Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Culture and Anarchy” as Want to Read:
Culture and Anarchy
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Culture and Anarchy

3.52 of 5 stars 3.52  ·  rating details  ·  502 ratings  ·  45 reviews
'The men of culture are the true apostles of equality.' Matthew Arnold's famous series of essays, which were first published in book form under the title Culture and Anarchy in 1869, debate important questions about the nature of culture and society that are as relevant now as they have ever been. Arnold seeks to find out 'what culture really is, what good it can do, what ...more
Kindle Edition, 276 pages
Published (first published 1869)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Culture and Anarchy, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Culture and Anarchy

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,272)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Reason -- "Sweetness and Light" -- Culture -- Perfection -- for Arnold these terms are nearly synonymous, and all underlie the same central claim: the cause of disorder is both identifiable and curable. Arnold's goal here is not to propose a specific program of reform but, as he says in Democracy, to "invite impartial reflections." While Arnold does not precisely live up to his own asserted impartiality, his essay does seem constructed to persuade rather than to argue. This results from a combin ...more
Adrian Colesberry
Arnold's idea of culture could not be less in vogue these days. As it is always salutary to read the out-of-vogue, I strongly recommend this book to everyone. Today, culture is used to mean what used to be called society or even traditional society. This entire book is Arnold's bid for culture to mean the collection of all that is best and perfect in the world and the agreed-upon commitment to develop that perfection even further, an idea that today we can only weakly express with the word civil ...more
When it comes to pure malicious wit, nobody beats Matthew Arnold, not even Jonathan Swift. The six short essays in Culture and Anarchy would have long passed out of print if they were not such fun. The first three essays take aim at all segments of society: the working, middle and aristocratic classes; leftwing, centrist and rightwing politicians; England, Europe and America; Nonconformists and conformists.

Evidently, even today, some people are sulky about Arnold’s poison-dipped sword, but he g
Christopher Rush
Indeed, yes. Though this is somewhat different from what you think it is going to be, based on your limited knowledge for what Arnold is arguing, and thus one could find it somewhat disappointing, but it should not be disappointing. What was somewhat surprising was Arnold's great phrase "the best of what's been thought and said" appears so soon in the book, in the preface, and then is never mentioned again. Arnold more often mentions the importance of letting one's reason play freely over issues ...more
I don't know where to even begin with this book. It is glorious and meaningful, useful, worthy and important - and it is also horrifying in its use of elitist rhetoric (we're here to perfect ourselves, didn't you know? and that's possible through cultural education! Perfection!), its colonial project (where an "epoch of expansion" is related not just to consciousness, but gets tacked on to a middle class progress narrative), not to mention the false parallels it draws between Jewish and Greek cu ...more
All the writings collected in this volume have as their central theme Arnold's advocacy of an autonomous role for culture in a society being transformed by industrialization and the ascendance of a middle class detached from, and even hostile too, the cultural aspirations and achievements of the aristocracy it is replacing.

Arnold's definition of culture is a complex one, but its basic characteristic is the pursuit of an internal ideal of perfection that owes much to romanticism, Plato, and even
I don't know how to rate this. There is good writing and very intelligent ideas (regarding culture), but they are overshadowed by the alarming conservatism of it all (the middle class with their tea rooms, disgusting!) and silly concepts (light, sweetness?). Also, too much love for the Establishment and Academies. It just amazes me that someone who is apparently so intelligent can say things like everybody is either Barbarians, Philistines or Populace except for men of culture, who are above cla ...more
Ali Nazifpour
"Culture and Anarchy" is a book written in 1875. Yet, it's a very relevant book today. If you look past the vocabulary, you'd have no idea, based on the content, that it's not written in 2014. The main crust is a defense of "culture", that is philosophy and other intellectual pursuits. It opposes the anti-intellectual attitudes that are rampant even today, and in our poisonous environment of postmodernism and postcolonialism and cultural relativism reading this book is very interesting. I also f ...more
Unbelievably boring.
Nadiime Melleh
“Culture which is the study of perfection, leads us… to conceive of true human perfection as a harmonious perfection, developing all sides of our humanity; and a general perfection, developing all parts of our society”

Matthew Arnold-Culture and Anarchy

Culture, then, is both study and pursuit. It is not merely the development of “literary culture”, but of “all sides of our humanity”. Nor is it an activity concerning individuals alone, or some part or section of society; it is, and must be, esse
Fred R
Many of the specific categories and oppositions he sets up don't seem to hold water, but I wholeheartedly endorse the general thrust of the argument. Of every human product it can be asked: "does this build up civilization, or tear it down?"

To give you a sense of his thought processes:

"So all our fellow-men, in the East of London and elsewhere, we must take along with us in the progress towards perfection, if we ourselves really, as we profess, want to be perfect; and we must not let the worshi
Marts  (Thinker)
Matthew Arnold's collected essays, previously published periodically as magazine articles.
The time is Victorian England and Arnold contrasts culture; an avenue to breaking down humanity's barriers and a means of creating human perfection, with anarchy; a mood of unrest resulting from certain elements of the modern life.
Therefore since through the decades perfection has not been achieved through culture, anarchic tendencies have developed...

