Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “King John” as Want to Read:
King John
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview
Read Book* *Different edition

King John

3.28 of 5 stars 3.28  ·  rating details  ·  1,952 ratings  ·  157 reviews
King John, a history play by William Shakespeare, dramatises the reign of John, King of England (ruled 1199–1216), son of Henry II of England and Eleanor of Aquitaine and father of Henry III of England. It is believed to have been written in the mid-1590s but was not published until it appeared in the First Folio in 1623.
Paperback, 352 pages
Published January 1st 2006 by Simon & Schuster (first published 1596)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about King John, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about King John

Hamlet by William ShakespeareMacbeth by William ShakespeareRomeo and Juliet by William ShakespeareA Midsummer Night's Dream by William ShakespeareOthello by William Shakespeare
Best of William Shakespeare
34th out of 63 books — 929 voters
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix by J.K. RowlingFallen by Lauren KateMockingjay by Suzanne CollinsShiver by Maggie StiefvaterCity of Ashes by Cassandra Clare
Books With The Blues
91st out of 2,529 books — 830 voters


More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Bill  Kerwin

This is perhaps Shakespeare's worst play, and certainly the worst of the history plays. It has an interesting theme underlying all the conflicts--what are the legitimate sources of power and authority--but throughout the various struggles (between first-born illegitimate and second-born legitimate sons, between an established king and his deceased older brother's minor heir, between the monarchy and the universal church) the connections are not artfully made nor are the distinctions carefully dr
...more
Bram
It's been a while (high school!) since I've read Shakespeare, and the pleasures of his language and verse-flow were almost completely lost on me at that time. Like many youths who are required to read the Bard at an obscenely young age (Julius Caesar and Romeo and Juliet were assigned in middle school for goodness’ sake), I viewed his verse and language as impediments to the story, which was sometimes pretty interesting to a distracted, pimply youth. But fast-forward a few years and here I am ne ...more
David Sarkies
Jul 29, 2015 David Sarkies rated it 3 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Shakespeare tragics
Recommended to David by: It's Shakespeare
Shelves: historical
What! No Magna Carta!
29 July 2015

Okay, I said this many times before but this time one of the commentators at the end of the book pointed out that reading some plays doesn't bring the play out the same way that watching it performed does, but the reason Sylvia Barnett made this comment is because this is one of those plays that is very rarely performed – namely because people simply are not that interested in it. In fact when she was looking at the various productions of this play she noted tha
...more
Terence
The Life and Death of King John is a very good play. It's similar to my recently reviewed Richard II in that there are no outright heroes or villains; it is instead a play about fallible men attempting to control events that are beyond their capacity.

The central character is King John. Not unintelligent but not a good king. He's unable to command the respect of his nobles, and even his villainies are small-minded and weak. Compare his treatment of Arthur with Richard III's treatment of his nephe
...more
Jim
This is not the same King John you know from history. For one thing, there is no Runnymede and no Magna Carta in this play. Secondly, Richard the Lion-Hearted has already died, so there is no Robin Hood, Sheriff of Nottingham, or Guy of Gisbourne. No, The Life and Death of King John is about retaining one's power as king when confronted with the demands of the papacy and of other surrounding monarchs.

In the process of trying to hold on to his power, John tries to have his nephew Arthur killed; b
...more
Libby
There are many people in the world who are intimidated by Shakespeare, namely his archaic language and inestimable impact on literature and the English language. To those, I gleefully point to King John and say, "See? Even Shakespeare had bad days!"

I started reading the play on a plane to San Francisco and was dismayed by my inability to grasp the characters and why things were happening. I mean, this is the King John who was the wicked Prince John from Robin Hood and the king who was convinced
...more
Max
The thing about King John that I'm not finding overtly discussed in the criticisms of the play (that I've read) is that it's essentially a comedy. Shakespeare takes a rote plot about regal machinations and twists it by creating the character of the Bastard Faulconbridge, a witty creation who comments on the action from his pragmatist's perspective. I really do think Shakespeare is going for satire here, and if you can read it as such, the play is well worth it. The mother of a usurped prince sho ...more
Kevin
Thus begins my reading of the so-called "History" plays of one William Shakespeare. Some I have read before, the others have been put off indefinitely...until now! So let us dive in...at the "beginning". Not the earlier plays that Shakespeare wrote, but rather the first play on a historical chronology: King John.

King John is based on that infamous king of England whose rule was so fantastic the Magna Carta was drafted as a result and King John would forever be the effeminate antagonist of Robin
...more
Matthew
King John is one of Shakespeare's least well-known plays, and there are some good reasons for this. We have seen some of its themes explored to better effect in Richard III, and even the Henry VI plays. Hence if we want a more satisfying account of a usurper who seeks to kill a child who is rightful heir to the throne, we should look to the former play. If we want a more fulsome account of England losing a war against France, we will find it in the latter plays.

