Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Plot Against America” as Want to Read:
The Plot Against America
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

The Plot Against America

3.65 of 5 stars 3.65  ·  rating details  ·  20,739 ratings  ·  1,610 reviews
In an astonishing feat of narrative invention, our most ambitious novelist imagines an alternate version of American history. In 1940 Charles A. Lindbergh, heroic aviator and rabid isolationist, is elected President. Shortly thereafter, he negotiates a cordial "understanding" with Adolf Hitler, while the new government embarks on a program of folksy anti-Semitism.

For one b
Paperback, 472 pages
Published 2005 by Vintage (first published 2004)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Plot Against America, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Plot Against America

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Jason Koivu
Some said Philip Roth is the new messiah of modern writers. Philip Roth is overrated, said others.

So I read a couple of Roth's books, Exit Ghost and Everyman. With only those to go on, to me, Roth seemed like your typical aging curmudgeon. Nothing special, just an old man venting through literature his disgruntled annoyance at no longer being able to get an erection. I was ready to call it quits on him, but felt like maybe I should try one more.

So I read The Plot Against America. Boy, am I glad
Sep 08, 2007 Brian rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Anyone with a desire for a good yarn
I gave this book 4 stars. I probably would have given it 5 had it not gotten a bit weak towards the end and the author seemed to lose focus of where his story was going. It seemed like he wanted it to end whereas I wanted it to continue on.

First off let me say this book is NOT what most of these reviewers are calling it. It is far too complex to be thrown into a category of "what-if" histories. The first thing that came to mind when I read it was that is was a memoir. In fact it reminded me a l
One star??!!!?? Really???!!! I gotta be kidding right? Either that or I’m on some kind of crazy drug trip.

Well, no. I really “did not like” this book. Hence, the single solitary star.

I hate it when mainstream novelists try their hand at science fiction. They usually muck it up. This is not too surprising given the disregard most of them have for science fiction in the first place. It’s even worse when the science-fiction novel in question is a thinly disguised political rant because the politi
I don't usually do this, but I'm halfway through this book and I want to write a review of my progress so far. For a couple of reasons:
1. The thought has crossed my mind a couple times in the first 200 pages to put the book down. If I don't finish it, I'll probably never write a full review.
2. As I near the midsection of the book, it becomes clearer that things might be about to turn upside down. If so, by the time I finish it I probably will have erased from memory everything I'm thinking about
Jason Pettus
(Reprinted from the Chicago Center for Literature and Photography []. I am the original author of this essay, as well as the owner of CCLaP; it is not being reprinted here illegally.)

So after a month of election obsession here in Chicago, I find my schedule of book reviews in complete chaos: nearly 20 titles read now, all of them awaiting essays, and with me still continuing to read new books on a daily basis. I thought I'd start this week, then, with a whole series of recently r
Jan 27, 2012 Shovelmonkey1 rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: chabon fans and 1001 book readers
Recommended to Shovelmonkey1 by: 1001 books list
Shelves: 1001-books
Ah Mr Roth, how you entertained and confounded me with this book. This book also served as a sort of stupidity graph for me, highlighting where my knowledge of early 20th century American History and Politics has a gaping hole.

Is it a hole in a sock sized hole? An oops, my-car-was-just- swallowed-up-by-this-big-hole sized hole? Or a Guatemala City sink hole sized hole? Well, the hole in my knowledge is probably about the size of the car swallowing hole which is still quite sizeable. I feel asha
Paquita Maria Sanchez
Coming soon...must first nurse hangover...having trouble with simple sentences at the moment...

Okay, here goes. This is going to be worded poorly because I killed a lot of braincells last night, but I need to get this out of my system.

I enjoyed this novel. I really, really did. To be more specific, I enjoyed it in the way you enjoy a movie-version of a book you've already read, or a cutesy little romance like The Princess Bride (no disrespect). I mean, you just KNOW where it's going. Describing
In The Plot Against America, Philip Roth lovingly re-creates the lost world of the Jewish community of mid-century Newark, the world of his own boyhood. Then he takes the main characters, modeled on himself, his friends and his family, and tortures them by forcing them to live through state-sponsored Nazism in America.

Roth imagines an America in which Charles Lindberg defeats FDR in1940 by pledging to keep the US out of WWII, then immediately signs non-aggression pacts with both Germany and Jap
Philip Roth is one of "the" guys in American literature - Harold Bloom puts him together with Cormac McCarthy, Don DeLillo and Thomas Pynchon as the four American novelists he thinks are worth praise. Having read at least one work from each of these authors the hour came to try Roth, too; this one was available so I picked it up and read it.