"without order there can be no society and without socie
This is 19th Century wit at its absolute best, and a wonderful work of cultural and political criticism (if not one that might find much more favor now than at the time it was written). Arnold's conclusions are frequently not those that I would advocate, and his analysis is not that of a thoroughly principled philosopher (as he freely admits), but there's a great deal of brilliance here, and one would be foolish to discount the entire work simply because it might not always agree with one's own ...more
Reading again, after many years in the wilderness of cultural studies bitterness, that home for frustrated and hateful spoilt brats all over the rich world. Undergraduates are taught to sneer at this book (of course, on the basis of a two or three page extract), in the beginning of their indoctrination into despising of the literary. There is, it is true, much to object to, but the light irony of its writing is delight and powerful of itslf: the issues it deals with frighteningly familiar themes ...more
Fazackerly Toast
to be honest, I'm not clear why this is supposed to be such a seminal high Victorian text. It seems to be largely taken up with prolonged discussions of obscure religious and political debates that no one gives a hoot about nowadays. But maybe the broader principles it establishes, the opposition of culture and anarchy, the establishment of the classes of Philistines, Barbarians and Populace etc are now so much part of the foundation of our culture that I can't see how seminal a text this is? An ...more
Sam P
I don't understand how people can like this. It is so hard to trawl through
It's good when he's hating on liberals, but everything else is bad.
Ayat Al Bloushi
Great! Even though many of Arnold's ideas were exclusive to England at his time, yet they still are applicable to any society that strives for the well-being of its individuals. Thought over action...
Hal Johnson
Too much culture, not enough anarchy.
Apr 07, 2015 Velvetink marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Haythem Bastawy
Arnold's series of essays is surprising not of date after a century and a half of cultural ageing. In spite of his Elitist, Eurocentric view of Mankind, Arnold's Culture and Anarchy raises a lot of questions on the boundaries of liberty and the futility of class struggle. He doesn't provide a clear solution to the cultural problem and he is not always accurate or correct when it comes to historical and anthropological terms, however his argument opens a lot of new passages in the labyrinths of t ...more
Ed Wagemann
Apr 04, 2012 Ed Wagemann marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Why Everything You Think You Know About Punk Is Completely Wrong:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
"The sterner self of the Populace likes bawling, hustling, and smashing; the lighter self, beer" (72).

Arnold writes against the English tendency to value freedom of action over considered thought about what is right and desirable for society, anarchy vs. culture (sweetness and light). Breaks English into classes: Aristocrat-Barbarians, Middle class-Philistines, Working class-Populace.
Very useful, especially to put into conversation with Arnold's theory of aesthetics - the latter portion is a little less compelling and pertinent, particularly if you're reading this for your PhD orals or something of that nature. "Sweetness and Light," "Doing As One Likes," and the "Conclusion" are, in my estimation, the most important sections of the text.
I'm torn here. On one hand, I think the basic idea of culture as the process of self-perfection is grand, and I think Arnold's idea and direction are admirable; on the other, however, it seems that his formulation falls short of outlining its practicality as a total worldview. Furthermore, he comes to a couple rather unpalatable sub-conclusions.
Often-sluggish prose and repetitive arguments, but rich in irony and with occasional flashes of genius. A plea for greater hellenism in an era where hebraistic literalism was shaken by recent inquiry. A subtle critique of Victorian dogmas that does not merely substitute our own dogmas for them.
Unreadable intellectual onanism. "Sweetness and Light" is the kind of meaningless phrase you hope is just a poor translation from a foreign language where the phrase had actual meaning. Unfortunately, English is Arnold's native language. But this particular work is utter gibberish.
Harrison Gearns
It's one of those classics you're happy you beat your head through, but I can't ever really see myself appreciating Arnold for what he said. A lot of this seems arbitrary. Insofar as, if you do what Arnold says, you'll do well as a society. Bullocks.
Arnold, you ivory-towerist. (He does create a space for the intellectual, which is good. But we should ALL be the intellectual. The space should be everywhere. We should all be the artist :)-in artistic (non-artsy) and diverse ways.)
As it turns out I can tolerate reading about Greek philosophy when it's dressed up in snarky Englishness. Also, this is exactly the kind of book (and society) from which soccer would be born and I'm really excited about it.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 42 43 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Renaissance: Studies in Art and Poetry
  • The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition
  • Selected Writings
  • A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful
  • Sartor Resartus
  • Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society
  • The Stones of Venice
  • Rabelais and His World
  • A Defence of Poetry
  • Axel's Castle: A Study of the Imaginative Literature of 1870-1930
  • The Liberal Imagination: Essays on Literature and Society
  • The Proper Study of Mankind
  • Modernism: A Guide to European Literature 1890-1930
  • Confessions of an English Opium-Eater & Other Writings
  • The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society
  • Liberalism: A Counter-History
  • The Well Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry
  • Dylan's Visions of Sin
Matthew Arnold was an English poet, sage writer and cultural critic who worked as an inspector of schools. He was the son of Thomas Arnold, the famed headmaster of Rugby School, and brother to Tom Arnold, literary professor, and William Delafield Arnold, novelist and colonial administrator.
More about Matthew Arnold...
Dover Beach and Other Poems The Function of Criticism at the Present Time Selected Poems The Poetical Works of Matthew Arnold The Works of Matthew Arnold

Share This Book

“For what can give a finer example of that frankness and manly self- confidence which our great public schools, and none of them so much as Eton, are supposed to inspire, of that buoyant ease in holding up one's head, speaking out what is in one's mind, and flinging off all sheepishness and awkwardness, than to see an Eton assistant-master offering in fact himself as evidence that to combine boarding-house- keeping with teaching is a good thing, and his brother as evidence that to train and race little boys for competitive examinations is a good thing?” 2 likes
“The sterner self of the Populace likes bawling, hustling, and smashing; the lighter self, beer.” 2 likes
More quotes…