The Lost World (Jurassic Park, #2)

The Lost World (Jurassic Park #2)

by
3.55 of 5 stars 3.55  ·  rating details  ·  48,302 ratings  ·  1,052 reviews
It is now six years since the secret disaster at Jurassic Park, six years since that extraordinary dream of science and imagination came to a crashing end — the dinosaurs destroyed, the park dismantled, the island indefinitely closed to the public.

There are rumors that something has survived.
448 pages
Published 1995 by Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
Forrest Gump by Winston GroomThe Devil Wears Prada by Lauren WeisbergerJurassic Park by Michael CrichtonJumanji by Chris Van AllsburgMary Poppins by P.L. Travers
I Only Watched the Movie!
87th out of 757 books — 3,433 voters
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix by J.K. RowlingTwilight by Stephenie MeyerHarry Potter and the Goblet of Fire by J.K. RowlingHarry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban by J.K. RowlingThe Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown
The BOOK was BETTER than the MOVIE
124th out of 1,129 books — 14,690 voters


More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Paul
The story goes that Steven Spielberg flush with the success of the first Jurassic Park movie, itself an adaptation of a Michael Chrichton novel, decided to try and repeat his success by commissioning the author to write a sequel to his original novel (which the first movie was based on) which they could then adapt into a movie.
Whether or not that's true I cannot say but I will say that do not base your initial judgement of this book or the prospect of reading it on the lacklustre utter turkey th...more
Enrique
Well to be honest, I had watched the film adaptation before reading the novel. I loved the film especially with the Big Rex attacking my hometown. (Sadly the news never reported it). Now I had begun reading it kind of late, since I could only find a copy of it at Barnes&Nobels but I begun reading!

Now when I did read the novel I tried to clear my mind and not try to expect alot from it. However when I actually did get to reading the Lost World I was slightly dissapointed. To be frank I think...more
Chris Friend
Mar 30, 2008 Chris Friend rated it 1 of 5 stars Recommends it for: No living creature on earth. Except silverfish. They need the fiber.
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Henrik
Feb 09, 2008 Henrik rated it 3 of 5 stars Recommends it for: those who enjoy science-based fiction
Basically the usual good Michael Crighton stuff, interesting ramblings and speculations about science (in this case, the role of extinction in evolution). Certainly readable and enjoyable, but the plot line was not as solid as it could and should have been.

[Plot discussion follows]

1) Having the two kids come along was artificial and contrived, whereas in Jurassic Park it was natural. Did he include them here as a compulsory element in the case the book became a movie? (Note: having the kids alon...more
Chelsea
I find a lot of people discuss the "resurrection" of Ian Malcolm in their reviews, and I'd like to throw in my two cents. It's true, Malcolm is mentioned as dead at the end of Jurassic Park. To be exact, Muldoon is telling Grant what's happened to everyone else as they're flying away in the helicopter:
"What about Malcolm?" Grant said.
Muldoon shook his head.

The epilogue mentions the Costa Rican government not permitting the burial of John Hammond or Ian Malcolm (amongst a list of other ways they...more
Wil
Sep 06, 2007 Wil rated it 1 of 5 stars Recommends it for: Masochists and the illiterate
What I learned from The Lost World: The only people worthy of surviving in Crichton's world are geniuses. Everyone else is destined to be fodder/feed for terrorizing thunder lizards.

The Lost World suffers from two things: First off, if you've ever read Jurassic Park, then you know that TLW's protagonist, Ian Malcolm, is, in fact, dead. That's right... he died in Jurassic Park, but since they couldn't convince Sam Neill to return for the movie, Crichton rewrote history so that Malcolm somehow sur...more
Emily Dahl
This was one of my vacay reads and I have to admit it was really enjoyable in that Dan Brown kind of way. I was drawn to the applications of modern animal behavior studies on the behavior patterns of the extinct dinosaurs. While it was awfully predictable (the red shirts were clearly identified from about chapter 3, and come on, a field scientist who LITTERS?...) and I got tired of Ian Malcolm's multiple-page-long diatribes (and got the funny feeling Michael Crichton envisioned himself as Malcol...more
Kyle Sheppard
Michael Crichton's, The Lost World: Jurassic Park, is written to inform readers about scientific theories. Crichton uses third person point of view to explain to the readers how science has changed from the past to the present in the areas of survival and extinction.

