Arthur and George

by Julian Barnes
Arthur and George
book data
1082 ratings, 3.60 average rating, 238 reviews (more data...)
edit

published
January 5th 2006 (first published 2005) by Jonathan Cape

binding
Paperback, 368 pages

literary awards
2005 Booker Prize Nominee

isbn
0224078771   (isbn13: 9780224078771)

description
Arthur and George grow up worlds and miles apart in late nineteenth-century Britain: Arthur in shabby-genteel Edinburgh, George in the vicarage of a s...more






Sign in to Goodreads to see your friends' reviews of this book.







topics  replies  views  last activity   
The Rory Gilmore ...: Any Devotees of Historical Fiction (And should I convert!?) 62 460 7 days ago, 05:17PM  
The Description could use a spoiler alert. 1 14 04/25/2008 08:02PM  

friend reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

This book is currently not featured on any Listopia lists. Add this book to your favorite list »

other reviews (showing 1-20 of 1577)



Kay
12/14/07

bookshelves: british_lit, victoriana
Read in December, 2007
I give five stars sparingly, so I was torn between giving and "four" and a "five" here. Ultimately, though, when I considered that I'd put aside all other tasks one weekend to devote to finishing this book, I decided that this was five-star material.

The last book I'd read by Barnes, England, England was a bit of a disappointment -- it came off, it seemed to me, like second-rate Tom Sharpe. But this book was a different matter. I especially liked the way it unfol...more
Like this review?   yes   (2 people liked it)
  3 comments

Stephanie
Read in April, 2008
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  2 comments

Steve
02/08/08

Read in February, 2008
What a great premise for a work of historical fiction. Take a larger-than-life figure known to all, make him larger still, and overlay his story on top of one with little fame but deserving of more. The acclaimed character was Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, who turned out to be even more intriguing than his detective stories would suggest. From early days in Mam’s kitchen listening to chivalric tales of adventure, to heroics in sports and at war, Arthur liked thinking of himself as an honorable kn...more
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  add a comment

Trevor
06/23/07

Read in May, 2007
I couldn't decide whether this book fell under the "loved it" or "it was amazing" category. I finally settled on "loved it" but only because I want to try (try) to keep my "it was amazing" books to an exclusive few. However, I must say that I was amazed by the book. Barnes writing was smooth and effortless to read. At the same time it was penetrating, and he could articulate feelings and contradictions with clarity.
The story was wonderful. It is abo...more
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  add a comment

Maureeen
Read in June, 2007
recommends it for: fans of sherlock holmes, historical novels, british humour, criminal justice, philosophy
The novel reflects the reserve of the English people. Insights are profound, and there is serious philosophical reflection, but it is all understated. For this reason, this novel is excellent for both people looking for an entertaining read, and people who expect an intellectual stimulation. Irony and astute observation make for a novel that is often incredibly funny. Barnes renders the cahracters in an endearing manner, I as a reader found myself immensely concerned with their outcomes. This wi...more
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  1 comment

Karl Steel
12/25/07

bookshelves: postmedieval_fiction
Read in December, 2007
Since I find all spiritualism either risible or of only historical interest, Barnes' attention to Doyle's spiritualist fervor transformed my affectionate interest for Doyle into disgust and impatience. But while watching yet another 'Christmas Carol' this holiday--since this is what one does with the in-laws--I realized the weirdness of early twentieth century English spiritualism loosened the syrupy anglophilic nostalgia of the holiday. It wasn't all carols and parlor games, unless you want to ...more
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  add a comment

Peter
09/29/08

Read in September, 2008
Completely charming. I'm glad I didn't know this was historical fiction before I picked it up, because I never would have. I thought I hated historical fiction the way I thought I hated musicals, before I got dragged to see Stephen Sondheim's 'Into The Woods', which was ten kinds of excellent.

Anyway, great read. Tiny flaws - a few poorly-concealed chunks of historical research, and some anachronistic psychologizing - don't damage the central core of this book, which is pure old-school nove...more
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  add a comment

Vikki
03/05/08

bookshelves: 2008-books-read
Read in March, 2008
recommends it for: Corey because she deserves it. ;-)
Not the worst book I've ever read, but I had high expectations going into it and unfortunately I was let down. I think this is because I found the book to be very slow going and filled with many unnecessary details. Although a fictional telling based on real events, I think that some of the information could have been condensed.
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  add a comment

