Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Korean War: A History” as Want to Read:
The Korean War: A History
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

The Korean War: A History (Modern Library Chronicles #33)

3.75 of 5 stars 3.75  ·  rating details  ·  251 ratings  ·  53 reviews

For Americans, it was a discrete conflict lasting from 1950 to 1953. But for the Asian world the Korean War was a generations-long struggle that still haunts contemporary events. With access to new evidence and secret materials from both here and abroad, including an archive of capture
ebook, 0 pages
Published July 27th 2010 by Modern Library (first published January 1st 2010)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Korean War, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Korean War

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 661)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
All history nerds have their obsessions and the Korean War is one of mine. Anything I have to say about the subject is going to be skewed by enthusiasm, but I bothered to get a history degree because scholarship matters to me, and Bruce Cumings is an important scholar, mostly because of what he has to say about the Korean War.

You may not agree with his interpretations of things, but you cannot fault him for the facts being what they are, and if a legitimate argument against his findings is out
Alan Jacobs
This is the book to read for an understanding of Korea--not just the Korean War, but Korea itself, north and south. North Korea will be much less enigmatic once you read this book. Cumings goes deep into Korean history, and especially into the Japanese occupation of Korea and Manchuria from the 1930s until the end of WWII. In Cumings' retelling, the North under Kim Il Jong was heroic in its determination to rid the country of their Japanese overlords and return to Korea to the Koreans. The South ...more
Simon Wood

While reading through the reviews of Bruce Cummings "The Korean War" I noticed more than one reviewer complain that Cummings book isn't a history of the war. Up to a point they are right, it is not a conventional history of that war beyond the first thirty-seven pages of two hundred and forty-three that narrate the actions of leaders and armies from beginning to end of the "war". But it only takes a moment of reflection to realise that the remainder of the book is a
This should not be the first book that you read about the Korean War. Cumings assumes that the reader has a basic understanding of events and then proceeds to explain how and why our common America understanding of this "forgotten war" is false. Very interesting but I need to read more basic historic narratives before jumping into this discussion.

What I liked: 1. 38th parallel was an imaginary boundary that we have enforced for more than 60 years. The Korean War was and is a civil war that we st
Dan Gorman
A good book, this history of the Korean War still suffers from a non-linear format, which jumps forward and backward in time to such a degree that the argument gets muddled.

Bruce Cumings is right to critique American involvement in Korea, especially the permanent military-industrial complex and forward-deployed military bases created by the Korean War. Cumings also does an admirable job of drawing out the atrocities committed by Syngman Rhee's regime and borderline-fascist youth groups in South
I've read a lot of criticism of this book and it's author in the past, so much so that I delayed reading it for a long time. I'm glad I finally read it because, while there are certainly problems with it, it certainly does fill in the gaps in the literature in regards to atrocities committed by allied, and, especially, South Korean forces.

Not too long ago I visited the POW camp on Goeje Island while on vacation and many of the things I saw there didn't make any sense, like signs explaining the p
Lauren Albert
Other reviewers have already pointed out that the title is a misnomer. While Cumings manages to cover the history of the war (as well as the pre- and post- history), it is definitely not a straight narrative history.

The book is a revisionist look at the "forgotten war" which tries to show the darker side (atrocities by our soldiers and allies) of our participation rather than just that of the North Koreans. I don't know enough about the events to judge his point of view but I found it interesti
I had issues with this book. Many, many issues (though, I didn't outright hate it, I have to give it that).

The first being that, for all the title is "The Korean War", this book really isn't about the Korean War. The first chapter is a brief summary, and then they talk about the atrocities committed during the war, but it's hardly the focus of the book. While I found a great deal of what he wrote about interesting, such as pre-Korean War rebellions, that's not what I bought a book to read about,
Mark Desrosiers
Leave it to Bruce Cumings to write a history of this forgotten war where the order of battle -- the major military operations agreed upon by most historians -- occupy only the first 36 pages. The rest of the book is both a resurrection of the tragic periphery, and an argument about what this war means, for Koreans and The United States.

Facts are facts: the U.S. (and UN) intervened in a civil war occasioned by the humbling of Korea's long-time occupier, Japan. Cumings is right on the money in co
one can imagine the steel nerves
required of leaders in Pyongyang, observing
a lone B-29 simulating the attack lines that
had resulted in the devastation of Hiroshima
and Nagasaki just six years earlier, each time
unsure of whether the bomb was real or a

with lines like this, we call Bruce Cumings a "pinko" or "Commie" and return to our mint juleps on dis heah hot suh-thern daye.

ah have read three accounts of thuh korean woah ... and this is the mos' leftie of them.

are you a communist sir? are y
About the worst book I've read about the Korean war,
the author tries so hard to discredit others who have written about this war.
And the American men who fought and suffered there.

I assume the author never fulfilled his military obligation.

