Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Crimea: The Last Crusade” as Want to Read:
Crimea: The Last Crusade
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Crimea: The Last Crusade

3.99  ·  Rating Details ·  1,942 Ratings  ·  182 Reviews
The terrible conflict that dominated the mid 19th century, the Crimean War killed at least 800,000 men and pitted Russia against a formidable coalition of Britain, France and the Ottoman Empire. It was a war for territory, provoked by fear that if the Ottoman Empire were to collapse then Russia could control a huge swathe of land from the Balkans to the Persian Gulf. But i ...more
Hardcover, 575 pages
Published October 1st 2010 by Allen Lane
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
William1
Jun 02, 2011 William1 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 19-ce, uk, 21-ce, history, war
Excellent. This is actually three books. The first one--up to p. 140 or so--is about the origins of the Crimean war. At the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem Catholic and Orthodox Christians would fight each other to the death for the right to, say, be the first to celebrate the Easter Mass. Disingenuously, Nicholas I of Russia used a concern for the Orthodox living under Turkish rule as an opportunity for imperialist expansion. He really wanted to partition Turkey. Russophobic Britain w ...more
Hadrian
May 11, 2011 Hadrian rated it really liked it
An impressive new history of a war which seems to be almost completely forgotten over here, with the exception of "The Charge of the Light Brigade".

It covers the war in all aspects, from the grisly siege of Sevastopol, the snarled diplomatic efforts which led to the start of the war, comparisons of the major players, the effects of religious differences, and the relatively neglected campaigns in the Baltic and Caucasus.

A worthy addition to the library of anyone interested in the era, to say no
...more
Caroline
Apr 26, 2014 Caroline rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history
A comprehensive history of the war with excellent chapters on the aftermath in world politics and national identity.

[on the aftermath of the war]

The Crimean War reinforced in Russia a long-felt sense of resentment against Europe. There was a feeling of betrayal that the West had sided with the Turks against Russia. It was the first time in history that a European alliance had fought on the side of a Muslim power against another Christian state in a major war.

All around the Black Sea rim, the
...more
Anastasia Fitzgerald-Beaumont
It’s Good Friday, April 10, 1846. Jerusalem is packed with pilgrims on an Easter weekend that happened to fall on the same date in both the Latin and Orthodox calendars. The mood is tense. The two religious communities had been arguing over who has the right to be first to carry out the rituals at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, one of the holiest places in Christendom, standing on the spot where Jesus is said to have been crucified.

That Friday was to be anything but good. The Catholics arrive
...more
Pavel
May 29, 2014 Pavel rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I strongly recommend this book to anyone who has any interest in current conflict in Ukraine/Crimea, who wants to understand historical, geopolitical and political roots of idiotic modern strife between Russia and the West and who at the same time is sick of media taking sides and in fact enkindling the conflict by that.

The book itself only covers that old XIX century war between Russia and Allies (GB, France and Turkey) of course, but it reflects current events so much it is even scary. O. Fig
...more
James Murphy
Dec 03, 2016 James Murphy rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Reading this interesting history I discovered that some of my preconceived notions about the war were wrong. Besides knowing very little about the war itself, I realized what familiarity I have with it is through British perceptions. The histories most available to us are British histories, and so such innovative work such as that of Florence Nightingale is filtered through British sensibilities, and the attention given to something like Tennyson's "Charge of the Light Brigade" has made that act ...more
Jill Hutchinson
This book began rather slowly for me but I soon became engrossed in Figes' narrative of this somewhat "forgotten" war which claimed so many lives for so little. I have always been fascinated by the Crimean War and this book added to my knowledge as the author had access to sources not previously available to other authors. It was a war of incompetent leadership, missed opportunities, outdated military tactics, and rampant disease. Much mystique and legend regarding the war has grown over the yea ...more
Bettie☯
To look into given the recent developments

Orlando Figes is a discredited author, however I would still like a flick through this.

