Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “King John” as Want to Read:
King John
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview
Read Book* *Different edition

King John

3.28 of 5 stars 3.28  ·  rating details  ·  2,061 ratings  ·  166 reviews
King John, a history play by William Shakespeare, dramatises the reign of John, King of England (ruled 1199–1216), son of Henry II of England and Eleanor of Aquitaine and father of Henry III of England. It is believed to have been written in the mid-1590s but was not published until it appeared in the First Folio in 1623.
Paperback, 352 pages
Published January 1st 2006 by Simon & Schuster (first published 1595)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
Hamlet by William ShakespeareMacbeth by William ShakespeareRomeo and Juliet by William ShakespeareA Midsummer Night's Dream by William ShakespeareOthello by William Shakespeare
Best of William Shakespeare
33rd out of 57 books — 976 voters
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix by J.K. RowlingFallen by Lauren KateMockingjay by Suzanne CollinsShiver by Maggie StiefvaterCity of Ashes by Cassandra Clare
Books With The Blues
92nd out of 2,514 books — 849 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Bill  Kerwin

This is perhaps Shakespeare's worst play, and certainly the worst of the history plays. It has an interesting theme underlying all the conflicts--what are the legitimate sources of power and authority--but throughout the various struggles (between first-born illegitimate and second-born legitimate sons, between an established king and his deceased older brother's minor heir, between the monarchy and the universal church) the connections are not artfully made nor are the distinctions carefully dr
It's been a while (high school!) since I've read Shakespeare, and the pleasures of his language and verse-flow were almost completely lost on me at that time. Like many youths who are required to read the Bard at an obscenely young age (Julius Caesar and Romeo and Juliet were assigned in middle school for goodness’ sake), I viewed his verse and language as impediments to the story, which was sometimes pretty interesting to a distracted, pimply youth. But fast-forward a few years and here I am ne ...more
David Sarkies
Jul 29, 2015 David Sarkies rated it 3 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Shakespeare tragics
Recommended to David by: It's Shakespeare
Shelves: historical
What! No Magna Carta!
29 July 2015

Okay, I said this many times before but this time one of the commentators at the end of the book pointed out that reading some plays doesn't bring the play out the same way that watching it performed does, but the reason Sylvia Barnett made this comment is because this is one of those plays that is very rarely performed – namely because people simply are not that interested in it. In fact when she was looking at the various productions of this play she noted tha
João Fernandes
I went to see this play at the Shakespeare Globe a few months ago, and I've been meaning to read it ever since.

It was the first time I saw a performance of a Shakespearian play and it was incredible, I mean everyone left with a pleasantly bewildered look on their face.

Of course, this play doesn't even come close to the double tetralogy of the War of the Roses. It is no Richard II or Henry V, but it is still an intelligent play.

The Life and Death of King John is a play that touches on the issue
The Life and Death of King John is a very good play. It's similar to my recently reviewed Richard II in that there are no outright heroes or villains; it is instead a play about fallible men attempting to control events that are beyond their capacity.

The central character is King John. Not unintelligent but not a good king. He's unable to command the respect of his nobles, and even his villainies are small-minded and weak. Compare his treatment of Arthur with Richard III's treatment of his nephe
This is not the same King John you know from history. For one thing, there is no Runnymede and no Magna Carta in this play. Secondly, Richard the Lion-Hearted has already died, so there is no Robin Hood, Sheriff of Nottingham, or Guy of Gisbourne. No, The Life and Death of King John is about retaining one's power as king when confronted with the demands of the papacy and of other surrounding monarchs.

In the process of trying to hold on to his power, John tries to have his nephew Arthur killed; b
There are many people in the world who are intimidated by Shakespeare, namely his archaic language and inestimable impact on literature and the English language. To those, I gleefully point to King John and say, "See? Even Shakespeare had bad days!"

I started reading the play on a plane to San Francisco and was dismayed by my inability to grasp the characters and why things were happening. I mean, this is the King John who was the wicked Prince John from Robin Hood and the king who was convinced
The thing about King John that I'm not finding overtly discussed in the criticisms of the play (that I've read) is that it's essentially a comedy. Shakespeare takes a rote plot about regal machinations and twists it by creating the character of the Bastard Faulconbridge, a witty creation who comments on the action from his pragmatist's perspective. I really do think Shakespeare is going for satire here, and if you can read it as such, the play is well worth it. The mother of a usurped prince sho ...more
Thus begins my reading of the so-called "History" plays of one William Shakespeare. Some I have read before, the others have been put off indefinitely...until now! So let us dive the "beginning". Not the earlier plays that Shakespeare wrote, but rather the first play on a historical chronology: King John.

