Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Darwin on Trial” as Want to Read:
Darwin on Trial
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Darwin on Trial

3.87 of 5 stars 3.87  ·  rating details  ·  1,028 ratings  ·  67 reviews
Johnson, a professor of law at the University of California, Berkeley, assesses the evidence for evolution as a lawyer would. His discovery: there is no evidence at all that one sort of organism can evolve into another. The fossil record and genetics, in fact, point against the theory of evolution and Darwinism.
Hardcover, 195 pages
Published January 15th 1991 by Regnery Publishing (first published 1991)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Darwin on Trial, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Darwin on Trial

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 2,134)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Phillip Johnson's DARWIN ON TRIAL should be viewed by most as Creationism's MEIN KAMPF or COMMUNIST MANIFESTO; a slick, well-written legal brief against evolution which is merely a litany of Johnson's anger towards "naturalistic" science and a compendium of alleged flaws made by distinguished 20th Century evolutionary biologists. It soon becomes quite apparent that Johnson neither understands nor appreciates why science must remain an enterprise devoid of supernatural explanations; one should on ...more
Dave Maddock
I was reminded about this book the other day as I was listening to a UCSD Anthropology podcast. As a child I was taught the typical anti-evolution Christian ideology. I've always been one to do my own research and make up my own mind about things. I finally got around to evolution in college where I minored in anthropology and learned of the ridiculously large body of evidence for this "just a theory". To be fair, I read this book to get a reasoned opinion from the anti-evolution camp.

Reading th
In a culture that supposedly places a high value on open-mindedness and healthy criticism, evolution has somehow been a sacred cow, beyond the reach of serious analysis. Dissent has been effectively marginalized through the use of a caricature which assures us that all educated people recognize that evolution is a fact, even if there are in-house disagreements about the details. We are told that the only dissenters are Biblical fundamentalists who insist on a narrow, literal reading of Genesis a ...more
Read this in college...not sure which edition, but it was definitely a shorter read than the more recent offerings of this book. Read this back before I knew just how controversial evolution could be.

From what I recall, this book is boring, poorly written, and naive. Johnson takes the lawyerly approach to presenting a case against evolution and the results feel like the word has been reduced to a rickety grade school diorama. Johnson most likely focused on word play and arguments based on defin
I should like to give this book 1.5 stars but that is not possible.

If you want to know what it's like to get the theory of evolution wrong in so many ways, yet think you understand it well enough to refute it, then read this book and believe what the author says.

Coming from an intellect of Johnson's caliber, I'm deeply disappointed in the many sophmoric logical fallacies (I do mean of the standard textbook variety) he employs for the sake of rhetorical persuasiveness--the result of promoting a
Darwin on Trial, a landmark book on intelligent design, is at the very least an important book for understanding a prominent sentiment in the United States. Johnson, a lawyer and philosopher, decided to examine the arguments of naturalistic (as opposed to theistic) evolution from a forensic (trial-law) standpoint. Really, though, it seems more that Johnson is employing a philosophical framework and using law as a rhetorical packaging, so that he can talk about weighing testimony and rendering ve ...more
I'm rating this book on the assumption of a stipulated umpteen-billion-year history of the universe. That is not my current belief, but I have virtually no knowledge of the science of dating so I have nothing to say about it at this point.

I recently read Coyne's much more recent Why Evolution is True. Seems that Darwinists have not been able to improve their presentation, because Darwin on Trial pretty much destroys Coyne as if he were responding to him, rather than writing a book twenty years a
In a culture that supposedly places a high value on open-mindedness and healthy criticism, evolution has somehow been a sacred cow, beyond the reach of serious analysis. Dissent has been effectively marginalized through the use of a caricature which assures us that all educated people recognize that evolution is a fact, even if there are in-house disagreements about the details. We are told that the only dissenters are Biblical fundamentalists who insist on a narrow, literal reading of Genesis a ...more
Philip Johnson fully admits that he is not a scientist--a fact that his critics seem to have brought up as a reason to discredit him. To a certain degree, I think they are right -- if he doesn't have a deep understanding of the science, he misses out on some aspects of the discussion. But to a large degree I think it's an elitist attitude to claim that a lack of complete and deep understanding means that one does not bring anything to the conversation.

