Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Russia Against Napoleon: The True Story of the Campaigns of War and Peace” as Want to Read:
Russia Against Napoleon: The True Story of the Campaigns of War and Peace
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Russia Against Napoleon: The True Story of the Campaigns of War and Peace

4.06  ·  Rating Details ·  540 Ratings  ·  61 Reviews
A major new history of the Russian conflict immortalized by Tolstoy in War and Peace

Russia's expulsion of Napoleon's Grande Armée in 1812 is considered one of the most dramatic events in European history. However, Tolstoyan myth and an imbalance of British and French interpretations have clouded most Westerners' understanding of Russia's role in the defeat of Napoleon.

Paperback, 656 pages
Published March 29th 2011 by Penguin Books (NY) (first published 2009)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Russia Against Napoleon, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Russia Against Napoleon

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Riku Sayuj
May 03, 2014 Riku Sayuj rated it really liked it

Tolstoy As Villain: Tolstoy, Tolstory, Tall Story

Russia’s defeat of Napoleon is one of the most dramatic stories in European history. The war has been immortalized by Tolstoy in his epic, War & Peace. There is no great puzzle as to why Russia fought Napoleon. How it fought him and why it won are much bigger and more interesting questions. To answer these questions requires one to demolish well-established myths.

It is not surprising that myths dominate Western thinking about Russia’s role in
Dec 19, 2011 Hadrian rated it really liked it
It is a common misconception, popularized by nationalist sentiments and even Tolstoy himself, that the Russian army was not responsible as it truly was for the defeat of Napoleon in the East. General Winter is most often credited.

This book is a worthy corrective to some of the misconceptions of the Russian campaign - that is, Russia was more responsible for defeating Napoleon than is given credit - by such preeminent sources as The Campaigns of Napoleon, and Tolstoy. The Russian state, although
Jun 11, 2012 Jim rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: france, history, russia
I gave this book five stars not because it is beautifully written, but because Russia Against Napoleon delivers not only more than its subtitle promises, but manages to upset much of the apple cart of Napoleonic history. Everyone knows the War and Peace story of Mikhail Kutuzov's courageous "escort" of the Napoleonic invading force to the borders of Central Europe.

But what happened next? That's where history commonly ignores the fact that the Russians continued their advance after Kutuzov's deat
Bryan Alexander
Aug 09, 2014 Bryan Alexander rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history, russia
A fine history of the epic 1812-1815 war between the Russia and French empires, Russia Against Napoleon rewards both the general reader and the student of the Napoleonic wars.

Dominic Lieven tells a vast story, beginning with Napoleon's invasion of Russia in 1812, then the German wars of 1813 (which include the biggest battle in European history by that time), and concluding with the 1814 invasion of France and (first) defeat of Napoleon. Readers new to this subject will be well treated by Lieven
Lauren Albert
Oct 26, 2010 Lauren Albert rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history-european
I thought that surely a book this long (around 525 pages) would be about a lot more than strategy and such. But the majority of it was indeed military. I'm giving it 4 stars for two reasons:

1. He manages to make the military stuff interesting even to me.
2. Someone who likes military history would find it a very good read.

His central premise is simple--Russia did a lot more to defeat Napoleon than they are given credit for. I don't know about you, but he is right that I was taught (or picked up s
Jan 15, 2015 Jerome rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
A very well-written study of Russia’s war with Napoleon. Lieven’s research is solid and it seems that he has examined almost every primary source on the topic. The book is almost entirely told from the Russian perspective, and he aims to show that defeating Napoleon was not just a matter of cold, mud, and weather. He shows how Napoleon was also defeated by the deliberate actions and foresight of Russian leaders and commanders.