King John is based on that infamous king of England whose rule was so fantastic the Magna Carta was drafted as a result and King John would forever be the effeminate antagonist of Robin
King John is one of Shakespeare's least well-known plays, and there are some good reasons for this. We have seen some of its themes explored to better effect in Richard III, and even the Henry VI plays. Hence if we want a more satisfying account of a usurper who seeks to kill a child who is rightful heir to the throne, we should look to the former play. If we want a more fulsome account of England losing a war against France, we will find it in the latter plays.

The play has other serious faults.
Aditya Mallya
'King John' perfectly embodies one of the great pleasures of reading a great author's collected writings - the discovery that some of his little-known creations are just as good or sometimes better than his most celebrated works. This is a compelling tale of politics and war - a sort of game of thrones played out in venomously poetic language.

"I had a thing to say, but let it go:
The sun is in the heaven, and the proud day,
Attended with the pleasures of the world,
Is all too wanton and too full of
Fourth time reading this play. It never had much of an impact on me but now I see it as a cross between the early tetralogy of history plays (Henry VI, parts 1,2 & 3 and Richard III) and the later, glorious tetralogy (Richard II, Henry IV parts 1 & 2 and Henry V). There is the satirical delight in exposing the raw mechanics of power-grabbing and political manipulation that you see in the earlier plays. There is wicked humor reminiscent of the best of Richard III. But there is a subtler c ...more
Dameon Manuel
King John is about the efforts of the eponymous king, a classic anti-hero, in navigating the murky realpolitik of west Europe in the early 1200s. Contending with finicky noblemen at home, enterprising relatives with ambitions of coronation and control, foreign armies, and a heavily influential Vatican, King John is completely overwhelmed. In spite of arguably having the military advantage over his foes, the events around him cause him to behave with irrational brashness, leading to the near-subj ...more
So, technically, I didn't read this play.

I used various study guides, then watched the play performed.

This leads me to theorize about what exactly constitutes fairness when determining if one has actually read a book.

Bear with me a moment.

If I read a book in my mind, then I have read that book.
If I read a book out loud, then I have read that book.
If I am reading with someone else (say a child), and we take turns reading passages out loud, then I have read that book.
If I look at the words while s
Shakespeare’s interpretation of King John summarizes the period of John’s reign after the death of Richard I until his poisoning. He works to solidify his authority against the aspirations of his nephew, Arthur, who also claims the crown. Unlike Richard III, John vacillates in his ruthlessness, making him more sympathetic, but also more inept, than Shakespeare’s most infamous king.

The Bastard, a fictional child by Richard I, provides a window into royalty from the audience’s perspective. The ma
Abe Goolsby
Not the most memorable of Shakespeare's plays overall, but, as always, there are plenty of morsels to savor. I enjoyed it.

As an interesting aside, I was also working through a commentary on Ecclesiastes at the same time. The events of Act II in this play served as a nice complement to the following passage:

"This wisdom have I seen also under the sun, and it seemed great unto me: There was a little city, and few men within it; and there came a great King against it, and besieged it, and built gre
This is the first time I've read this play. Its unfamiliarity made it a little difficult to keep the characters straight. Poor Arthur's plaintive entreaties ("Must you put out my eyes with those hot irons, Hubert?") broke my heart.
I quite liked this play, though I don't know that it's the best of the best. The language seemed rougher to me and the monologues less compelling than in other of the history plays. Yet, I think Shakespeare's mastery of human nature, individual and political, is evident here. The absurdity amused me and I especially liked the Bastard and the Dauphin, Arthur and Hubert. King John and Queen Eleanor where exactly what you might expect from popular representation. I also particularly liked the Basta ...more
David Bates
This isn't one of Shakespeare's highly regarded plays, but I like this little mutt. The theme is indecision, with every character making major decisions and then almost instantly going back on them. Constance, the mother of prince Arthur, dies early on from grief (get it? eyeroll). Prince Arthur himself perishes later when, after his would be murderer changes his mind about killing him, after the King who sent the murder had thought better of it, he jumps off a wall trying to escape a castle and ...more
What a weird play. On one level, very melodramatic and reminiscent of _Richard III_: speeches, mourning, royal concerns. And yet the beginnings of what I love about Shakespeare are here, as well. The Bastard (Falcounbridge) is awesome, fully full of personality and inner workings. Thematically, I love the idea that people are switching sides constantly, and paying for it. Falcounbridge switches from being a Falcounbridge to a Plantagenet, and witnesses the downfall of that family. King John swit ...more
Kind of odd for plotting--there are so many false starts, so many unfulfilled promises, and yet that may be the whole point of it. The Bastard, for a point of inconsistency, begins flippant and detached, but becomes so tied up in the intertwined battles (which are painfully personal, familiar) that he grows solemn and jaded. Constance, too, flares up and fades out of the play, and poor Arthur (spoiler alert) who pleads to elegantly to save his life is dispatched in less than 20 lines by making a ...more
My goal was to read 5 Shakespeare plays that I hadn't studied in school and this was #5. I added it because I had read a tragedy, a comedy, and a couple others and wanted to include one of the history plays. This one made me dizzy! According to the notes, the play compresses 14 years or so of English history into the span of several months, which doesn't help. But the switching of allegiances -- war! peace! war again! King John excommunicated -- then redeemed! All the nobles continually switchin ...more
Oft times funny and sad this follows John through his reign until his untimely death. He doesn't seem to be able to see beyond the moment. His decisions are instantaneous, and he fails to predict the route of the falling of the dominos, so to speak. The scenes alternate between foolishness and treachery. With John not knowing which way to turn. Easily influenced by those around him, he seems to be walking through an unlit maze with directions to the exit written in a language he will never under ...more
King John isn't a widely read or performed play, but I'm not sure why. In many ways, the plot looks a lot like Game of Thrones- complicated lines of succession, thrones contested, war, the question of the influence of the Pope, strategic marriages and offspring killed... It features one of the most intensely scary and stressful Shakespearean scenes I've ever read (Act IV, sc. 1, specifically). It also contains some intensely flowery language. A typical response in conversation in Act IV:

