Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Journey to Avalon: The Final Discovery of King Arthur” as Want to Read:
Journey to Avalon: The Final Discovery of King Arthur
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Journey to Avalon: The Final Discovery of King Arthur

3.33  ·  Rating Details ·  21 Ratings  ·  6 Reviews
The authors sort fact from fiction to provide the most convincing and detailed account of King Arthur that has ever been compiled. This intriguing work of historical detection unlocks the solution to one of the greatest mysteries of the world. Readers will learn the true identity of Arthur, the sixth-century king of the Britons, as well as the locations of his courts and l ...more
Paperback, 355 pages
Published November 1st 1997 by Weiser Books (first published January 1st 1993)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Journey to Avalon, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Journey to Avalon

Community Reviews

(showing 1-47)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Chris
Many years ago F T Wainwright wrote an illuminating essay (Archaeology and Place-names and History: an essay on problems of co-ordination 1962) about the relationship between the disciplines of history, archaeology and place-name studies; and when I first read Barber and Pykitt's Arthurian theory I found it informative to use some of Wainwright's criteria by which to judge its success.

Journey to Avalon is a handsome book co-authored by David Pykitt (who provided the bulk of the text) and Chris B
...more
Krzysztof
A good read, proposing a quite believable theory about the real identity of the legendary King Arthur. One criticism I have is about the style of the book - for a theory based on guesses, uncertain sources and on assumptions rather than 100% facts, the authors are pretty damn sure that the truth lies with them. Yes, they do go into detail on how they came to their realisations, but for every "Thus it is certain that this person was Arthur" there are several "Previous writers/researchers probably ...more
Dark-Draco
Apr 10, 2013 Dark-Draco rated it it was ok
This book annoyed me intensely :( It sets out to discover the real historical identity of King Arthur, which is all well and good and very interesting. The authors use historical records, diaries and poems to pinpoint Arthur, his courts and famous battles. However, what annoyed me was the attitude of the book. It was very condescending, arrogant and repititious, constantly asserting that the authors are the only ones to have got it right because...well, just because they are better! To my mind, ...more
A.J. Campbell
Feb 06, 2012 A.J. Campbell rated it liked it
I gave this Arthurian scenario an extra star for author-imagination. Evidently the only way to write one of these books is through pairing-up-- ie Wilson & Blackett, Littleton & Malcor, Frick & Frack... all of whom got one star less.

Oddly enough, or maybe not, Barber & Pykitts' candidate-- Arthwyr ap Mauric-- carried the Welsh nomen of "The Bear's grandson." That's what "Arthwyr" means. In this case, it might be more productive to elect his grandfather, Tewdrig ap Theithfallt, as
...more
Susan
Jun 29, 2011 Susan rated it it was ok
Very feasible, good sound argument, very likely King Arthur & King Meurig's son Arthur one & the same man but my interest started to wane at the end found it a bit repetitious in places. Skipped some of the Appendixes altogether, just briefly scanned them, repeating main text.
Amelia
Jan 12, 2014 Amelia rated it it was ok
Too many confusing assertions. Too many "w"s
Stephanie Bradley
Stephanie Bradley rated it it was amazing
May 12, 2015
Sophia
Sophia rated it really liked it
Aug 15, 2011
Stephen Inkpen
Stephen Inkpen rated it really liked it
Sep 25, 2014
Jonathan Houpt
Jonathan Houpt rated it liked it
Feb 27, 2013
Yvonne
Yvonne rated it it was amazing
Jan 15, 2016
Larry Bell
Larry Bell rated it really liked it
Jan 16, 2017
Adam Gołębiowski
Adam Gołębiowski rated it it was ok
Jan 09, 2014
Jan Celt
Jan Celt rated it it was amazing
Apr 15, 2014
Bill Renk
Bill Renk rated it liked it
Dec 22, 2016
Kinga
Kinga rated it it was ok
Feb 10, 2013
Klaudia
Klaudia rated it liked it
Aug 18, 2010
Krystyna Rowińska
Krystyna Rowińska rated it really liked it
Sep 06, 2013
Ian
Ian rated it liked it
Dec 22, 2011
Adam Watkins
Adam Watkins rated it it was amazing
May 31, 2014
Michael
Michael rated it really liked it
Nov 04, 2014
Karolinde (Kari)
Karolinde (Kari) marked it as to-read
Jul 19, 2010
Morgana
Morgana marked it as to-read
Nov 19, 2011
Bahige
Bahige marked it as to-read
Jan 29, 2012
Katey
Katey marked it as to-read
Mar 21, 2012
Shanna
Shanna marked it as to-read
May 08, 2012
Emily
Emily added it
Jun 28, 2013
Cjeffcoat
Cjeffcoat marked it as to-read
Aug 18, 2013
Emily Sedgwick
Emily Sedgwick marked it as to-read
Sep 21, 2013
Ian Heseltine
Ian Heseltine marked it as to-read
Nov 05, 2013
Leah Walker
Leah Walker marked it as to-read
Feb 07, 2014
A.
A. added it
Sep 28, 2014
Robert
Robert added it
Mar 15, 2015
Aneta
Aneta marked it as to-read
Apr 07, 2015
Meghan
Meghan marked it as to-read
Aug 10, 2015
Rem
Rem marked it as to-read
Sep 17, 2015
Andy Hall
Andy Hall is currently reading it
Nov 20, 2015
Chris
Chris added it
Nov 24, 2015
Tanner
Tanner marked it as to-read
Dec 17, 2015
BethLuisNion
BethLuisNion marked it as to-read
Mar 10, 2016
BookDB
BookDB marked it as to-read
Sep 11, 2016
Fishface
Fishface marked it as to-read
Oct 05, 2016
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Share This Book