Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Grand Design” as Want to Read:
The Grand Design
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Grand Design

3.97 of 5 stars 3.97  ·  rating details  ·  31,884 ratings  ·  1,511 reviews

When and how did the universe begin? Why are we here? Why is there something rather than nothing? What is the nature of reality? Why are the laws of nature so finely tuned as to allow for the existence of beings like ours
Hardcover, First Edition, 199 pages
Published September 7th 2010 by Bantam (first published 2010)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Grand Design, please sign up.

Popular Answered Questions

Ben McDonald in a word, yes. one of the main ideas in the book is 'M-theory.' A theory of everything, a single equation that maps out and explains the whole of…morein a word, yes. one of the main ideas in the book is 'M-theory.' A theory of everything, a single equation that maps out and explains the whole of existance. it's logical to accept such a thing exists. but the religious contrevercy occurs when you apply this logic: if M-theory is reolised then there will be no need for a god to map out and explain the whole of existance. (less)

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
It's a funny thing being a cosmologist in the greater Los Angeles area. Back when I was a partying single graduate student, I'd frequently hit the town for some fun. Inevitably I'd meet someone, strike up a conversation, and they might ask me what I did for a living.

"Oh, I'm a cosmologist."
"Cosmetologist? Cool, do you do make-up for movies?"
"Um...not unless rouge is a component of dark matter." (ba-da-bum)
"I make detectors and use them to study the origins and geometry of our universe."
When this book was released, I was reading a story about it on-line, and the headline said something like: “Stephen Hawking Says There Is No God”. Then I made the critical mistake of looking at the user comments under the story. It was the usual collection of badly spelled notes from ignorant asshats who tried to say that stupid science didn’t know nuthin’ or that it was all Obama’s fault.

But one in particular caught my eye. It was by someone who undoubtedly dabbles in both neurosurgery and roc
Look John look!
See the pop science bestseller.
See the glossy paper.
See the large font.
See the wide margins.
See the world-famous physicist.
See the ghostwriter.

See the double slit experiment!
Maybe you have seen it before.
But you can never see the double slit experiment too many times.
See the theory of everything.
It is free of infinities.
Anyway, never mind that.

See the quantum multiverse!
See the strong anthropic principle.
See them explain the mystery of being.
They are science.
They make pre
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Stephen Hawking is smarter than I am. That's no big feat because two of my cats are smarter than I am. The other cat is a certifiable idiot. But Hawking is way smarter than I am. The Grand Design is Hawking's explanation, more or less, about why the universe is the way it is. The answer comes down to M-theory which is more of a combining of explanations than one single unifying theory. Many reviewers seem to think Hawking is saying there is no God but he really seems to be stating that God is i
I have a feeling that the publishing industry is milking Stephen Hawking. There was a time when we had a dashing physicist named Richard Feynman who used LSD and played banjo in a strip club. The naked pole dancers didn’t distract him from formulating quantum electrodynamics. He was quite a genius, and he was all over the place with his talks and popular books. But he’s dead. Now Stephen Hawking seems to be the coolest physicist around. He’s paralyzed and wheelchair-bound, and he speaks through ...more
Riku Sayuj
In the first chapter Hawking says that his aim is to provide an answer to "Life, Universe and Everything" and goes on to assure us that his answer will not merely be "42". After just completing the last chapter, I think I still prefer "42".

Wake me up when you actually define M-Theory.
(Which has yet to be defined)

This was a short read that cost WAY TOO MUCH money.

Any book I can read in a day should cost less than 9 dollars.
Note: I'm a physicist, so my experience reading this was colored by my training.

