Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Three New Deals: Reflections on Roosevelt's America, Mussolini's Italy, and Hitler's Germany, 1933-1939” as Want to Read:
Three New Deals: Reflections on Roosevelt's America, Mussolini's Italy, and Hitler's Germany, 1933-1939
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

Three New Deals: Reflections on Roosevelt's America, Mussolini's Italy, and Hitler's Germany, 1933-1939

3.41 of 5 stars 3.41  ·  rating details  ·  71 ratings  ·  14 reviews
From a world-renowned cultural historian, an original look at the hidden commonalities among Fascism, Nazism, and the New Deal

Today Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal is regarded as the democratic ideal, the positive American response to an economic crisis that propelled Germany and Italy toward Fascism. Yet in the 1930s, shocking as it may seem, these regimes were hardl
...more
ebook, 256 pages
Published April 1st 2007 by Metropolitan Books (first published 2006)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Three New Deals, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Three New Deals

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 151)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Lauren Albert
Fascinating and surprising comparison of the administrations of Roosevelt, Mussolini and Hitler. Remember, as the author writes, quoting someone else "to compare is not the same as to equate." Schivelbusch is comparing some very specific features of the administrations including their promotion of large, even grandiose, public works projects, their use of propaganda and social pressure to create "voluntary compulsion" as he writes, and their skill at seeming to be addressing the "common man."

"T
...more
Fred R
The book opens up the under-explored connections between The New Deal in America, and similar programs of revitalization and unification carried out simultaneously in Europe. I am not sure why he omits any discussion of the Soviet Union, which surely would provide similarly resonant examples. To the close-minded or excessively political reader this may seem an unwarranted book, but I suggest that before dismissing it one meditate, for a moment on the TVA or the NRA blue eagle campaign. Unfortuna ...more
Aaron
A fascinating examination of the similarities between Hitler’s Germany, Mussolini’s Italy, and Roosevelt’s America. The comparisons are interesting, but the thesis is shallow and non-confrontational. A nice inquiry into the general mind of western politics in the 1930’s and that’s about all you get. It wasn’t disappointing, just underwhelming.
Paul
Not a bad book, but not quite the book I had hoped for. It felt as if it was seen from a little too high up, too many generalities, which were then repeated in different combinations. Once again I read a book that felt padded.
Anthony Mercando
Didn't take long to get through this niche title. The author even alludes to the now non-existent field on American Fascism, though any basic analysis of history explains why. Interesting to look at the New Deal and the burgeoning fascist regimes developing at the same time with a handful of the same ideas, but Schivelbusch overlooks that all three leaders/nations had no other viable choice but to innovate. As the previous systems had been doing the same thing for the past two decades, the only ...more
Iben
Besides having the world's best name, Schivelbusch is also a fantastic writer. While this book is primarily based on existing research, he is able to pull together various sources to make a compelling argument: that the various governmental projects under Roosevelt, Mussolini and Hitler had certain aspects in common (e.g. public works, propaganda, focus on the land). Schivelbusch also constantly reminds us (smartly) that to compare is not to equate, and his argument is a fascinating one. This bo ...more
Josh
i'm just smitten with schivelbusch. it is limited in scope, but i sheds important like on the changes in the nature of the state in the 1930s.
John Schneider
I wish that I could rate this book more highly, but I found its pace and lack of wit significant drawbacks. Although always illuminating this book has a very dry and matter of fact style that prevents the reader from enjoying it greatly. Schivelbusch firmly establishes his thesis that Roosevelt, Hitler, and Mussolini shared much in common in how they changed their nations. That accomplishment makes this book a good read for historians and lovers of politics; its lack of style, however, will make ...more
Walid
"[propaganda] is to the will of a regime what the automatic transmission is to an automobile engine."

more like a 3.5 stars review. in keeping with schivelbusch's writing style, the book is clearly written and articulated, and quite informative. a few unsupported claims are sprinkled here and there, which brought the review down.
Stephen Hines
Crappy book, that I decided to throw out rather than finish. Someone decided to publish their long and boring thesis, trying to draw lines between three very different systems of government.

Might be okay as a magazine article, but the author just couldn't avoid boorishly putting on paper too many words.
Sheryl Tribble
Schivelbusch makes a good case for the parallels between Roosevelt's America, Mussolini's Italy, and Hitler's Germany, but I pretty much believed that going in. I thought a lot of his observations were interesting, less impressed with his conclusions.
arjuna
Can't really disagree with this review - limited discussion, barely mentions Italy really, would have liked a bit more meat. Enjoyable but hardly world-shattering.
Divinus
While agreeing with the central point, that all three grew in a large part from the same sort of soil, and enjoying the writing style, much of the book kinda turned me off. I'm still trying to figure out what it was that did that.
Danucha
Danucha marked it as to-read
Feb 19, 2015
Josh
Josh marked it as to-read
Jan 21, 2015
Rhiannon
Rhiannon marked it as to-read
Jan 08, 2015
Eugene Kuporos
Eugene Kuporos marked it as to-read
Dec 26, 2014
La
La marked it as to-read
Dec 06, 2014
Megan
Megan marked it as to-read
Dec 03, 2014
Vladimir Belev
Vladimir Belev marked it as to-read
Nov 01, 2014
Daniel Hauff-Lazar
Daniel Hauff-Lazar marked it as to-read
Oct 29, 2014
Hannah
Hannah marked it as to-read
Aug 19, 2014
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
Tastes of Paradise: A Social History of Spices, Stimulants, and Intoxicants The Railway Journey: The Industrialization and Perception of Time and Space Disenchanted Night: The Industrialization of Light in the Nineteenth Century The Culture of Defeat: On National Trauma, Mourning, and Recovery In a Cold Crater: Cultural and Intellectual Life in Berlin, 1945-1948

Share This Book