Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Bush at War” as Want to Read:
Bush at War
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Bush at War (Bush at War #1)

3.44  ·  Rating Details ·  2,943 Ratings  ·  156 Reviews
Award-winning author and journalist Bob Woodward turns his attention to the presidency of George W. Bush. Before the acts of terrorism on 11 September, George W. Bush's presidency had been beset by numerous problems. Not only was it in many peoples eyes invalid, very few people took him seriously as a world statesman. Then following one violent mindless act of terrorism, G ...more
Audio CD
Published November 19th 2002 by Simon & Schuster Audio (first published November 1st 2002)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Bush at War, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Bush at War

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Erik Graff
Mar 08, 2013 Erik Graff rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Woodward fans
Recommended to Erik by: A.M.
Shelves: history
The more I read Bob Woodward himself and the more I read about him, the more fishy I think he is. Having started his career in naval intelligence and professionally associated with Alexander Haig, Woodward went on to a meteoric rise through the newspaper industry to land in the right place and the right time to contribute to the unseating of Richard Nixon. The right place was The Washington Post, an occasional asset of the CIA. The right time was after Nixon had earned the ire of the Joint Chief ...more
Leo Jacobowitz
Will go down in history as one of the flimsiest pieces of propagandist bullshit written by a pathetic sycophant of a writer....who just years later would turn on the administration....Everyone (outside of the early street protesters in my beloved San Francisco) was watching Powell's videos thinking they saw something and admiring Rumsfeld on how tough and handsome he was....pathetic, disgusting, cowardly and horrifying period. Now everyone is a Bush critic but I remember the cowards then.
I don't want to debate, but this book kept me in, and left me, in a state of supreme anger!
Jun 26, 2008 Erin rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
"Where have I heard this before? Hey,this sounds familiar, too!" Because we HAVE heard it...
Is this his literary agent's best work, yet? Face it, Mr Woodward's book tour ripped across your lawn, flashed from your TV, issued forth from the radio, and came to rest on your kitchen table folded up right next to your morning coffee. Thanks to an expert publicist, this book was excerpted, quoted, and publicly recounted by B.W. in over-the-air interviews. Bob Woodward's face, name, voice, and bio str
On the recent 15th anniversary of 9/11 Politico Magazine published a very good story of President Bush's actions on that day. From the first whispered news in the Florida classroom to his return to the White House that night, the article gave the reader the sense of what it was like aboard Air Force One with so little information at hand. The Politico piece spurred my interest in what happened in the days and months following September 11. Bob Woodward's Bush At War provides a closely observed n ...more
Dec 30, 2014 Kelley rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
In Bush at War, Woodward presents a very insightful insiders' view of the 9/11 and its aftermath as the Bush administration waged war against Afghanistan and debated war against Iraq. Woodward's research and writing style are to be admired. One never gets a hint of his own view of all what he wrote here. Considering the debate that raged during this time, it's good to know that Woodward maintained his neutrality throughout. I have always been intrigued with the insider perspective of this event, ...more
This book is about President Dubya and the first 100 days after September 11, 2001. It chronicles the goings-on of the President and his inner circle of advisers: Vice-President Cheney, Secretary of State Powell, Secretary of Defense Rumsfield, CIA Director Tenet, and National Security Adviser Rice. How did they react to 9-11? What was their advice to the President? Did they all agree with each other?

Woodward answers those questions and more, and reveals some interesting tidbits. For example, P
Sep 17, 2007 Nathan rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: I have connections, baby!
I read this book wanting to find proof that George W. Bush was evil. I came to this book, just prior to the 2004 election, longing for a repeat of All the President's Men, and hoping for Bob Woodward to work his magic again and show us the evil warlock behind the curtain. It didn't happen. What Woodward revealed was a man who was deeply hard-headed, convicted and sincere. That he was tragically wrong and that people who worked for him broke laws to further his agenda seems like an idea from anot ...more
Aug 16, 2011 Ken rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Very interesting. I thought it was fairly non-biased. It frequently felt a little jumbled in terms of flow.

Near the beginning of the book, Woodard made it appear as though the Bush Admin wasn’t prioritizing the UBL/aQ threat adequately. He referenced the sequencing of the National Security Presidential Directives (NSPD) . In particular, the one addressing aQ was number 9. Woodard states, “meaning eight other matters had been formally assessed, vetted, agreed upon and signed off on as policy by t
Barry McCulloch
What do you want from this book? The answer to this question will decide whether you should read it or enjoy doing so.

If you want an analysis of Bush’s foreign policy up until the invasion of Iraq don’t buy it. Yet, if you want a documentary account of an epoch defining moment and the rise of unilateral foreign policy making then this is a must read.

