Vol 7)
  • Philoctetes
  • Clouds
  • The Enneads
(Greek: Πλάτων) (Arabic: أفلاطون)
Plato is a Classical Greek philosopher, mathematician, student of Socrates, writer of philosophical dialogues, and founder of the Academy in Athens, the first institution of higher learning in the Western world. Along with his mentor, Socrates, and his student, Aristotle, Plato helped to lay the foundations of Western philosophy and science.

Plato is one of the most
More about Plato...
The Republic The Trial and Death of Socrates Apology Five Dialogues: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Meno, Phaedo Complete Works

Share This Book

“According to Greek mythology, humans were originally created with four arms, four legs and a head with two faces. Fearing their power, Zeus split them into two separate parts, condemning them to spend their lives in search of their other halves.” 613 likes
“...and when one of them meets the other half, the actual half of himself, whether he be a lover of youth or a lover of another sort, the pair are lost in an amazement of love and friendship and intimacy and one will not be out of the other's sight, as I may say, even for a moment...” 325 likes
More quotes…