Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism (1920)” as Want to Read:
The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism (1920)
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism (1920)

3.94  ·  Rating Details ·  254 Ratings  ·  15 Reviews
An excerpt from the beginning of:

Tradition and the Individual Talent

IN English writing we seldom speak of tradition, though we occasionally apply its name in deploring its absence. We cannot refer to "the tradition" or to "a tradition"; at most, we employ the adjective in saying that the poetry of So-and-so is "traditional" or even "too traditional." Seldom, perhaps, does
Hardcover, 174 pages
Published June 1st 2008 by Kessinger Publishing (first published December 31st 1920)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Sacred Wood, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Sacred Wood

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Margaret Langstaff
I read this first as a know-nothing English major, highlighted the devil out of it, scribbled mad marginalia throughout bristling and with exclamation points (and arrows, astrices) and swallowed in gulps every bit of Eliot hagiography my profs dished up, without reserve, uncritically.

I found my old undergraduate copy a few days ago and was alternately appalled and entertained by my personal reactions recorded there. Also as I re-read it, the actual text of the book itself, those "priceless" essa
I was a comp. lit concentrator, yet no one forced me to read this book? Something does not add up. P.S. you're all fired.
Dec 31, 2015 Johnny rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The Sacred Wood and Major Early Essays has been in my library for a long time. I finally read it yesterday. There are numerous sarcastic phrases that authors have made about critics, two are “pigs at a pastry cart” or “eunuchs in a harem,” but most of them amount to “those who can do and those who cannot, critique.” Of course, this little volume on literary criticism was written by Thomas Stearns Eliot. When he dissects a poet’s work, it has the voice of authority.

Of course, there is a certain d
Simon Mcleish
Jan 11, 2013 Simon Mcleish rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: owned
Originally published on my blog here in December 2001.

The poetry of the past was extremely important to T.S. Eliot, and he wrote a fair amount of criticism. This is quite an early collection of essays, mainly about Elizabethan and Jacobean poetic drama. In most of them, the emphasis is on where earlier critics had gone wrong in their assessments of the significance and stature of the poets. While Eliot's writing is (unsurprisingly) insightful, this theme of re-examination and the tone in which i
"Marlowe's Mephistopheles is a simpler creature than Goethe's. But at least Marlowe has, in a few words, concentrated him into a statement. He is there, and (incidentally) he renders Milton's Satan superfluous. He embodies a philosophy. A creation of art should not do that : he should replace the philosophy. Goethe has not, that is to say, sacrificed to consecrated his thought to make the drama ; the drama is still a means. And this type of mixed art has been repeated by men incomparably smaller ...more
Oct 28, 2012 Lesliemae rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I went to E.J. Pratt Library. I was preparing for my very first university lecture. Not to attend, but to give one. I was caught in nothing less than an aura of magic and absurdity. Who was I to teach the new undergraduates about T.S. Eliot? What did I know? and yet thoughts about life as a professor - the tweed jacket and gentle the late afternoon sunlight streaming through the window as I make subtle and powerful gestures.

I heard my name called from the circulation desk and was taken into a l
Stacy Nyikos
Apr 17, 2014 Stacy Nyikos rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Eliot is widely credited with creating the term, objective correlative, which he uses first in this piece to discuss some of the shortcomings of Shakespeare’s Hamlet. He defines objective correlative as: “…a set of objects, a situation, a chain of events which shall be the formula of that particular emotion; such that when the external facts, which must terminate in sensory experience, are given, the emotion is immediately evoked” (Eliot para. 7). In working to become more familiar with literary ...more
Mar 26, 2007 max rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: the critics
Shelves: unpossessed
Everyone should read the essay "Hamlet and His Problems", which discusses the Objective Correlative, Eliot's preferred critical wedge to attack those poets whose literary moods surpass their ability to embody them in dramatic action. Oh wait, that describes most of Eliot's corpus quite succinctly.

Perhaps, inadvertently, Eliot defines exactly that rare artistic accomplishment which ought to fail but does not, whose elan vital outperforms its plot and soil.