The matter of logistics is one often ignored when it comes to the hist
Feb 11, 2013 Justin rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Professor Lieven spends a little too much time bemoaning the distorted lens (French, English, & Prussian) through which posterity has viewed the Napoleonic period. He must concede that the distortion is somewhat borne out of necessity: La Grande Armee which invaded Russia in 1812-- consisting of a French plurality accompanied by Germans, Italians, Spaniards, Poles, Austrians, Prussians, Swiss, and Portuguese--was a fairly literate (and in some instances, graphophilic) host; that Tsar Alexand ...more
Feb 20, 2014 Ed rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I found this in my local bookstore Nicola's and was immediately taken because it turned over most of what I thought I knew about Napoleon's campaign in Russia. Namely that he was defeated by his own over reach and the Russian winter. This book makes the case that he was beaten by superior strategy, fighting forces and tactics, though no doubt winter and over-reach helped. And I had forgotten that the Russians actually pursued the French all the way back to Paris and were part of the allied group ...more
Jul 31, 2012 Simon rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Good God. Yes, it is a worthy corrective to the idea that little history of the Napoleonic conflict has been written from the Russian perspective. But the writing is turgid, to put it as kindly as possible, and it tells you far more about what a particular cavalry unit was doing on a particular day than Russian foreign policy on a broader level. I found this almost unreadable, and I read history the way a slot machine takes quarters. To be fair, it might be of interest to military historians. To ...more
Molly L
Mar 20, 2015 Molly L rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
I read this book while I was reading War & Peace in the hopes that would be a closer companion to the story line (Mostly because the tag line for this book said that it outlined the battles of War and Peace while I was researching). While it has very little to do with War and Peace directly, it still offers a very informative look at major battles, military history, and political history during the time period. And however much I really enjoyed learning about the various battles and the stru ...more
I couldn't. I just couldn't do it. I live for this stuff and I found Lieven's chronological retelling of the Russian side of the Napoleonic Wars so dry and devoid of narrative as to be unreadable. And I have literally been trying to finish this book for YEARS.

Good facts and sources, but as for a story or book worth reading cover to cover, this is not that. Like a full length version of Homer's Catalog of Ships with Preobazhenskys instead of Trojans.
Sid Singh
The Napoleonic wars are a fascinating period of European history and there are few books written on the "Eastern Front" of the war. I had high hopes for Lievin's work. Unfortunately, this book epitomizes the types of books that kill readers interest in history.

The author's writing style is very dry and the book reads like a textbook written for a graduate course in Russian History. Lieven has absolutely no literary skills; rather he inundates the reader with tedious detail after detail that actu
Daniel Kukwa
As a research tool, this is a peerless resource, with unbelievable detail to the Nth degree. However, it's also a hell of a long read, and for every chapter that sings, there are others that feel like slogging through treacle. It's fantastic history, but poor recreational reading I'm splitting the star-rating difference accordingly.
Katia Nosenko
Mar 07, 2016 Katia Nosenko rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
My main reason for reading this book was to compare Tolstoy's "War and Peace" interpretation of this campaign with what a modern historian would say. Understandably they approach it from different angles and put different accents on the story. But surprisingly Tolstoy's description of the campaign as such seems to be not far off.

Lieven draws different conclusions about the reasons of the Napoleon's defeat and supports it with a lot of historical evidence. But the description of the main events i
Bill V
Jul 05, 2016 Bill V rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This book offers a unique Russian perspective of the war from 1812-1814. The author explicitly states that he is serving to represent an underserved story, that Russia's contributions to the war effort have been minimized by other books. I've only read two other books that covers Napoleon's invasion of Russia. This book, as I already mentions also covers 1813 and 1814.
The book is a bit too pro-Russian for my liking. It seems by reading it that the Russians committed almost no mistakes, that they
Maurits van Rees
The great war between Napoleon and Russia finally seen from Russian standpoint. Usually the victor writes the history, but in this case the loser was the enigmatic Napoleon, so he captivated not only Europe's continent, but also its imagination: he stands firm as a brilliant strategist. There is a lot of merit to that thought: this book grants that the presence of Napoleon basically granted the French army the equivalent of say fifty thousand soldiers extra. But he was also a dictator, perhaps n ...more
Jim Pfluecke
Sep 27, 2010 Jim Pfluecke rated it really liked it
Billed as the first English language to cover the 1812-1814 war from the Russian perspective, Lieven delivers.

