Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “In the Devil's Garden: A Sinful History of Forbidden Food” as Want to Read:
In the Devil's Garden: A Sinful History of Forbidden Food
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

In the Devil's Garden: A Sinful History of Forbidden Food

3.68 of 5 stars 3.68  ·  rating details  ·  740 ratings  ·  73 reviews

Deliciously organized by the Seven Deadly Sins, here is a scintillating history of forbidden foods through the ages—and how these mouth-watering taboos have defined cultures around the world.

From the lusciously tempting fruit in the Garden of Eden to the divine foie gras, Stewart Lee Allen engagingly illustrates that when a pleasure as primal as eating is criminalized, t

ebook, 352 pages
Published December 18th 2007 by Ballantine Books (first published 2002)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about In the Devil's Garden, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about In the Devil's Garden

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
I had high hopes for this book, and it didn't really meet many of them. It's more a collection of vignettes and anecdotes, loosely organized according to the Seven Deadly Sins, than an examination of foods that correspond to those sins. There are a few interesting segments, and a couple of recipes I plan to try out, but many of the connections are extremely tenuous, and seem to be simply an excuse for the author to relate some of the exotic journeys he's gone on through the years. It feels very ...more
This is an interesting read about different forbidden foods throughout history, which bases its structure on the seven deadly sins. It's entertaining and sensuously written.

There are a number of factual inaccuracies however, despite what looks like a fairly extensive bibliography (a "vomitorium" is not a room where Romans went to throw-up their food at the end of a meal so that they could eat more... a basic google search tells you that this is a common misconception. I mean... how did this get
Once I got past the subtitle for this book, which isn't entirely accurate, I really enjoyed it. It bothered me at first that Allen didn't really write about forbidden foods altogether. He also wrote about food that caused trouble and food that carried significant meaning for various cultural and religious groups. But then, I realized that as much as a title matters, I was already reading the book anyway, and it didn't really matter that the book strayed from it's titular guidelines.
The structure
I added this book to my Library To Read list based on an NPR piece from January 2004.

Allen uses the seven deadly sins as the structure for a discussion on foods both irresistible and forbidden, beginning with a fanciful menu for each section. Not surprisingly, the Lust chapter discusses aphrodisiacs, but it also includes a compelling case for why the apple was the Forbidden Fruit of the Bible - it boils down to Roman vs Celtic Christianity. The tomato's carnal history vs that of its humble, blan
Author Allen sets out to give the history of foods as they pertain to the seven deadly sins- lust, gluttony, pride, sloth, greed, blasphemy and anger. It’s an entertaining social history of human eating habits and taboos, but that’s where I’d leave it- entertainment.

With it’s long bibliography, one would think that the book was well researched. But I had the feeling that some things were more myth than fact; when he got to a bit about absinthe, I knew he was flying blind. (He said that absinthe
Abhishek Ganguly
When San Jose Mercury News reviewed this one as "Clever ... In the Devil's Garden will amaze your dinner guests", they were clearly judging the book by its cover. If I shared any of the so called 'witty' annecdotes from this book with my dinner guests, I would be assured that they would never return to my table (with a very strong possibility that I would not be invited to theirs either, anytime soon).

There is nothing delightful to mention in 'In The Devil's Garden'. For an ardent fan of Microhi
This book combines three of my favorite reading topics: history, theology, and food. Totally impressed with Allen's anthropological approach and keen eye to historical detail regarding the dialogue between people and their relationship with food over the ages. Highlights for me include: 1 - Garden of Eden, was it an apple or a tomato? 2 - Pythagoras, the world's first intellectual vegetarian! 3 - How the link between aggression and eating in our brains leads potato chip manufacturers to making e ...more
3.5 stars. Interesting concept, and the writing style fit nicely with the subject matter. The prose is sensual, almost lurid at times. The red of a sinful tomoato is described as "slut-red;" no one ever just "cuts" with a knife, when they can thrust it into something. I kind of felt like I needed a cigarette after reading a couple of these sections. I'm not sure I loved this way this is arranged according to the seven deadly sins--clever idea, but a little haphazard.
Strange but for once the book about food did not made me run to the fridge, in fact it had quite opposite effect and literary killed any notion of appetite.
The subject is fascinating - food as taboo trough the history - with all different and colourful anecdotes Bill Bryson usually throws out of his sleeve but this author is not Bryson and he kind of enjoys more in gleefully presenting oddities and nastiness about what people considered delicacies at various points trough centuries. The sheer vo
Had a few interesting stories, but on the whole seemed poorly researched and fact-checked. The author takes a "who knows" attitude to a lot of well-known facts and makes insultingly sweeping generalizations, assumptions, and ethnocentric statements. Also, the editor should be horsewhipped for letting so many misused words slip through.
I started this book with enthusiasm for the subject. I soon lost that feeling. The author cared more about being titillating than informative. There is nothing wrong about writing about sex but don't mask it behind the pretense of another subject.

