Liberal Fascism: The Totalitarian Temptation from Mussolini to Hillary Clinton

by Jonah Goldberg
Liberal Fascism: The Totalitarian Temptation from Mussolini to Hillary Clinton  
published 2007 by Doubleday
binding Hardcover
isbn 0385511841   (isbn13: 9780385511841)
pages 272
description

“Fascists,” “Brownshirts,” “jackbooted stormtroopers”—such are the insults typically hurled at conservatives by their liberal opponents. Calling someone a fascist is the fastest way to shut them up, defining their views as beyond the political pale. But who are the real fascists in our midst?

Liberal Fascism offers a startling new perspective on the theories and practices that define fascist politics. Replacing conveniently manufactured myths with surprising and enlightening research, Jonah Goldberg reminds us that the original fascists were really on the left, and that liberals from Woodrow Wilson to FDR to Hillary Clinton have advocated policies and principles remarkably similar to those of Hitler's National Socialism and Mussolini's Fascism.

Contrary to what most people think, the Nazis were ardent socialists (hence the term “National socialism”). They believed in free health care and guaranteed jobs. They confiscated inherited wealth and spent vast sums on public education. They purged the church from public policy, promoted a new form of pagan spirituality, and inserted the authority of the state into every nook and cranny of daily life. The Nazis declared war on smoking, supported abortion, euthanasia, and gun control. They loathed the free market, provided generous pensions for the elderly, and maintained a strict racial quota system in their universities—where campus speech codes were all the rage. The Nazis led the world in organic farming and alternative medicine. Hitler was a strict vegetarian, and Himmler was an animal rights activist.

Do these striking parallels mean that today’s liberals are genocidal maniacs, intent on conquering the world and imposing a new racial order? Not at all. Yet it is hard to deny that modern progressivism and classical fascism shared the same intellectual roots. We often forget, for example, that Mussolini and Hitler had many admirers in the United States. W.E.B. Du Bois was inspired by Hitler's Germany, and Irving Berlin praised Mussolini in song. Many fascist tenets were espoused by American progressives like John Dewey and Woodrow Wilson, and FDR incorporated fascist policies in the New Deal.

Fascism was an international movement that appeared in different forms in different countries, depending on the vagaries of national culture and temperament. In Germany, fascism appeared as genocidal racist nationalism. In America, it took a “friendlier,” more liberal form. The modern heirs of this “friendly fascist” tradition include the New York Times, the Democratic Party, the Ivy League professoriate, and the liberals of Hollywood. The quintessential Liberal Fascist isn't an SS storm trooper; it is a female grade school teacher with an education degree from Brown or Swarthmore.

These assertions may sound strange to modern ears, but that is because we have forgotten what fascism is. In this angry, funny, smart, contentious book, Jonah Goldberg turns our preconceptions inside out and shows us the true meaning of Liberal Fascism.

...more
date added
02-10-07



Sign in to Goodreads to see your friends' reviews of Liberal Fascism: The Totalitarian Temptation from Mussolini to Hillary Clinton.







discuss this book

There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »




friend reviews (0)

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.



other reviews (showing 1-20 of 315)



Mark
Mark rated it: 4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars
04/08/08

Read in April, 2008
With a Hitler-esque smiley face and the title "Liberal Fascism" gracing the cover, a casual political observer might view Jonah Goldberg's new tome as a work of contradictory hyperbole. But after reading the introduction, it becomes clear that Goldberg is laying out a serious and somewhat-scholarly argument that modern American liberalism is a sibling of the Fascist movements that swept Italy and Germany prior to World War II. His central thesis is that, while "fascism" is a ...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Ian
Ian rated it: 5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
04/15/08

Read in April, 2008
recommends it for: Anyone interested in the history of Fascism
(Note that the listed title is wrong. It is actually "Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left from Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning")

This is a fascinating book. Jonah Goldberg traces the history of "Fascism", from Rousseau through Bismarck, the Progressives, Woodrow Wilson, Mussolini, FDR, the Nazis (remember, "Nazis" is short for "National Socialists" - look at the Nazi party platform: environmentalism, animal rights, organic fo...more
Like this review?   yes   (2 people liked it)
  add a comment

Francine
Francine rated it: 3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars
03/29/08

Has a copy to sell/swap — Read in March, 2008
recommended to Francine by: Bill Capra
I gave Mr. Goldberg's book 3 stars for creativity and inventiveness. PLEASE this is not an academic work but an attempt to show parallels between Hitler's Nazism, Mussolini's Fascism and the administrations of Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, John F.Kennedy, Bill Clinton;
also Hillary Clinton and Al Gore. Politics as usual.
These passages in his book represent Jonah Goldberg's thinking on these parallels.