Several things stand out in the book.

(1) Lieven consistently seeks to debunk myths and misrepresentations of the period, some of which are Russian national myths but mostly he addresses situations where Western authors do not give the Russians the credit they were due. For example, he details (complete with service records) the relative quality of the Russian infantry, noting that early
Jun 22, 2010 Carol rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Dominic Lieven is a professor of Russian history in England, and a descendant of three generals of the battles described. He provides a history from the Russian viewpoint, having accessed Russian records in addition to those of other observers. He views Tsar Alexander I as a highly competent man, not at all weak, who often hid his own views and strengths when dealing with other European leaders. Napoleon's failure against Russia was no accident. It's true that Napoleon's judgment sometimes was a ...more
Captain Sir Roddy, R.N. (Ret.)
This is an excellent, and eminently readable, political and military history of the latter stages of the Napoleonic Wars from the Russian perspective. Professor Lieven has done a superb job of crafting a suspenseful story involving some truly remarkable characters. His description of the battlefield tactical situations, the strategic implications of the armies moving across Europe in pursuit of Napoleon's Grande Armee is some of the best I've read, and rivals Shelby Foote's treatment of the Amer ...more
Tom Corddry
Oct 31, 2010 Tom Corddry rated it really liked it
Compelling alternative to Tolstoy's view, giving far greater credit to the Russian military and political leadership, instead of simply crediting Russian peasant spirit and Russian nasty winter. A fascinating history, now possible thanks to newly-available Russian sources. Reminds us of something we didn't really know; Napoleon's demise was brought about by Czar Alexander more than any other single person, including Wellington, Nelson, etc. Thanks to "War and Peace," most people believe that Nap ...more
David Bird
Aug 10, 2013 David Bird rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Nemesis herself seldom provides the vantage for the telling of a tragedy. Casting Napoleon as the tragic protagonist, undone by his own hubris, forms the basis of most western accounts of the climax of the wars that bear his name. In such a drama, the Russian Army is treated as much like the Russian winter: something that befell the French, more than something created and led. British accounts tend to take the line that 'Wellington invaded France, and then the other allies followed.' Lieven sets ...more
Paulo Migliacci
Jun 30, 2012 Paulo Migliacci rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Dominic Lieven, Professor of Russian History at the LSE, is a direct descendant of generals and diplomats who served Russian Czar Alexander II in the wars against Napoleon. That family connection provides him with an insider view of Russia's victorious war in 1812-1814. One of his book's many strengths is that he dedicates most of his space to the Russian counter-offensive that led the Czar's armies from beyond Moscow to Paris. His account of the logistical structure created and deployed by the ...more
Steve.  g
Mar 06, 2012 Steve. g rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: favorites
Just completed a selection of three; Napoleon by Mclynn, 1812 by Zamoyski and this one.
So now I know my Caulaincourt from my Kutuzov, my Barclay from my Ney, and that helps.
There are a lot of players in this three year war and, writing from the Russian perspective, Leiven does everyone the justice of a mention and a thumbnail sketch (some of whom may have preffered that he hadnt). Alexander, over the long haul, comes out very well.
The overwhelming, OVERWHELMING image you get from these books,
Feb 26, 2013 Andrew rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This book corrects a very serious historical flaw in the popular understanding of the Napoleonic era -- the general belief that Napoleon invaded Russia in a pique of megalomania and was defeated by hunger and cold after the cowardly Russians burned Moscow, that he subsequently evaporated into the historical mists, only to rise up once more after his escape from Elba to be defeated once and for all by the courageous forces of Wellington. This misconception is the fruit of Tolstoy's revisionist Wa ...more
Frank Kelly
Dec 19, 2010 Frank Kelly rated it it was amazing
An extraordinary book. Lieven, a professor of Russian history at the London School of Economics and the direct decendent of three generals who fought at the Battle of Leipzig, gives a whole new perspective to Napoleon's classicly ill-advised invasion of Russia. Using newly available material from Russian archives to show that Czar Alexander and his brilliant general staff, knowing Napoleon was likely to unleash his massive army on Russia, actually planned for a number of years in advance and in ...more
very good stuff showing that war has two sides; most books on this subject tend to focus on Napoleon and his mistakes - and while with a different strategy and tactics he may have fared batter - the actual response of the Russians, how their leadership learned from the earlier defeats and adopted the right tactics probably mattered more in the long run and would have doomed Napoleon anyway eventually
Alex MacMillan
Aug 10, 2015 Alex MacMillan rated it really liked it
I never thought a book about logistics could be so fascinating. My unexpected takeaway was how Russia's war of attrition against Napoleon marked the beginning of modernity much better than the steam engine or U.S. Constitution. The Industrial Revolution is one long tale of the nerds gradually gaining the upper hand against jocks like Napoleon. Just like John Henry's battle against the drilling machine, conventional wars after this conflict became a matter of superior technology and supplies rath ...more
Nov 29, 2015 John rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Very well written. The author covers the Napoleonic wars from 1807 to 1814 particularly the Russian efforts to free Europe from Napoleon by creating an alliance among difficult allies. It connects the political, diplomatic, strategic, tactical, logistical and human efforts of the war in a readable form. It gives very favorable support to Alexander I.
Dec 28, 2013 Jwduke rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The only book I have ever seen which presents the Russian perspective (and indeed that of Alexanders I) clearly. This book is very well written, but can be dry in places. The dryness cannot be limited, as the dry writings are necessary. 80% of the book, especially the early chapters, was engaging. I could not put it down. Towards the end and the fall of Paris, I started to loose interest. That is no fault of the book or the writer, being familiar with the history and what took place made it diff ...more
Mar 04, 2013 Karl rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history, non-fiction
A dry romp through a bleak era. woof.
The chip on Dominic's shoulder against popular thought concerning the russians various victories over Napoleon, so evident in opening chapters, graciously fades as he gets into the meatier bits where he offers some real insight into the specific battles and overall state of Russia during its war years.