I really enjoyed this play! The dirty politics and shaky alliances really describe the time period well, and I loved the flowery speeches full of pomp and bravery and even a little sass. Love me some Shakespeare! I don't find the historical plays dry at all. Full of action and some really delightful characters and dialogue.

I was surprised that King John was written with any conscience whatsoever. He's the villain in every story ever written about him, and although he IS a bad guy in this play, h
tetszett (3 csillag)

Az első királydrámám. :)
Hát, János király nem jött be nekem. Mármint nem volt rossz, csak nem tetszett annyira, mint a legtöbb már olvasott Shakespeare-darab. De az is lehet, hogy nem a legjobbkor olvastam, mert kusza egy hetem volt/van, és szinte mindig fáradtan ültem le hozzá, úgy meg nem tudok annyira odafigyelni ugye… szóval szerintem ez is rányomta a bélyegét az összhatásra. A másik meg, hogy őszintén szólva ezt a művet nem önmagáért olvastam el, hanem mert a királydrámá
Pietro Coen
This play is about two kings and a bastard, and it has some funny scenes though many people get killed in it. There is a king called John and his mum, Queen Elinor. John became king after his brother Geffrey was killed in battle. The French ambassador, Chatillon, tells John (on behalf of King Philip of France) that unless he leaves his kingdom (“this fair island and the territories, to Ireland, Poictiers, Anjou, Touraine, Maine” ) to his nephew Arthur Plantagenet (Duke of Britaine), King Philip ...more
This play is truly an oddity from Shakespeare's canon. It's a history play, but not one tied to any of the others outside the fact it is about an English king. It features Shakespeare's most pro-Protestant, anti-Catholic writing, but it doesn't seem to matter much. The king himself is rather a weak choice. King John today is remembered for being the weaselly Prince John in the Robin Hood stories, and for signing the Magna Carta. In Shakespeare's day, he was held as an early Protestant martyr/her ...more
Jackson Cyril
One of Shakespeare's big underrated plays. I'm surprised that this book isn't studied more often. John and Phillip are both reluctant kings who don't want to fight and choose any option over war, and John especially comes off as an extremely unsavory character who can't inspire loyalty in anyone, and allows his mother too much freedom and power. Constance would actually be a great character if she didn't spend an entire scene crying over her captured (and then dead) son Arthur. The really fascin ...more
Edward Cheer
A bold, epic and intense story that builds and builds then leads to a sullen, depressing end. A great rendition of the actual king.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
underrated 4 10 Apr 06, 2013 02:41PM  
  • Tamburlaine
  • The Shoemaker's Holiday
  • All for Love
  • Shakespeare After All
  • Samson Agonistes
  • Eumenides
  • The Ecclesiazusae (or Women in Council)
  • Brand
  • The Man of Mode
  • The Lady's Not for Burning
  • Women of Trachis
  • Wordsworth: Poems
  • Caesar and Cleopatra
  • The Alchemist
William Shakespeare (baptised 26 April 1564) was an English poet and playwright, widely regarded as the greatest writer in the English language and the world's pre-eminent dramatist. He is often called England's national poet and the "Bard of Avon" (or simply "The Bard"). His surviving works consist of 38 plays, 154 sonnets, two long narrative poems, and several other poems. His plays have been tr ...more
More about William Shakespeare...

Share This Book

“Be great in act, as you have been in thought.” 324 likes
“He is the half part of a blessed man,
Left to be finished by such as she;
And she a fair divided excellence,
Whose fullness of perfection lies in him. ”
More quotes…