Johnson specializes in Law -- specifically,
a dense book that takes on both extremes: the neo-darwinists AND the creationists. the writer is a lawyer, not a scientist and lets it be known at the beginning that his book is an attempt to examine the rationality and the reasons for both darwin's evolutionary theory and the creationists' counter-argument. totally an amazing read. actually i think i'm going to have to study this book before i come to a firmer conclusion on where this book informs my already held position on this subject and wh ...more
This book is a refreshing, logical discussion of why many of the "facts of evolution" are simply not proven. As a child, I had no reason to question evolution. Everywhere I encountered it, biology class, museums, weather reports, astronomy was presented as fact, not theory. The elaborate artwork that fills museums and books regarding evolution was not presented with a strong caveat. It was shocking to learn how experts--scientists-- defended evolution, even when faced with huge cou ...more
The first really intellectually satisfying challenge to Darwinianism I've ever read. Johnson's book is NOT a religious challenge to Darwinian evolution, it is a scientific challenge to current evolutionary theory. Yet as a serious Christian I deeply appreciate the information that Johnson brings to light. It drastically reduced the tension between Christian faith and science for me. As someone who's also been deeply interested in science for most of my life it's also an eye opening presentation ...more
Aug 10, 2007 Todd rated it 3 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: anyone who has questions about the validity of evolution
This book attempts to discredit Darwin's theory of evolution. Johnson has done a great deal of research on the subject and his arguments can't be pushed aside lightly. If nothing else he points out Darwinism for what it is, a faith system that does not require God. As a layperson I found some of the scientific data a little overwhelming at first. I had to go back and reread several chapters before I was able to truly understand his arguments. Overall I enjoyed this book.
John Porter
I was given this book while I was dealing with medical issues; maybe the idea was that debunking evolution would bring me closer to God. Well, I'm Christian, thanks. This book made me want to vomit. Leaving out the obvious lies and misrepresentations (it's startling how far off Johnson is about the BMNH and its position on evolution), I am completely baffled as to how someone can attempt to debunk science when said person doesn't know what the scientific method is.
Josh Crews
The author is not a Phd biologist, but rather and keenly-interested-in-evolution-origins law professor at Berkeley. He very well cross examines molecule-to-man evolution worldview that affects Western culture daily. He makes the case really well and for me delivered the intellectual fatal blow to evolution when I was a young Christian.
Phillip Johnson is a lawyer, so anyone who calls this book "scientific" is sadly mistaken. As for Johnson's arguments, most were rebutted before finding their way into his book. The Wikipedia article on Johnson is a good place to start, specifically Eugenie Scott's and Stephen Gould's criticisms.