Not a light read, and probably 200 pages too long, but Lieven certainly held my interest and I gotta give him props for finding so much actual correspondence b
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Napoleon's Wars: An International History, 1803-1815
  • Moscow 1812: Napoleon's Fatal March
  • The Crimean War: A History
  • The Campaigns of Napoleon
  • The Franco-Prussian War: The German Conquest of France in 1870-1871
  • The Thirty Years War: Europe's Tragedy
  • Defeat: Napoleon's Russian Campaign
  • Napoleon in Egypt
  • Afgantsy: The Russians In Afghanistan, 1979-1989
  • The New Nobility: The Restoration of Russia's Security State and the Enduring Legacy of the KGB
  • Vienna 1814: How the Conquerors of Napoleon Made War, Peace, and Love at the Congress of Vienna
  • A Writer at War: Vasily Grossman with the Red Army
  • Absolute War: Soviet Russia in the Second World War
  • Ivan's War: Life and Death in the Red Army, 1939-1945
  • The First Total War: Napoleon's Europe and the Birth of Warfare as We Know It
  • The Hundred Years War: The English in France 1337-1453
  • Wellington: The Iron Duke
  • The War of Wars: The Great European Conflict 1793 - 1815
Dominic Lieven is Professor of Russian studies at the London School of Economics and Political Science, a Fellow of the British Academy and of Trinity College, Cambridge.
More about Dominic Lieven...

Share This Book

“The basic lesson of 1805–7 was that not only must the three eastern monarchies unite but the Russian army must already be positioned in central Europe when military operations began.” 1 likes
“In March 1812 proposals were hatched to unite all the reserve units of the ‘second line’ into three reserve armies. In time these reserve armies would be able to reinforce Barclay, Bagration and Tormasov. In the event that the front-line armies were defeated or forced to retreat, they would be able to fall back under the cover of these rear formations.41 This plan never came to fruition and in reality reserve armies never existed in 1812. One reason for this was that Napoleon advanced more quickly than anticipated and the Russian reserve units were forced to decamp before they could form such armies.” 0 likes
More quotes…