Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Don't Know About Them)” as Want to Read:
Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Don't Know About Them)
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Don't Know About Them)

3.94  ·  Rating Details ·  5,976 Ratings  ·  518 Reviews
The problems with the Bible that New Testament scholar Bart Ehrman discussed in his bestseller Misquoting Jesus—and on The Daily Show with John Stewart, NPR, and Dateline NBC, among others—are expanded upon exponentially in his latest book: Jesus, Interrupted. This New York Times bestseller reveals how books in the Bible were actually forged by later authors, and that the ...more
ebook, 304 pages
Published March 3rd 2009 by HarperCollins e-books (first published February 20th 2009)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Jesus, Interrupted, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Jesus, Interrupted

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Apr 14, 2009 Eric rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
First off, I think it’s important to dismiss any of the common misunderstandings about Bart Ehrman and this book. The book is not a diatribe. It does not set out to debunk Christianity. Ehrman, in my opinion, is not angry, condescending, or uncaring in this book – quite the opposite, actually. Ehrman is not asking that you abandon your faith. I personally feel, having read the book, that Ehrman has served us up a wonderful tool, and has provided us with a great opportunity for discussion that co ...more
I have written elsewhere in angry fashion about a crisis of faith I experienced a couple of years ago. I have emerged from the crisis and entered something of a renaissance in my own faith. I haven’t given up on everything I once believed but I also won’t pretend that the faith I now hold is merely a stronger version of what I was taught to believe growing up. To be sure, my faith now is much stronger than what I was taught to believe, but it’s also much more thoughtful, intelligent, egalitarian ...more
Oct 15, 2009 Trevor rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history, religion
Here’s a question for you. How important is it that the Jesus of the Bible and the historical Jesus are more or less the same guy? Or even better, how important is it that the ideas Jesus was trying to spread by his ministry are the same ideas that have come to be followed in the various Christian churches?

There was a time when I would have thought that all Christians would have wanted to answer both of these questions by saying that it was fundamentally important to their faith that what they c
I’m going to catch Hell for this………..

The Bible is the most boring book ever written. Ever.

This book has some very interesting observations and conclusions, but the author admitted he was delving into the minutia of the Bible but that he just couldn’t help himself, he then stated “I’m going to stop that now.” Soon after a few cogent points, he was right back at it. God love him.

Bart D. Ehrman knows his stuff when it comes to religion and the Bible, in particular. The guy has more degrees on reli
K.D. Absolutely
Apr 08, 2014 K.D. Absolutely rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: religion, thematic, expose
An eye-opener. This book points out the inconsistencies in the Bible. But it is written positively or with no malice of putting down one's faith. It just makes the reader aware of those inconsistencies so one can search for truth be it in further research by reading more books or internet entries or, in my case, search from the bottom of my heart on those deep-seated beliefs that no matter how blunt and thought-provoking the exposes are, what prevails is that belief that I have since I was a lit ...more
Jan Rice
I have read several of Bart Ehrman's books previously, or listened to his lecture series: The New Testament (Great Courses series), From Jesus to Constantine: A History of Early Christianity (Parts 1 and 2) (Great Courses), Lost Christianities, and now the present book. For some reason Goodreads isn't showing many of his books, and I'm not up for laboriously adding them tonight. This is surprising, for surely he has a wide readership. Bart Ehrman is one of those writers about whom it is said he ...more
Jun 24, 2012 A added it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: truth seekers
Once again Bart D. Ehrman has reminded me why I transferred out of Lancaster Bible College. "Jesus, Interrupted" is a summery of the Critical-Historical approach to the New Testament. This is opposed to the devotional studies approach espoused by nearly all evangelical churches. The Critical-Historical approach looks at the various books of the Bible as being historical documents existing separately, each written with a specific message for a specific audience. I.e. Paul's letter to the Church o ...more
Jun 08, 2010 Hayden rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Despite having an incredibly stupid title, this book is fascinating. Ehrman dishes all the dirt on not just the contradictions between how, say, Mark and Luke tell Jesus' story, but also who the authors of the New Testament really were (and more importantly, who they were not), what the early sects of the Christian church were like, and how they battled it out to decide what would be left in and out of the canon.

