Burmese Days
by George Orwell
|
|
Sign in to Goodreads to see your friends' reviews of Burmese Days.
discuss this book
friend reviews (0)
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
lists with this book
This book is not in any lists. Go add it to a list.
other reviews (showing 1-20 of 938)
Read in June, 2008
I'd like to offer, as a sort of disclaimer, that it's a little weird for me to say whether or not I "like" a book, or worse still, to be the judge of how "good" it is. As a dutifully relativist English major, I'm wary of these terms, and especially of a star scale. I fall into all sorts of relativist angst over what "good" really is, who can say a book is "good," what these stars signify, and who am I to pick a number of stars...
That said (and I supp...more
That said (and I supp...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in April, 2007
This is Orwell's first novel (published in 1934). Its satirical stereotypes make for potentially uncomfortable reading in today's politically correct world and yet to concentrate on this aspect is to miss both the point of the novel and Orwell's brilliant prose.
The setting of 'Burmese Days' (1926 in Burma) is in the period when the influence of the British Empire is waning in Asia but is not yet moribund. It is a period where codes of conduct, of 'proper' behaviour (or, at least the boundar...more
The setting of 'Burmese Days' (1926 in Burma) is in the period when the influence of the British Empire is waning in Asia but is not yet moribund. It is a period where codes of conduct, of 'proper' behaviour (or, at least the boundar...more
Like this review?
yes
1 comments
Read in June, 2008
recommends it for:
do you like birthmarks, whores, and imperialism?
my favorite quotes:
'Of course I don't deny,' Flory said, 'that we modernise this country in certain ways. We can't help doing so. In fact, before we've finished we'll have wrecked the whole Burmese national culture. But we're not civilising them, we're only rubbing our dirt onto them. Where's it going to lead, this uprush of modern progress, as you call it? Just to our own dear old swinery of gramophones and billycock hats. Sometimes I think that in two hundred years all this --' he waved a ...more
'Of course I don't deny,' Flory said, 'that we modernise this country in certain ways. We can't help doing so. In fact, before we've finished we'll have wrecked the whole Burmese national culture. But we're not civilising them, we're only rubbing our dirt onto them. Where's it going to lead, this uprush of modern progress, as you call it? Just to our own dear old swinery of gramophones and billycock hats. Sometimes I think that in two hundred years all this --' he waved a ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in February, 2008
recommended to sara by:
my son's India books collectionrecommends it for: expats, orwell fans, Indian history buffs
Perfect to read this back in Mexico, where I often feel like the white oppressor. Reminded me of White Mischief, though unlike the dilettante expats and second sons and wealthy family embarassments sent to Africa, these are the disspated managers of remote stations in Burma that sent timber and other resources back to the British empire. Takes place in 1932, but oh how contemporary it felt! Brits never hold back with scathing characterization, and James Flory as the protaganist is a tortured sou...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
alltimegreatest
Read in June, 2000
The conventional wisdom is that Orwell was still finding his voice as an author when he wrote this semi-semi-autobiographical novel about the degenerate managers of a British rubber plantation in Burma (He was coming off of a long stint as an imperial policeman there) and thus cranked out a Somerset Maugham potboiler about intrigue and backbiting in a fetid swamp at the edge of the Raj.
I disagree. The prose is concise in the same way it is in his last, best novels. (There were two or three me...more
I disagree. The prose is concise in the same way it is in his last, best novels. (There were two or three me...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
literature
Read in January, 2006
I am embarrassed to admit that I had never even opened this book until I read Finding George Orwell in Burma by Emma Larkin, a journalist writing under a pseudonym. She traveled the police state of Myanmar (Burma) keeping a secret diary in the company of George Orwell via his book Burmese Days.
It is a pity that all the attention on Orwell is always on Animal Farm and ...more
It is a pity that all the attention on Orwell is always on Animal Farm and ...more
Like this review?
yes
(2 people liked it)
2 comments
Read in May, 2008
Burmese Days chronicles the beginning of the end for the British Raj in Burma and British Imperialism in general. As the subtext of the story is the decline of a brutal empire, it is by no means a surprisingly violent book, but given the period in which it was first published, I had to remind myself how shocking its release must have been to readers. Orwell saw first hand the violence arising out of colonialism, having served in the Indian Imperial Police in Burma from 1922-1927. This novel and ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
fiction,
history
Read in March, 2008
This has been lying around my house for years and I haven't read it before today. It was pretty good, I must say-- definitely not my favorite Orwell, but I did appreciate it quite a lot. Orwell has a wonderful capacity for making one feel utterly embarrassed and disgusted. It's quite masterful. However, I did notice that he went to a bit of a length to slip socialism in. No idea why he had to have Florey be a socialist. It wasn't relevant. It seemed a bit silly, knowing Orwell, that he would hav...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in February, 2008
It was okay. Orwell is pleasantly cynical about EVERYONE: the corrupt Burmese local rising up the ranks through bribes; husband-hunting British women, Burmese women prostituting themselvs; British officers drinking and whoring the days away.
But it's a bit ponderous. I had to push to get through it.
If you realize that this is the guy who ends up writing 1984, you can see he's already seeing the world as sort of trapped in a bad place of rich holding down the poor.
----
I'm gonna give ...more
But it's a bit ponderous. I had to push to get through it.
If you realize that this is the guy who ends up writing 1984, you can see he's already seeing the world as sort of trapped in a bad place of rich holding down the poor.
