Ecumenical Babel: Confusing Economic Ideology And The Church's Social Witness

Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

Ecumenical Babel: Confusing Economic Ideology And The Church's Social Witness

by Jordan J. Ballor (Goodreads Author), Stephen J. Grabill (Foreword)

4.57 of 5 stars 4.57 · rating details · 7 ratings · 3 reviews

A critical engagement of the ecumenical movement’s approach to ethical and economic issues, Ecumenical Babel updates a line of criticism articulated by Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Paul Ramsey, and Ernest W. Lefever. Arguing for the continuing importance of Christian ecumenism, Jordan J. Ballor seeks to correct the errors created by the imposition of economic ideology onto the soc...more

Paperback, 167 pages

Published 2010 by Christian's Library Press

more details... edit details

Get a copy:

More…

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Lists with This Book

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-11 of 11)

filter | sort: default (?) | rating details

Jan 04, 2011 Ross Emmett rated it 4 of 5 stars

Shelves: religion-and-society, christian-writings

Ballor explores the history of social economic statements by three ecumenical councils -- the Lutheran World Federation, the World Communion of Reformed Churches, and the World Council of Churches -- in light of two issues: a) the relation between the church statements and their underlying dependence on a particular view of political economy; and b) the question, for whom does the council speak? A third issue -- the question of what it means for an ecumenical council to make such statements in a...more Ballor explores the history of social economic statements by three ecumenical councils -- the Lutheran World Federation, the World Communion of Reformed Churches, and the World Council of Churches -- in light of two issues: a) the relation between the church statements and their underlying dependence on a particular view of political economy; and b) the question, for whom does the council speak? A third issue -- the question of what it means for an ecumenical council to make such statements in a democratic society, both for the society and for Christ's church, lies behind much of his discussion.

On the first issue, I have little to add to Ballor's commentary, because I largely agree with it. The three ecumenical councils all treat the basic human problem as one of evil structures and institutions -- reliance of markets allowing corporations to gain both economic and political power which enables the oppression of the poor and the elevation of the rich. The world exists, it seems, in a zero-sum condition; in order to fix inequity (which seems the be the surest sign, if not the definition, of the presence of sin) we must reverse the course of economic takings and ensure that all policy decisions are done for the direct benefit of the poor (oh, and of course, the earth -- a late addition to the argument). Ballor correctly points out that the veracity of the ecumenical council statements all depends, not on their theological and moral bases, but instead on the extent to which the world actually lines up with the underlying political economy. Both Ballor and I argue that it does not: the world is not zero-sum, not even close, and that increased reliance on markets over the past twenty years has significantly improved the lot of everyone, most especially the poor of the world (see "The Age of Milton Friedman" by Andrei Shleifer in the Journal of Economic Literature for a brief summary of the argument).

I expect Ballor would agree with me that another erroneous aspect of the ecumenical councils' statements does not, however, stem just from their adoption of a seriously flawed political economy. For the argument that the basic human problem is one of evil structures is also deeply flawed. I will not say that institutions are morally neutral -- the rules of the game can often be made for evil purposes and lead to tragic consequences. But locating evil in institutions opens one to the Rousseauian notion that all we need is the perfect set of institutions in order to have a perfect human society (and the line between perfect and tragic is quite thin, isn't it?!). Orthodox Christianity in all its versions has resisted that mistake, even while accepting in different ways that human sinfulness permeates our institutional life.

I'm more interested in Ballor's examination of the question, for whom and to whom do the ecumenical councils speak? In a sense, he argues that the two aspects of this question are collapsed into one: the council statements are NOT made "of the church, by the church and for the church" but rather by an elite within church governing bodies to themselves or those like them. (One could go farther here and argue that my comment reveals the underlying problem Christianity has with democracy). Consider this: Christianity has expanded rapidly over the past thirty years in exactly the same places that what the ecumenical councils sarcastically call "neoliberalism" has expanded, and in both spiritual and economic terms, the poor are better off. But if you judged their economic and spiritual state by the ecumenical councils' statements, they are still poor and oppressed by evil structures. A cynical economist might say -- thank God for the evil of the market, which has clothed the naked and fed the hungry! All I'll say is, go read some of "Aunt" Deirdre McCloskey's work!

