Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Servile Mind: How Democracy Erodes the Moral Life” as Want to Read:
The Servile Mind: How Democracy Erodes the Moral Life
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Servile Mind: How Democracy Erodes the Moral Life

4.22  ·  Rating Details  ·  45 Ratings  ·  6 Reviews
One of the grim comedies of the twentieth century was the fate of miserable victims of communist regimes who climbed walls, swam rivers, dodged bullets, and found other desperate ways to achieve liberty in the West at the same time as intellectuals in the West sentimentally proclaimed that these very regimes were the wave of the future. A similar tragicomedy is being playe ...more
Hardcover, 384 pages
Published August 3rd 2010 by Encounter Books (first published July 13th 2010)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Servile Mind, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Servile Mind

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 216)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Jul 06, 2013 Matthew rated it really liked it
Kenneth Minogue died the day after I finished this book. (Beware, Tom Wolfe, I just started your latest novel.) I know very little about the man, but if The Servile Mind is any indication, he was very perceptive, learned, and well-versed in human nature and political philosophy.

The book is in large part a critique of the ideological prejudices of our times, an ideology Minogue labels the politico-moral. But Minogue is not simply joining in our political and culture wars. Like the ancients, Mino
Jul 14, 2014 Dan rated it really liked it
As much as I agree with the thesis of the volume: that the monistic striving of many in the West for societal perfection actually harms morality by turning everyone into "singletons" growing more comfortable with an overbearing government, I wish the author would organize his thoughts a bit more effectively. Too many times I get lost in his long, meandering paragraphs, and despite their profundity, they can ramble for a while before getting to the point. Sometimes rambling can be good, like Alla ...more
Jan 14, 2014 Tristram rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: sociology, philosophy
Not to Everybody’s Liking

The Servile Mind. How Democracy Erodes the Moral Life – the very title, at least its second part, will at first sight probably put off readers who are convinced of the blessings of modern democracy. Ironically, though, Kenneth Minogue’s last book is anything but a rejection of democracy and the freedom promised by this form of government; quite on the contrary, Minogue tries to alert his readers to the loss of liberty in the wake of modern western governments’ efforts to
Scott Collingwood
Jan 29, 2011 Scott Collingwood rated it it was amazing
Most inspiring and enlightening, the purport of this book can be carried into any field and used with great effect. As might be expected from a work by a leading academic, much of it simply flows 'in one ear and out the other', but there are so many gems of cogent contemporary coherence that the general impression gained will guarantee a repeated reading of this book. Aside from that, Prof. Minogue's key points about individualism and moral agency are made so clearly and strongly and with such r ...more
Eduardo Garcia-Gaspar
Jul 30, 2014 Eduardo Garcia-Gaspar rated it really liked it
Shelves: política
Buen libro, buenas ideas. Necesario para ver lados oscuros de la democracia
Drew Bullock
Aug 02, 2012 Drew Bullock rated it it was ok
Plodding, verbose, meandering. A case study in failing to distinguish the proximate genus. It's a great deal more indignation at finding the neighbor children on one's lawn than it is incisive commentary on the status quo in Western social and political culture. BOOOOOOOOOORING.
Bleat marked it as to-read
Feb 10, 2016
Bob Croft
Bob Croft rated it it was amazing
Feb 05, 2016
Mjber marked it as to-read
Jan 31, 2016
Jacob marked it as to-read
Jan 28, 2016
thomas endicott
thomas endicott marked it as to-read
Jan 24, 2016
Kevin Johnston
Kevin Johnston marked it as to-read
Jan 19, 2016
Bence marked it as to-read
Jan 18, 2016
Josiah marked it as to-read
Jan 10, 2016
John Craig
John Craig marked it as to-read
Jan 08, 2016
Gemseeker marked it as to-read
Dec 14, 2015
dmt enema
dmt enema marked it as to-read
Dec 11, 2015
Some  Girl
Some Girl marked it as to-read
Dec 08, 2015
Sam rated it it was amazing
Dec 04, 2015
Andrew marked it as to-read
Oct 31, 2015
Sean added it
Oct 17, 2015
Matt Calvey
Matt Calvey rated it really liked it
Oct 13, 2015
Decurium rated it liked it
Oct 11, 2015
Christinne Blacker
Christinne Blacker marked it as to-read
Oct 08, 2015
Joseph marked it as to-read
Oct 02, 2015
Klaas marked it as to-read
Oct 04, 2015
Charles H Berlemann Jr
Charles H Berlemann Jr marked it as to-read
Sep 29, 2015
Stefu marked it as to-read
Aug 30, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Notes on Democracy
  • Always Right
  • The Quest for Cosmic Justice
  • Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World
  • Without Roots: Europe, Relativism, Christianity, Islam
  • Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
  • The Counter-Revolution of Science
  • Another Sort of Learning
  • On Power
  • The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey
  • How Civilizations Die (And Why Islam Is Dying Too)
  • The Opium of the Intellectuals
  • Fides Et Ratio: On the Relationship Between Faith and Reason: Encyclical Letter of John Paul II
  • Natural Right and History
  • The Economics and Ethics of Private Property: Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy
  • Breakthrough: Our Guerilla War to Expose Fraud and Save Democracy
  • Economic Depressions
  • A Political Philosophy: Arguments for Conservatism
Political theorist who was Emeritus Professor of Political Science and Honorary Fellow at the London School of Economics.
More about Kenneth Minogue...