----
I'm gonna give ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
This is, I think, Orwell's best novel... several years after reading it, I can still vividly remember passages, and the predicament of its hero, who feels compassion for the people of Burma but tries -- way too hard -- to find acceptance and respect among his fellow Englishmen. It is a scathing critique of colonial occupation, but not a club-you-over-the-head catalog of abuses, but a matter-of-fact account of English people preoccupied with their own petty intrigues and politics, and just enough...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in April, 2008
Depressing. I expected this book to be an out and out rejection of imperialism but perhaps that was asking too much for a book written in 1934. Instead Orwell paints a picture of the malaise surrounding a few British officers and businessmen in a small Burmese village drinking themselves numb and/or into fits of rage while native Burmese live voicelessly in the background. A much more explicit understanding of how Orwell felt about the Empire and his experience there (he had been a police office...more
Like this review?
yes
1 comments
Read in June, 2007
My god. Orwell is a comedian! Who knew? Aspects that are funny in a dark dark dark way. Loved it! Flory is hilarious - Imagine meeting the love of your life while trying to save her from a raging buffalo and then giving her a tiger skin that ends up reeking her house to high heavens. I mean talk about creating a fool. It's brilliant. And don't forget the birthmark on his face that seems to have a life of its own, choosing to embarrass him each time he gets close to kissing her. Of course there's...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Orwell is a central figure in Nandy's Intimate Enemy. His "Shooting an Elephant" demonstrates Orwell's ambivalence towards colonialism. But Burmese days struck me as very pointed. I was so pleased for Orwell.
By the way, Orwell's essay, "Politics and the English Language," is the best thing I have ever read diagnosing unclear language use. In a nutshell here is the message: "Clarity has to be risked." Or conversely, when we are not being clear, this is bec...more
By the way, Orwell's essay, "Politics and the English Language," is the best thing I have ever read diagnosing unclear language use. In a nutshell here is the message: "Clarity has to be risked." Or conversely, when we are not being clear, this is bec...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
1 comments
Read in July, 2004
recommends it for:
Diehard Orwell Fans, people who like grim stories.
I read this book after several abortive attempts to read other Orwell, as I had promised myself following Animal Farm and 1984.
Well-written, solid character development, gloomy as all hell . . .
I got annoyed with how obviously-autobiographical it was, but that's taste. Apparently he had to change out several real peoples' names before anyone would publish it.
Don't expect a hippie-dippy indictment of colonialism and orgiastic praise of the brave locals. That would be far too s...more
Well-written, solid character development, gloomy as all hell . . .
I got annoyed with how obviously-autobiographical it was, but that's taste. Apparently he had to change out several real peoples' names before anyone would publish it.
Don't expect a hippie-dippy indictment of colonialism and orgiastic praise of the brave locals. That would be far too s...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
won-t-read-again
to be honest, not his finest moment. Stereotyped characters, chiched situations...
the prose is fine, but the plot didn't sink in and I'm not quite sure where the colonialism really starts to come into play. As in, what the hell is he saying about it other than it was bad and there weren't really enough courageous people in the outposts of progress to stand up to the bullies?
One of the climactic scenes is Hemingway material- male insecurity and incompleteness- and Hem handled it so mu...more
Read in January, 2007
to be honest, not his finest moment. Stereotyped characters, chiched situations...
the prose is fine, but the plot didn't sink in and I'm not quite sure where the colonialism really starts to come into play. As in, what the hell is he saying about it other than it was bad and there weren't really enough courageous people in the outposts of progress to stand up to the bullies?
One of the climactic scenes is Hemingway material- male insecurity and incompleteness- and Hem handled it so mu...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
currently-reading
fascinating take on the british rule in india (burma was considered part of the indian territory under british rule) at the beginning of the 20th century. only thing i don't like is that he drops the "N" word a lot when referring to burmese natives (he also calls them burman), which is a bit lame but then so did kipling use the "N" word in his wonderful stories too. was common at the time, i guess, and no more or less offensive than any other regular insult to a guy.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in May, 2008
Burma is on the mind with the recent cyclone and oppressive military regime. Yet, this book takes you back to earlier days of colonialism. Flory is a well developed character which you dislike and empathize with simultaneously. I disliked the female character, which was extra hard because we share a name, but in the end everyone gets what you'd expect in a Orwell novel. It's not happy, but it's interesting and a good read.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in January, 1997
recommends it for:
people who like George Orwell
pOTENTIAL sPOILER aLERT
.
.
.
.
.
What did I learn?
Orwell did not like for his fictional characters to live happily ever after.
I learned that Orwell was not an optimist.
I liked the book a lot.
If you:
-like Orwell
-are interested in pre-WW2 Burmese colonial culture and the like
-like stories where the protoganist is going to go down like Sonny Liston and then some
it's a fit.
.
.
.
.
.
What did I learn?
Orwell did not like for his fictional characters to live happily ever after.
I learned that Orwell was not an optimist.
I liked the book a lot.
If you:
-like Orwell
-are interested in pre-WW2 Burmese colonial culture and the like
-like stories where the protoganist is going to go down like Sonny Liston and then some
it's a fit.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in November, 2007
recommends it for:
Casey
This book is hard to read because you really get a feeling of how awful the ignorance, the unwillingness to learn about others and the parasitic imperialistic cultures had an effect on the "conquered." But it's also a phenomenal Orwellian commentary on imperialism and he does it in a wonderful way that really gives you an idea of how much he hated his country while he was in the service.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in October, 2007
This book made me think of Twain's Connecticut Yankee in that while Yankee was shockingly dark, but still recognizeably Twain, the humor in this book is as loud if not louder than the misery behind it. If all you've read is the big two and some of his non-fiction, this will be a jolt. (Blech, he'd probably object to that last sentence on numerous levels, but hey, it's the Internet).
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
