Cynthia
Read in November, 2008
This book did not immediately grab me, and I so wanted it to. The author had come highly recommended. It had a slow beginning, chronicling the lives of two boys, who have completely opposite upbringings. After I was half way into it, I was finally hooked, and that was because of a wonderful surprise. Arthur turns out to be Sir Arthur Conan Dole. I have been a fan of Sherlock Holmes since the 1950’s when I started watching the dramatic Basil Rathbone portrayal. Progressing through the story...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Philip
09/19/08

George Edalji (that’s Ay-dal-ji, by the way, since Parsee names are always stressed on the first syllable) is the son of a Staffordshire vicar of Indian origin and his Scottish wife. George is thus a half-caste, to use the language of his late-Victorian and Edwardian age. He’s a diligent, if not too distinguished a scholar. He is uninterested in sport, is of small stature and doesn’t see too well. He sleeps with his father behind a locked door, is in bed by 9:30, becomes a small town solic...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Bill
07/23/08

Read in July, 2008
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  add a comment

Jee Leong
11/16/08

Read in September, 2008
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Esilenna
Esilenna rated it: 3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars
06/19/08

Arthur and George, set in late nineteenth-century Britain, deals with a sequence of events that became known as The Great Wyrley Outrages.

George, son of a Parsee father and a Scottish mother, grows up in the obscure and modest circumstances of a village vicarage in rural Staffordshire and eventually becomes a solicitor in Birmingham. Meanwhile, Arthur goes from humble beginnings in Edinburgh to becoming a doctor, an author and one of the most famous men of his time. Their stories are parallel ...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Franzi
09/25/08

Read in April, 2008
recommended to Franzi by: Carolin
The book is a good read because of it's character studies, because the characters are far from perfect.
The book is an even better read because it is actually based on real events.
The book is amazing because it screws with your head.

As the blurb says, the book is about the difference between thinking, believing and knowing. The first time you're being tricked is right in the beginning. You probably won't notice until p.50 or something. From that moment on, you'll be on your guards. To a ...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Neil
06/28/08

Read in June, 2008
I don't go for whodunnits so much, mostly because I have such a poor head for plot that by the time the mystery is revealed, I've long forgotten who these people are that are now being identified as the criminals. This piece of historical fiction is no different in that regard, but the mystery of who committed the crime is only a small part of what Barnes is trying to do.

The other topics that the book tackles--changing definitions of masculinity and honor in early 20th century England, the s...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Alina
02/26/08

Read in February, 2008
recommends it for: those interested in Doyle or British law (or Barnes fans)
This book was very good, which meant that I was a bit disappointed. (Only for Julian Barnes does "very good" not live up to his potential.) I find Barnes to be a genius and master at writing. The word choices and writing flow coupled with his incredible portrayal of deep human emotion produces books that absolutely involve the reader. This story, although 'very good' did not capture me quite as intensely as other of his works have.
This book is centered on the lives of two men -- Arth...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Diane
03/12/08

Read in March, 2008
recommended to Diane by: Steve's review on Goodreads
recommends it for: Historical & non-fiction fans
Many thanks to Steve on Goodreads for his Arthur & George review which drew me to the book.

I liked everything about A & G, from the way the individual stories were told, to the new things I learned about Arthur Conan Doyle, to the changes in English law made because of George's trial & treatment. I read the book on a vacation trip, stealing time between activities & staying up late to see what happened next.

"Arthur & George" was the first novel I've read b...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

James
12/30/07

bookshelves: fiction, lincolnparkgroup
Read in December, 2007
Julian Barnes uses an elegant and readable writing style to create the dual fictional lives of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and George Edalji in this his tenth novel. The result is a compelling narrative that at once is both interesting as fictional biography and as a detective story. Personally, I found the mystery and Doyle's investigation into its' source was more interesting, but the rest of the novel was well enough told to almost keep up with the suspense created by the mystery. The combination ...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Trish
12/02/07

Read in July, 2006
I really enjoyed this book, but I can't think of annyone to whom I could recommend it. I told Aaron that it isn't post-modern enough for him. Aaron's favorite Julian Barnes book is, I believe, A History of the World in 10 1/1 Chapters, while mine is the more narratively traditional Flaubert's Parrot. And Arthur & George is yet more traditional.

Arthur is Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the creator of Sherlock Holmes. George is George Edalji, a man falsely convicted of a bizarre rural crime. Barn...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Suzy
11/07/07

Read in June, 2007
It's not that this book is bad, it's just that it's not good....

A story about two men - Arthur & George - whose lives begin in very different places, yet end up colliding for a very strange reason. The best part of this book is the first 100 pages. The author does a tremendous job in describing the two men (at this point, boys), the writing style here is simple yet subtle, and there are a few twists. That is, you think you have a good idea of who each boy is - then suddenly you realize t...more