The Bodhisattva Question: Krishnamurti, Rudolf Steiner, Valentin Tomberg, and the Mystery of the Twentieth-Century Master

by T.H. Meyer, Elisabeth Vreede, John M. Wood (Translator)

The twelve sublime beings known, according to eastern tradition, as the Bodhisattvas, are the great teachers of humanity. One after another they descend into earthly incarnation, until they fulfil their earthly mission. At this point they rise to Buddahood and are no longer obliged to return in a physical form. But before a Bodhisattva becomes a Buddha, he announces the name of his successor…

According to Rudolf Steiner, the future Maitreya Buddha - or the 'Bringer of Good', as his predecessor named him - incarnated in a human body in the twentieth century. Presuming this to be so, then who was this person? The Theosophists believed they had discovered the Bodhisattva in an Indian boy, Krishnamurti, who grew up to be a teacher of some magnitude. Adolf Arenson and Elisabeth Vreede, both students of Rudolf Steiner, made independent examinations of this question in relation to Steiner's personal mission, and were led to contrasting conclusions. More recently a claim has been made that Valentin Tomberg - a student of anthroposophy but later an influential Roman Catholic - was the Bodhisattva. These conflicting theories are analysed by Thomas Meyer, who demonstrates how the question can be useful as an exercise in developing sound judgement in spiritual matters.

Elisabeth Vreede's two lectures on the subject, included here in full, are a valuable contribution to our understanding of the true nature and being of Rudolf Steiner.

216 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1993

Reviews

[Anthony Zappia · Rating 3 out of 5]

An interesting account of the events surrounding the Theosophical and Anthroposophical societies in the early decades of the twentieth century. I found that the author at times diverged from the central topic (the Bodhisattva). e.g. T.H. Meyer discusses the Roman Catholic church and how their elite may have viewed anthroposophy. Perhaps it's my failing but I couldn't see what this had to do with the identity of the Bodhisattva. The book is more a discussion of who WASN'T the Bodhisattva, so by the end of the book we are left none the wiser as to who if anyone was the Bodhisattva. It's possible as I think suggested by the author, that humanity simply wasn't ready for such a being to emerge and teach humanity. Overall a very interesting book.