Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Only Revolutions” as Want to Read:
Only Revolutions
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Only Revolutions

3.19  ·  Rating Details ·  4,656 Ratings  ·  485 Reviews
Librarian's Note: this is an alternate cover edition - ISBN 10: 0375421769. This is a Review Copy.

Mark Danielewski's first novel House of Leaves is a cult-favorite--experimental horror fiction in a gorgeous (and newly remastered) full-color package. His new book Only Revolutions takes the experiment 10 steps further in a story about teenage lovers Hailey and Sam: the book
Paperback, Review Copy, 360 pages
Published September 12th 2006 by Pantheon
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Only Revolutions, please sign up.

Popular Answered Questions

Kayla We live in a cold, cold universe, so it's either punishment for some collective sin, or a particularly unfortunate natural accident.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Howdy there, O happy reader!
It is of the utmost
and most sincerest importance
that you understand
what kind of adventure
you will bestow upon your self
by undertaking and reaping
the novel that HOUSE OF LEAVES'
very own Mark Z. Danielewski has sown.

Sam and Hailey and Hailey and Sam
are two star-crossed lovers
driving across America and
through time as their love
blossoms and grows and yet
so do the country and times
they invade most irreparably.

It is the ambition and the bravery
that makes this labyrinthian p
Oct 28, 2009 Michelle rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Aug 08, 2007 Adam rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Pre-teen boys desperate to feel like they're deep
This book was like a cross between Da Vinci Code and something by Palahniuk. And I mean that in the most insulting way possible.

The summaries and reviews I read before getting the book had all focused on how it's the same story about two people told from each of their perspectives. Therefore, I hoped going in that it would have some interesting and thought-provoking juxtapositions.

There were no interesting juxtapositions. When reading one character's take on a situation, the question was not in
Feb 21, 2007 Amber rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: people with ritalin handy
I really wanted to like this book as I LOVED House of Leaves, and furthermore, I wanted to be the elitist one that could espouse, "ohhhh, you didn't like it??? well, it was a difficult boooook..."


I just didn't like it. I mean, I get the concept. I get the format, I get the epic quality.... but I think the entire thing could have been done in half the length with twice the impact. After a while the "flip the book" gimmick because almost unbearable as I would get distracted and forget in which
Nathan "N.R." Gaddis
Mar 27, 2012 Nathan "N.R." Gaddis marked it as partial-credit  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2015-gelesen
Alright. That's enough. Page 113 (from each end). Were I to finish it, it would be merely pro forma.

So but anyway. If you're even in the least bit curious about his book, this object of the book designers' trade, probably not so much the novelists' trade(?), then my own very personal suggestion would be that ; lieber to be curious about either Larva: A Midsummer Night's Babel or Zettels Traum. Seriously.

On the other hand, all best wishes to those who've made Only Revolutiions a meaningful work
I have learned that something can be structurally interesting and yet completely unappealing. I read about 24 pages each direction before I realised that reading more would be a chore and not worth my time.
Feb 04, 2010 Stevie rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: dustbunnied
I dont mind working to read a book. I loved "House of Leaves" and I dont mind being a bit 'lost' in a book - Umberto Eco's "Focault's Pendulum" was a truly difficult read that required work to read and research to fully comprehend. But this one... lost me WAY before it could hook me.

I don't mind the gimmick, really. "House of Leaves" was gimmicky - but it had a great story, an interesting story, a story that sucked you in and kept you reading, and turning, and looking, and puzzling. "Only Revol
Jun 15, 2007 secondwomn rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2007, fiction
reread: may 14, 2011-

(1/1/07): the best book i've read in a while is now out in paperback and as an audio book and mzd has announced his fall tour. what better time to update my review of this gorgeous, personal, political work? plus, who doesn't love a book that so prominently features american cars and asks to be read like a steering wheel?

only revolutions succeeds at a nigh-impossible feat: it is a modern epic poem. it is a novel. a love story. a history. a myth. it is lewis carroll, jack ker
Jan 25, 2008 Matthew rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Oh, what a gimmick! Two stories, sharing the page, meeting at page 180, and continuing on to page 360 where the ending of each story is also the beginning of the next. If you follow the publisher's recommendation, you'll turn the book over every eight pages to weave the two stories together. There's different colored ink, puns and riffs that would make Joyce jealous, and a list of dates in the sidebar that serves as a kind of Cliff's Notes of American History. It's all very exciting and exhausti ...more
Dec 20, 2008 Paul added it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2007
Zero stars. That's right. Zero of them. This is the worst book I've ever read. It was appallingly bad. Again, it was the worst book I have ever read.

