Against All Enemies
by Richard Clarke
|
|
Sign in to Goodreads to see your friends' reviews of Against All Enemies.
discuss this book
friend reviews (0)
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
other reviews (showing 1-20 of 291)
bookshelves:
memoirs,
politics
Read in May, 2007
I totally devoured this book. I wish I would have read it three years ago. Essentially, it's a stripped down memoir of former White House counterterrorism expert Dick Clarke's career as a civil servant. I say stripped down, because it focuses almost exclusively on the bureaucratic struggles and politiciking behind the hunt for al Qaeda before 9/11. No time for coffee or breakfast; this guy has four administrations to get through.
But is it ever riveting. While I had read stories in the paper...more
But is it ever riveting. While I had read stories in the paper...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in September, 2006
recommends it for:
Political readers, people who'd like to know what they're talking about
One of the best-written (even if it was probably ghost written) memoirs to come out of Washington D.C. in quite some time, Richard Clarke takes us inside the anti-terrorism wards of four presidents - from Reagan to the W. Bush. His best gift is to illustrate the attitude of each regime, and where their interests lay. It's written very sharply, drawing some excellent scenes from real life, including the opening - 9/11 in the White House. It is critical of all administrations, but considerably mor...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in December, 2007
This book is similar in its presentation to another I read by another National Security Council staffer, David Rothkopf, entitled "Running the World."
I purposely chose to avoid reading this book for quite a time after it came out, as I generally dislike the "timely" political non-fiction. I find that the basic premise is:
I was right. Nobody listened to me. The government operated best when I was at the zenith of power during my career. It was bad before I got to t...more
I purposely chose to avoid reading this book for quite a time after it came out, as I generally dislike the "timely" political non-fiction. I find that the basic premise is:
I was right. Nobody listened to me. The government operated best when I was at the zenith of power during my career. It was bad before I got to t...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
biography,
history,
history-politics
Read in April, 2005
recommends it for:
Calm down. Breathe. Think. Add it to the pile...
It's hard to describe how alarming this book is. Sadly, the events described inside it aren't too surprising. If the great surprise of the 9/11 Commission Report was that Monica Lewinsky kept us distracted from getting Bin Laden during Clinton's administration, the great surprise of this book is how an "anything but Clinton" attitude in the new Bush administration helped ensure there'd be no national security meetings on terrorism. No matter which party you blame the failures of 9/11 o...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in January, 2008
this link is a great youtube clip from 60 minutes. http://youtube.com/watch?v=zte... they talk about how the bush administration was planning the invasion from the beginning. it confirms what you'll read in clarke's book. the only reason i don't give this book a 5 star is because it gets a bit redundant in the last chapter, but clark is brave for speaking out in what is clearly an administration with a selfish agenda. i think t...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in September, 2007
Clarke's book is an enlightening, sometimes scathing, look at how the last three presidential administrations have approached the threat of al Qaeda. Clarke would know since he worked for all three on counter-terrorism.
His book makes a convincing case that al Qaeda is currently the biggest threat to global security and that the current administration is busy playing Cowboy in Iraq, a country that was no threat to us, instead of trying to repair our relations with the peoples of Iran, Pakist...more
His book makes a convincing case that al Qaeda is currently the biggest threat to global security and that the current administration is busy playing Cowboy in Iraq, a country that was no threat to us, instead of trying to repair our relations with the peoples of Iran, Pakist...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in March, 2008
I should have read this book when I first received it, in 2005 -- and before so many other writers commented on this subject. Now, in 2008, so much of the content seems "old" and even perhaps a bit superficial. A better book for truly understanding Al Queda, for instance, is The Looming Tower. (Clarke seems more preoccupied with documenting and covering his own tracks.) However, Clarke's book DID bring home strongly the warnings we had prior to Sept. 11 and the hard work that many put ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
a must read for the limited number of intelligent americans. clarke relates his history as a presidential advisor from reagan to w bush. the pace is brisk and breezy, like a thriller, but crammed with fascinating facts about government operations. the payoff is that w appears as a gullible dimwit manipulated by fossilized cold-warriors unable to realize the dangers to a post soviet world posed by terrorists. i could go on at length.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read it awhile ago, but it was the first book that disproved all the rumors that the US was doing nothing to stop Bin Laden. This guy is one smart cookie, hence his position as guarding the nation against terrorists. Quite entertaining, and a little frustrating too to learn that bureaucracy is such an integral part of decisions that have a direct effect on whether the US can use full force against terrorists, for whatever the reason.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
political
The existence of this book is depressing. The one guy working in government that knows the most about anti-terrorism policy was forced into retirement and is writing a memoir. Then, to watch as someone who has worked for every president since Reagan be accused of partisanship tortured my soul into a depression defined by self-mutilation.
Because of this depression, I can not say that I loved the book. Therefore, I liked it.
Because of this depression, I can not say that I loved the book. Therefore, I liked it.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
politics
This book is out-of-date now but I have to ask, why didn't anyone listen to this man back in 2001 or even 2004!! He explains so clearly the Bush/Cheney agenda. I know he is, of course, putting some of his own spin on it and casting himself in a good light, but seriously, there is no way he just made all this shit up. He was the chief counter-terrorism advisor for Christ's sake!!
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
politics
Read in March, 2008
Pretty boring read now, but I'm sure at the time-it was a lot more ground breaking. The writing isn't very good but it was interesting reading that the Clintons seemed to act too fast on terrorism threats and that Bush acted too slow-and why this or that was the reason for our invasion. Glad I read it-but it was just ok.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in February, 2007
A pretty in-depth look at the government's reaction on September 11, the history of Al Qaeda, and the Bush/Cheney administration. I'm sure the author put a positive spin on his own involvement as the counter-terrorism chief, but the book helped me to better understand the United States' ongoing conflict with terrorism.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in January, 2006
The man was there. This is his insider account. It made me cry several times and drew me in completely.
It's an amazing story of how this administration squandered so many eager and available resources after 9/11, and how actual human beings react to the challenges of running the country.
It's an amazing story of how this administration squandered so many eager and available resources after 9/11, and how actual human beings react to the challenges of running the country.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in August, 2004
I'm not one to read too many political current event non-fictions so I don't know if this was a particularly amazing and insightful look at the Bush workings or if that's the genre I haven't explored. I do know it gave me a much better sense of what's been going on during this administration.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in January, 2007
Reads like a spy novel! Richard Clarke has an outstanding way of delivering what really happened (from his perspective) prior to 9/11. He was the counter-terrorism expert for the last 20 or so years until he left, frustrated a great deal by the GWB administration.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in September, 2007
The first political book I tried to read all the way through and succeeded. Infuriating and fascinating. What really got me was his theory that our biggest mistake was letting Saddam Hussein live in a weakened state after the first gulf war. Just like Voldemort.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in January, 2007
recommends it for:
people interested in politics and government
Quite the eye-opener. I read this book for work, and I was truly shocked at the first chapter. From then on, it is a fascinating read on the history of modern terrorism. A must-read for anyone wondering how the heck we ended up like this.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in January, 2007
Why did they do that, and so on? I don't have a clue. But actually, this is rather interesting in learning how stuff works in Washington. It is much more interesting, I would think, than some book by Tom Clancy or somebody like that.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in November, 2006
I found it disturbing b/c of the abuse of power within the Bush White House (not that I was surprised). Clarke worked under several administrations; democrat and republican, making it more difficult to question his intentions.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
