"The Nazis declared war on smoking, supported abortions, gun
control, and p...more
Like this review?   yes  
  4 comments

Varmint
Varmint rated it: 5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
01/20/08

Read in January, 2008
In a way, it reminded me of a book on dog psychology i'd read a few years back. So many behaviors made sense when when you realize that there's still a good bit of wolf hardwired in.

Much of liberalism confused the hell out of me. From F.D.R.'s internment of the japanese, to enviromentalist terrorism, to Sean Penn's almost sexual attraction to Hugo Chavez. It only starts to make sense when you understand the fascist impulse at it's core.

A century ago there was one united progressive move...more
Like this review?   yes   (4 people liked it)
  8 comments

Kenny
Kenny rated it: 5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
04/06/08

bookshelves: current-events
Read in April, 2008
In political circles, there is probably no word more misused and misunderstood than "fascism." Goldberg's exhaustive review of the sources and ideology of fascism prove, once again, that popular meanings are often diametrically opposed to the actual facts: that fascism has historically been a malady of the left, not the right, though there have been a few right-wing fascists, though they are nothing compared with the Mussolinis and Hitlers, both statists and corporatists par excellence...more
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  add a comment

Robert
Robert rated it: 5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
04/01/08

bookshelves: currently-reading
Read in April, 2008
This book is a whole section of history you've never known. Some of the things I once believed have been turned on their head. Mussolini has long been attributed to being the first fascist, but he actually followed in the footsteps of our very own Woodrow Wilson. Wilson was a progressive. As Wilson put it, The essence of Progressivism was that the individual "marry his interests to the state." Totalitarianism in other words. If that isn't fascism I don't know what it is. And guess who ...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Great Cthulhu
Great Cthulhu rated it: 5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
01/19/08

recommended to Great Cthulhu by: Mark Steyn
recommends it for: Everyone, basically
Goldberg does a grand job of describing the taxonomical and existential affinities between liberalism -- which believes that people are children requiring an all-beneficient state led by a philosopher elite to make decisions for them about healthcare, housing, consumption, etc -- and fascism, which believes that people are children requiring an all-beneficient state, led by a philosopher-elite, to make all decisions for them about healthcare, housing, consumption, etc. (*bump*) I had given four...more
Like this review?   yes   (2 people liked it)
  add a comment

Skylar
Skylar added it
04/11/08

bookshelves: history, politics, unfinished
Read in January, 2008
So-called fascists such as Hitler and Mussolini were socialists. This is hardly a revelation. It's quite obvious, even down to the very name of Hitler's party. If this does come as a shock and a revelation to the reader, I can only imagine the reader probably isn't going to be convinced of the obvious truth by this book either. I think it's good someone finally made a book-length effort to try to lay to rest the complete misuse of the term fascism and the myth that Hitler was some kind of "...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Jacki
Jacki rated it: 3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars
05/05/08

Read in February, 2008
A history of American/European politics.

The main thing I learned from this book: The political spectrum can not easily be divided into Christian vs. atheist or intellectual vs. uneducated or rich vs. poor. Fascism is about using government to create an ideal or evolved state, at the cost of freedom or taxes or what have you vs. than minimizing or restraining government and letting society evolve on it's own. Fascism isn't about racism, or Nazis or military power. So a lot of liberal act...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Mara
Mara marked it as to-read
01/20/08

bookshelves: to-read
The cover and title of the book are flagrantly controversial, but as they say about books and covers, this one should be judged only after reading it, which is what I plan to do. The title is actually from H.G. Wells who coined the term "liberal fascism" or "friendly fascism" to mean a statist utopian enterprise designed to lift everyone collectively to a better life, but as Jonah Goldberg, the author, points out, "Even a hug can be a problem if you don't want to be hugg...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Jake
Jake rated it: 5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
04/13/08

Read in December, 2007
As Jonah Goldberg says, having heard to many times how blithely Conservatives are equated to fascists, he set out to prove the philosophical, ethical, and historical continuity between the modern liberal who makes such accusations, and concrete fascism. He makes the point that the word itself doesn't mean much except a synonym for evil with a connotation of the Holocaust. His thesis seems to be that liberalism or progressivism, socialism/Bolshevism and Fascism are all intellectual heirs of a few...more
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  add a comment

