Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Obliquity: Why Our Goals Are Best Achieved Indirectly” as Want to Read:
Obliquity: Why Our Goals Are Best Achieved Indirectly
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Obliquity: Why Our Goals Are Best Achieved Indirectly

3.51 of 5 stars 3.51  ·  rating details  ·  334 ratings  ·  46 reviews
A leading economist charts the indirect road to happiness and wealth.

Using dozens of practical examples from the worlds of business, politics, science, sports, literature, even parenting, esteemed economist John Kay proves a notion that feels at once paradoxical and deeply commonsensical: The best way to achieve any complex or broadly defined goal-from happiness to wealt
Hardcover, 240 pages
Published April 14th 2011 by Penguin Press HC, The (first published May 1st 2010)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Obliquity, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Obliquity

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 752)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Ian Heidin-Seek
The Allure of the Oblique

I bought and read this book because of one word, which happened to be its title.

I was fascinated by the word “obliquity”. I wasn’t familiar with it. I didn’t even know whether it was a neologism created by the author, John Kay, a Professor of Economics and regular columnist for the Financial Times.

As it turns out, the word has been around since the fifteenth century. Naturally, it derives from the word “oblique", which means "slanting, sidelong, indirect".

As a noun, it
Good quick read about how the path to achievement is often obtained by "muddling through" with uncertain destinations as opposed to detailed planning, sterile objectives, and over-analysis. Some excellent perspectives, and well worth reading.

On the downside, the book comes across as almost anti-objective decision making. I don't think this was Kay's intent, but I hoped the book would at some point go further in highlighting the value of using objective decision frameworks - even in instances whe
Recommended. However, like many business and conceptually-driven academic books, the provocative concepts in the book make enduring the repetition and lack of stark definition worthwhile.

I am annoyed at the publisher and whatever writer from the Financial Times placed and wrote, respectively, the quote saying Kay was an excellent writer on the book's front cover. Unfortunately, Kay is not a great writer, as he failed to solve the problem of having an absorbing book spring out of concept that ar
Per spiegare il pensiero obliquo l'autore ricorre spesso a confronti con lo sport:

Ed Smith, giocatore di cricket e scrittore, esprime questo concetto molto bene: "Non dico che lo sviluppo personale sia più importante della vittoria; al contrario, dico che godere del viaggio alla scoperta di sé, rimuovendo parte della pressione e delle angosce associate alla vittoria a tutti i costi, aiuta a vincere più spesso".

Bob Rotella autore di 'Golf is not a Game of Perfect' spiega che si può riuscire a f
Mara Shaw
Remember the Smurfs? How half the words in their conversations were replaced with the word "smurf" or "smurfy"? John Kay has done something similar with "obliquity" and "oblique". Decisions that are made iteratively, with trial and error, employing emotion or intuition, or from going for greatness and reaping a side benefit of profits -- these are all oblique according to Kay. Quickly in the book, I was frustrated with the repetition, much as the Smurfs made me cringe.

Chapters 1 - 4 and "Conclus
If you are looking for the short version, another Brit gave us the same message: No, you can't always get what you want
But if you try sometime, you just might find
You get what you need

For the most part, obliquity seems to be pursuing goals that come from the heart rather than the pursuit of fame or fortune.

The book's set up: if you follow obliquity, it will get you the true measure of success. So as long as you are doing it for the right reasons, you will get wealthy, which was really the goal
Well I read this book in more or less one sitting today. Couldn't put it down. I guess it has profoundly shaken some of my ideas about how to make good decisions, and I will have to weave it into my conflict work.It is a well written and persuasively argued case for going about achieving things indirectly, in an exploratory, provisional way. And this is necessary in business, in our own personal lives, in our attempts to become happy. Life is way too complex for our goals to be always clearly st ...more
The book discusses on why an indirect/muddling through (or just oblique) way is better than a direct approach. For example, why paradoxically, the happiest people in the world arent pursuing happiness per se nor are the richest people on the world maximizing wealth per se...that happiness and wealth are often a by product of our passion/energy.

