Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Tratamiento invasor” as Want to Read:
Tratamiento invasor
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Tratamiento invasor

by
3.27  ·  Rating Details ·  2,951 Ratings  ·  372 Reviews
Los ''curadores'', con sus musculosos y fuertes cuerpos escondidos tras negras capas, se mueven sigilosamente por las calles de la ciudad recogiendo indigentes y, sobre todo, curando enfermedades y proporcionando esperanza a los desahuciados. Usan un virus adaptado al genoma de cada paciente para eliminar enfermedades geneticas hasta hoy incurables: la enfermedad de Parkin ...more
Paperback, 368 pages
Published February 1st 2009 by Ediciones B (first published 2007)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Tratamiento invasor, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Tratamiento invasor

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Liz B
Oct 27, 2008 Liz B rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: sciencefiction
In a word: Tiresome.

If you're considering buying/ reading this one, be aware that Card did not write it. It's based on one of his earliest short stories, and he collaborated with Aaron Johnston in planning it, but I have no doubt that every actual word was written by Aaron Johnston. Bless his heart.

The science was boring and predictable (probably made a great and creepy short story 20+ years ago), the characterization was unbelievably superficial, the dialogue was painful. The evil characters we
...more
Ben Babcock
Genetics is one of the reasons I'm glad we have science-fiction authors. So far physicists have conspired to make faster-than-light travel impossible (or at least highly impractical), so perhaps we won't be meeting any intelligent alien species any time soon. In the past ten years, however, our understanding of genetics and the human genome has grown considerably. As we become more adept at manipulating our genome, whether it's to cure hereditary diseases or augment healthy genes, we must confro ...more
Bryan
Nov 18, 2009 Bryan rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: sf


SAY IT AIN'T SO!

An author's name should represent something - it's a brand after all, and gives some kind of quality assurance.

So Mr. Card: "Say it ain't so!" Did you actually write a single word of this mess? Or was it just based on your short story from way back?

Top Five Reasons why you should read this book:
1) you find ways to enjoy second-rate writing
2) you don't mind unrealistic science being used as a key element in a thriller
3) you can tolerate awkward plotting designed to keep the sus
...more
David
Jun 12, 2016 David rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
This sci fi novel has a few interesting ideas. The plot, however is so-so. The story is fast-paced and sometimes exciting. But the psychological concepts for which the author is well known for developing are not developed here as well as they could be. For example, what is it really like to have two sets of memories?

If you are looking for a fast-paced thriller for summertime reading, then this book is for you.
Jonathan
Apr 02, 2008 Jonathan rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This is actually a collaboration with Aaron Johnston. Originally a short story by Card, Johnston developed it into a screenplay with help from Card, and then Johnston turned the screenplay into a novel. It's well-written, definitely different from Card's usual style. I liked it a lot; it has suspense, interesting social commentary and biology, and it keeps you guessing.
Wendy
Jun 05, 2008 Wendy rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
I like Orson Scott Card, but this book is not really written by him, which I think is the problem. It's based on a short story of his, but then Aaron Johnston turned it into a screenplay and later this book. We're told in the back of the book that Aaron is a "successful Hollywood screenwriter", of the kind of movies that I don't like, I'd imagine. The writing might be fine for a screenplay when the actors will bring more to it, but I found the descriptions generic, and the attempts to express wh ...more
Jim
Apr 08, 2015 Jim rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
I'm shocked. OSC's books normally get 3 or 4 stars, but this one just sucked. The idea behind it seemed OK - gene therapy used for morally ambiguous purposes - but the execution was awful. The writing wasn't tight, a lot of redundancy & useless description. The science was bogus, not just SF, but unbelievably ridiculous & miraculous. The characters were caricatures & the plot just became stupid. I got about halfway through &, as much as I wanted to hang on, I just couldn't. Rudni ...more
Nick
Two weaknesses in this novel are:
a) an inadequate level of hard-science as background to some fairly significant advances in genetic technologies.
b) some strained 'leaps-of-faith' of character behavior changes at some key points in the novel (no spoilers here).