Hawking and Mlodinow begin by declaring, on the very first page, that "philosophy is dead," and that modern science alone must carry our search for knowledge into the future. Several pages later, they launch into a purely philosophical discussion on the nature of reality and discovery. Dead, indeed. In my opinion, this accurately colors the entire book, and if you can't stomach this kind of hard-and-fast science for
محمد  النعمه
في هذا الكتاب الذي يكتب الفيزيائي والعالم الكبير ستفين هوكينج .. يقدم لنا أخر ما توصل له العلم للإجابة على " أسئلة الكون الكبرى "

كتاب ممتع وجميل .. معقد قليل ومصطلحاته الفيزيائية صعبه لغير المتخصصين .. أنصح بقراءته .. قيمته بأربع نجوم على السته الأولى .. فهي جميلة وعلمية ومفيدة .. والكتاب مقسم للفصول التالية //

في الفصل الأول يتحدث " لغز الوجود " .. يطرح المؤلف فكرة الكتاب وكيف سيجيب على الاسئلة الكبرى ( لماذا يوجد الشيء بدلاً من اللا شيء؟ .. لماذا نوجد نحن ؟ .. لماذا توجد هذه المجموعة المحددة
After reading Bill Bryson's A Short History of Nearly Everything and Brian Greene's The Fabric of the Cosmos, I felt that I might finally be ready for my first Hawking book. There were a couple of sections that I re-read, in an attempt to make concrete some of the more abstract aspects of m-theory. Despite my rudimentary understanding of quantum physics, I still gleaned a great deal from this book and would recommend it to anyone who is even mildly curious. Those who have a more advanced educati ...more
David Boyce
As a cosmologist and a Stephen Hawking fan, I have a real issue with this book. His statement, that the Universe unpacks itself and therefore does not need a creator is based on some really flawed logic called 'model dependent realism'. MDR is a way of comparing reality to a model, if the model produces the same observable characteristics as observed in reality then the model is said to be as true as any other model.

Imagine this, if there was equal amounts of incriminating evidence that two peop
Erik Graff
Mar 05, 2015 Erik Graff rated it 1 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Hawking fans
Recommended to Erik by: A.M.
Shelves: sciences
I was given this book as a reward for helping a friend pick up and deliver newly purchased furniture. As is the case with most such gifts, I began to read it immediately.

I was almost immediately turned off by the text owing to an extraordinary display of ignorance on the part of the authors and the editors, a mistake appearing in the first few pages in their lead-up to what is supposed to be a survey of the history of physics as germinated in Ionian philosophy. Here they note in passing that wri
خیلی قشنگ توضیح داده شده بود... یه کوچولو تکراری بود، ولی ارزششو داشت :)
I own several of Hawking's books, and so I was drawn to this thin volume. Obviously his co-author did most of the work, since Hawking's health continues to deteriorate. Mlodinow is a physicist at Caltech and an author in his own right. His name should appear as co-author, but my cynical brain thinks the publisher felt Hawking's name would sell more copies.

Much time is given to Richard Feynman and his work in quantum physics. In fact, this book promotes the study of quantum theory as the main ans
Andrew Langridge
There are only a couple of positives that I can think to say about this book. Firstly, Hawking has some Feynman-like qualities in being able to lucidly express important ideas in physics such as time dilation in special relativity and the double slit experiment. Secondly, his philosophy of science that he calls model-based realism has many things going for it, although why it is called realism is never fully explained. I did not find this book particularly easy to read, probably because I did no ...more
عمر الحمادي
أصر هوكنغ أن الفلسفة قد ماتت منذ زمن وأن من يتولى زمام شرح العلوم وتفسيرها هم علماء الطبيعة ، لكن أوليس بحث الفيزياء أو الأحياء التطورية في مطلق الوجود أو الإله الأعظم هو تماما مثل بحث أحدنا في نوعية أحد البرامج التلفزيونية عن طريق تفكيك جهاز التلفزيون وتشريحه ومعرفة كيفية عمل وصلاته لمعرفة نوعية ذلك البرنامج ! فرغم ان ذلك التفكيك عمل مضن وشاق الا انه كان جهد في غير محله لأنه لم يقدم جوابا عن السؤال المراد الاجابة عنه، فالبحث في وجود الله عقلي بحت في المقام الأول و تتم الاستعانة بالعلوم الطبيعية ...more
Since I read this here book, I’m going to attempt to talk like a smart person. It’s a half-hearted attempt and is doomed to failure, as hopefully you realize it already done did.