Throughout the story, the author develops a theme of respecting nature and life. Crichton makes the reader understand the ethics of modern science. Through plot development, he strives to make his readers understand that technology...more
Deslni01
Michael Crichton's The Lost World is an interesting piece of work. On the one hand, it is an exciting, page-gripping, edge of the seat thriller reminiscent of the first Jurassic Park novel. On the other hand, it is exactly that: reminiscent of the first Jurassic Park novel. In many ways, it is merely a rehash of the original. Ian Malcolm returns, as does Dodgson, there are other dinosaur and mammalian experts involved (of course, they are all considered the best in the world), and the story coul...more
Fizzgig76
Ian Malcolm is alive (!? don't ask) and goes to the mysterious Site B for Jurassic Park with some gung-ho people set of studying dinosaurs and plucky kids BUT they face dinosaurs and humans. Jurassic Park 2 (the movie) didn't use much of this book for its script...Having seen Jurassic Park 2 that would be a good thing one would think, but the book is possibly just as bad, if not worse for the fact that Crichton can write but chose to vomit up this story. The characters are flat, the action is ev...more
Dody Yw
Saya membaca buku ini setelah menonton versi filmnya. Cerita asli di buku ini jauh berbeda dengan yang ditampilkan di film. Jika dalam film bercerita tentang pemburuan dinosaurus oleh tim pemburu InGen pimpinan Peter Ludlow untuk dipindahkan ke lokasi baru Jurassic Park di San Diego, maka dalam cerita aslinya sama sekali tidak ada pemburu maupun aksi buru memburu dinosaurus.
Karakter antagonis di sini adalah Lewis Dodgson, yang tampil sepintas di seri pertama. Gagal mendapatkan embrio dinosaurus...more
CJ
Though this sequel to the beloved Jurassic Park takes a while to get going (and I mean a good quarter of the book is spent making the reader wonder if anything interesting is going to happen) this book does not disappoint once it does.

Professor Ian Malcolm who was believed to have been dead during the first novel teams up with a man named Richard Levine to go to a second island called Isla Sorna. Apparently experimentation with resurrecting dinosaurs happened on this island too called "Site B" a...more
Peter
Dec 16, 2012 Peter marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Amazon.com Review

Written in the wake of Jurassic Park's phenomenal box-office success, The Lost World seems as much a guidebook for Hollywood types hard at work on the franchise's followup as it is a legitimate sci-fi thriller. Which begs the inevitable questions: Is the plot a rehash of the first book? Sure it is, with the action unfolding on yet another secluded island, the mysterious "Site B." Is the cast of characters basically the same? Absolutely, from a freshly minted pair of cute, comp

...more
S
I really, really enjoyed Jurassic Park and couldn't wait to start the sequel and I wasn't disappointed. I have watched the films (a very long time ago) but the book is so much more.
The Lost World follows on from Jurassic Park. The main character this time is mathematician Ian Malcolm (who is the only character from the previous book. Along with him are a few new characters, Sarah Harding, Richard Levine, Kelly, Arby, Thorne, and Eddie. Malcolm and Levine attempt to track down an island where Lev...more
Lady
Malcolm, terrorised beyond belief by his experiences on Isla Nublar, decides that once is never enough and that it's high time he stopped, y'know, not almost dying all the time in his newly won civilian life. So he goes back to play amongst the dinosaurs. How'd he ever make it off Isla Nublar in the first place? It got bombed back to the Cretaceous period, and it is acknowledged in this puny follow-up to Jurassic Park that everything on the island was destroyed by said bombing, but Malcolm survi...more
Donovan
Unfortunately this didn't meet the bar compared to the first (as so many sequels fail to do). I got the distinct feeling that Crichton was pushed in to writing this rather than wanting to write it. He makes an effort though and in being fair, it is not too bad. There are some cheap plot-hole fixes, to make this compatible with Jurassic Park but you can probably push those aside. It is still mostly about dinosaurs chasing people and has too many similarities to the first novel.