Jeffrey
Jeffrey rated it: 5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
04/29/08

bookshelves: conservatism, current-events, history
Read in January, 2008
I reaD this book to make a review. So far I can say that the book is different than I imagined. The book is an intellectual history of fascism and how the left in the united states embraced it. Now this will be a hard sell with most people that suffered through a public school education since they are taught that fascism and Nazism are products of the far right, something I never understood since I was able to see the forms that they took and it looked old school left to me. Yet Goldberg is able...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Anthony
Anthony rated it: 5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
04/25/08

bookshelves: favorites, history, non-fiction, politics-political-thought
Read in April, 2008
recommends it for: Anyone who EVER plans to vote, or presumes to voice an opinion on current political events.
This book is brilliant. It is a look at many aspects of U.S. and World history you THOUGHT you knew. You may be surprised. You will certainly be educated. This isn’t a book you read casually. You will find yourself underlining, cross-referencing, and annotating this book as you go. I was frequently cross-referencing other sources, both for varying perspectives, and to review people and events for which the author presumed background knowledge. Even so, I did not find the process cumbers...more
Like this review?   yes  
  2 comments

Spencer
Spencer rated it: 3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars
04/02/08

Read in April, 2008
This book was very educational. I'm quite familiar with Goldberg's political views and this has to be one of his strongest works yet. I've long been concerned with our nations 'progressive' movement: removing capitalism, implementing social health, etc... This is a great book full of history about different civilizations who have tried to essentially pull of what the progressives are tryin to do - and how and why they failed. It was interesting to read about the "people's" reaction...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

MJ
MJ is currently reading it
05/02/08

bookshelves: currently-reading, politicalbooks
Read in May, 2008
recommends it for: inquisitive minds
So far, I'm two chapters in and riveted. I don't recall ever learning very much about Mussolini in school - even in college when I studied Nazi Germany and post-WWI Europe, there wasn't much except the image of a bumbling, follower-type who got himself hung by his own people.

Not a polemic screed, either. Goldberg has struck a sour note with the "other side" which is no surprise - the title is very inflammatory - but it's really a wonderful exploration into ideas and intellectua...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Jeremy
Jeremy rated it: 5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
03/09/08

Read in February, 2008
Fantastic look at the history of liberal thought in this country. Liberal philosophy is, as Goldberg masterfully argues, happy fascism. Extensive outline and history of this movement. Very well documented and supported. If your favorite enlightenment thinkers are John Locke and Adam Smith and your political mantra is maximum individual freedom under the benign protection of a minimalist state, then you have been handed a gift with this treatise. Goldberg shines a light (a lot of light) on the t...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Mary
Mary rated it: 5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
03/28/08

Read in February, 2008
This book is dense and takes a great deal of attention to follow and absorb--and too important to read off-handedly--so I stopped about 3/4 through and read Pillars of the Earth; I was sick and the energy to read the Pillars was far less than Goldberg's book.

The ideas he puts forward and supports with immaculate research and study are disturbing, to say the least. All the same, I have found that in general he supports what I have observed over the years. If you are interested in the politi...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Jonathan
Jonathan added it
01/03/08

bookshelves: to-avoid-or-mock-thoroughly
Money quote from the dust jacket: "In America, [fascism] took a 'friendlier,' more liberal form. The modern heirs of this 'friendly fascist' tradition include the New York Times, the Democratic Party, the Ivy League professoriate, and the liberals of Hollywood. The quintessential liberal fascist isn't an SS storm trooper; it is a female grade-school teacher with an education degree from Brown or Swarthmore."

Source
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  2 comments

Merrijane
Merrijane rated it: 4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars
04/09/08

bookshelves: political-commentary
Has a copy to sell/swap — Read in April, 2008
Very entertaining for a wonky political/historical book. Written from a conservative perspective, it challenges the notion that "fascist" is best used to describe extreme right-wingers. Instead, the central premise asserts that fascism shares roots with modern liberalism. It was labelled reactionary by the Stalin when it became politically expedient to distance himself from Mussolini and Hitler. Contains copious notes and references, and is written in fresh, easy-to-understand prose.
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Alessandra
Alessandra rated it: 4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars
04/01/08

bookshelves: currently-own, non-fiction, political
Read in April, 2008
A very ineresting, and entertaining book. If you like history lessons, then go for this - other wise, you may find yourself VERY bored (though the authors occasional antidotes are quite refreshing). The political mudslinging doesn't get started until the last chapter, at which point I found myself no longer interested in the information - as it moved away from history, and closer to political opinion. I give major kudos for the research!
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment


« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 15 16 next »



book data (includes all editions)

avg rating (all editions): 4.15 (81 ratings)
number of reviews: 49






other editions