the book also advocates an present adaptive approach to achieving goals vs long term plan. I agree with this thinking. another thinking is to break down
I read this book in Dutch (for I rated it as "okay" because the message is interesting, as are the examples but I didn't see the practicality of it. Even the chapter "Obliquity in practice" gave more arguments and not the "how to apply this" that I hoped for. Kay argues that often goals for success, happiness aren't reached directly but indirectly. People or companies that aim at being successful, often aren't so successful. I found the concept of Franklin's Gambit interestin ...more
Magda Roberto
John Kay é um economista de renome que no seu livro Obliquidade procura mostrar o valor do pensamento lateral no processo de tomada de decisão, contrariando a importância atribuída a processamentos de informação racionalizados e directos. A premissa de que os grandes ganhos e as melhores decisões são efeitos colaterais de objectivos de primeira ordem é apresentada ao longo de três partes: na primeira o autor explora a importância e os benefícios do pensamento obliquo; na segunda parte, Joh Kay f ...more
Kirsty Darbyshire
I was in complete agreement with the author before I started reading. If you want to achieve something, especially something like "be happy" or "make lots of money", you simply won't achieve it by setting it as your goal, mostly I think because it doesn't give you anything concrete to do. And there are lots of examples here about people and companies who have set out to do these things without success, as well as those who achieved these goals by trying to do something else entirely. One example ...more
The achievement of a great statesman is to mediate effectively between competing views and values The success of a leader is to continuously match the capabilities of the firm to the market conditions The skill of problem solving frequently lies in the interpretation and re-interpretation of high level objectives The best means of reengineering is not going back and inventing a better way of doing work but trying models that have been successful elsewhere Happiness is where you find it, not wher ...more
The Joy of Booking
Just the kind of “stuff I’ve always known without being put into words” kind of book I like! Quick: which band do you think has a chance at making it big? The band that has real passion for what they do and whose focus is on making music, or the band that has determined what a #1-selling band looks like, sounds like, and acts like and has strategically implemented all of those elements in order to get rich? If you guessed the first one, you already get the premise of Obliquity.

Our society is ful

I found some western philosophers like this book’s author might have reached the concept of “Wu Wei (non-doing)”, which is the basis of Taoism, in oblique ways. The author argues we cannot pursue elusive and sublime goals, such as running a good company, winning a war, directly. There are many reasons: we cannot fully understand and get enough information to make a perfect decision even with hindsight; environment and situation take turns and twists constantly; we cannot enforce our will unilate
This is a non-fiction book that discusses how the straightforward approach is not always the best one. When it comes to our goals, approaches to happiness, decision-making processes, etc. the oblique approach is often better. In the book John Kay explains this theory and gives a myriad of examples (several from his professional field: economics). One example in the book is mountain climbing. Climbing a mountain is a dangerous, grueling experience that is extremely difficult, yet mountain climber ...more
Not worth reading beyond intro, first two chapters, and randomly pick one or two others. You'll get it. He doesn't define obliquity very well, or stick close to his definition, as he rambles about all the associated concepts. There's a lot to his main gist, but his organization of the material and concepts is unnecessary. You know it, you just need four chapters to jostle all the ideas in your head a bit.
This was a short and interesting read; its premise is that the world and systems are complex therefore taking a direct approach to decision making may not be as effective as an 'oblique' or indirect manner which adjusts for circumstances and environment. Practical examples are provided where corporations, nations, individuals have failed by taking a direct approach through oversimplifying their aims (maximise shareholder value over building good businesses; redesigning cities without recognising ...more
After reading Nate Silver's "The Signal and the Noise" and Daniel Kahneman's "Thinking Fast and Thinking Slow," John Kay's "Obliquity" is a requisite counterbalance.

I did not give more stars because I set the standard extremely high for Mr. Kay. His articles in the Financial Times are almost always path breaking. I try never to miss one of his articles as I invariably learn something entirely new; he jars me away from long-held assumptions and prompts me to question basic beliefs about the role
D.m. Smith
I used to read a lot of John Kay, including his commentary, which I usually found refreshing. In this book, I don't think he makes his case. And it's an odd case to make from one who has written so extensively on strategy as the hard nuts-and-bolts work of making and executing feasible plans.
Wendy Yu
Charles Darwin attempted to follow Franklin’s rule when he set out the pros and cons of marriage in two opposing columns. A wife would provide “children, companionship, the charms of music and female chit chat.” But Darwin also noted the disadvantages: the prospect of “being forced to visit relatives, and to bend in every trifle”, the “loss of freedom to go where one liked”. Both men understood perfectly well that moral algebra is not how people really make decisions. Below his assessment Darwin ...more
Richard Newton
I enjoyed this book, but it is a bit of a one trick wonder and it could probably have been much shorter. Having said that it would not be a book then but just an essay - but it could have been a 5 star essay. I found the main ideas, that goals are best achieved indirectly, to be interesting - and some of the examples are almost persuasive. But I can equally come up with many examples of people who have relentlessly and directly pursued their goals and achieved them quickly. However, that is not ...more
Jonno Cohen
I enjoyed this book. Kay's style is engaging and simple enough not to require too much concentration. He draws on the same set of examples throughout the book, which does get a little tiresome, and the big idea is simple enough that maybe the book could have been a little shorter. But it's an important big idea, and one that's applicable to many different spheres of life and work.