“There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened.”

(Douglas Adams)

This book totally agrees with
Ever since I was little, I remember the image of Stephen Hawking from TV. I don't know why, but he remained embroidered in my brain after watching a TV show that spoke of him. This must have been 10 years ago, or something like that, but when it was explained to me what he was and what he was doing and did and why he looked the way he looked (remember I was 7 or 8 so I was bound to ask hurtful questions), I became to develop this fondness towards him.

In my late years (oh, I'm soooo old), when I
Manish Sinha
This book isn't for beginners. They should first read more simpler books before starting with this one.

The first few chapters of the book are relatively easy to understand and need just basic physics to understand. It assumed you remember concepts of physics like matter-wave-duality. It even assumes you have a basic knowledge of our view of universe some two hundred years back like we are in center of universe etc.

The book contains beautiful graphical depictions and photos. It makes the book ea
I've read snippets of Hawking's books before and enjoyed them. The particular theme of this one interested me so I picked it up. It started out with some creation myths and a well-paced history of bigger picture science. It bogged down in the middle with an exploration of quantam physics that the author felt was necessary for his subsequent theory of Grand Design, but in reality did little for his theory or the book as a whole.

In fact, while engaging, fun to read, and highly informative, the boo
I read this book as part of a Christmas challenge with my fiance. He is a science PhD student who wanted to expand my horizons. I think this was just the book to do it. It is written in a clear, accessible style with hints of humor. I will say that I still dont understand string theory but my fiance's assures me that no one else does either.
Adam J E L
The Grand Design
4 Stars - Fun read by one of the brightest minds of today, for those looking to begin understanding why we all are here!

To start with, this book is not as easy as a read as it comes across, regardless of how it is 'dumbed down' for the average Joe. I personally enjoy this topic, but can very easily see how folks not to keen on understanding many of the topics enclosed, can be stuck rereading many portions of the book.

I went with 4 of 5 stars, as I am a tad disappointed that it s
Ahmad Sharabiani
The Grand Design, Stephen Hawking
سه برگردان فارسی از این کتاب وجود دارد: «علی هادیان و سارا ایزدیار نشر مازیار»؛ «حسین صداقت و امیر امیرآبادی نشر نقش و نگار»؛ «جمیل بصام انتشارات افکار»؛ ا. ش
استیون هاوکینگ میگوید: ممکن است روشی که کیهان بوجود آمده هماهنگ با قوانین دانش باشد، که در این صورت نیازی نیست به خدا متوسل بشویم تا تصمیم بگیریم که کیهان چگونه آغاز شدهاست. اگر ما یک فرضیه همهجانبه و کامل را در مورد پیدایش عالم کشف کنیم، این مهمترین پیروزی انسان خواهد بود چون ما قادر خواهیم بود که فکر خدا ر
I once had a friend that was taught by Stephen Hawking. He said that Stephen was a brilliant man, but a poor teacher, and within the community of theoretical physicists, his profile far exceeded his achievements. He caught the interest of his peers with contributions to our understanding of black holes, and the interest of the public first through the release of the now infamous A Brief History of Time (which has sold over 10 million copies), and second, via his personal struggle with motor neur ...more
Jonathan B
The subtitle to this book could have been "Assertions in search of an argument." The book isn't documented and arguments aren't given at some key points. Hawking and Mlodinow also manage to make themselves look a little naive at times. For example, stating, in the very beginning of the book, that "philosophy is dead" and then going on to rest their entire theory on a (highly controversial) philosophical theory of model-dependent realism.

