Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Antifederalist Papers” as Want to Read:
Antifederalist Papers
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Antifederalist Papers

4.23  ·  Rating Details ·  344 Ratings  ·  15 Reviews
During the period from the drafting and proposal of the federal Constitution in September, 1787, to its ratification in 1789 there was an intense debate on ratification. The principal arguments in favor of it were stated in the series written by Madison, Hamilton, and Jay called the Federalist Papers, although they were not as widely read as numerous independent local spee ...more
ebook, 0 pages
Published January 1st 2004 by Nuvision Publications
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Antifederalist Papers, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Antifederalist Papers

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Jul 16, 2012 Kevin rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Having now read both the Federalist Papers and the Anti-Federalist papers, I can get a glimpse of the full debate which took place between the end of the Constitutional Convention and the eventual ratification. Many of the concerns of the Anti-Federalists were included in the first ten amendments, known today as the Bill of Rights. The writer of the Anti-Federalist Papers shared many common concerns: a general mistrust of ceding power to a national government, a fear of an all encompassing judic ...more
Jun 04, 2012 Neal rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
One must read the Anti Federalist Papers to get the rest of the story of America. From these readings one begins to understand why we have the division we have in our society. Most people skip reading (if they are even aware of this source)and never get the complete story. Although I keep this book in my archives (Kindle) I do pull it up from time to time to refresh my memory.
Nov 30, 2016 Doug rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
"hydra made its way from the dark conclave into the open light."

That sums up what I learned while reading. The fact that not one section, not one quote from this is generally taught in high school is very telling. Americans are meant to be ignorant to the interworkings of their government and even their own history in how the Constitution was debated before being adopted. Anyone who has not read this in part or in whole, cannot begin to speak in matters of American politics with any true underst
Aug 04, 2016 Rdt rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Unlike the Federalist Papers, which express a consistent and coherent point of view in favor of the Constitution expounded by Hamilton and Madison, the Anti Federalist Papers are a collection of a diverse group of essays from a variety of authors with different points of view, who had some common themes, but who are generally only united by opposition. The quality of the writing and persuasiveness of the arguments vary greatly. The Federalist Farmer was the best of the bunch, both as to the qual ...more
Mar 29, 2013 Paul rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
This collection had nearly tragically been lost to history.

Most people don't remember anything about the Articles of Confederation or the debates surrounding the ratification of the US Constitution. Most of us are aware that the Federalist Papers exist and serve as the anonymous voice in support of the Constitution. Well, here's the other side of the coin—the argument that the Articles of Confederation were all that was necessary to the government of a free people in the absence of the strong Fe
Michael Stumborg
Aug 08, 2015 Michael Stumborg rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: The Supreme Court
When I wrote Hillary Clinton's Village , I noted that those in opposition to the new Constitution – the Anti-Federalists – deserve an equal share of the credit for the final form of our Constitution. The Federalists would have to win over the Anti-Federalists, or refute their objections to the new Constitution, if they had any hope of seeing it ratified by the States. No doubt then, that the “loyal opposition” put forward in the The Anti-Federalist Papers made the protections in our Constitut ...more
Paul B Norton
Oct 15, 2016 Paul B Norton rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Anti-Federalist Papers are a blueprint on Nullification

Anti-Federalist Papers are a blueprint on how to nullify the freedoms of the U. S. Constitution and at the same time use power of the constitutional national government to create an absolute central government. Understandably not studied in public school as the Federalist papers are. All the political ills of 21th century America is predicted by these Anti-Federalists who with pedantic and accurate understanding of human nature (and not dist
Jack Haefner
Jan 31, 2013 Jack Haefner rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
A very important work. Even a casual reader will see how the Federalist and Anti-Federalist arguments survive to this day with a number of Anti-Federalist arguments were incorporated in the final US Constitution (most notably, in the Bill of Rights).

The Federalists have the distinct advantage of both coherence of argument and assembly of the documents. Since I read the Anti-Federalists after the Federalist Papers, I had difficulty following the arguments and logic train of Anti-Federalists for t
Nov 08, 2011 Tate rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
The Anti-Federalist Papers provide a look at the opposition to the ratification of the United States Constitution. Anti-Federalists like George Clinton, Patrick Henry, Richard Henry Lee, and Robert Yates were skeptical about the increased power of the federal government under the new Constitution and the lack of a Bill of Rights. This a great read for history lovers and anyone who wants to understand the debates over federal government verses state government powers or civil liberties.
Because of goodreads' lamentable and unwise intertwining with, the edition of The Anti-Federalist Papers that I read, is not included in goodreads' list of books. So I somewhat arbitrarily selected this book as the one I "read," when in fact it was a different edition, invisible to the narrow eyes of goodreads' amazon collaborators.
Connor Copeland
Jun 14, 2015 Connor Copeland rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Everything up till the presidency was great.