Share This Book

“My concern with democracy is highly specific. It begins in observing the remarkable fact that, while democracy means a government accountable to the electorate, our rulers now make us accountable to them. Most Western governments hate me smoking, or eating the wrong kind of food, or hunting foxes, or drinking too much, and these are merely the surface disapprovals, the ones that provoke legislation or public campaigns. We also borrow too much money for our personal pleasures, and many of us are very bad parents. Ministers of state have been known to instruct us in elementary matters, such as the importance of reading stories to our children. Again, many of us have unsound views about people of other races, cultures, or religions, and the distribution of our friends does not always correspond, as governments think that it ought, to the cultural diversity of our society. We must face up to the grim fact that the rulers we elect are losing patience with us.
No philosopher can contemplate this interesting situation without beginning to reflect on what it can mean. The gap between political realities and their public face is so great that the term “paradox” tends to crop up from sentence to sentence. Our rulers are theoretically “our” representatives, but they are busy turning us into the instruments of the projects they keep dreaming up. The business of governments, one might think, is to supply the framework of law within which we may pursue happiness on our own account. Instead, we are constantly being summoned to reform ourselves. Debt, intemperance, and incompetence in rearing our children are no doubt regrettable, but they are vices, and left alone, they will soon lead to the pain that corrects. Life is a better teacher of virtue than politicians, and most sensible governments in the past left moral faults to the churches. But democratic citizenship in the twenty-first century means receiving a stream of improving “messages” from politicians. Some may forgive these intrusions because they are so well intentioned. Who would defend prejudice, debt, or excessive drinking? The point, however, is that our rulers have no business telling us how to live. They are tiresome enough in their exercise of authority—they are intolerable when they mount the pulpit. Nor should we be in any doubt that nationalizing the moral life is the first step towards totalitarianism.
We might perhaps be more tolerant of rulers turning preachers if they were moral giants. But what citizen looks at the government today thinking how wise and virtuous it is? Public respect for politicians has long been declining, even as the population at large has been seduced into demanding political solutions to social problems. To demand help from officials we rather despise argues for a notable lack of logic in the demos. The statesmen of eras past have been replaced by a set of barely competent social workers eager to take over the risks of our everyday life. The electorates of earlier times would have responded to politicians seeking to bribe us with such promises with derision. Today, the demos votes for them.”
“However ignorant a person may be, he or she can always moralize. And it is the propensity to moralize that takes up most of the space for public discussion in contemporary democracy.” 2 likes
More quotes…