The play has other serious faults.
...more
Aditya Mallya
'King John' perfectly embodies one of the great pleasures of reading a great author's collected writings - the discovery that some of his little-known creations are just as good or sometimes better than his most celebrated works. This is a compelling tale of politics and war - a sort of game of thrones played out in venomously poetic language.

"I had a thing to say, but let it go:
The sun is in the heaven, and the proud day,
Attended with the pleasures of the world,
Is all too wanton and too full of
...more
Mitchell
Fourth time reading this play. It never had much of an impact on me but now I see it as a cross between the early tetralogy of history plays (Henry VI, parts 1,2 & 3 and Richard III) and the later, glorious tetralogy (Richard II, Henry IV parts 1 & 2 and Henry V). There is the satirical delight in exposing the raw mechanics of power-grabbing and political manipulation that you see in the earlier plays. There is wicked humor reminiscent of the best of Richard III. But there is a subtler c ...more
Dameon Manuel
King John is about the efforts of the eponymous king, a classic anti-hero, in navigating the murky realpolitik of west Europe in the early 1200s. Contending with finicky noblemen at home, enterprising relatives with ambitions of coronation and control, foreign armies, and a heavily influential Vatican, King John is completely overwhelmed. In spite of arguably having the military advantage over his foes, the events around him cause him to behave with irrational brashness, leading to the near-subj ...more
Rebecca
So, technically, I didn't read this play.

I used various study guides, then watched the play performed.

This leads me to theorize about what exactly constitutes fairness when determining if one has actually read a book.

Bear with me a moment.

If I read a book in my mind, then I have read that book.
If I read a book out loud, then I have read that book.
If I am reading with someone else (say a child), and we take turns reading passages out loud, then I have read that book.
If I look at the words while s
...more
Matt
Shakespeare’s interpretation of King John summarizes the period of John’s reign after the death of Richard I until his poisoning. He works to solidify his authority against the aspirations of his nephew, Arthur, who also claims the crown. Unlike Richard III, John vacillates in his ruthlessness, making him more sympathetic, but also more inept, than Shakespeare’s most infamous king.

The Bastard, a fictional child by Richard I, provides a window into royalty from the audience’s perspective. The ma
...more
Abe Goolsby
Not the most memorable of Shakespeare's plays overall, but, as always, there are plenty of morsels to savor. I enjoyed it.

As an interesting aside, I was also working through a commentary on Ecclesiastes at the same time. The events of Act II in this play served as a nice complement to the following passage:

"This wisdom have I seen also under the sun, and it seemed great unto me: There was a little city, and few men within it; and there came a great King against it, and besieged it, and built gre
...more
Sally
This is the first time I've read this play. Its unfamiliarity made it a little difficult to keep the characters straight. Poor Arthur's plaintive entreaties ("Must you put out my eyes with those hot irons, Hubert?") broke my heart.
David Bates
This isn't one of Shakespeare's highly regarded plays, but I like this little mutt. The theme is indecision, with every character making major decisions and then almost instantly going back on them. Constance, the mother of prince Arthur, dies early on from grief (get it? eyeroll). Prince Arthur himself perishes later when, after his would be murderer changes his mind about killing him, after the King who sent the murder had thought better of it, he jumps off a wall trying to escape a castle and ...more
Amanda
What a weird play. On one level, very melodramatic and reminiscent of _Richard III_: speeches, mourning, royal concerns. And yet the beginnings of what I love about Shakespeare are here, as well. The Bastard (Falcounbridge) is awesome, fully full of personality and inner workings. Thematically, I love the idea that people are switching sides constantly, and paying for it. Falcounbridge switches from being a Falcounbridge to a Plantagenet, and witnesses the downfall of that family. King John swit ...more
Mary
Kind of odd for plotting--there are so many false starts, so many unfulfilled promises, and yet that may be the whole point of it. The Bastard, for a point of inconsistency, begins flippant and detached, but becomes so tied up in the intertwined battles (which are painfully personal, familiar) that he grows solemn and jaded. Constance, too, flares up and fades out of the play, and poor Arthur (spoiler alert) who pleads to elegantly to save his life is dispatched in less than 20 lines by making a ...more
Cheryl
My goal was to read 5 Shakespeare plays that I hadn't studied in school and this was #5. I added it because I had read a tragedy, a comedy, and a couple others and wanted to include one of the history plays. This one made me dizzy! According to the notes, the play compresses 14 years or so of English history into the span of several months, which doesn't help. But the switching of allegiances -- war! peace! war again! King John excommunicated -- then redeemed! All the nobles continually switchin ...more
Eyehavenofilter
Oft times funny and sad this follows John through his reign until his untimely death. He doesn't seem to be able to see beyond the moment. His decisions are instantaneous, and he fails to predict the route of the falling of the dominos, so to speak. The scenes alternate between foolishness and treachery. With John not knowing which way to turn. Easily influenced by those around him, he seems to be walking through an unlit maze with directions to the exit written in a language he will never under ...more
Dan
King John isn't a widely read or performed play, but I'm not sure why. In many ways, the plot looks a lot like Game of Thrones- complicated lines of succession, thrones contested, war, the question of the influence of the Pope, strategic marriages and offspring killed... It features one of the most intensely scary and stressful Shakespearean scenes I've ever read (Act IV, sc. 1, specifically). It also contains some intensely flowery language. A typical response in conversation in Act IV:

Salisbur
...more
Kailey
I really enjoyed this play! The dirty politics and shaky alliances really describe the time period well, and I loved the flowery speeches full of pomp and bravery and even a little sass. Love me some Shakespeare! I don't find the historical plays dry at all. Full of action and some really delightful characters and dialogue.