Well, it turns out that The Plot Against America ain't all that it promises to be. iIn the novel it's 1940, and Roosevelt lost the election to Lindbergh, who
This alternative history ponders what might have happened had pilot Charles Lindbergh run against and defeated Roosevelt in 1940. The Plot Against America is a wonderful and surprising read -- especially in its restraint. Roth's story provides insightful commentary on how American presidential campaigns are run, our media's role in them, how we choose our leaders, the bigotry behind assimilation efforts, and how corruption can and often will run its course. At the book's end, I was surprised to ...more
Like others here, I often found this book to be a compelling read (though there were some unnecessary bits), but ultimately, I think Roth (do I need to warn about 'spoilers'?) presents us here with a more sophisticated version of the Dallas 'it was all a bad dream' solution, where all the events of an entirely plausible American support for Nazism in the Second World War -- intelligently illustrating how other countries might also have been seduced by fascism and anti-Semitism -- are nearly comp ...more
I’d been a big fan of Philip Roth since stumbling across Portnoy’s Complaint in college. That book spoke hysterically of the torments of a desire conflicting with one’s upbringing and one’s own better sense. Roth captured so keenly the nature of an almost self-destructive pursuit and the complexities of repression, transference, and what Dostoevsky’s Underground Man referred to as “contrary to one’s own interests…that very ‘most advantageous advantage.’” The book was hilarious absurdity yet hear ...more
I thought this was fairly naff. We bounced between "my history of the Lindbergh Presidency for everyone who's never heard of the Lindbergh Presidency (which would be no one if there had been a Lindbergh Presidency, right?)" and an admittedly very cute "my Jewish To Kill a Mockingbird". It felt a bit amateur.

"...Lincoln in his capacious throne of thrones, the sculpted face looking to me like the most hallowed possible amalgamation - the face of God and the face of America all in one."

"one of thos
Ron Charles
Once again, Philip Roth has published a novel that you must read - now. It's not that an appreciation of his book depends on the political climate; our appreciation of the political climate depends on his book. During a bitterly contested election in a time of war against an amorphous enemy, "The Plot Against America" inspires exactly the kind of discussion we need.

With a seamless blend of autobiography, history, and speculation, Roth imagines that Charles Lindbergh ran against Franklin Roosevel
Mar 06, 2008 Sam rated it 2 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: People who are into alternate history
Note that I will discuss major plot points in this book, including the end. If you have any intention of reading the book, don't read below. I'll simply say that I was very disappointed.

I was very disappointed by this novel. Philip Roth does a good job of building the hopes of the reader that he will find a compelling and provocative conclusion to the events that begin with the election of Charles Lindbergh to the presidency. However, he fails to capitalize on them. As it turns out, things just
Dec 30, 2010 Meghan rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: historical fiction fans
I tried reading a Roth book about 10 years ago. I read chapter one and never got any further. The thought of picking up another Roth book ever again would mean I was under serious torture to do otherwise. And yet, this title caught my eye about 5 years ago. And the jacket synopsis lured me into thinking "hey, this is historical fiction, so maybe I'll like this one." And I was under the influence of the crack B&N puts in their lighting and bought the book.

But once out of the mind-altering aur
Katherine Coble
I read this years ago and remember enjoying it as an alt. history speculative fiction that examined Lindbergh in a less than flattering light. Given that most Lindbergh books are hagiographic in tone I appreciated the difference. Upon re reading it now I feel like it loses a star.

Why? It's the preachiest, most agenda-driven thing I've read all year. Apparently Philip Roth doesn't like Republicans. Seeing as how half this country agrees with him I guess it's a safe bet the preaching won't bother
I do NOT life alternate history. It makes me confused about facts and usually just pisses me off. But this one is different. It's a "what if?" sort of book that feels very real. Probably because Roth inserts his own boyhood self into the narrative. It did make me hate Lindbergh, and I am not sure he deserves quite as much hate as I am feeling. I have to research that! (because the fake history has messed with my head)
Aug 29, 2008 Spike rated it 3 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: those who like historical novels
Given the current political climate and global trouble spots, I thought this would be about some kind of Islamic jihad being carried out inside the United States. I was only off by an entire religion and sixty years or so: the theme and the 'plot' is antisemitism. The premise is a great one: what if Charles Lindbergh had become president, and staffed his administration with other alleged anti-Semites, such as Henry Ford, Burton K. Wheeler, etc? Roth lets us see these events play out through the ...more
Read probably 3 seconds after it came out. Roth takes a faintly possible fictional premise--Charles Lindbergh wins the 1940 Presidential election, then proceeds to implement suspiciously Hitleresque policies--and imbues it with relentless realism. It's an astonishing act of bravura...or chutzpah, if you prefer. This is what it would have felt like to suddenly realize that coded speech, political discrimination, the whole gamut up through pogroms, could happen here, to coin a phrase. Roth has alw ...more
3.5, maybe. Like Arthur Miller's The Crucible, this book may tell more about Roth's state of mind perhaps than any real or likely "history."

Great premise: pro-Nazi, anti-Semite Charles Lindbergh is elected President in 1940. What is the impact on a secular, urban Jewish family in New Jersey, as seen through the eyes of a seven-year-old (in 1940) protagonist?

But poorly developed and told. All sorts of logical gaps. Too complete knowledge. But worst, Philip as narrator tells us how the "history"

My closest book-swapping sidekick disliked this one, and another friend began but put it down soon after, so I started reading with a bit of hesitation.

I should say at this point that Roth's American Pastoral is one of my all-time favorites. It starts incredibly slow (i.e. I didn't expect to read in excess of 50 pages about the inner workings of a glove factory), but knowing that the build-up in this book was well worth it, I stuck with The Plot...

The quality of the writing itself didn't strike
Meghan Sweeney
Jul 03, 2008 Meghan Sweeney rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: History lovers
Divine. This is a fantasy book in a way; a history book in a way; and a coming-of-age novel in a way.

It takes place in America in the early 1940's and takes us through the journey of a Jewish family living in the ghetto of Newark. The twist is: FDR didn't get a third term. Instead Lindbergh wins the presidency. As an isolationist and a Nazi sympathizer, he keeps America out of World War II and begins to implement "programs" that help Jewish Americans assimilate into middle America.

Roth deftly
i'm not going to lie -- i didn't fall in love with this novel from the get-go. it's not that it was uninteresting; it was. i just felt as though i should be enjoying it more than i was.

at some point, however - and i'm not sure exactly when that was - i was sucked in. this is peanut butter and chocolate, a reese's peanut butter cup, if you would. literature with a capital L meets alternate history, introspective flowery meandering meets epic frontpages 128 point headlines. it's not perfect by any
Oct 14, 2007 Brooke rated it 1 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: nobody
Shelves: crap
This book angered me because what had the potential to be a really interesting plot spiraled quickly into absurdity. If this book taught me anything, it's that history is more fascinating than someone else's re-imagining of events.

I literally threw this book across the room after finishing it.
This book definitely has a great coming of age story involved in what is looked at as a historical novel. But the best insight that I got from it was something along the lines of this: it warns of the dangers of big government. And by that, i mean not the actuality of large government, but how a large government can fall in to the hands of the wrong people and easily become a dictatorship or a fascist state.

As a liberal, its easy to romanticize the New Deal era and all of its programs. One such
What a brilliant novel. Well thought out, based on enough historical facts to feel very real and uses its characters very well. What would have happened had isolationist won the presidential election in 1940 and not Roosevelt? How would his anti-Semitic politics influenced the life of a Jewish-American family? Roth tries to answer this from the viewpoint of 8 year old namesake (I don't know whether family, etc. depict autobiographical elements).

Roth's writing is astounding in that it delivers th
Philip Roth’s re-imagining of history reminds me of the old What If? comic books, wherein they take a specific point in history and change an event or the choice someone makes. The narrative then follows this alternate reality to demonstrate how different the world would have become. It’s like Clarence the angel in It’s A Wonderful Life when he shows George how different his entire town would be had he never been born.

But in The Plot Against America, Roth chooses to ask What if Charles Lindbergh
Stephanie A. Higa
I made it halfway through this book and probably won't pick it up again. Frankly, it's boring. There's too much fictionalized memoir and not enough plot, let alone "plot against America." Also: unconvincing in every way. It doesn't take much for me to believe that Charles Lindbergh was a terrible person, but it takes a lot more for me to believe that he actually became president. And it's hard for me to take any of this seriously when the protagonists glorify people whom I think are also terribl ...more
I'm not really sure how to describe this book. It's an "alternative history," book in which FDR didn't win a third nomination, and somehow Charles Lindbergh got elected instead.

It was fascinating to read the book and compare/contrast and think very deeply about our political situation today: Unpopular war, pro-war president, charismatic presidential candidate and so forth. (And before anyone gets carried away and upset, I said compare and CONTRAST. Some things are clearly very different, but it
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Adjunct: An Undigest
  • Dining on Stones
  • Islands
  • Thursbitch
  • The Lambs of London
  • The Red Queen
  • Small Remedies
  • In the Forest
  • Shroud
  • Schooling
  • Vanishing Point
  • That They May Face The Rising Sun
  • How the Dead Live
  • Super-Cannes
  • Nineteen Seventy Seven (Red Riding, #2)
  • An Obedient Father
  • Nowhere Man
  • Celestial Harmonies
Philip Milton Roth is an American novelist. He gained early literary fame with the 1959 collection Goodbye, Columbus (winner of 1960's National Book Award), cemented it with his 1969 bestseller Portnoy's Complaint, and has continued to write critically-acclaimed works, many of which feature his fictional alter ego, Nathan Zuckerman. The Zuckerman novels began with The Ghost Writer in 1979, and inc ...more
More about Philip Roth...
American Pastoral (The American Trilogy #1) Portnoy's Complaint The Human Stain (The American Trilogy, #3) Everyman Goodbye, Columbus and Five Short Stories

Share This Book

“--nor had I understood til then how the shameless vanity of utter fools can so strongly determine the fate of others” 34 likes
“Anything can happen to anyone, but it usually doesn't. Except when it does.” 6 likes
More quotes…