Here's my longer review of it:

Writing by Numbers:
Mark Danielewski’s Only Revolutions

The age-old love-struck teenaged social pariah theme gets a new spin in Only Revolutions, Mark Z. Danielewski’s latest meretricious undertaking. Told by two sixteen-year-olds, Hailey and Sam, the book begins from both ends, “allowing” the reader to flip it over every
Erin Beck
Apr 25, 2008 Erin Beck rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
I’m on the bus for 2 hours a day. It’s where I do all of my reading. It’s like being in the bathroom and reading the back of shampoo bottles – Almost anything is better than just looking out the window – But not this book.

I really wanted to like Only Revolutions. I thought the idea was great. The same story told from the male and female perspective. You read 8 pages of the male side then flip the book over and read 8 pages of the female side.

But I thought I would be reading prose - not an epic
Mar 03, 2008 M rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I think I'm one of very few people actually set up to love this book. Obtuse pointless internal rhymes, a romp through history for some vague reason hanging on the Kennedy assassination as fulcrum, an obsessive parallelism as metaphor for love, a total overstuffing of reference as a way of talking about Americanness, and a bunch of Finnegans Wake references--yes, this is one of those things where taste is defined by what kinds of silliness you'll tolerate.

But for me, anyway, it's like reading a
Mar 21, 2007 M rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
An epic poem, told from the point of view of two people, with lots of annotation and other Danielewski tricks anyone who read the interesting, if flawed, 'House of Leaves' will be familiar with. When I read this book I felt like it would probably be good for me to finish it, like eating Cheerios or Wheaties, but that's not why I read books (as a general rule). It's also supposed to be read 10 pages at a time, from each protagonist's point of view, and that definitely got annoying after about pag ...more
Alex V.
Feb 03, 2008 Alex V. rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
I think a lot of people pick up Finnegan's Wake and fall in love with the perverse but precise architecture of that book and figure, "shit, I can do that."

Well, they can't.

I positively adore Danielewski's House of Leaves equally for its compelling structure and the stories stretched up on those frames, but this one is all stretcher and no canvas. It's a he-said she said, both stories glind through the book, upside down from each other. The letter O appears in green everywhere in the book. The fo
Apr 30, 2010 Colin rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Seriously literate people who enjoy a challenge, or people who cherish odd books
Shelves: four-star
Make no mistake about it--this book is *not* for everyone. Even those who managed to conquer Danielewski's House of Leaves (or at least finish it--conquering it is perhaps another matter altogether), may find themselves ultimately beaten or annoyed by Only Revolutions. Taking structural formalism to an extreme, Danielewski weaves the story of two seemingly immortal and un-aging sixteen year old kids, Hailey and Sam, as they trek across the United States on the run from the enigmatic character Th ...more
May 08, 2007 J rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
An incredible reading experience that works more as a novelistic slam poem than a typical novel. Danielewski creates two timeless characters whose youth never dies as their love continues to grow. Written in perfect rhythm and pace, reading the book outloud adds to the experience. The movements of the words and the power of Danielewski's language could be dampened by just looking at the book and letting it work interiorly. However, by saying the words, the story is brought to life even more to l ...more
Nate D
Sep 22, 2007 Nate D rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: post-modernism
America, its history, its ideals, as quadraphonic epic poetry. Extremely ambitious and probably brilliant, but I'm not exactly up to the task of determining this for myself. The one real complaint I feel fairly up to making is that unlike, say, Pynchon, where the references echo, riff off of, and bolster the content, here there virtually is no content outside the references. I'm not even convinced that all the references refer to anything at all. The design, however, is utterly gorgeous.

Or maybe
Dec 11, 2007 Brendan rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This read like a dream. It was confusing, then clear and then confusing again. The story seemed to inch, jut, and leap forward, and then with a flip of the book an instant replay revealed a different perspective.