Of course, Hawking is a huge authority in the eyes of the
Въпреки, че поне 60-70% от нещата в книгата вече съм ги срещал и чел в предишните популярни трудове на Хокинг, последните глави обхващат точно темите за живота, сътворението и засяга въпроси от сорта "уникален ли е нашия свят?".
През останалата част сбито и стегнато са ни представени познати неща - опитите на физиката да намери прости математически принципи и чрез тях да се създаде единна теория, която да обясни всичко. Под всичко разбираме обяснение за всеки детайл на материята и силите, които н
Hawking is a terrific self-promoter, and he managed to grab a lot of headlines for this book by claiming he'd killed God or whatever, but the truth is there's very little in this book that Brian Greene didn't cover - and cover better - ten years ago. In fact, a lot of this is stuff Hawking himself has covered in A Brief History of Time.

In the last chapter he brings up Conway and Turing and things get significantly more interesting, but it's too late by that time, since Hawking apparently feels h
This is a short, elegant, beautifully illustrated book. I read it in less than a day. The book gives a good answer to the so-called "anthropic principle"--namely, that the laws of physics and the fundamental constants appear to be perfectly tuned to allow our world, life, and humans to develop. If any of the laws or fundamental constants were to deviate even slightly, life might not be even possible.

The answer to this dilemma, the authors state, is not that God created the laws of physics, and t
Grand design is one of those books that challenge ones basic assumptions of reality. Hawking explains that the way we perceive and experience reality is only a working model, helping us to deal with the reality around us. To help us understand this he uses the example of goldfish and how its world view helps it to navigate in water despite being very different from ours.
The ultimate nature of reality is unknowable.There can be multiple ways to see a reality that all seem to work despite their be
Albaraa Najjar
عندما نشر ستيفن هوكينگ كتابه "تاريخ موجز للزمن" غيّر رؤية الكثير جداً للعلم و حول العلم الى أمر يهتم به الجميع و يمكن أن يثير به أي شخص و لكنه في نفس الوقت قام بسخط العلم الى مجال تسويقي آخر لا يمكن أن يكتب فيه العلماء بحرية حقيقية لأن كل دراسة تكتب يعدل عليها و تحوّل الى خبر صحفي جذّاب.

من بعد ذلك أحب الكثيرين العلم و منهم أنا و لكننا أحببنا الجزء الخارجي من العلم و الذي يعطينا النتائج المثيرة بلا أن نعرف الذي أخرج هذه النتائج العلمية و هو الجزء الممل جداً و لكنه مهم أيضاً، حاول الكثير منا الدخو
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Science and the existence of God 12 217 Jun 09, 2014 06:43AM  
Goodreads Librari...: Page number addition 3 15 Jan 16, 2014 06:41PM  
The grand design 1 14 Jul 06, 2012 01:59AM  
  • The Hidden Reality: Parallel Universes and the Deep Laws of the Cosmos
  • River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life
  • Hyperspace
  • Billions & Billions: Thoughts on Life and Death at the Brink of the Millennium
  • In Search of the Multiverse
  • Why Does E=mc²? (And Why Should We Care?)
  • The First Three Minutes: A Modern View Of The Origin Of The Universe
  • The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values
  • A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing
  • Death by Black Hole: And Other Cosmic Quandaries
  • Why Evolution Is True
  • Big Bang: The Origin of the Universe
  • The Black Hole War: My Battle with Stephen Hawking to Make the World Safe for Quantum Mechanics
  • Relativity: The Special and the General Theory
Stephen William Hawking was born on 8 January 1942 in Oxford, England. His parents' house was in north London, but during the second world war Oxford was considered a safer place to have babies. When he was eight, his family moved to St Albans, a town about 20 miles north of London. At eleven Stephen went to St Albans School, and then on to University College, Oxford, his father's old college. Ste ...more
More about Stephen Hawking...
A Brief History of Time The Universe in a Nutshell A Briefer History of Time Black Holes and Baby Universes The Illustrated A Brief History of Time/The Universe in a Nutshell

Share This Book

“The idea of 10 dimensions might sound exciting, but they would cause real problems if you forget where you parked your car.” 60 likes
“The human capacity for guilt is such that people can always find ways to blame themselves” 42 likes
More quotes…