When GI's were dying in Asian countries,
he was probably sipping mint julips and playing with himself.

The author has a very scattered style of writing with mentions of Marilyn Monroe, Picasso, and a lot of other silly trivia.

He does the usual MacArthur ba
Alyson Hagy
I am still sorting through my thoughts about this book. I have read perhaps ten other books about the Korean War (including the Halberstam book, The Coldest War), but Cumings has pressed me to rethink some of the conclusions I may have drawn from those more "traditional" (and American-centered) volumes. I knew nothing about the extended bombing campaign against North Korea. I knew little about the tangled history of poor relations between Japan and Korea. I did know a few isolated facts about th ...more
E. Kahn
As almost every other reviewer has noted, this book is not a history of the Korean War, despite the title. It's more of a collection of historical essays on the Korean War, focusing largely on atrocities committed by US and ROK forces on South Korean civilians and the lack of balance in what little there is written about the war. Cumings is not shy about his political sympathies, which will turn off many readers.

That said, every horrifying event presented in the book is backed up by thorough res
David Roberts
The book I read to research this post was The Korean War: A History by Robert Cumings which is an excellent book which I bought from kindle. This book was written by an American author about a war that was largely fought by America although other nations like Britain & China were involved. The roots of the war go back to the Japanese invasion of China & Korea around 1910 which the west welcomed because they thought it would help modernize Korea. Of course Japan had a brutal and totalitar ...more
This book is many things, few of them well thought out or properly explained. It is a brief history of Korea under Japanese imperialism, a history of American politics under McCarthyism, a literary study of some war literature, and an attack on the historiography of the Korean War. But it's not really a history of the Korean War. Cumings says all he wants about the war in the first forty pages, then he lapses into thoughts on Nietzsche, memory, and the nature of reconciliation. He spends close t ...more
Richard Macquarrie
This book was informative about mostly ghastly and terrible war crimes that were committed during the Korean war. It did not go in depth about the actual battles or the White House strategy of the war as I was hoping. It was clearly written by a hard core liberal with a lot of anger built up for his own country. The book demonized the South Koreans and the Americans in the war while trying to make Kim Il Sung look not so bad. The most damning part of the book was when he stated and I'm paraphras ...more
Hard to frame this book. On the one hand, some passages sound like ramblings, other parts are just so philosophical and well written that they're read like revelations.

The actual events of the war are only a minor part of this book. It's very descriptive in nature and deals more with the context of the Korean peninsula since the 1930s. Thus the author shows that the Korean War is not limited to the 1950-1953 period, but is stretched from the 30's anti-Japanese struggles to this very day.

In a sen
Salvatore Leone
An engrossing, complete history of the war. For those interested, I would recommend this very highly.
At the close of the Pacific War, it became clear that Japan would soon surrender, and its colony Korea would have to be occupied jointly by the Soviet Union and the United States (FDR's idea of a four-power trusteeship over the country died with him). The day after Nagasaki, Dean Rusk and another official decided to split the country in half along the 38th parallel, leaving the capital Seoul in the American half; the next day, the Soviets agreed. Both occupying powers set up governments in their ...more
Ah, here is a revisionists delight. While I overall recommend the book, there are two somewhat significant complaints to address.

The first is the title, which is inappropriate. The book should really be called Things You Did Not Know About The Korean War. It focuses on the aspects of the war, often challenging to read as an American, that are less often discussed.

The second is that the author goes more than a little easy on the North Koreans in the book. Charges that he is an apologist are a tad
The Korean War: A History by Bruce Cumings is essential reading for those interested in the origins of the Korean war and its current trajectory. It is a historical essay that not only delves into the roots of the conflict and its evolution in the 1930s and 40s, but also in dwells on the US political and domestic scene, including McCarthyism, and how it shaped the view of the conflict to this date. There are many remarkable insights that come form this book, the first being the origins of the co ...more
Josh Liller
"Gooks, napalm, rapes, whores, an unreliable ally, a cunning enemy, fundamentally untrained GIs fighting a war their top generals barely understood, fragging of officers, contempt for the know-nothing civilians back home, devilish battles indescribable even to loved ones, press handouts from...headquarters apparently scripted by comedians or lunatics, an ostensible vision of bringing freedom and liberty to a sordid dictatorship..." Vietnam? Korea.

The title of this book is misleading. It would be
Alex Napoli
Cumings' book is valuable in that it challenges preconceived notions of The Korean War—countering the narrative that has been spoon-fed to most US and ROK citizens. Most have been taught that The Korean War was a UN intervention against an aggressive North Korea. This narrative makes sense as we consider the two Koreas today. The South has "flourished" into what one might call, somewhat problematically, a functioning democratic nation, whereas the North has seemingly become an abusive regime. Ho ...more
A good history from a left-liberal perspective

The bipartisan mythologizing? It all centers around how, when, where and why the Korean War started.

