by
2.42 of 5 stars
Before AidSat I had no self, no soul. I was a billing address. A credit score. I had a TV, a computer, a phone, a car, an apartment, some furnit... read full description

reviews

Aug 25, 2008
Sheila rated it: 3 of 5 stars
I vacillate between two and three stars on this one.

I found this story of super-high technology and psychosis interplay(with a heavy dose of paranoia mixed in) rather compelling, although it ultimately left me feeling stranded and confused (maybe not an inappropriate reaction at all, given the subject matter).

The whole thing had me thinking "well, this is what you get when you put modern technology in the hands of the wrong individuals". Unfortunately, it al More...
2 comments like (1 person liked it)
Nov 27, 2011
Nick rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Really disconcerting book. The main character is fairly sociopathic, yet is strangely sympathetic (?) (probably lending to the disconcertion). It takes place in a near future where everything is monitored electronically. The main character's job as one of these monitors dominates the book. I've heard this described as "Orwellian" but thats really wrong. Its too corporate-friendly, or suspicious-internet-person-friendly to be Orwellian. The story is told through internet posts, emails, More...
Jan 04, 2008
Vicki rated it: 1 of 5 stars
I'm still technically reading this book. (As in, I haven't finished it yet, not that I'm actively reading it.) But I don't like it. I'm going to finish it, for two reasons: 1) I will not be bested by a book; and 2) it's like 35 pages long. Seriously, if I ever just pick it back up, I'll finish it and then I can hate it, qualm-free.

Here's the thing: it's a book that was initially published online, in installments. If you read it when it came out, you followed all of these link More...
Aug 04, 2009
Jessica rated it: 2 of 5 stars
"But that's my impression whenever I ask my colleagues for helpful tidbits on clients I'd like to bang."

"'Forget the White House. Forget the Capitol. If somebody wants to kick us in the balls, he should attack the Library of Congress."'

"Her smile was like the flap on a white envelope: that clean, that even, and that wide."

"When you finally let someone in, completely, wholly, it's nice to know that he has insides, too." More...
Feb 13, 2008
shawn rated it: 2 of 5 stars
This novella was okay. I like the structure and "flow" of each chapter. Originally for the web (I think Slate), the author of Thumbsucker delves into a not-too-distant future scenario of a society well entrenched in the information age, where background checks replace rumors and speculation, surveillance is more a formality than a sign of mistrust, and the term "blind date" loses all meaning.

When originally published online, it was chock-full of links for further More...
Jul 21, 2009
Kevin rated it: 2 of 5 stars
There's no story here. Or rather, what there is storywise amounts to an argument over the internet. Not precisely the stuff that stirs the soul.
Kirn has some worthwhile insights and satirical points. Not worthwhile enough to read this short book to glean, but, you know, theoretically worthwhile
Dec 27, 2008
Mike rated it: 2 of 5 stars
This book was crazy. It made very little sense. It was mostly confusing.
On the good side it was short and some parts were interesting. I liked the spy aspect to it but that was also a confusing part too.
Jul 26, 2009
Joe rated it: 2 of 5 stars
There are so tremendous cultural insights that show up as nuggets. The style reminds me of Bret Easton Ellis' Lunar Park part Douglas Coupland circa Girlfriend in a Coma.
Oct 03, 2009
Joslyn rated it: 3 of 5 stars
was originally a serial on salon, lending interesting of-the-moment elements, and enjoyable for folks of a sci-fi bent. not the best bit of literature ever, but i had fun with it.
Aug 26, 2009
Mimi rated it: 1 of 5 stars
What an unholy mess. This is the sort of thing I write when I take a lot of cold medicine.
Jul 04, 2011
Radha rated it: 1 of 5 stars
I've tried to read this book a few times, and am finally giving up.
Dec 21, 2008
Brandi rated it: 2 of 5 stars
I realized I already read this on-line. Meh...
Apr 13, 2009
Corey rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Kirn is one of our best and most important writers.
Dec 17, 2009
Alex rated it: 3 of 5 stars
This novel was compiled from an online serial about an operator at AidSat – a ubiquitous company (like medicalert) whose powers to offer emergency aid and assistance are abused by the obsessive love-struck protagonist. A paranoid romp; through consistency this novel manages to achieve in some small part, the successful paranoia of DeDillo. This writer was at his best writing scathing rants about the everyday lives of the middle and upper middle class.
Jul 11, 2010
Beth marked it as to-read
pb original; 1st edition, signed by author
Jul 14, 2008
Stephanie rated it: 2 of 5 stars
ok i've only read 4 pages of this book and i'm already hooked...
------------------------------
too bad the above review did not last...got very confusing towards the end, lost some of the plot and too many random references...but still interesting as a concept
Jan 17, 2010
Tim rated it: 1 of 5 stars
Kirn's a nice guy. No joke. And it's a nice little story.

Beefs:
Purports to be post-medium. (I hate that.)
Appropriates mythemes, years before Levi-Strauss died.
Jan 15, 2008
Lesa rated it: 2 of 5 stars
OK so I didn't read it all... it bored me. Don't bother, life is to short to waste time on insignificant literature.
Sep 18, 2007
Meg rated it: 1 of 5 stars
Unsympathetic, amoral characters with no interesting personality traits.
Jul 06, 2007
Seth is currently reading it
wtf is an interactive book mr. thumbsucker....we are about to find out
Dec 17, 2009
Meg rated it: 1 of 5 stars
The best thing I can say about it is that it's relatively short.
Feb 04, 2012
Michelle rated it: 1 of 5 stars
Jan 16, 2012
Dee Ann marked it as to-read
Jan 02, 2012
Waleed added it
Dec 09, 2011
Josh marked it as to-read
Nov 14, 2011
Laura marked it as to-read
Oct 26, 2011
Rae rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Aug 29, 2011
Zet_bi rated it: 2 of 5 stars
Aug 25, 2011
Doanator marked it as to-read
Aug 16, 2011
Steve added it