I thought many of the points made on the legislative branch, taxation, and the balance of power between the federal and state governments were well founded. The attacks on the judiciary and presidency not as much.
It was not this book but I don't see a book for the composed anti-fed papers. I often liked Brutus said. More often I did not understand much of Hamilton on the Federalist side. I realize it would take more re-reading but can't imagine I will go here again.
Jan 01, 2014 J. rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Required reading as part of a graduate Political Science Seminar during the mid 90s. Probably had as much to do with my conversation away from being a conservative republican as any experience I've ever had.
Dan Traina
Mar 05, 2013 Dan Traina rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Again, this is a must read
Royce Ratterman
Jan 14, 2016 Royce Ratterman rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Read for personal research - found this book's contents helpful and inspiring.
A good book for the researcher and enthusiast.
Richard A, Roemer
Richard A, Roemer rated it it was amazing
Oct 31, 2015
James C. Carr
James C. Carr rated it it was amazing
Apr 20, 2016
Michelle rated it really liked it
Feb 04, 2016
Hallie Southard
Hallie Southard rated it really liked it
Feb 23, 2017
Lorin rated it it was amazing
Apr 28, 2014
Anne rated it it was amazing
Jun 08, 2013
Michael Joseph
Michael Joseph rated it really liked it
Apr 09, 2014
William rated it it was amazing
Jul 03, 2015
John rated it it was amazing
Jan 09, 2017
Kl rated it it was amazing
Sep 25, 2010
Rich rated it really liked it
May 08, 2015
Roy Orosco
Roy Orosco rated it it was amazing
Nov 26, 2013
John D. Farris
John D. Farris rated it it was amazing
Dec 05, 2016
Walter Aikens
Walter Aikens rated it liked it
Jan 27, 2015
Shayne Lee Charlesworth
Shayne Lee Charlesworth rated it it was amazing
Jan 02, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787 Reported by James Madison
  • The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification : Part One, September 1787-February 1788 (Library of America)
  • The Nature of the Judicial Process
  • The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)
  • Conceived in Liberty (4 Volume Set)
  • 1999: Victory Without War
  • The Path of the Law (Little Books of Wisdom)
  • Theodore Roosevelt: Letters and Speeches
  • Contempt of Court: The Turn-of-the-Century Lynching That Launched a Hundred Years of Federalism
  • No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority
  • The Great Decision: Jefferson, Adams, Marshall, and the Battle for the Supreme Court
  • Magna Carta
  • Mothers of the Prophets
  • The Tempting of America
  • Great Speeches / Abraham Lincoln: with Historical Notes by John Grafton
  • The Declaration of Independence
  • Our Enemy, the State
  • The U.S. Constitution: A Reader
The term Founding Fathers of the United States of America refers broadly to the individuals of the Thirteen British Colonies in North America who led the American Revolution against the authority of the British Crown and established the United States of America. It is also used more narrowly, referring specifically to those who either signed the Declaration of Independence in 1776 or who were dele ...more
More about Founding Fathers...

Share This Book

“I have either read or heard this truth, which the Americans should never forget: That the silence of historians is the surest record of the happiness of a people. The Swiss have been four hundred years the envy of mankind, and there is yet scarcely an history of their nation. What is history, but a disgusting and painful detail of the butcheries of conquerors, and the woeful calamities of the conquered?” 6 likes
“It is to be lamented that the interested and designing have availed themselves so successfully of the present crisis, and under the specious pretence of having discovered a panacea for all the ills of the people, they are about establishing a system of government, that will prove more destructive to them than the wooden horse filled with soldiers did in ancient times to the city of Troy. This horse was introduced by their hostile enemy the Grecians, by a prostitution of the sacred rites of their religion; in like manner, my fellow citizens, are aspiring despots among
yourselves prostituting the name of a Washington to cloak their designs upon your liberties.”
More quotes…