A couple of my favorite tidbits:

1. Matthew says that Jesus was born "of a virgin" be
Nov 19, 2013 Casey rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
So when I bought this book on a whim who knows how long ago, I expected it to be a collection of interesting contradictions in Biblical statements. I thought that Ehrman might do something like contrast 1 Corinthians 14:33 ("For God is not a God of disorder but of peace") with Matthew 10:34 ("I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword"). Then we'd all get a good laugh out of the ridiculous of it all.

Jesus, Interrupted is not a book about these surface level contradictions. In fact, it was f
Mar 10, 2010 A.J. rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Christians, here is what Dr. Ehrman will do for you. He'll pick you up at the airport on his own time and with his own car. He'll put your bags in the trunk, engage you with small talk, and show you around town so you're comfortable. He knows what's going through your head, but once the surroundings are more familiar, maybe you'll loosen up. Then he'll explain why we have the Procedure. He knows it's scary, but by now you'll know that a lot of people have been through it. As you arrive at the fa ...more
Aug 05, 2009 Nick rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
By far his best book.....until the last chapter. Before I explain why, I would like to put forward that I find Bart Ehrman by FAR the best of the newer agnostic authors. Much like myself, he know longer believes in the Christ or the bible, and yet he is not condescending or combative with those who are, unlike a Richard Dawkins who kills his own arguments for me when he attacks religions. However, This line in the last chapter killed it for me...

"Even now, as I type these words, I'm on a beach h
David S. T.
Imagine if you tried to remove all of the later history of the bible, the views of inerrancy of scripture, the later theology, later tradition and then started to study the bible for the first time, looking for clues in the text, study the culture it was written in, treat it like any other surviving ancient document not the divine word of God, you'd probably come away with something like what is presented in this book. This book was a very good easy to read introduction to the historical critica ...more
Apr 08, 2012 James rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Nov 03, 2009 Matt rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I generally avoid the religion section of the bookstore, not for lack of interest but because of a general fear of accidentally picking something up that basically wants to preach one way or another. In that sense, it's not a lot different than the political aisle. Some years ago I stumbled into the work of Elaine Pagels and I liked several of her books. But with religion, most books are guilty until proven otherwise.

But I took a flyer on this one. I became familiar with Ehrman because he's one
poorvi cowkur
Oct 15, 2014 poorvi cowkur rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: favorites, religion
The Bible is the most important book in the history of Western Civilization.It is the most extensively purchased,read and deeply revered book and ,as Bart. Ehrman puts it, also the most misunderstood book in history!Having come from an evangelical Christian background himself, the author takes a very sympathetic approach towards unraveling his thesis of the Bible and makes it clear from the very start that this book is not some ground breaking attempt to unravel the many contradictions in the Bi ...more
Apr 02, 2014 Carolyn rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
I read the first half of this book with friends and then gave up on it. I felt like Erhman consistently took advantage of his credentials and readers' ignorance to make claims that would not stand up to rigorous inquiry. He completely dismisses centuries of scholarship and the entire discipline of hermeneutics when he claims all sorts of "contradictions" in the Bible. Does he really think devoted Christians who believe the Bible have not noticed these things before? That Calvin wrote his institu ...more
Nov 04, 2011 Dave rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Bart Ehrman, saddened by the misery in the world and deluged by factual discrepancies in the canon, succumbs to the "Historical Jesus" movement and sets out on a crusade to convert the unwashed masses to his newfound agnosticism. Previous reviewers of this book squabble about whether it's a diatribe or not; I'm not sure, but Ehrman doesn't score any points with his tone, style, or editing. I find his approach transparently pedantic: (1) point out differences between accounts in the Gospels, (2) ...more
Dec 29, 2010 Tim rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Oh man was this book good....

It's along the same vein as Misquoting Jesus, his previous book on the scribal mistakes of the NT. This book focuses more on the textual, political, and theological history of early Christianity and how these factors came to influence the orthodox views that we're familiar with today. Ehrman exposes a few very important issues and the impact they may have for us today.

A few of the issues that he brings up strike me particularly hard, and now that he's brought them u
Clif Hostetler
May 08, 2009 Clif Hostetler rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: religion
I recommend the review of this book by Trevor at the following link:

The following is my review written five months ago:
There is nothing new or revolutionary in this book for anyone who has studied bible in a mainline seminary or divinity school (or in my case, listened to Ehrman's lectures from the Teaching Company). The problem is that most ministers use the Bible only as a source of devotional material, and refrain from telling their parishioners about w
Jul 30, 2013 Rickey rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I'm not an expert on the Bible, which is why I read this book, although I'd always been interested in the history of the Bible and early Christianity, which a lot of people also aren't very knowledgeable about. Many seem to think the Bible just dropped down from heaven in the form it is today and that the Christian religions of 2000 years ago were the same as today. Ehrman convinced me that he had quite a lot of expertise on the New Testament. I liked his delivery and was impressed with his rese ...more
Trey Nowell
Jul 13, 2013 Trey Nowell rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I enjoyed this book better than Misquoting Jesus actually. I like how Ehrman has respectable scholarship and reiterates other scholars would agree on the historical implications he has put forth. I reach the conclusions of many collegues he refers to often in his book, not to say his ideas for not believing are not resonable. This book points out many of the questions I have asked for years....did Nicea get it right with all the chosen books of the cannonical 27? What about other books like The ...more
May 24, 2010 Terence rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Terence by: Xmas gift from the Dad
Bart Ehrman is joining Jonathan Kirsch as a writer whose earlier books I admire and enjoyed but whose more recent works are largely rehashes and (worse) often poorly written and edited. Jesus, Interrupted doesnt' cover any territory not already covered in Ehrman's Misquoting Jesus or Lost Christianities. It also reads like Ehrman threw together his lecture notes - it's repetitive and slapdash. I could envision him using this to good effect in a lecture hall but as a book, the style has serious p ...more
Sep 17, 2012 Steven rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: novels, non-fiction
Had I read or been taught the bible from the perspective Bart D. Ehrman gives in Jesus Interrupted, I might still be a practicing Christian. But I was brought up a fundamentalist, a Northern Baptist. In that religion every word of the bible is inspired, the word of God himself, inerrant. So what does a smart kid do when he perceives contradictions and no religious leader can give him a good answer; chuck the religion. What sort of religion perpetrates such absolutism, but then contains such broa ...more
Oct 15, 2009 Judith rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Like many people, I had a vague picture of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John keeping journals of their everyday lives with Jesus and stapling them together to send them in to Random House for publication. Well, duh! Do you know who wrote the Bible? As it turns out, every seminary student learns in his first year of college that the 1st 4 books of the New Testament weren't written by MML&J at all, at least not the disciples, (though they could have been coincidentally 4 men with the same names.) ...more
Oct 17, 2016 Rusty rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
So, way back in my youth, I held firm to a specific doctrine in my particular religious faith most commonly referred to as Biblical Inerrancy. If that isn’t self-explanatory and you need me to elaborate, it’s the belief that the Bible (the Protestant one, btw) is inerrant in all respects, whether on matters of doctrine, science, history, or any other topic that it might wander into. Now, even amongst those who hold that view, there is whole host of sub-categories they may fall into. King James o ...more
Feb 06, 2015 Luke rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
A terrific eye-opening book which summarises the views of learned scholars (both non-Christian and Christian) on the bible, Jesus, and early Christian church. Ehrman's approach is graceful and non-alarmist, as he insists that nothing in this book is neither new to those who have attended seminary college or causative of a loss of Christian faith. That being said, this book is surely going to throw a spanner in the works for an unexamined Christian philosophy, of which I now discovered mine is in ...more
Notary Tim
Jul 18, 2010 Notary Tim rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
If you are happy in your belief that the Bible was dictated by God or otherwise inspired in such a way that it is "inerrant," you will not want to read this book -- as it is a direct challenge to that belief.

Ehrman points out the many, many contradictions within the New Testament (his speciality as a Bible scholar) and gives a good overview of the historical-critical approach to Bible studies, as contrasted with the devotional and other approaches. Most church-based Bible studies are devotional
Chungsoo Lee
May 30, 2011 Chungsoo Lee rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: all Christians
Recommended to Chungsoo by: NPR
Every Christians should read this book. “Have courage to read this book,” as Sartre said about Fanon's The Wretched Of The Earth. As Ehrman says, the book contains information which is nothing new. He only organized very lucidly the updated scholarly findings regarding the New Testament which are widely taught in the top 10 seminaries in the U.S.A. for the last 20 to 50 years. But American layman is completely in the dark due to pastors not teaching them in the Sunday schools about the historica ...more
Aug 02, 2011 Curtis rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
A fascinating and objective history of the New Testament's creation and the formulation of the early Christian church, and about the transition from the religion OF Jesus to the religion ABOUT Jesus that dominates much of the world today. This book is a revelation (no pun intended) because of the startling facts it reveals and because of the availability of those facts to anyone who cares to know more about the book that guides so many lives. I think it is the duty of any devotional Christian to ...more
Oct 26, 2010 Bob rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I liked this book a lot more than I expected to. My typical reaction to Bart Ehrman is that I find his facts compelling, but I don't feel compelled to accept all his conclusions, and this book was no different.