I loved Danielewski's use of two voices to tell a story. His understanding of the two main characters and their insatiable need for each other showcased the madness of love in a remarkable form of suggestion, saturation and passion.

I was often confused and amazed by the intricacies, la
Max Nemtsov
Ну что, с одной стороны ничего нового, с другой — эксперименты хороши в свое время. Читая Данилевски, вспоминаешь «симюльтэн» — симультанизм Анри-Мартена Барзана (его «Эпоха драмы, 1912) и его последователей (хотя как посмотреть, многие считают — сверстников) Робера Делоне и прочих. Блэз Сандрар с его транссибирским путешествием в придачу. Те тоже — 100 лет назад — раскрашивали буквы разными красками, жонглировали шрифтами и шрифтовыми композициями. Выдавать экзерсисы Данилевски за новое слово в ...more
Nov 17, 2008 Darrell rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: reviewed
After Danielewski's first novel House of Leaves, my expectations were high for Only Revolutions. Unfortunately, I was severely disappointed.

The book is about two young lovers, Sam and Hailey, who each tell their own side of the story (you flip the book upside down to switch between their viewpoints.) Their story takes the form of a poem, with arbitrary line breaks and indentation, puns, inconsistent rhyme, alliteration, intentionally misspelled words, made-up words, and so forth.

It's an interest
I've been thinking about this book for days. What would I rate it and why. I'm not even sure that it's 3 worthy? Maybe 2 1/2? (finally settled on a 2) I know for a fact this might turn into less of a review and more of theories I have about this book.

The love story between two sixteen year olds, Sam & Hailey.

This book was sitting in the FREE section at a local used book store. And, hey, free is free. So I double checked that it wasn't a mistake because the paperback was going for $12/used an
Jan 04, 2014 Sam rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
House of Leaves was and still is one of my favorite books when I read it around ten years ago. The House was my introduction to postmodernism, metafiction and ergodic literature; and while it took me an embarrasingly long time to make even a sliver of sense of that behemoth, I still fondly remember countless summer days spent with Johnny Truant, Zampanò and Will Navidson.

I read The Fifty Year Sword in 2013 - still in love with Danielewski's concepts, even if the quintiphonic ghost-story itself w
Apr 25, 2013 Jill rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Exactly halfway through this book, my opinion of it changed completely.

Up to that point, I wasn't enjoying it. I was tired, as I am always tired, of arrogant adolescents getting into misadventures, scampering about having sex and consuming exorbitant amounts of drugs (aside: when you teach high school, glamorous nostalgia for the teenage years kinda loses ANY AND ALL power). I was irritated with the writing style -- choppy sentences and constant references to wildlife (what? I still don't get th
Rachel Chamberlain
This book is somewhat irksome...not for reasons pertaining to its "prosetry," rotating, double reading, etc; but because I really want to like this book, but can't quite bring myself to give it a sterling review. I liked the themes, and the concept -- tying together American history with flora and fauna with rebellion, youth, travelling cross country, sex, minorities, love, written to show how these things revolve around each other, work upon each other, and are even ingrained within not only th ...more
Jenny (Reading Envy)
Reading this book was like an acid trip, or being schizophrenic. It is the story of two 16 year olds, Sam and Hailey. They are timeless, and they are on a road trip, and they are in love. It is written in some type of... prose? I don't know what to call it. It's not like a regular story. The stories start from opposite sides of the book, and you read 8 pages of a time, then flip it, then read 8 pages, then flip it. Each pair of 8 pages retells the same story. I noticed some parts of the story th ...more
May 26, 2008 Jeeyun rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
this is one of those books that i desperately wanted to love. i wanted to praise it and find it a place deep in my heart, but at the end of the day... it's like the middle child of the brood, you know? sorry honey, you're just not my favorite kid. mommy doesn't love you. one of these days you were going to grow up and find out so why not just own up now. (oh, that and you're adopted.)

No but seriously. it's wonderful in concept: some sort of elliptical, intertwining he-said/she-said love story ta
Aug 09, 2009 Susan rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: ugh
Clever in concept; awful in execution. The characters are as thin as the gimmicks are thick. Revolvings devolve into revolting. Only Revolutions can't really make up its mind what it is -- bad fiction or bad poetry -- circling tediously from cartoon to pornography to B-movie dialogue to quest narrative (though what is sought is never made clear and I use "narrative" losely), to alternative and parallel worlds. The idea of a book that can be read in both directions has potential and the flip-book ...more
Jun 23, 2013 Liz rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 21st-century, fiction
Oh, God. This book.
It's not a 3, it's a 1 and a 5 at once. It's brilliantly conceived, wonderfully executed, covering a depth and breadth of...I don't know what only made possible by the advent of the internet.
And I kinda hated it.
I mentioned by Danielewski's other book that whether you love or hate House of Leaves depends on how much you accept the gimmick.
I couldn't this time around. I just could get beyond the gimmick.
In terms of discussion and wonder and exploration, this is a great book to
Aug 16, 2010 Hadrian rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: fiction
Not nearly as impressive as House of Leaves. Some neat ideas, but most were gimmicky. I may try to tackle this again later.
Mar 29, 2017 Jesse rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
So I finally got around to tackling this book (or more like letting it tackle me) - and I must say this is definitely NOT a book for everyone. By that I mean that the book itself is conceived, structured, designed, and executed in a way that purposefully insulates - creating a sort or ring or sphere around the work (which means that it requires much work on the reader to find a way in). That said - history itself creeps in and there are amazing faint echoes and allusions that resound from the ch ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Weird question on how to read it 6 341 May 26, 2011 01:45AM  
This book 1 75 Apr 29, 2008 10:19AM  
  • Angel Dust Apocalypse
  • A Frolic of His Own
  • Wrong
  • Holy Skirts: A Novel of a Flamboyant Woman Who Risked All for Art
  • A Greater Monster
  • Demon Theory
  • You Bright and Risen Angels
  • Sunnyside
  • Plowing the Dark
  • Dermaphoria
  • Take Five
  • Plus
  • Click
  • Anatomy Courses
  • You Shall Never Know Security
  • A Gravity's Rainbow Companion: Sources and Contexts for Pynchon's Novel
  • This Is Not a Novel
  • The Raw Shark Texts
Mark Z. Danielewski is an American author best known for his books House of Leaves, Only Revolutions, The Fifty Year Sword, and The Familiar series.

Danielewski studied English Literature at Yale. He then decided to move to Berkeley, California, where he took a summer program in Latin at the University of California, Berkeley. He also spent time in Paris, preoccupied mostly with writing.

In the ear
More about Mark Z. Danielewski...

Share This Book

“We're the unmended, the untended,
cold soldiers of the shoe. We're the neglected,
the never resurrected, agonies of the few.
We're the once kissed, unmissed and always
refused. Because we're the unfinished
and feared and we're never pursued.

And just that easily, on my behalf,
I come around. Because I'm burning.
The beast of War feeds only on the meats of War.
And now I'm for carnage.
Here's how my anguish frees.
Destroy everyone of course. Because I'm unwanted
and unsafe. And I'll take tears away with torments and rape,
killings and fears not even the dead will escape.
Encircling the Guilty, Ashamed, Blameless and
Enslaved. Absolved. Butchering their prejudice.

Patience. Their Value. Because I'm without value.
I'm the coming of every holocaust. Turning no lost.
Rending tissue, sinew and bone. Excepting no suffering.
By me all levees will break. All silos heave.
I will walk heavy.
And I will walk strange.

Because I am too soon.
Because without Her, I am only revolutions
Of ruin.

Because I am too soon.
Because without You, I am only revolutions
Of ruin.

I'm the prophecy prophecies pass.
Why need dies at last.
How oceans dry. Islands drown.
And skies of salt crash to the ground.
I turn the powerful. Defy the weak.
Only grass grows down abandoned streets.

For a greater economy shall follow Us
and it will be undone.
And a greater autonomy shall follow Us
and it too will be undone.
And a greater feeling shall follow Love
and it too we will blow to dust.
For I am longings without trust. The cycloidal haste
freedom from Hailey forever wastes.
Dust cares for only dust.
And time only for Us.

Because I am too soon.
Because without Her, I am only revolutions
Of ruin.

Because I am too soon.
Because without You, I am only revolutions
Of ruin.

We are always sixteen...”
“I will walk heavy, and I will walk strange.” 48 likes
More quotes…