Plot ***Spoilers***...more
Danny M
Dec 10, 2011 Danny M rated it 5 of 5 stars Recommends it for: Suspense and mystery readers
Recommended to Danny by: Read the presious novel.
This is the sequel to the novel Jurassic Park written by Michael Crichton. You should read Jurassic park before reading this book. Michael Crichton is a genius, and I always liked his novels. His books are filled with brilliant ideas and plenty of suspense. Michael Crichton does plenty of research in writing his novels and there is a mixture of truth and fiction in his writing. The novel Jurassic Park was one such idea that was brilliant and fascinating. The book was so good when Steven Spielber...more
Jenine
First off, I love the Jurassic Park series and have enjoyed all three movies. The first book was great and I have read it a few times already...but I have to say I was very disappointed in this book. Yes I saw the movie already but that in no way has any bearing on my lack of enthusiasm for this novel. I had good expectations for this book because of the first book and Michael Crighton's talent for writing. However I found little to enjoy from this book. The plot (whatever the plot is, I never g...more
Kenny
There’s no doubt that Michael Crichton is a genius, but his particular ability lies in conception, not execution. His books are always brilliant ideas less than brilliantly written. His style is often clunky and predictable, but his ideas . . . his ideas are golden.

Jurassic Park was one such idea, so wonderful and powerful that even Steven Spielberg could not much improve on it. The success of the movie owes a debt to the great setting, characters, and situations already present in the novel. Th...more
Lindsay
Michael Crichton has been one of my favorite authors for only a couple of years now, but I've been trying in that time to slowly work my way through all his novels. This book is the second part of the Jurassic Park story, and it's the only sequel Crichton ever wrote. It takes place six years after the events of JP, with mathematician Ian Malcolm as the main protagonist. He and Lewis Dodgson, the unscrupulous researcher from the Biosyn company, are the only two characters from JP to make an appea...more
Clementine
I feel the same way about this one that I did about Jurassic Park: it's fun and exciting, and basically does its job as a biological thriller, but it's not exactly high quality. The writing's not great, the science obviously doesn't hold up (like, uh, he referred to velociraptors as 2m tall Jurassic creatures when they were actually the size of a large-ish dog and lived during the Cretaceous), and the whole thing requires quite a lot of suspension of disbelief.

I mean, not just in terms of the sc...more
RaskolnikovRR
Gripping, thrilling and surely an engaging science fiction. This is a more like a series of the first book, Jurassic Park, but it's still okay if you read this straight off ( I did ). It has the enough of the back story to cover the previous one. Starting off with the mysterious appearances of these lizard-like creatures, scientists and bio-tech companies race to the island. The scientists are research oriented while the companies want to exploit the situation commercially.

Ian Malcolm is a re...more
Vicki Le Feuvre
Not that I am prone to speaking ill of Spielberg, but whatever calamitous decision led to him not having Michael Crichton co-write the screenplay of The Lost World alongside David Koepp as he did for the first Jurassic Park movie was obviously a big mistake.

In terms of plot, characterisation and carefully crafted atmosphere this novel is vastly superior to the movie that shares its name. Also there are a lot more raptors in it, which is just gravy.

Don’t get me wrong, I enjoyed watching a fully-g...more
Antof9
I read Jurassic Park about a million years ago, and I've always wanted to read this one. Neither of them is really "my" kind of book, but they do hold some fascination for me, in their own little ways. And I have to say, this one didn't disappoint! When I started this, I couldn't even remember the movie, but by the time I got to the part where they splint the baby raptor's leg, I could picture the whole scene! The best part? As intense as the movie was at that point, the book did it better!