May 2014: President Putin's visit to Crimea was welcomed there but criticised by Washington BBC news
Mark
Dec 16, 2012 Mark marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history, religions, 2016
Thanks Santa!!
Mike
May 02, 2013 Mike rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
It’s still a little difficult for me to believe that the French and the British were relying on freaking travel writing for the logistics of their attack on Crimea, that some of the soldiers thought they were headed to a jungle, and a little more than 150 years later we can take virtual walks there. Makes you wonder what Napoleon had to work with. But one of the most interesting parts of this book, for me, was reading that the Crimean War coincided with a sort of information boom. Britain ended ...more
Tim Martin
Aug 11, 2013 Tim Martin rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history, reviewed
I have to admit that I didn’t know much at all about the Crimean War before I read this book. I was probably like most people when I thought about the conflict, if I thought about it at all; it was one of those endless little European wars, maybe less little than most, that seemed to pop up between the Napoleonic Wars and World War I, one of a series of conflicts that involved Turkey and its neighbors or somehow involved the Balkans (the Balkans!), famous for Florence Nightingale and the Charge ...more
Marguerite Kaye
Oct 27, 2011 Marguerite Kaye rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I'll be honest, before I started this book, I had very little idea of where the Crimea was, let alone the causes of the war. Flroence Nightingalge, 'The Thin Red Line', balaclavas and of course The Charge of the Light Brigade I knew about. Cardigan and Raglan, I recognised had given their names to knitting. I'd read about the fall of Sevastopol in the excellent 'Rose of Sebeastopol'and had long had an idea for a book or series of my own set in and around the war, and I'd really enjoyed one of Or ...more
Steven Peterson
Apr 16, 2011 Steven Peterson rated it really liked it
A fine history of the nasty Crimean War. This was one of those wars that should never have happened. Neither the French nor British could quite figure out why to go to war. Russia had the deteriorating Czar Nicholas seeing possible war in religious terms. The Ottoman Empire was in decline. The dynamics, thus, were not auspicious.

Once war began, the allies (Britain, France, the Ottoman Empire, plus others as well) bruised the Russian forces at the outset. Then, a surprisingly strong stand by the
...more
Don
Apr 27, 2012 Don rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This is a solid, very readable history of the Crimean War, with particular attention paid to the political and religious origins of the conflict.

Just to vent a little, I read this on my Kindle, and was unhappy about the ebook experience here. First, the conversion to ebook seems somewhat sloppy. I know that some books are converted in a process where the text is supplied to Amazon via a PDF file, and then presumably is scanned into Amazon's system. That appears to be what happened here, since so
...more
Bob H
Mar 05, 2015 Bob H rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
A majestic and magisterial history of the bloody 1853-1856 conflict; the author has done considerable research, including first-person accounts (and not just those of a young Leo Tolstoy). He does show the other fronts in the war -- the Balkans, the Caucasus, the Baltic -- and not just the Crimean peninsula, though the narrative mostly focuses on the latter, and the siege of Sevastopol. We also learn of the diplomatic and religious intrigue before and after the conflict.

This book is not just a m
...more
Mac McCormick III
With the ongoing crisis and unrest in Ukraine, I decided to read Orlando Figes' The Crimean War: A History. I'm glad that I picked this book to read because it offers some insight into the reasons of the current situation in Ukraine and the Crimea. Figes not only gives a narrative of the war, he puts in perspective by reviewing what caused the war and reviewed the impact it had on the participants, especially Russia and Great Britain. If, like me, you were not fully familiar with the Crimean War ...more
Alexander Vassilieff
This latest addition to the historical topic of the Crimean War sounds interesting as there are many books in English on the Crimean War. But this is the first in any language to draw extensively from Russian, French and Ottoman as well as British sources to illuminate the geo-political, cultural and religious factors that shaped the involvement of each major power in the conflict.