Hate his conclusions if you like and labe
J. Alfred
Eliot accomplishes a few things with this, but foremost among the things that he accomplishes is forcefully reminding his reader that he is unbelievably erudite. Some of us didn't need convincing! Other than some interesting quips on isolated authors (interesting only to parties who know and care about those authors- Blake and Dante, for me) there is nothing in this book lost by only reading the central essay "Tradition and the Individual Talent." That, however, is important for anyone intereste ...more
Aug 09, 2012 Jake rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
This is a collection of Eliot's critisism. No one will ever accuse T.S. of being a page turner, and without a doubt he can be padantic and dull, but there is enough good things in this book to recommend reading. Now, you have to be as sharp as a library to understand the many literary references he makes, but if I takes the attitude of learning something new, then this is pretty good. Also a lot of good one liners.
I do know it's time now for me to read this dusty old hardback properly.
I do like T S Eliot. He has moments of pinpointing a thought in words so clearly.

And now, at this time in my life, I am very interested to hear what he thought about literature and criticism - long before Structuralism and the Marxists and the Feminists (to name but a few) arrived and interfered with everything that happens between a text and a reader -

May 15, 2011 pjr8888 is currently reading it
1969, "Price net 21S: £1.05"

"Poetry is a superior amusement: I do not mean an amusement for superior people. I call it an amusement, an amusement pour distraire les honnêtes gens not because that is a true definition, but because if you call it anything else you are likely to call it something still more false." TSE
Some of the essays were quite insightful, others Eliot seemed to spend more time decrying the criticism of others and little on the work under review. Seem a bit dated too. No denying his erudition though...
Aug 29, 2013 Blair rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: essays-etc
While I admit that some of the concepts Eliot touches upon are outdated, his views on the role of the artist and critic are very apt and hold up over time. If you have to, focus on "The Perfect Critic" and "Hamlet and His Problems"
Benjy rated it liked it
Jan 29, 2014
Louise rated it it was ok
Oct 23, 2010
Yvette rated it it was amazing
Jul 02, 2009
John  Ervin
John Ervin rated it it was amazing
Sep 15, 2009
David Morley
David Morley rated it liked it
May 20, 2017
unnarrator rated it liked it
Jan 06, 2009
Sebastian rated it liked it
Jan 22, 2017
Quincy Lehr
Quincy Lehr rated it really liked it
Jun 09, 2014
Andi Bob
Andi Bob rated it it was amazing
Oct 06, 2011
Greg Ridge
Greg Ridge rated it it was ok
Oct 23, 2014
Gina rated it really liked it
Feb 11, 2008
Ambra rated it really liked it
Jun 21, 2013
Brendan rated it really liked it
Jul 26, 2012
Levan Ramishvili
Levan Ramishvili rated it it was amazing
Mar 29, 2013
Aprile rated it it was amazing
Jun 17, 2012
Hamdy rated it really liked it
Feb 03, 2017
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Chinese Written Character as a Medium for Poetry
  • The Dyer's Hand
  • A Poetics
  • Literary Essays of Ezra Pound
  • Anatomy of Criticism
  • The Necessary Angel: Essays on Reality and the Imagination
  • Theory of Prose
  • Less Than One: Selected Essays
  • Poetry and the Age
  • Notes on Thought and Vision
  • The Well Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry
  • Nine Gates: Entering the Mind of Poetry
  • The Rise of the Novel
  • Why You Should Read Kafka Before You Waste Your Life
  • Narrative Discourse
  • Proofs & Theories: Essays on Poetry
  • The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry
  • Seven Types of Ambiguity
Thomas Stearns Eliot was a poet, dramatist and literary critic. He received the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1948 "for his outstanding, pioneer contribution to present-day poetry." He wrote the poems The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, The Waste Land, The Hollow Men, Ash Wednesday, and Four Quartets; the plays Murder in the Cathedral and The Cocktail Party; and the essay Tradition and the Individ ...more
More about T.S. Eliot...

Share This Book

“Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal.” 255 likes
“Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal; bad poets deface what they take, and good poets make it into something better, or at least something different.” 81 likes
More quotes…