(Don'...more
Stephen
Pretty decent sequel to Jurassic Park, though it does seem like Michael Crichton just stuck 2 kids in to either up the stakes and make us feel more invested, or he's a formulaic hack who can't figure out another way to create that emotion. This sequel sees Ian Malcolm reprise his role as cynic and chaos expert, and exploring Site B, the dinosaur factory that produced the adult specimens in the first book. There's a lot of backstory that is explored through some really forced exposition and an en...more
Jenna Watt
Starting out reading this book I had high expectations. I was told this was better than the first one. Well those people must not have been readers because this book was not nearly as good as the first. I was looking for action and fun but mostly this was a 'how dinosaurs were when they lived' book. All the action started at the end of the book and thats where i started to get the feel of the first one.

the descriptions of certain dinosaurs were very well written, and i could see them clearly.

I...more
Rebecca Anderson
‘The Lost World’ is proof that the sequels can be better than the originals, grown ups can still love dinosaurs, and even the most rigid reader can indulge in a little adventure. Michael Crichton returns to the world he originally introduced to us through Jurassic Park with new vigor. The sequel to the famous dino-zoo thriller may have blown its prequel out of the water. With more likable characters, more blood and grit, and more scientific spark, this is a must read for adventure fans.

‘Somethin...more
Dennis Troy
Jurassic Park was no doubt worthy of a continuation, unfortunately The Lost World will not hold the same interest as the first novel did. While the story is not totally flat--it had its moments--it just can not worthy of the name Jurassic Park.

Before I begin a basic plot analysis, it is worth mentioning that the this story should not be compared with the movie in any way. Other than some same characters and very basic storylines, the movie takes it's own direction--unlike in the film Jurassic Pa...more
Alazzar
I liked Jurassic Park so much when I read it 2 years ago that I gave it 5 stars. The Lost World, however, I was unable to finish.

I’ve often said in the past that I don’t mind weak characterization so long as the plot is engaging enough to compensate for it. Apparently, I was wrong.

This book is about dinosaurs. I, like most human males, wanted to be a paleontologist when I was a kid. To this day, I’m still certain that dinosaurs are objectively awesome. So, we had a strong plot element already.

B...more
Brandy Eggleston
After reading Jurassic Park, I kept putting off starting (and then finishing after I had finally started reading) The Lost World, simply because I didn't want the dinosaur fun to end. I still feel that way after finishing the book. I enjoyed Michael Crichton's sequel to Jurassic Park, very much. Admittedly, I think I liked the first one a bit more but that doesn't mean that I didn't enjoy The Lost World any less. I can't help but wish for more of the Jurassic Park/Lost World story, though I know...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Which was better: Book or Movie? 24 91 Apr 05, 2013 06:46am  
The Lost World (Paperback)
The Lost World (Hardcover)
The Lost World (Paperback)
The Lost World (Kindle Edition)
The Lost World (Paperback)

5194
Michael Crichton was an American author, film producer, film director, and television producer. His books sold over 150 million copies world wide, and among his best-known works were techno-thriller novels, films and television programs. His works were usually based on the action genre and heavily feature technology. Many of his future history novels had medical or scientific underpinnings, reflec...more
More about Michael Crichton...
Jurassic Park (Jurassic Park, #1) The Andromeda Strain Timeline Sphere Congo

Share This Book

Your website
“What makes you think human beings are sentient and aware? There's no evidence for it. Human beings never think for themselves, they find it too uncomfortable. For the most part, members of our species simply repeat what they are told-and become upset if they are exposed to any different view. The characteristic human trait is not awareness but conformity, and the characteristic result is religious warfare. Other animals fight for territory or food; but, uniquely in the animal kingdom, human beings fight for their 'beliefs.' The reason is that beliefs guide behavior which has evolutionary importance among human beings. But at a time when our behavior may well lead us to extinction, I see no reason to assume we have any awareness at all. We are stubborn, self-destructive conformists. Any other view of our species is just a self-congratulatory delusion. Next question.” 219 people liked it
“All your life people will tell you things. And most of the time, probably ninety-five percent of the time, what they'll tell you will be wrong.” 82 people liked it
More quotes…