The book also seemed poorly researched and devoid of information. I suppose the size of the book in comparison to the subject matter should have clued me in.

I received the book as a gift as I'd put it on a to-read wish list without having actually see
It is a history of food, couched in the general vague terms of foods that have been seen as sinful here and there, now and again. The "sinful" idea is stretched thin at times, to accommodate all kinds of interesting facts and issues and interpretations of food customs, but that is okay, for his attitude is ironic and curious, tongue-in-cheek and seriously interested in how humans have responded to the issue of eating as a cultural phenomenon over the centuries.
A nicely written book, clever and w
The Devil's Cup is a fun read. In part because the tale spinning is tightly linked with the author. Sure I read it taking everything with a grain of salt. Unfortunately, in this book, the author veers away from that in the text (although it does surface in the end notes). So he outrageous statements are just that, and even fictitious although presented as highly probable. I also found the writing lacked connectivity. The food items weren't linked in the writing but rather expounded on in a list ...more
Quite possibly the most disgusting book I ever read about food. It was difficult to really like this book even though it is not bad. Stewart Lee Allen has a particular style - he mingles facts with rampant imagination, which makes for colourful (in this case often 'dripping') descriptions but it is hard to know which bit actually contains the morsel of truth to his tales, unless one is willing to read the entire bibliography on which he draws to tell the story. I also thought that the structure ...more
There's a lot to like about this book; the stories of fascinating, horrifying, and sometimes depraved food traditions keep you turning the page. However they are flung out too quickly and without any strong organization so it can feel like mental whiplash. "HEY LOOK OVER HERE AT THESE CREEPY CANNIBALS! NOW OVER HERE AT THIS PERVERTED ANCIENT ROMAN FOOD ORGY!"

I thought the classifications of the foods into the seven deadly sins was weak at best. Usually the author's back story to get them to fit
This is a fairly whimsical exploration of food taboos throughout history, organised around the principles of the Seven Deadly Sins - lust being aphrodisiacs, for example, or chocolate, raw meat under Wrath. It ranges from Roman 'vomitoriums' to the modern day banning of pate foie gras, from Jewish and Muslim dietary strictures to cannibalism and the Roman Catholic Mass - and includes a number of relatively exotic recipes, to boot.

It's an entertaining enough read, although I could have done with
Fantastically written, this book was interesting, informative and flowed really well. It helps to be about the gorier bits of food history in making it less dry than most history books. I skipped over most of the recipes and it's not something I imagine I'd go back to, but great still.
A light, humorous look at some of the foods we've considered sinful. Some of the entries seem to barely fit in the category they are placed in, and some of the entries are barely food. His concept of vegetarians is pretty limited and as the title implies, the book has a very Judeo-Christian-Islamic spin (although other religions do make an appearance). But overall, it was interesting to read.
I wanted this to be so much more than it is; I'm very interested in learning about food folkways and taboos. That is, why do we eat certain foods and not others? What events, rumors and ideas form those perceptions?