For a decent synopsis of the book, by the author himself, check out the talk he gave at the RSA last year. There's an
Jun 06, 2011 Laura rated it 3 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: people who enjoy discussing logic
This was an interesting read, but less earth shattering than the blurb led me to expect. At one point the author himself comments that "everyone else knows that our approach to problem solving is more oblique." If you are a game theorist or economist who believes everyone makes rational choices, this may be the book that changes your mind. If you're part of the "everyone else" you'll find some philosophical/psychological backup for ideas you know to be true ("The more we practice the better our ...more
Interesting. But could have been much better
Disappointing prose and a lack of the in-depth analysis I expected from this former Said Business School Director, but that said, the content and hypothesis are interesting and merit further attention. I'd certainly read more on the subject, so it serves as a fine introduction to the concept.

They may be trying to jump on the Gladwell bandwagon of bite-size research based non-fiction, but Obliquity underlines some of the genres major shortcomings in doing so.

Fabulous? No. A conversation starter?
Jill Edmondson
This was kind of interesting, albeit out of my usual reading realm. I agree with the thesis, but question some of the examples Kay uses to illustrate his point.
Michael Vagnetti
This book was grown from an article in the Financial Times. Although it includes examples from the arts, its main source material are business cases that show indirect methods of problem solving. It's like something of an alternate universe, and, to my taste, thrillingly human. Going across the grain like this must drive most "serious" people crazy - yet if you know how to describe it, it can be utterly convincing.
I really liked this unconventional look at economics and decision making. The book is dense with information and comment on the world in which we operate. It is quite philosophical and so I feel like I may need to read it again in order to fully grasp some of the concepts put forward by John Kay. Not everyone who reads this book is likely to take the same message away.
Steve Bradshaw
Good long form essay on how attacking goals directly doesn't always yield the best results
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 25 26 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Why Everyone (Else) Is a Hypocrite: Evolution and the Modular Mind
  • Chief Culture Officer: How to Create a Living, Breathing Corporation
  • High Output Management
  • Introducing Linguistics
  • Surreal Numbers
  • The Flight of Icarus
  • Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?
  • Microstyle: The Art of Writing Little
  • The Grammar Of Fantasy: An Introduction To The Art Of Inventing Stories
  • The War on Moms: On Life in a Family-Unfriendly Nation
  • Power Cues: The Subtle Science of Leading Groups, Persuading Others, and Maximizing Your Personal Impact
  • Open Leadership: How Social Technology Can Transform the Way You Lead
  • Sincerity: How a Moral Ideal Born Five Hundred Years Ago Inspired Religious Wars, Modern Art, Hipster Chic, and the Curious Notion That We All Have Something to Say (No Matter How Dull)
  • High Financier: The Lives and Time of Siegmund Warburg
  • Atheism Explained: From Folly to Philosophy
  • At Eighty-Two: A Journal
  • Silos, Politics, and Turf Wars: A Leadership Fable about Destroying the Barriers That Turn Colleagues Into Competitors
  • Rapt: Attention and the Focused Life
I was born in Edinburgh, Scotland in 1948, and completed my schooling and undergraduate education in that city: I am fortunate to have lived most of my life in beautiful places. I went to the University of Edinburgh to study mathematics. But, after taking a subsidiary course in economics, I decided that I wanted to be an economist. The notion that one might understand society better through the ap ...more
More about John Kay...
The Truth About Markets: Why Some Nations are Rich But Most Remain Poor Long & the Short of It: A Guide to Finance & Investment for Normally Intelligent People Who Aren't in the Industry Culture and Prosperity: The Truth About Markets - Why Some Nations Are Rich but Most Remain Poor Everlasting Light Bulbs Obliquity: Why Our Goals Are Best Achieved Indirectly

Share This Book