"It was the earliest example of a truly modern war - fought with new industrial technologies, modern rifles, steamsh
...more
Marks54
May 03, 2016 Marks54 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This is a wonderful book about a not so wonderful war. There are several ways to look at the Crimean War. It was just like the Napoleonic Wars, only with fewer people and better firearms. It was just like World War I, except that it was smaller in scale, with more primitive technology, and perhaps even more incompetent generals. It was a Crusade -- a religious war -- although the protagonists seemed to use religion as more of a rationalization than a reason. The religious war was three-way or mo ...more
Columbia Warren
Feb 02, 2014 Columbia Warren rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
If you are in the market for a book about the Crimean War (and who isn't?), this is a damn fine book. Apparently there are other recent books out there about this war, but I'm certainly not going to read another one, so I can't really compare. This book provides very good coverage about the actual fighting of the war as well as the causes, connected events during the war, and the aftermath. One complaint I'd have is that the author seemed to set up the war as a religious conflict, but then stron ...more
Emmanuel Gustin
The Crimean war is today mostly a dim memory from a bygone age in politics and warfare: Most people faintly remember something about Florence Nightingale, the charge of the Light Brigade, incompetent leadership and much human suffering. And perhaps there is much to be said for that summary.

One thing Figes does is tell that story in more detail, doing more justice to those who lived through the bitter conflict. But he also adds a lot of context to this war, explaining why the governments chose t
...more
Mitchell
May 23, 2012 Mitchell rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Figes rescued the Crimean War from further obscurity and it's a good thing he did. Unfortunately, it is still too relevant in today's world, especially in Ukraine, Chechnya, and the Balkans. All wars make for some depressing reading, but the Crimean War is even more than most in that regard. No power comes out looking good in this conflict -- the Russians are blinded by Christian messianic attitudes; the British are overconfident, bellicose, and arrogant; the French are determined to win back th ...more
Dirk Baranek
May 04, 2013 Dirk Baranek rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: geschichte
Klassische, historiografische Darstellung des Krimkriegs (1854/55), in dem eine Koalition aus Frankreich, Großbritannien und der Türkei den russischen Einfluss im Schwarzen Meer und auf der Krim sowie auf dem ganzen Balkan zurückdrängten. Wir finden uns wieder in der Zeit der Kabinettskriege und europäuschen Monarchien, die um jedes Fleckchen Einfluss am Bosporus, im Kaukasus, auf dem Balkan und in Griechenland ringen, den Niedergang des osmanischen Reiches und den sich daraus ableitenden Konseq ...more
Lizixer
May 03, 2014 Lizixer rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
A monster of a book. Took me most of the month of April to read it but worth the effort.

The Crimean War loomed as large in the minds of the Victorians as the First World War does today and yet what we know of it can be boiled to primary school kid projects on courageous nurses, that poem (Tennyson laid it on a bit thick apparently) and the names of a few pubs (The Alma, The Inkerman).

It was a war of religious fanaticism, a war spurred on by Russophobia, a war that was encouraged for the first
...more
Joe
Jul 29, 2011 Joe rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
A quite excellent military, social, political and cultural history of the Crimean war rolled into one. Packed with detail and anecdote, without becoming too enormous, and very engagingly written.

Details of the military debacle are fascinating; Lord Raglan was clearly a geriatric imbecile (curious to note a pub called The Lord Raglan opposite Postman’s Park in London). However, it’s the cultural and social history that really makes this book. The interaction of the media and public opinion is fa
...more
David
Dec 02, 2011 David rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction, history
A well writen book that left me with the impression that the author really wanted to write a book about religious conflict in southeastern Europe during the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. Professor Figes did include a detailed (and excellent) account of the Crimean War itself, but he did as part of a broader narrative that went from the 1815 Congress of Vienna to the First World War. I appreciate historical context, but I thought Professor Figes went a little overboard. On the plus side, the ac ...more
S.
Feb 07, 2013 S. rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: hookah, cheshire, m-turtle
well-researched professional work; sole weakness was that compared to great WW2 histories where we learn the names of individual divisions/commanders, the Crimean War was a more chaotic, less organized affair and so the story becomes more about generalities (viz., 'the minie gun' vs the 'musket') rather than pure tactics / personages.