I was surprised that King John was written with any conscience whatsoever. He's the villain in every story ever written about him, and although he IS a bad guy in this play, h
...more
Hóvirág
tetszett (3 csillag)

Az első királydrámám. :)
Hát, János király nem jött be nekem. Mármint nem volt rossz, csak nem tetszett annyira, mint a legtöbb már olvasott Shakespeare-darab. De az is lehet, hogy nem a legjobbkor olvastam, mert kusza egy hetem volt/van, és szinte mindig fáradtan ültem le hozzá, úgy meg nem tudok annyira odafigyelni ugye… szóval szerintem ez is rányomta a bélyegét az összhatásra. A másik meg, hogy őszintén szólva ezt a művet nem önmagáért olvastam el, hanem mert a királydrámá
...more
Pietro Coen
This play is about two kings and a bastard, and it has some funny scenes though many people get killed in it. There is a king called John and his mum, Queen Elinor. John became king after his brother Geffrey was killed in battle. The French ambassador, Chatillon, tells John (on behalf of King Philip of France) that unless he leaves his kingdom (“this fair island and the territories, to Ireland, Poictiers, Anjou, Touraine, Maine” ) to his nephew Arthur Plantagenet (Duke of Britaine), King Philip ...more
Tom
This play is truly an oddity from Shakespeare's canon. It's a history play, but not one tied to any of the others outside the fact it is about an English king. It features Shakespeare's most pro-Protestant, anti-Catholic writing, but it doesn't seem to matter much. The king himself is rather a weak choice. King John today is remembered for being the weaselly Prince John in the Robin Hood stories, and for signing the Magna Carta. In Shakespeare's day, he was held as an early Protestant martyr/her ...more
Jackson Cyril
One of Shakespeare's big underrated plays. I'm surprised that this book isn't studied more often. John and Phillip are both reluctant kings who don't want to fight and choose any option over war, and John especially comes off as an extremely unsavory character who can't inspire loyalty in anyone, and allows his mother too much freedom and power. Constance would actually be a great character if she didn't spend an entire scene crying over her captured (and then dead) son Arthur. The really fascin ...more
Edward Cheer
A bold, epic and intense story that builds and builds then leads to a sullen, depressing end. A great rendition of the actual king.
Emily
I've already hit a few plays that have a decent claim on being Shakespeare's worst, but this one is so marginal that I don't think I knew it existed until I started my reading project. It is both muddled and dramatically rather inert; there's one scene where someone's in peril of being murdered or having their eyes put out, and the reaction I could muster was "Huh." You'd think that a work where Shakespeare gets to compose speeches for Queen Elinor would be a delight for us Eleanoristas but here ...more
Salvatore
My favourite era of the Plantagenet reign, especially since it deals with who the hell should and can be king. This play tackles that, as primogeniture was just becoming the fashion, thank you very much Henry II; but the drama is kinda dull - more talk than action, notably the threat of eye-burning/mutilation from Hubert on Arthur. I do enjoy how John is crowned three times (to add to the confusion of who is king), and how characters flip-flop on political points. And the story ends without wrap ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
underrated 4 10 Apr 06, 2013 02:41PM  
  • Tamburlaine
  • Shakespeare After All
  • The Shoemaker's Holiday
  • Passion Play (TCG Edition)
  • The Ecclesiazusae (or Women in Council)
  • 'Tis Pity She's a Whore and Other Plays
  • Heartbreak House
  • The Alchemist
  • Eumenides
  • The Man of Mode
  • Brand
  • The Misanthrope and Tartuffe
  • All for Love
  • The Poems of Robert Browning
  • Oedipus at Colonus
947
William Shakespeare (baptised 26 April 1564) was an English poet and playwright, widely regarded as the greatest writer in the English language and the world's pre-eminent dramatist. He is often called England's national poet and the "Bard of Avon" (or simply "The Bard"). His surviving works consist of 38 plays, 154 sonnets, two long narrative poems, and several other poems. His plays have been tr ...more
More about William Shakespeare...
Romeo and Juliet Hamlet Macbeth A Midsummer Night's Dream Othello

Share This Book

“He is the half part of a blessed man,
Left to be finished by such as she;
And she a fair divided excellence,
Whose fullness of perfection lies in him. ”
23 likes
“Grief fills the room up of my absent child,
Lies in his bed, walks up and down with me,
Puts on his pretty look, repeats his words,
Remembers me of his gracious parts,
Stuffs out his vacant garments with his form”
10 likes
More quotes…