Back to the main point: Ballor's analysis suggests that the ecumenical councils face a dilemma. Either they are the church, in which case they should stop making statements and figure out how to help cloth the naked and feed the poor themselves, or at least help Christians sort through general principles that can inform how we ourselves participate in solving social and economic problems, leaving the actual policy formulations to the hustling and higgling of politics and markets. Or they are just an interest group with a moral agenda -- something like the Sierra Club or Mothers Against Drunk Driving -- operating in a democratic society, in which case they cannot appeal to some special moral authority, and will end up looking just like any interest group.

If Ballor is right, and he is, then one of the things economists need to do is start examining the work of the ecumenical councils not as reflections of theological truth but instead as the creation through political action of a common benefit for the councils' members, at the expense of others in society. Such rent-seeking behavior can usefully be examined using theories already in use in public choice theory. Frankly, I do not believe that economics can explain everything, but I am confident that it can explain the actions of this type of rent-seeking behavior, and if the councils have reduced themselves to interest groups, then we should use economics to explain their actions!

In his conclusion, Ballor does call the councils to take up for themselves tasks that churches cannot do for themselves (p. 110); namely, to help Christians work through issues like the relations among wealth, value and work. In this regard, Ballor echoes themes that are common themes of the Acton Institute: the fundamental dignity of the human person, the recovery of the natural law tradition, and the principle of subsidiarity, both in society and in the church.

Those concerned about the role of the church in the world today can learn a lot by reading and reflecting on Ballor's excellent critique of the ecumenical movement's political economy.

(less)

like · see review

Jun 20, 2010 Marc rated it 5 of 5 stars Recommends it for: Anyone interested in being serious about the reformed/protestant faith.

A fine and worthwhile book from Jordan Ballor, and a worthy work to re-launch Christian's Library Press. Ballor examines the economic assumptions that underlie much of the work of the modern Ecumenical movement, paying particular attention to recent actions of the Lutheran World Federation, World Communion of Reformed Churches, and the World Council of Churches. These economic assumptions - which in large part reflect a neo-marxist view of the world - have often led ecumenical bodies to issue pr...more

like · see review

Jun 16, 2010 Victor Claar rated it 5 of 5 stars

Here's my blurb that is printed inside this book's front matter:

With Ecumenical Babel Jordan J. Ballor gives us a much needed consideration of modern ecumenism. In particular he grapples with this daunting question: whether ecumenical bodies indeed speak for the church in their pronouncements on the hot-button social issues of the day. Wedding compassion with clear-headed thinking, Ballor questions whether ecumenical bodies may rightfully make such assertions on behalf of God’s people, and – mor...more

like · see review

Dec 06, 2012 Jordan marked it as to-read

Nov 26, 2012 Jacqueline Otto rated it 4 of 5 stars

Nov 08, 2011 Joseph Sunde rated it 4 of 5 stars

Aug 20, 2011 Sean marked it as to-read

Dec 23, 2010 Sarah marked it as to-read

Recommended to Sarah by: http://mereorthodoxy.com/?p=4517

Oct 08, 2010 Anna marked it as to-read

Jul 30, 2010 Vin Labetubun rated it 5 of 5 stars

Jul 17, 2010 Chris rated it 5 of 5 stars

new topic
Discuss This Book

There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Recommend it | Stats | Recent status updates

Popular Shelves

to-read

4 shelves

christian-writings

1 shelf

religion-and-society

1 shelf

currently-reading

1 shelf

About Jordan J. Ballor

Jordan J. Ballor (Dr. theol., University of Zurich) is a research fellow at the Acton Institute and serves as executive editor of the Journal of Markets & Morality.

More about Jordan J. Ballor...

Books by Jordan J. Ballor

More…

Share This Book

Facebook Twitter Your website

Trivia About Ecumenical Babel:...

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

title link	preview: Ecumenical Babel: Confusing Economic Ideology And The Church's Social Witness
avg rating	preview: Ecumenical Babel: Confusing Economic Ideology And The Church's Social Witness Goodreads rating: 4.57 (7 ratings)
small image	preview: click here [close]
med image	preview: click here [close]
BBCode	[url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/8441901-ecumenical-babel?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book][img]http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1329315506l/8441901.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/8441901-ecumenical-babel?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book]Ecumenical Babel: Confusing Economic Ideology And The Church's Social Witness by Jordan J. Ballor[/url]

Ecumenical Babel: Confusing Economic Ideology And The Church's Social Witness

Friend Reviews

Lists with This Book

Community Reviews

new topicDiscuss This Book

Popular Shelves

About Jordan J. Ballor

Books by Jordan J. Ballor

Share This Book

Share This Book on Your Website

Trivia About Ecumenical Babel:...

new topic
Discuss This Book