In a series of essays, Cumings' central themes are:
1. The "Korean War" goes back before 1950, ultimately to Kim Il Sung and others fighting guerrila war in northern Korea and mainly in Manchuria/Manchukuo against Japanese imperialists, then facing a post-1945 South Korea with much of its leadership consisting of collaborators with the Jaapanese.
2. Kim
Pretty good and readable. Cumings establishes pretty clearly what the Korean war was all about: the US intervened to suppress an anticolonial uprising (in the north and the south) and to prop up a ruthless dictator. It was, in that sense, a prelude to the Vietnam War, but also in its own right a truly horrifying slaughter of innocents. Most of the massacres were committed by the southern side and by the US (which carpet bombed the north); but Cumings doesn't diminish the atrocities committed by ...more
Daniel Simmons
The subtitle of this book -- "A History" -- is awfully misleading. By rights it should instead be subtitled, "Several Things You Won't Read In Other Histories of this Subject Because They Make South Korea and America Look Really Really Bad." The information he presents seems well-sourced and is certainly eye-opening. I just wish he'd had a more judicious editor (what was with the misplaced and distracting Nietzsche and Brecht references?) and let the evidence speak for itself without a lot of ov ...more
Daniel Burton-Rose
For over a decade I've been putting off reading Cumings' work because everything close to the Korean War and North Korea is so relentlessly depressing. But picking up a copy of his latest I found his impatience with ignorance and mendacity refreshing and amusing, a welcome counterweight to the terrible history he relates.
I think this book is well written and is an excellent place to start for someone who knows very little about the Korean War. I personally would like to balance it with additional reading on the subject as he takes an obvious stance against U.S. actions. That is not to say his thoughts on that are wrong, I just want to learn more about it before I take his word for it. The author himself provides a number of resources throughout the book which should provide that opportunity!

I was particularly i
Michael Bradham
“The same kind of inquiry is needed into American massacres such as Nogun-ri, the unrelenting firebombing of the North, and one of the most astonishing cover-ups in postwar U.S. history, the black-and-white reversal of the truth of what happened in Taejon.”(Cumings page 174)

Cumings details many aspects of the Korean War, including:
Nations involved (Korea, China, Japan, Russia, US, Britain)
Firebombings and massacres
US napalm use
Peasant uprisings
Infrastructure bombings
Political motivations
A valuable but frustrating book. Badly edited, too often repetitive.

That said, has remarkable insights into the origins and impact of this "forgotten war" (at least in U.S. memory). Confounds the "good guy/bad guy" narrative that exists up to the very present in America's episodic interest in/fears about North Korea.

Also does a persuasive job of making the case that U.S. foreign policy, with its emphasis on the military industrial complex and attendant far-flung outposts, has as much, if not mor
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 22 23 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Korean War (Pan Grand Strategy)
  • The Coldest War: A Memoir of Korea
  • Cultures of War: Pearl Harbor/Hiroshima/9-11/Iraq
  • Basta!: Land And The Zapatista Rebellion In Chiapas
  • A Fiery Peace in a Cold War: Bernard Schriever and the Ultimate Weapon
  • Mao's Last Revolution
  • The Coldest Winter: America and the Korean War
  • This Kind of War
  • The Eagle Unbowed: Poland and the Poles in the Second World War
  • Breakout: The Chosin Reservoir Campaign, Korea 1950
  • The Ghost Mountain Boys: Their Epic March and the Terrifying Battle for New Guinea--The Forgotten War of the South Pacific
  • The Guest
  • The Dragon in the Land of Snows: A History of Modern Tibet Since 1947
  • God's Chinese Son: The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom of Hong Xiuquan
  • Inventing Japan: 1853-1964
  • Ivan's War: Life and Death in the Red Army, 1939-1945
  • The Two Koreas: A Contemporary History (Revised and Updated Edition)
  • Red Star over China: The Classic Account of the Birth of Chinese Communism

Other Books in the Series

Modern Library Chronicles (1 - 10 of 34 books)
  • The Renaissance: A Short History
  • Islam: A Short History
  • The Balkans: A Short History (Modern Library Chronicles)
  • The German Empire, 1870-1918 (Modern Library Chronicles)
  • The Catholic Church: A Short History
  • Peoples and Empires: A Short History of European Migration, Exploration, and Conquest, from Greece to the Present
  • Communism: A History
  • Hitler and the Holocaust
  • The American Revolution: A History
  • Law in America: A Short History
Korea's Place in the Sun: A Modern History North Korea: Another Country The Origins of the Korean War, Volume I: Liberation and the Emergence of Separate Regimes, 1945-1947 Dominion from Sea to Sea: Pacific Ascendancy and American Power The Origins of the Korean War, Volume II: The Roaring of the Cataract, 1947-1950

Share This Book