Woodward attempts to put you in the shoes of the administration during and after 9-11 up until the Iraq War and on the whole he does a good job. Y
Aug 31, 2009 Stefan rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history-politics
Bush At War is a insightful and highly readable account of President Bush’s administration following September 11. Bob Woodward does an excellent job at describing the different schools of thought and management style of the key characters in the Bush government (Powell’s disagreement with Rumsfeld over foreign policy being one example). Reading this book really helped me to grasp why the Bush administration acted the way it did and how political ideologies and personal agendas influenced the co ...more
I thought this book would contain dramatic insight into the Bush presidency, and the decisions made immediately after 911. It was not dramatic, and I only found my interest piqued toward the end of the book. Too much, "Cheney said this," then "Powell said this", and finally "Rice said this. "
It was a crappy situation we got into after 911, lots of good, lots of bad things happened as a result. What would you have done, what would someone else have done? The more I read about Bush, the more I sy
Sep 16, 2015 Alice-catherine rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
A fast and easy read. I finished it in two nights. It was super interesting and I learned a lot that I don't remember from when 9/11 happened.
Samuel Maina
How I came to know about this book is I came across this link in one of the dailies….>
The writer stated that bush was strategic and I want to agree. In his conversations with the deputy president and the core security and intelligence team, he seemed to be able to pick their brains with the common question “what do you think”
While admitting that most of the people around him (Bush) were quoting from experience and had high IQ’s he had to step up and be
Tony Cavicchi
Woodward was going to write a book about Bush's tax cuts, but the September 11th Attacks intervened, redirecting the Bush Presidency, and of course Woodward's coverage of it. 15 years after the event, I can give this book a much different review than in 2002, precisely because Woodward's record of current events has passed into history and we know the results of the many choices made by Bush and his war cabinet.

Powell's concerns about the political objectives and how to achieve victory in Afghan
James Hatton
Book 1 of 3 on the subject of the Bush administration's response to September 11, 2001, and the "global war on terror".

September 11, 2001, actually began two days earlier when Al Qaeda operatives assassinated a key American ally, Ahmad Shah Massoud, the "Lion of Panjshir". That was in Afghanistan. Al Qaeda was in Afghanistan, by then. Their allies, the Taliban, were in Afghanistan. The initial U.S. response to 9/11 was in Afghanistan, against Al Qaeda and the Taliban. But then, Iraq. Why Iraq? W
Robert Jones
Jun 08, 2015 Robert Jones rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Bob Woodward is very good at keeping his opinion out of the narrative. This is quality journalism - but that's all it really is. The book focuses on the 100 days following the September 11 attacks, and the Bush administration's discussions and decision making processes. It's nice to see the process from the inside, but we know how it all turned out, and I don't think Woodward offers anything too insightful, here. Informative, yes. Insightful, no.
Ira Livingston
Jun 14, 2015 Ira Livingston rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I wanted to read this when it first came out. The problem I have with the book, because it essentially points out that George W. Bush and his war cabinet had plans about Iraq as they walked into the White House after the most controversial election in American history. From there it just spirals down. You realize how naive a "new" President is during a life changing attack, like 9-11, but how his team didn't really give him any true options on the table other than this preconceived conditions th ...more
Andrew Georgiadis
Feb 16, 2011 Andrew Georgiadis rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: nonfiction, politics
So there are a number of reasons NOT to read this book at this point in time: new president, a desire to free your mind from dwelling on errors of the past, an improving situation in Iraq, a possible removal of U.S. forces in the next 18 months, and the way it's almost tiresome to rag on Bush in the twilight of his presidency.

Still, this catalogues the three months following 9/11. Every briefing, memo, backdoor conversation between Hadley and Rice, Rumsfeld and Cheney, our Special Forces on the
Aug 11, 2012 Jerome rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Well, given how thin this book was, and the fact that this book was almost ten years old when I first read it, I wasn't expecting loads of new information here. This reads like a newspaper article.

Woodward's reporting, when not uselessly asinine, fails to scratch the surface of 9-11. He makes sure to note that George Tenent and Richard Armitage met head Pakistani intelligence officials before and after 9-11, but does not note that the same official, Gen. Ahmad, who was visiting the White House f
Jason Phillips
Feb 09, 2013 Jason Phillips rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I suppose you can draw whatever conclusions you want from Mr. Woodward's "Bush At War" depending on your political slant. For those considering the book, I ask you to look at it impartially - it is a fascinating study into presidential decision making, and can be considered a primary source for research purposes. The decision making portrayed here are those of President Bush, and despite attacks from either end of the spectrum directed at Mr. Woodward, he has, as always, turned a reporter's eye ...more
marcus miller
From the perspective of mid-2010 as President Obama's military surge in Afghanistan gets underway one can only hope that his national security/military/diplomatic team works better than did that of President Bush.
Woodward describes Bush as "acting on his instincts," "his gut reactions," and his belief that he was going to shape the world. Cheney just wants to kill people, then hides in his undisclosed location, Rumsfeld seems incapable of making his mind up about anything except covering his as
Ben Haymond
I have mixed feelings about this book.

