Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Servile Mind: How Democracy Erodes the Moral Life” as Want to Read:
The Servile Mind: How Democracy Erodes the Moral Life
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

The Servile Mind: How Democracy Erodes the Moral Life

4.21 of 5 stars 4.21  ·  rating details  ·  34 ratings  ·  6 reviews
One of the grim comedies of the twentieth century was the fate of miserable victims of communist regimes who climbed walls, swam rivers, dodged bullets, and found other desperate ways to achieve liberty in the West at the same time as intellectuals in the West sentimentally proclaimed that these very regimes were the wave of the future. A similar tragicomedy is being playe ...more
Hardcover, 384 pages
Published August 3rd 2010 by Encounter Books (first published July 13th 2010)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Servile Mind, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Servile Mind

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 176)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
As much as I agree with the thesis of the volume: that the monistic striving of many in the West for societal perfection actually harms morality by turning everyone into "singletons" growing more comfortable with an overbearing government, I wish the author would organize his thoughts a bit more effectively. Too many times I get lost in his long, meandering paragraphs, and despite their profundity, they can ramble for a while before getting to the point. Sometimes rambling can be good, like Alla ...more
Kenneth Minogue died the day after I finished this book. (Beware, Tom Wolfe, I just started your latest novel.) I know very little about the man, but if The Servile Mind is any indication, he was very perceptive, learned, and well-versed in human nature and political philosophy.

The book is in large part a critique of the ideological prejudices of our times, an ideology Minogue labels the politico-moral. But Minogue is not simply joining in our political and culture wars. Like the ancients, Mino
Not to Everybody’s Liking

The Servile Mind. How Democracy Erodes the Moral Life – the very title, at least its second part, will at first sight probably put off readers who are convinced of the blessings of modern democracy. Ironically, though, Kenneth Minogue’s last book is anything but a rejection of democracy and the freedom promised by this form of government; quite on the contrary, Minogue tries to alert his readers to the loss of liberty in the wake of modern western governments’ efforts to
Scott Collingwood
Most inspiring and enlightening, the purport of this book can be carried into any field and used with great effect. As might be expected from a work by a leading academic, much of it simply flows 'in one ear and out the other', but there are so many gems of cogent contemporary coherence that the general impression gained will guarantee a repeated reading of this book. Aside from that, Prof. Minogue's key points about individualism and moral agency are made so clearly and strongly and with such r ...more
Eduardo Garcia-Gaspar
Buen libro, buenas ideas. Necesario para ver lados oscuros de la democracia
Drew Bullock
Plodding, verbose, meandering. A case study in failing to distinguish the proximate genus. It's a great deal more indignation at finding the neighbor children on one's lawn than it is incisive commentary on the status quo in Western social and political culture. BOOOOOOOOOORING.
Andrew Fulford
Andrew Fulford marked it as to-read
Oct 22, 2014
Lindsey Armstrong
Lindsey Armstrong marked it as to-read
Oct 22, 2014
Joe marked it as to-read
Oct 04, 2014
Seth is currently reading it
Oct 03, 2014
Amy marked it as to-read
Oct 01, 2014
Lucy Gill
Lucy Gill marked it as to-read
Sep 24, 2014
Luke Shanahan
Luke Shanahan is currently reading it
Sep 23, 2014
Paddy marked it as to-read
Sep 15, 2014
Andrew Thickett
Andrew Thickett marked it as to-read
Sep 15, 2014
Jon is currently reading it
Sep 12, 2014
Jung, Keun-Hwa
Jung, Keun-Hwa marked it as to-read
Aug 03, 2014
Majid added it
Jul 27, 2014
Sabrina marked it as to-read
Jul 19, 2014
patricia marked it as to-read
Jul 06, 2014
Sergio marked it as to-read
Jul 03, 2014
Booksearcher marked it as to-read
Jul 17, 2014
James marked it as to-read
Jun 08, 2014
Andrew Hill
Andrew Hill marked it as to-read
May 25, 2014
Jay marked it as to-read
May 23, 2014
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
Political theorist who was Emeritus Professor of Political Science and Honorary Fellow at the London School of Economics.
More about Kenneth Minogue...
Politics: A Very Short Introduction The Liberal Mind Alien Powers: The Pure Theory of Ideology The Concept of a University Nationalism

Share This Book

“My concern with democracy is highly specific. It begins in observing the remarkable fact that, while democracy means a government accountable to the electorate, our rulers now make us accountable to them. Most Western governments hate me smoking, or eating the wrong kind of food, or hunting foxes, or drinking too much, and these are merely the surface disapprovals, the ones that provoke legislation or public campaigns. We also borrow too much money for our personal pleasures, and many of us are very bad parents. Ministers of state have been known to instruct us in elementary matters, such as the importance of reading stories to our children. Again, many of us have unsound views about people of other races, cultures, or religions, and the distribution of our friends does not always correspond, as governments think that it ought, to the cultural diversity of our society. We must face up to the grim fact that the rulers we elect are losing patience with us.
No philosopher can contemplate this interesting situation without beginning to reflect on what it can mean. The gap between political realities and their public face is so great that the term “paradox” tends to crop up from sentence to sentence. Our rulers are theoretically “our” representatives, but they are busy turning us into the instruments of the projects they keep dreaming up. The business of governments, one might think, is to supply the framework of law within which we may pursue happiness on our own account. Instead, we are constantly being summoned to reform ourselves. Debt, intemperance, and incompetence in rearing our children are no doubt regrettable, but they are vices, and left alone, they will soon lead to the pain that corrects. Life is a better teacher of virtue than politicians, and most sensible governments in the past left moral faults to the churches. But democratic citizenship in the twenty-first century means receiving a stream of improving “messages” from politicians. Some may forgive these intrusions because they are so well intentioned. Who would defend prejudice, debt, or excessive drinking? The point, however, is that our rulers have no business telling us how to live. They are tiresome enough in their exercise of authority—they are intolerable when they mount the pulpit. Nor should we be in any doubt that nationalizing the moral life is the first step towards totalitarianism.
We might perhaps be more tolerant of rulers turning preachers if they were moral giants. But what citizen looks at the government today thinking how wise and virtuous it is? Public respect for politicians has long been declining, even as the population at large has been seduced into demanding political solutions to social problems. To demand help from officials we rather despise argues for a notable lack of logic in the demos. The statesmen of eras past have been replaced by a set of barely competent social workers eager to take over the risks of our everyday life. The electorates of earlier times would have responded to politicians seeking to bribe us with such promises with derision. Today, the demos votes for them.”
“However ignorant a person may be, he or she can always moralize. And it is the propensity to moralize that takes up most of the space for public discussion in contemporary democracy.” 2 likes
More quotes…