He does a good job of presenting scholarship (i.e. facts you can look up for yourself in the Bible) about discrepancies in the New Testament accounts. He also presents good historical information about the origin of the New Testament canon, as well as conclusions scholars have drawn about
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
  • The Incredible Shrinking Son of Man: How Reliable is the Gospel Tradition?
  • The Christian Delusion: Why Faith Fails
  • The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology's New Vision of Ancient Israel and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts
  • Proving History: Bayes's Theorem and the Quest for the Historical Jesus
  • 50 Reasons People Give for Believing in a God
  • The Jesus Puzzle: Did Christianity Begin with a Mythical Christ? Challenging the Existence of an Historical Jesus
  • Godless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America's Leading Atheists
  • The New Atheism: Taking a Stand for Science and Reason
  • The Invention of Christianity
  • Jesus Wars: How Four Patriarchs, Three Queens, and Two Emperors Decided What Christians Would Believe for the Next 1,500 years
  • Losing My Religion: How I Lost My Faith Reporting on Religion in America—and Found Unexpected Peace
  • Nailed: Ten Christian Myths That Show Jesus Never Existed at All
  • The Dark Side of Christian History
  • The Evolution of God
  • Society Without God: What the Least Religious Nations Can Tell Us about Contentment
  • Jesus for the Non-Religious
  • Jesus Lied - He Was Only Human: Debunking the New Testament
  • The Atheist's Introduction to the New Testament: How the Bible Undermines the Basic Teachings of Christianity
Bart D. Ehrman is the James A. Gray Distinguished Professor at the University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill. He came to UNC in 1988, after four years of teaching at Rutgers University. At UNC he has served as both the Director of Graduate Studies and the Chair of the Department of Religious Studies.

A graduate of Wheaton College (Illinois), Professor Ehrman received both his Masters of Div
More about Bart D. Ehrman...

Share This Book

“One of the most amazing and perplexing features of mainstream Christianity is that seminarians who learn the historical-critical method in their Bible classes appear to forget all about it when it comes time for them to be pastors. They are taught critical approaches to Scripture, they learn about the discrepancies and contradictions, they discover all sorts of historical errors and mistakes, they come to realize that it is difficult to know whether Moses existed or what Jesus actually said and did, they find that there are other books that were at one time considered canonical but that ultimately did not become part of Scripture (for example, other Gospels and Apocalypses), they come to recognize that a good number of the books of the Bible are pseudonymous (for example, written in the name of an apostle by someone else), that in fact we don't have the original copies of any of the biblical books but only copies made centuries later, all of which have been altered. They learn all of this, and yet when they enter church ministry they appear to put it back on the shelf. For reasons I will explore in the conclusion, pastors are, as a rule, reluctant to teach what they learned about the Bible in seminary.” 56 likes
“The historical problems with Luke are even more pronounced. For one thing, we have relatively good records for the reign of Caesar Augustus, and there is no mention anywhere in any of them of an empire-wide census for which everyone had to register by returning to their ancestral home. And how could such a thing even be imagined? Joesph returns to Bethlehem because his ancestor David was born there. But David lived a thousand years before Joseph. Are we to imagine that everyone in the Roman Empire was required to return to the homes of their ancestors from a thousand years earlier? If we had a new worldwide census today and each of us had to return to the towns of our ancestors a thousand years back—where would you go? Can you imagine the total disruption of human life that this kind of universal exodus would require? And can you imagine that such a project would never be mentioned in any of the newspapers? There is not a single reference to any such census in any ancient source, apart from Luke. Why then does Luke say there was such a census? The answer may seem obvious to you. He wanted Jesus to be born in Bethlehem, even though he knew he came from Nazareth ... there is a prophecy in the Old Testament book of Micah that a savior would come from Bethlehem. What were these Gospel writer to do with the fact that it was widely known that Jesus came from Nazareth? They had to come up with a narrative that explained how he came from Nazareth, in Galilee, a little one-horse town that no one had ever heard of, but was born in Bethlehem, the home of King David, royal ancestor of the Messiah.” 20 likes
More quotes…