In terms of quality investigative reporting it is in a class by itself. How Woodward got all of these people to tell him what they did is pretty incredible and a just a little troubling. He meticulously recreated every meeting of the National Security Council principals from September-December of 2001 which is quite a feat. I got a sense of the personalities and ideas of everyone around the table and also how this affected the decisions that were made.

I li
Dec 01, 2015 Freeson rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Woodward's first "Bush at War" book goes into detail about the initial year after September 11th. It is interesting to get such detail - the prologue to the more prominent stuff that happened later on - about the initial war into Afghanistan. In a sense, this book is a time capsule of the first few months before we knew how the story ended. If we view it as a narrative, we see foreshadowing of Bush entering into Iraq and the tensions between Rumsfeld and Cheney, and Rice and Powell.
Jun 27, 2013 Christopher rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
A fly-on-the-wall book of the deliberations inside the Bush Administration immediately following the 9/11 attacks though the successful toppling of the Taliban in Afghanistan. Iraq looms large in the shadows of the book as the Cheney-Rumsfeld cabal continually advise aggressive action against any state deemed "rogue". Colin Powell and, less so, Condi Rice shine through as the voices of reason in an increasingly aggressive administration. One negative point is a general criticism of Bob Woodward' ...more
Mark Valentine
I finished this book with some frustration that Woodward was too soft on Bush. He always gives him the benefit of the doubt. Bush almost seems the victim of Presidency--it happened to him so now he must try to figure this out.

Fortunately, I did not let this be the last Woodward book.
Mar 02, 2009 Bonnie rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
I'm trying to plow my way through this book. Why? (I keep asking myself) I'm hoping to find some logic or reason behind the mess we're in. HARD TO READ! I can't decide if it's because of Bush's language, often quoted directly and hard to decipher, or Woodward's writing style--maybe he should stick to shorter newspaper articles. Very choppy and disjointed, but gives a detailed look to the discussions and decisions made shortly after 9/11. It's been interesting to see how much pressure Bush was ge ...more
Michael Kocher
It won't change anyone's opinion of the Bush administration or their conduct in the 'war on terror' but it is an interesting look at how this presidency initially responded to 9/11. Unfortunately as the book progresses it often becomes tedious in the almost word for word reconstructions of cabinet meetings. The beginning and end are the most interesting pieces.
Asmaa Elwany
بوش فى حرب
اولا احداث 11 سبتمبر اقوى اختبار لاى رئيس ونظامه فى امريكا
ثانيا حرب القضاء على الارهاب وضرب افغانستان
ثالثا غزو العراق
الكاتب اوضح ليه كانوا بيضربوا افغانستان علشان تنظيم القاعده اللى كان شبه مستقر فيها لكن مااوضحش ليه غزو العراق ؟ معتقدش ان اسقاط نظام صدام حسين هو السبب لانه ممكن يكون بيمول الارهاب لان نظام صدام اصلا كان ساقط هما كانوا واثقين ان العراق مفيهاش اسلحة دمار شامل ازاى هيكون فيها وهى فى عزلة اكتر من 10 سنين معروف ان الجيش العراقى وقف تسليحه بعد غزو الكويت ولو كان باقى اسل
A fairly even-handed look at the invasion of Afghanistan -- a topic that Woodward then just ignores in his next three books. Quite an oversight, that. An important set up for the next three booke that follow.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Against All Enemies
  • Rise of the Vulcans: The History of Bush's War Cabinet
  • Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq
  • State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
  • War by Other Means: An Insider's Account of the War on Terror
  • House of Bush, House of Saud: The Secret Relationship Between the World's Two Most Powerful Dynasties
  • The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O'Neill
  • The Terror Presidency: Law and Judgment Inside the Bush Administration
  • Conservatives Without Conscience
  • American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush
  • The Greatest Story Ever Sold: The Decline and Fall of Truth from 9/11 to Katrina
  • The Lies of George W. Bush: Mastering the Politics of Deception
  • Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War
  • Cobra II: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq
  • The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States
  • What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington's Culture of Deception
  • Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About the '60s
  • The Clinton Wars
Robert "Bob" Upshur Woodward is an assistant managing editor of The Washington Post. While an investigative reporter for that newspaper, Woodward, working with fellow reporter Carl Bernstein, helped uncover the Watergate scandal that led to U.S. President Richard Nixon's resignation. Woodward has written 12 best-selling non-fiction books and has twice contributed reporting to efforts that collecti ...more
More about Bob Woodward...

Other Books in the Series

Bush at War (4 books)
  • Plan of Attack
  • State of Denial
  • The War Within: A Secret White House History, 2006-08

Share This Book

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »