Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Dhalgren” as Want to Read:
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview


3.82 of 5 stars 3.82  ·  rating details  ·  5,332 ratings  ·  569 reviews
In Dhalgren, perhaps one of the most profound and bestselling science fiction novels of all time, Samuel R. Delany has produced a novel "to stand with the best American fiction of the 1970s" (Jonathan Lethem).

Bellona is a city at the dead center of the United States. Something has happened there…. The population has fled. Madmen and criminals wander the streets. Strange po
Paperback, 801 pages
Published May 15th 2001 by Vintage (first published December 28th 1974)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Dhalgren, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Dhalgren

Ender's Game by Orson Scott CardDune by Frank Herbert1984 by George OrwellFahrenheit 451 by Ray BradburyBrave New World by Aldous Huxley
Best Science Fiction & Fantasy Books
166th out of 5,074 books — 17,464 voters
Ulysses by James JoyceFinnegans Wake by James JoyceThe Sound and the Fury by William FaulknerMoby-Dick; or, The Whale by Herman MelvilleGravity's Rainbow by Thomas Pynchon
Most Difficult Novels
52nd out of 331 books — 1,570 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Michael Alexander
Jun 05, 2007 Michael Alexander rated it 5 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: pomos, queer theorists, 60s counterculture obsessees, open minded SF fans, joycean techno-dreamers
This book is a whole world, part of the constellation of works that help me navigate my intellectual life. It's about the 60s, but it's also about metafiction, about solitude, and about that strange feeling when the dull and the surreal merge (late, late at night. when life has gotten one step too strange. when one more trudge down the street puts you into a reverie where you feel utterly lost).

In it, a nameless guy with a faulty memory (that's why he's nameless--though otherwise his recall is e
Dhalgren is a terrible work of genius. By that, I mean that the mechanical writing of the text is brilliant and falls into the category of masterpiece. It is also a terribly dull read.

The structure of the novel is amazing: the narrative loops, the integration of mythology, the accurate portrayal of psychosis, the dazzling postmodern language, etc. Absolutely stunning work.

Of course, the characters are unbelievably boring, the story is filled with lots of meaningless babble with no action, no on
Whatever request for complicity, in whatever labyrinth of despair, it made of the listener, whatever demand for relief from situations which were by definition unrelievable, these requests, these demands could only be made of the very new to such labyrinths, such situations. And time, even as he munched flat bread, was erasing that status.

Today, however, art is about the only thing that can redeem religion, and the clerics will never forgive us that.
When the canon comes crumbling down, who wil
to wound the autumnal city ... I have come to

Dhalgren is the
Unreal City
Under the brown fog of a winter noon

—TS Elliot
This is a difficult book to review, difficult to put one's thought's and feelings into words, the written word is perhaps insufficient to the task (a meme of this novel, I think). Following are some random thoughts.

Overall I found it engaging, for reasons I cannot express; I was compelled to get back to reading, as compelled, perhaps as The Kid was to writing.

I read Dhalgren fr
Dhalgren, by Samuel R Delany, has been my favorite book since I first read it in 1979. I have read it twice more since then and every time I've read it I got something different out of it. I've given the book away as gifts to several people but I don't think any of them appreciated it (oh well).

I recommend that y'all go to Amazon and read some of the reviews of Dhalgren there. It is interesting to read the long positive reviews by the "smart" people and it's also a laugh to read the negative rev
May 03, 2007 Ben rated it 5 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: the adventurous and not-easily-frustrated
Shelves: favorites
It's tough to review a favorite book, especially when it's a book that almost completely changed the way you view literature. But I suppose it's worth a shot.

Dhalgren is a glorious mess, but that's not to say that it lacks structure. In fact, I wrote my senior thesis in undergrad on the narrative structure of the novel, and upon close examination it's stunning just how carefully put together the whole thing is. Everyone knows that it's an imperfectly closed loop, but few really understand how De
*Available from KOBOBOOKS

I think this is a brilliant novel and I hated every moment I spent with it.

I struggled to get through this. Part of that was due to my own neuroses: I now know that I find vivid descriptions of dirty, smelly people who haven’t bathed for days having sex very very offputting. Part of that was due to the fact that, as many reviewers have already noted, nothing really happens in the novel. Incidents occur but by and large the plot rambles all over the place.

Delany appare
I read a lot of Samuel R. Delany's sci-fi when I was young, and all the way up through "Einstein Intersection" (aka "A Fabulous, Formless Darkness") and "Nova", I loved his work. Yet...somewhere around "Triton" he went badly off the rails. The same kind of thing happened to Piers Anthony and Roger Zelazny, but it their cases it was simply the lure of quick, large paychecks for Bad Fantasy Novels. Delany...fell into another trap. He positioned himself as the face of Black Queer High-Lit Quasi-Pol ...more
Sentimental Surrealist
Apr 11, 2015 Sentimental Surrealist rated it 5 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: people who need sci-fi to believe in
Recommended to Sentimental Surrealist by: the jacket flap, Aubrey's enthusiasm
Shelves: doorstopper
Let us now, so as to avoid the dreaded trap of "well let's not think too hard about what we read, let's just read fun books and have fun with them," confront the issue of sci-fi. The issue of sci-fi, to my vision, looks a little like this. Sci-fi fans claim that it's an unfairly marginalized genre, especially when compared to more serious literature. Indeed, works by Philip K. Dick, William Gibson, Ursula K. Le Guin, Kurt Vonnegut, and others (ignore the overwhelming dudeliness of these names at ...more
I struggled with this book, and I understand how polarizing such an experimental piece of literature can be. But somewhere along the trip something clicked right for me and I'm thinking now this is probably the best novel to come out of the flower-power movement. It captures the rejecton of consummer society, the free love craziness, the drug experiments, the confusion and the open doors of perception that seemed more important at the time than the bourgeoise conformism of an older genration.

Nate D
Feb 27, 2015 Nate D rated it 5 of 5 stars
Recommended to Nate D by: Kate, Lucy

This might turn out to be one of those reviews I write over and over.

Perhaps such a novel -- equal parts fine-focused lens, social/personal mirror, and harshly distorting prism -- just demands this endless rethinking.

So what is Dhalgren?

It is a deft cultural analysis, part perfectly current, part more dated 60s/70s scrutiny that is nonetheless perceptive and interesting.

It is a probing of time and perception laid out in dilating asymptotic fade contracting sudden into action. Or perhaps
Probably 2.5 stars....

There is a lot going on in this novel—lots of references to mythology, I think there are deliberate parallels to Joyce’s Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, and a lot of exploration of what it means to be an artist and to live an artistic life.

Our unnamed protagonist begins the adventure when he encounters (and has sex with) a woman who turns into a tree, a dryad. It is she who ensures that he receives the chains that will mark him as special in the place where he is goi
Jenny (Reading Envy)
First attempt: Will write longer review later.

"Sometimes when I don’t understand - or even when I do, I just wanna fuckin’ cry, you know?" (pg. 615)


Second attempt: Let's see if I can make heads or tails about my thoughts on this book. First you should go read articles on i09 and Tor (Jo Walton) about why you should read this book.

The i09 article quotes Jeff VanderMeer who says that reading it is a lot of work, and sometimes we don't like to work. He also says Dhalgren "signaled a marshaling
I finished this book this morning, and I just haven't managed to find the words to write a proper review. I still can't quite decide between 3, 4, or 5 stars. I started re-reading the first few pages when I finished, and just now read some more of the book - this time at random places in the text.

I don't know what I expected when I started this, but purposely didn't get excited since the whole science fiction genre and I are so hit-or-miss most of the time. I also heard this is like the science
Ruediger Landmann
When a book includes a passage like:

Upstairs a woman was laughing, and the laughter grew, ghter grew, laughter: “Stop it! Stop it will you?” in Mr Richards’ harsh voice. “Just stop it.” op it, ghter grew ew.

and you have no immediate way of knowing whether it’s an OCR error when the ebook was put together, a typesetting error when the original printed book was put together, or whether it was meant to say that, you know you’re dealing with no ordinary text.[1]

Dhalgren is a long, cryptic, and weird
Ben Babcock
I tend to read books one at a time in quick succession. I have to, for the same reason I am so assiduous in writing reviews: I have a poor memory for these types of details. However, every so often I'll have a "project" book that takes me weeks or months to read, in parallel with my other books. I tend to do this with lengthy anthologies; I've been doing it with the Iliad. In retrospect, Dhalgren would have made a good project book. It's lengthy and difficult to read, and if I had invested the t ...more
Mar 26, 2008 Dan rated it 3 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: fans of sci-fi literature who I'm not worried will think I'm a pervert
Recommended to Dan by: Chris
I read this book because my home boy Buer from high school recommended it. And then my old roomie Jimbo gave me his copy of this book at his wedding. The conversation went like this:

Me: "I'll get this back to you when I'm done reading it."
Jim: "That won't be necessary. I never want to see this book again."

Quite ominous... The copy of the book I read had a forward by William Gibson. He is one of my favorite authors, and he cited this book as one of his favorites. So now, this book has a Buer and
No. No no no. What? No.

Get a second shoe. Take a shower. Stop sleeping with everyone. Simultaneously.
Jenia Sukhan
The greatest literary litmus test of the 20th century, Dhalgren is not simply "not for everyone" (read: pretentious) - it is a work of poor, lazy, and ultimately insulting craftsmanship.

Story, structure, characters, clarity be damned, the prose at least was supposed to be spectacular. One-of-a-kind. If nothing else did it for me in this alleged "love it or hate it" novel, the language, at least, should have left me in awe. What I found inside was a heinous and uninspired repetition of images, i
Simon Fay
Dhalgren, a book with a reputation that precedes it...kind of. More on that in a moment.

The book is more of an experience than a story. For me, it was a memorable and mixed affair I'm happy to have had but also happy to move on from. For others it's one they'll return to again and again trying to understand exactly what it was they read. In a way this echoes what the protagonist of the book goes through. If you do intend to read it I would try to go into it knowing as little about it as possible
Wow. Either there is a fictional Midwestern city, Bellona, where some sort of environmental disaster has occurred and now space-time there is in flux, or there was a disaster in said city and the narrator has escaped from a psychiatric hospital and we experience things through his perspective. The narrator in question can’t remember his name, but chances upon moniker “the Kid.” Also seemingly falling to place-time is Kid’s emergence within the half-abandoned city as its de facto poet laureate an ...more
Stephanie Sun
to reconstruct the autumnal city. The city is Bellona. The time is not too long after man has landed on the moon.

Structured like a simultaneously left- and right-facing Necker cube, Dhalgren is not your mom’s Great American Novel.
The ambiguous Necker cube
"...the moon and something called George…”

Not just because of the sex, drugs, and discordant harmonica that Delany recounts with fondness, humor, and the occasional eye-popping detail, but also because this is a book that knows that it’s a book. In fact, this is a ver
I just don't know.

So, picture Lost meets Burning Man. Seriously. Imagine a bunch of bohemian hippie types having lots of sex in a weirdly cut-off place that has weird phenomenon and is out-of-time. Not like time's run out, but weird stuff happening with time itself.

Can't picture it?

Also, you should throw in a bit of:
Wizard of Oz (for the man-behind-the-curtain)
The Postman (for the lone-wolf lead character who becomes legend)
Fight Club (for the violence)
And some more books/stories/movies that thr
It is difficult to approach a book as widely praised and remarked upon as Dhalgren.

The cover has quotes from William Gibson and Jonathan Lethem, for God's sake. Luxurious praise surrounds the work like a corona: It's baffling, prescient, postmodern, premodern, an enigma, a sexual challenge, and on and on.

Many reviews compare it to David Foster Wallace, or Borges, in terms of length and circular structure.

So, in short, I came to the work with many preconceptions.

What I admire, is that Dhalgren
Vit Babenco
Philosophy and anarchy, apocalypse and heresy, disarray and creativity: such is a universe of Dhalgren.
“Clouds out of control decoct anticipation. What use can any of us have for two moons? The miracle of order has run out and I am left in an unmiraculous city where anything may happen.”
A city of chaos and entropy is an ideal place for a daydreamer – the lack of reality provides a perfect freedom to dream.
I had never heard of this book, or read anything by Delany before but a friend of mine asked if I would be interested in reading it for a book club. I did some investigating and saw that it had "difficult prose" and "wasn't really sci-fi" so decided I would either love or hate it and give it a try. Thankfully I ended up loving it. This was a post-apocalyptic beat book. The guy arrived in town and went around talking to everyone and writing poetry. It was the least violent or dangerous post-apoca ...more
Sep 17, 2007 Chris rated it 4 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: Serious SF or Modernist Lit Readers
It's a tough call as to whether this is a 4 or 5 star book (rating things in such restrictive terms is hard enough to begin with...). While this book does have some flaws, it is nonetheless a remarkable meditation on a multitude of themes and has many passages of absolutely amazing prose. The first page contains one of my favorite paragraphs written in English. It is also the quintessential example of the application of techniques of (high) modernism to SF material.

The Kid(d) and Ernest Newboy,
J.M. Hushour
Philip K. Dick famously threw this book at the wall after reading 361 pages. I read about 300 and couldn't stand another page, so Phil is one up on me. Don't get me wrong, I seriously love me some goddamn meta- speculative fiction/what-have-you. I consider Pynchon to be the pinnacle of American literature and "Gravity's Rainbow" (to which Dhalgren is often compared) one of the great American novels. This book is nothing like that. It's a meandering, dull and crappily written novel-that-is-the-no ...more
I passionately hated this book. The additional star is for some neat Greco-Roman allusions, but that's pretty much the only saving grace. This book has been called a "riddle that was never meant to be solved" and that pretty much sums up what makes it so awful. It's stream of consciousness drivel without a consistent direction. It is Joyce without the writing skill and Keats without the poetry. In short, you've been warned.
2.5 stars. While I appreciate what Delany was doing here I just really didn't enjoy this book. There were parts in the middle that I hated. I did like the last part. The experimental nature of that made it kind of fun to read. Not sorry I read it but happy to be done with it.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
  • The Long Tomorrow
  • 334
  • The Female Man
  • Greybeard
  • Star Maker
  • Floating Worlds
  • Engine Summer
  • Arslan
  • Drowning Towers
  • Life During Wartime
  • Riddley Walker
  • Midnight Robber
  • Viriconium
  • Pavane
  • Her Smoke Rose Up Forever
  • The Child Garden
  • The Complete Roderick
  • R.U.R. & War with the Newts
Samuel Ray Delany, also known as "Chip," is an award-winning American science fiction author. He was born to a prominent black family on April 1, 1942, and raised in Harlem. His mother, Margaret Carey Boyd Delany, was a library clerk in the New York Public Library system. His father, Samuel Ray Delany, Senior, ran a successful Harlem undertaking establishment, Levy & Delany Funeral Home, on 7t ...more
More about Samuel R. Delany...
Babel-17 Nova The Einstein Intersection Stars in My Pocket Like Grains of Sand Babel-17/Empire Star

Share This Book

“You meet a new person, you go with him and suddenly you get a whole new go down new streets, you see houses you never saw before, pass places you didn't even know were there. Everything changes.” 81 likes
“But I realized something. About art. And psychiatry. They're both self-perpetuating systems. Like religion. All three of them promise you a sense of inner worth and meaning, and spend a lot of time telling you about the suffering you have to go through to achieve it. As soon as you get a problem in any one of them, the solution it gives is always to go deeper into the same system. They're all in rather uneasy truce with one another in what's actually a mortal battle. Like all self-reinforcing systems. At best, each is trying to encompass the other two and define them as sub-groups. You know: religion and art are both forms of madness and madness is the realm of psychiatry. Or, art is the study and praise of man and man's ideals, so therefore a religious experience just becomes a brutalized aesthetic response and psychiatry is just another tool for the artist to observe man and render his portraits more accurately. And the religious attitude I guess is that the other two are only useful as long as they promote the good life. At worst, they all try to destroy one another. Which is what my psychiatrist, whether he knew it or not, was trying, quite effectively, to do to my painting. I gave up psychiatry too, pretty soon. I just didn't want to get all wound up in any systems at all.” 33 likes
More quotes…