Bill Nohmer
We know so little about it (Darwinian evolution) that many christians think it is possible God used evolution in creation. Phillip E. Johnson takes a courtroom approach to his investigation/examination of Darwinian evolution and concludes: If it were on trial, it would LOSE.
Full of information concerning fossil records, genetic, and molecular evidence, and such. The author writes as a lawyer, and stands face to face with the likes of Dawkins, Darwin, Gould, and others. Researched and well written.
The book that launched the Intelligent Design movement. After reading this, you'll never look the same way at the shallow Darwinistic dogma you get in the average news story of high school science textbook.
This book challenged me to revisit what I knew -- or thought I knew -- about evolution. As is hinted at in the title, the author is not a scientist but rather a professor of law, and as such, his world is that of words, arguments, and persuasion. And indeed, his skills are evident: his points are presented quite logically and persuasively.
Early in the book he acknowledges that he holds Christian beliefs, but he promises to try to avoid biases and evaluate the evidence objectively on its own mer
David Gilley
Excellent legal like discussion regarding the theories of Darwin and how they can be broken down.
Russ Olsen
A lawyer argues against evolution. Tail chasing nonsense.
Detoured to this book because of a mention in Nancy Pearcey's Total Truth. Johnson's thesis is that Darwinism has received prevalent acceptance because it is a convenient thesis for those with a prior commitment to philosophical naturalism, not because of the strength of the evidence. He does a fantastic job of showing that Darwinism is not especially well supported by any of the available empirical evidence, and much evidence runs contrary to it. Darwinism survives because it has become the sac ...more
Execellent and objective.
Johnson, a professor of law at Cal-Berkeley, systematically weighs the scientific evidence for evolution. He concludes that there is no evidence that natural selection has the ability to cause one organism to evolve into another. Surprisingly, most of Johnson's evidences against evolution are quietly conceded by Darwinists themselves. Darwin himself wrote that if intermediates (smooth evolutionary transitions) were not found in the fossil record, his theory would be in serious trouble. The evide ...more
I read this immediately after finishing Richard Dawkins' "The God Delusion", so it's been interesting to compare the books.

It struck me a long time ago that some evolutionary scientists were saying fairly absurd things in response to identified improbabilities in the theory (I noticed it once when reading what was obviously a completely imaginary narrative about the evolution of flying squirrels, for example). They often seemed to think that the ability to propose any explanatory story, no matte
John Brackbill
This is a great read that I would recommend to anyone who is looking for a systematic analysis of the underlying presuppositions that support the supposedly impenetrable fortress of "evolutionary fact."

Here are some quotes that illustration the book's position/purpose:

"The concept of creation in itself does not imply opposition to evolution, if evolution means only a gradual process by which one kind of living creature changes into something different. A Creator might well have employed such a
An interesting and thought provoking work of criticism which makes its points intelligently without sounding like a stereotypical advocate for intelligent design. This book was a gift from my now late co worker Seth Williamson, and it has his notes, marks and comments in pencil throughout. It was somewhat comforting to encounter them; because his opinions were documented, it was like having a conversation with someone I wasn’t expecting to be able to have.
I read this book over 15 years ago, so this review is based on a sketchy memory of it, and I'm only writing it for the benefit of family or friends who may be interested in it. The book is pretty old now and some of the science discussed may be outdated. The author is an attorney, not a scientist, but he's no "young earth" creationist. This book is more about the rhetoric and philosophies surrounding evolution than the science of it and I found it very interesting and enlightening.
Benjamin Torres
I picked up this trying to keep an open mind, and listen what the author had to say, but it was hard not to feel disappointed and frustrated. It is unbelievable that creationists are not satisfied with the evidence there is for evolution (not enough intermediate species in the fossil records) and yet they are willing to belive in a higher power for which there is no evidence at all.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 71 72 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth? Why Much of What We Teach About Evolution Is Wrong
  • Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution
  • Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design
  • Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science and Theology
  • Evolution: A Theory In Crisis
  • Christian Apologetics
  • Scaling the Secular City: A Defense of Christianity
  • Bones of Contention: A Creationist Assessment of the Human Fossils
  • The Real Face of Atheism
  • The Historical Reliability of the Gospels
  • Defense of the Faith
  • Reasonable Faith
  • The Devil's Delusion: Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions
  • The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos Is Designed for Discovery
  • The New Answers Book: Over 25 Questions on Creation/Evolution and the Bible
  • God's Undertaker: Has Science Buried God?
  • The Dawkins Delusion?: Atheist Fundamentalism and the Denial of the Divine
  • Escape from Reason: A Penetrating Analysis of Trends in Modern Thought
Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds Reason in the Balance: The Case Against Naturalism in Science, Law & Education Wedge of Truth The Right Questions: Truth, Meaning & Public Debate Objections Sustained: Subversive Essays on Evolution, Law and Culture

Share This Book