In the Devil's Garden covers some of those things, but there's a lot of sloppy, imprecise language and conjecture that makes the writing a lot more wishy-washy than it should be. Anecdotes are presented as fact or as representative of a whole culture or time period, rather than clear
This started out so promising. Witty, interesting tidbits of info on the histories of various foods. And then the politics snuck in with the corn. And some of the claims made started to seem like such ridiculous tinfoil-hat nonsense (something about a conspiracy by fast-food makers to make food taste so horrible so that Americans would hurry back to work faster and be more productive??? really???) that I begin to question the veracity of every other supposedly factual tidbit. Maybe I'm just clue ...more
Ellen Salomé
Really interesting facts. I just had to look up some stuff and ended up reading the entire book.
There were some interesting facts in here but I felt they were hidden a bit behind the gimmicky, casual tone... I'm not too keen on non-fic books sprinkling words like bitch and brats around instead of woman and children.... I also felt the idea of devising foods up by the 7 deadly sins didn't work that well, sometimes what was being talked about didn't really link in to the chapter and it felt like it had been put there for lack of knowing where else to put it! However, if you over look the ann ...more
It's not what I expected. Food and sex have always gone hand in hand but I didn't realize to what extent. Some things I would have preferred not knowing that it was considered food. Other, common foods, I won't be able to look at in the same way. Overall an interesting read but it does drag at times.
Missie Kay The Book Fix
Entertaining and interesting, although definitely not a scholarly work, and many of the foods included only fit under their "sin" if you squint really hard.
Jay Divine
So fascinating our convoluted history with food.
So many of the tales were just gruesome, making it not a very pleasant read. (Maybe that's because I'm a vegetarian...) Despite the long bibliography in the back of the book, I'm also not fully convinced the stories are completely accurate, as many others have noted. The chapters may have been organized, in name, according to the seven deadly sins, but I'm not sure that framework was very effective - the content of each chapter was often very indirectly or peripherally related to the sin under d ...more
I give it 3 George Takei "Oh My(s)" and 4 or 5 ick moments. We as a species have been downright psychotic with ourselves and the food we eat or won't eat. The author takes you on a ride down our collective culinary lane and makes you think about what we eat and why. The chapter about crunchy snacks will make you think twice about offering that potato chip to your already aggressive teenager. Bon Appetit!
Book linking food and the seven deadly sins. Very interesting. It is obvious if you are well read about any one of the many topics he discusses that not everything is 100% accurate. As an example he talks about Marie Antoinette's famous 'cake' quote as referring to brioche, but as far as anyone can tell, Marie Antoinette never said anything about letting anyone eat either cake or brioche.
I really enjoy the topic of food history, and much of this book was fascinating. The problem is that some of it was exaggerated or made up, and there is no way of distinguishing what is factual and what isn't. This made the book pointless to read for me. I wanted to read about things that definitely happened in history, not some things that happened and some that just made a good story.
I LOVED this book! The anecdotes about food culture from around the world are fascinating as is the seven deadly sins structure of the book (although blasphemy isn't technically one of the seven deadly sins; it certainly makes more sense than envy, I guess). Excellent read for anyone who is interested in why we eat the way we do or really why we are the way we are.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Food in History
  • The True History of Chocolate
  • The Potato: How the Humble Spud Rescued the Western World
  • The Taste of Conquest: The Rise and Fall of the Three Great Cities of Spice
  • Taste: The Story of Britain Through Its Cooking
  • Spice: The History of a Temptation
  • Tea: The Drink that Changed the World
  • Much Depends on Dinner: The Extraordinary History and Mythology, Allure and Obsessions, Perils and Taboos of an Ordinary Meal
  • Milk: The Surprising Story of Milk Through the Ages
  • An Edible History of Humanity
  • History of Food
  • Food: The History of Taste
  • Pickled, Potted, and Canned: How the Art and Science of Food Preserving Changed the World
  • Seeds of Change: Six Plants That Transformed Mankind
  • Vanilla: Travels in Search of the Ice Cream Orchid
  • Potato: A History of the Propitious Esculent
  • Swindled: From Poison Sweets to Counterfeit Coffee—The Dark History of the Food Cheats
  • Near a Thousand Tables: A History of Food
The Devil's Cup: A History of the World According to Coffee Newcomer's Handbook for Moving to and Living in New York City: Including Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, The Bronx, Staten Island, and Northern New Jersey

Share This Book

“The guinea pig took another sip of his beer and rolled his eyes in exasperation - was this never going to end? 'He works better when he's drunk,' Señor Villanova explained. ” 2 likes
“Only two questions, however, need concern the civilized creature. Why is traditional kosher wine so second-rate (it is often boiled); and, if Muslims and Jews are the only people whose laws make them (almost) each other’s ideal dinner guests, why can’t they get along?” 0 likes
More quotes…