professional work. really should give it the fourth star, but probably I'm trying to game the recommendations from the GR alg
Garrett
Oct 15, 2014 Garrett rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history
This is a great history of one of the more over-looked wars of the mid-19th century. Figes does an excellent job of detailing the causes for the war as well as the long-term effect the war had on each of the main participants. This book is especially relevant given the recent situation in the Crimea between Russia and Ukraine. It is well worth the read for anyone interested in history.
Tom
Jan 25, 2016 Tom rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The first 100 pages sets up the background to the war and is a bit of a slog, but then the book takes off. A great explanation as to how the war has affected events since then, with the final page explaining the significance of Crimea to Russia, and why Putin would later invade this part of Ukraine (the book came out before the current events there).
Jonathan Hyslop
Apr 28, 2012 Jonathan Hyslop rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Fine narrative history - gives you a real sense of Russian and (to a lesser extent) Turkish perspectives, in contrast to most British writers on the topic. Much better than Royle on the same war, which I have struggled to read several times without succes.
Lynn
I really enjoyed what I read of this - about 350 pages. Unfortunately, halfway through the book we went on holiday for two weeks, and when I came back, I just couldn't get into it again. Someday I'll probably start the whole thing over again, but it's a bit much to think about at the moment.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Crimea or The Crimean War - what is the deal? 3 27 Apr 05, 2015 04:00PM  
  • Russia Against Napoleon: The Battle for Europe, 1807 to 1814
  • Crimea: The Great Crimean War, 1854-1856
  • Moscow 1812: Napoleon's Fatal March
  • The Thirty Years War: Europe's Tragedy
  • Absolute War: Soviet Russia in the Second World War
  • The White War: Life and Death on the Italian Front 1915-1919
  • The Fall of Paris: The Siege and the Commune 1870-71
  • The Franco-Prussian War: The German Conquest of France in 1870-1871
  • Napoleon's Wars: An International History, 1803-1815
  • The Boer War
  • The Russian Origins of the First World War
  • The Icon and the Axe: An Interpretive History of Russian Culture
  • Ivan's War: Life and Death in the Red Army, 1939-1945
  • God's Fury, England's Fire: A New History of the English Civil Wars
  • The Eagle Unbowed: Poland and the Poles in the Second World War
  • The Pursuit of Glory: Europe 1648-1815
  • Iron Kingdom: The Rise and Downfall of Prussia, 1600–1947
  • The Hundred Years War: The English in France 1337-1453
21461
Orlando Figes is a British historian of Russia, and a professor of history at Birkbeck, University of London.
More about Orlando Figes...

Share This Book



“In 1846 Easter fell on the same date in the Latin and Greek Orthodox calendars, so the holy shrines were much more crowded than usual, and the mood was very tense. The two religious communities had long been arguing about who should have first right to carry out their Good Friday rituals on the altar of Calvary inside the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, the spot where the cross of Jesus was supposed to have been inserted in the rock. During recent years the rivalry between the Latins and the Greeks had reached such fever pitch that Mehmet Pasha, the Ottoman governor of Jerusalem, had been forced to position soldiers inside and outside the church to preserve order. But even this had not prevented fights from breaking out. On this Good Friday the Latin priests arrived with their white linen altar-cloth to find that the Greeks had got there first with their silk embroidered cloth. The Catholics demanded to see the Greeks’ firman, their decree from the Sultan in Constantinople, empowering them to place their silk cloth on the altar first. The Greeks demanded to see the Latins’ firman allowing them to remove it. A fight broke out between the priests, who were quickly joined by monks and pilgrims on either side. Soon the whole church was a battlefield. The rival groups of worshippers fought not only with their fists, but with crucifixes, candlesticks, chalices, lamps and incense-burners, and even bits of wood which they tore from the sacred shrines. The fighting continued with knives and pistols smuggled into the Holy Sepulchre by worshippers of either side. By the time the church was cleared by Mehmet Pasha’s guards, more than forty people lay dead on the floor.1” 2 likes
“The moonlight was still floating on the waters, when men, looking from numberless decks towards the east, were able to hail the dawn. There was a summer breeze blowing fair from the land. At a quarter before five a gun from the Britannia gave the signal to weigh. The air was obscured by the busy smoke of the engines, and it was hard to see how and whence due order would come; but presently the Agamemnon moved through, and with signals at all her masts – for Lyons was on board her, and was governing and ordering the convoy. The French steamers of war went out with their transports in tow, and their great vessels formed the line. The French went out more quickly than the English, and in better order. Many of their transports were vessels of very small size; and of necessity they were a swarm. Our transports went out in five columns of only thirty each. Then – guard over all – the English war-fleet, in single column, moved slowly out of the bay.50” 1 likes
More quotes…