Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World” as Want to Read:
Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World

4.19 of 5 stars 4.19  ·  rating details  ·  98 ratings  ·  14 reviews

The big economic story of our times is not the Great Recession. It is how China and India began to embrace neoliberal ideas of economics and attributed a sense of dignity and liberty to the bourgeoisie they had denied for so long. The result was an explosion in economic growth and proof that economic change depends less on foreign trade, investment, or material causes, an

Hardcover, 592 pages
Published November 30th 2010 by University Of Chicago Press (first published 2010)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Bourgeois Dignity, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Bourgeois Dignity

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 433)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
My ancestors were illiterate peasants living in their own filth. But that’s okay – so were yours, and you probably don’t have to go back very far to find them (mine crawled out of the rural idiocy of the Scottish Highlands a mere six or seven generations ago). Unless you happen to be reading this in, say, sub-Saharan Africa, you are enormously, fantastically richer than your great-great-grandparents ever dreamed of being. Even if your Visa card is maxed out and your ’92 Honda Accord is emitting ...more
Sean Rosenthal
Interesting Quotes:

"[T]he modern world arose out of an entirely new 'ideology.' Or, equivalently, it arose out of an entirely new social 'rhetoric'--an older term meaning about the same thing. For example, the word 'honest' in Shakespeare's time, as you can see in dictionaries of Shakespearean English or by searching the texts of the plays, was understood mainly as 'noble' (that is, honorable in an aristocratic way, achieved in battle or at court: 'Honest, honest Iago'). Its rhetoric changed rad
Jan 10, 2011 Chris is currently reading it
Shelves: economics
Brilliant and worldview-changing. McCloskey surveys all the leading explanations for the Industrial Revolution (institutions, trade, science...) and finds them wanting. Her preferred answer is a "bourgeois revaluation" that exalted peaceful commerce and innovation as opposed to the old ways of getting honor through war and conquest....
This is a work of economic history. That's not a topic that I would usually interest myself in, but I heard the author speaking on the radio and I was impressed. The question this book seeks to answer, apparently a perennial one for economic historians, is why did the Industrial Revolution occur when and where it did, and not somewhere else and at another time? The answer, it is asserted, is pretty simple, but all the economists have missed it:

"A big change in the common opinion about markets an
Dan Walker
I believe Deirdre McCloskey has unlocked the secret to why we are so wealthy today. Most people, and apparently all politicians, walk around believing there is something fundamentally wrong with the world and that money is a big part of the problem. Somehow things just aren't right and what we really need to do is reshuffle the deck and spread the wealth "fairly." Strangely, "fairness" seems to coincide with helping this or that politician win the next election.

Since most people only live a few
Paul Crider
McCloskey offers an invaluable contribution to the quest to understand the causes of what she calls the Great Enrichment, that explosion in human capabilities that has been ongoing since ~1800 or so. The book is in its bulk critical of the other theses that have been suggested by other scholars. Her own theory is unique in that it is resolutely non-materialistic. Ideas matter. Art, literature, etc, but especially ethics and our conversation around these ideas all matter as much as the underlying ...more
Andrew Clough
I was hoping for a book on how people started to respect commerce and how it might have contributed to western economic development. Instead I mostly just got a very unpersuasive attack on competing theories. I spent the book trying to figure out what exactly the difference between her theory and the "Institutions" theory of development was, and didn't find anything in the book to let me figure that out.

Also, listing among the reasons that science couldn't have been responsible for development s
An excellent and enlightening analysis of the reasons why mankind has made so much progress in the last couple of hundred years in comparison to the rest of history. A little tedious to read though.
The American Conservative
'McCloskey’s learning is prodigious—ranging across history, literature, and economics—though always lightly worn. She writes chattily, if at times a bit obsessively, and has a great professor’s ability to make the complex accessible.

Bourgeois Dignity, like its predecessor The Bourgeois Virtues, is a tour de force. If the four subsequent volumes are on this level, “The Bourgeois Era,” as her series is named, will stand as one of the great achievements in intellectual history of our time.'

Read th
Alex MacMillan
A brilliantly-written culmination of a lifetime researching and critically thinking about why the Industrial Revolution happened. Information contained in ten-page chapters were superior to entire books or even semester-long college courses. This is a must read for anyone who majored in a liberal arts discipline who wants their perspective about the nature of modernity expanded beyond the constraints in their thinking (absorbed unawares) by socialists, neoliberals, conservatives, economists, sci ...more
Petr Špecián
Although I dislike McCloskey's rather weird and confused methodological writings, here, where she does not try to philosophize too much, she does a pretty good job. The book illustrates the crucial role played in the economic development by ideology and its change, the Burgeois Revaluation, that started the Industrial Revolution. McCloskey's attempt to disprove all competing theories, especially the materialist ones, is persuasive and well written, although a little repetitive at times. Perhaps ...more
I found this book basically unreadable. The author can't stay on a single thought without an endless mess of self-glorifying asides. The premise is interesting -- that wealth is basically about knowledge, not about the accumulation of physical capital or global knowledge. But the author doesn't really stay on the point.
Not really finished, because I dipped and skipped my way through all the economics and quite a few of the pages: McCloskey has a lot to say and says it with a lot of beautifully-crafted words. I did find the book thought-provoking and enlightening and have no doubt that traditional economists consider her a complete iconoclast.
Chris Mericle
Why after tens of thousands of years did England and latter much of the world escape the Malthusian trap? This book is a 500+ debate on the issue, very stimulating.
Michael Tomac
Michael Tomac marked it as to-read
Nov 24, 2015
Dan marked it as to-read
Nov 23, 2015
Andrew marked it as to-read
Nov 23, 2015
Lucia Cohen
Lucia Cohen marked it as to-read
Nov 19, 2015
Olli Kytömäki
Olli Kytömäki marked it as to-read
Nov 18, 2015
Margaret marked it as to-read
Nov 13, 2015
Rrrrrron marked it as to-read
Nov 10, 2015
Edita Gradek
Edita Gradek marked it as to-read
Nov 04, 2015
Matthew Dambro
Matthew Dambro marked it as to-read
Oct 27, 2015
1801 Study
1801 Study marked it as to-read
Oct 27, 2015
Leonardo marked it as to-read
Oct 22, 2015
Orton marked it as to-read
Oct 17, 2015
Eric Tyler
Eric Tyler marked it as to-read
Oct 12, 2015
Christina marked it as to-read
Oct 10, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 14 15 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities
  • The Forgotten Depression: 1921: The Crash That Cured Itself
  • The Great Stagnation: How America Ate All The Low-Hanging Fruit of Modern History, Got Sick, and Will (Eventually) Feel Better
  • Empire of Wealth: The Epic History of American Economic Power
  • Modernity Britain, 1957-1963
  • The Economics of Enough: How to Run the Economy as If the Future Matters
  • Economics for Real People: An Introduction to the Austrian School
  • The Machinery of Freedom: Guide to a Radical Capitalism
  • Centuries of Change
  • Religion and the Rise of Capitalism
  • Radicals for Capitalism: A Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement
  • Why It's Kicking Off Everywhere: The New Global Revolutions
  • Launching The Innovation Renaissance: A New Path to Bring Smart Ideas to Market Fast
  • The Firm, the Market, and the Law
  • Individualism and Economic Order
  • The Servile Mind: How Democracy Erodes the Moral Life
  • Zombie Economics: How Dead Ideas Still Walk Among Us
  • Economic Sophisms
Deirdre N. McCloskey has been since 2000 UIC Distinguished Professor of Economics, History, English, and Communication at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Trained at Harvard as an economist, she has written fifteen books and edited seven more, and has published some three hundred and sixty articles on economic theory, economic history, philosophy, rhetoric, feminism, ethics, and law. She tau ...more
More about Deirdre N. McCloskey...

Share This Book

“Nor during the Age of Innovation have the poor gotten poorer, as people are always saying. On the contrary, the poor have been the chief beneficiaries of modern capitalism. It is an irrefutable historical finding, obscured by the logical truth that the profits from innovation go in the first act mostly to the bourgeois rich.” 4 likes
“The change in rhetoric has constituted a revolution in how people view themselves and how they view the middle class, the Bourgeois Revaluation. People have become tolerant of markets and innovation.” 1 likes
More quotes…