Nevertheless, you will probably enjoy this novel as escapist 'vacation' reading.

It reads like a novel from a screenplay. Enjoyable, but Card did a much better job with his novelization of the screenplay from The Abyss.

'Genetic SF' novels
...more
Xabi1990
Jun 19, 2017 Xabi1990 rated it really liked it
7/10
Doreen
Dec 19, 2009 Doreen rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
This novel totally freaked me out. And not in a good, thriller kind of way: what boggled my mind the most was how a writer as smart and self-examining as Orson Scott Card could possibly allow his name to headline this sophomoric mess. The lead male and female are virtually cardboard cut-outs, and I was honestly surprised by all of one scene in this book (and that was about 300 pages in.) Otherwise, it was predictable and unexciting. Card virtually apologizes in his afterword for how the book was ...more
Virginia
Nov 09, 2009 Virginia rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
It is apparently a tragedy that Orson Scott Card's name is attached to this book. I've read a little by him, and thought it was better then this book, and Drew has read most things by him, and, after reading this book, said that it was far below Orson Scott Card-level writing. And, if you read the front of this book, it's because the actual author of the book (whose name is listed in smaller print underneath the ginormous lettering of Card's name) just collaborated with Card for ideas, and Card ...more
Timothy Ward
Apr 07, 2011 Timothy Ward rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
A virologist with military training, Dr. Frank Hartman, must find a way to stop a genetic scientist's insidious plan that goes beyond healing genetic disorders. This scientist, George Galen, believes he has the science to take humanity to their next step in evolution. His followers' physical advancements make them formidable opponents and the stakes our heroes have to overcome to avoid unleashing a catastrophic virus, let alone maintain their sanity, make this story a thrilling ride.

I picked up
...more
Sri
Sep 09, 2011 Sri rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
As background - I really enjoy thrillers based on modern technology. Another bit of background- i am a huge, huge, orson scott card fan.

Having said that, you will understand why this review pains me. I really thought that i would like this book. It had everything i could want. Or so i thought. Unfortunately, despite the fun little bits about technology there were serious issues.

First, the technology was poorly thought out. Second, the characters seemed anything but believable.

Third, and what b
...more
Tauna
Mar 17, 2010 Tauna rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: medical, don-t-bother
This book is NOT written by Orson Scott Card. It's based on a short story written by card, but this actual book is written by Aaron Johnston.

This book started out promising, but by the end was just kind of far-fetched and lame. There were interesting ideas and medical bits through-out, but overall a bit of a let-down. 2-2 1/2 stars
Alex Bouffard
Jul 17, 2016 Alex Bouffard rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: sci-fi
Man I am surprised with the amount of hate this book is receiving. Orson Scott Card is my favorite author because he comes up with stories that have excellent character development that make you think, "What would I do if I were in this situation?" It's what made the Ender series so great. It also made it a complex read too.

This story is written in a very different style and I can definitely see why people wouldn't like it as much as some of Card's other works but I'm still shocked by the hate f
...more
John
Sep 07, 2009 John rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Margot
This medical thriller story came across like a season of 24 without the charisma and likeability of Jack Bauer or the the high personal stakes that make each episode an edge-of-your-seat thrill of moral and ethical dilemma. I was interested enough in the story to keep reading (listening, actually, to the audio version), but I never fell in love with the characters so didn't feel the tension and drama this story really needed.

In Invasive Procedures, the corrupt scientist George Galen has created
...more
S
Aug 29, 2013 S rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2013
I've just started reading some books by Orson Scott Card, and picked this one up on a random whim while idly browsing the library stacks. I like reading thrillers and I'm a scientist, seemed like a win-win.

Unfortunately, this was nowhere near as enjoyable as the other stories I've read by Card. Turns out he is only a nominal contributor -- I'm guessing in the most literal sense of the word, because there's another writer. I think Aaron Johnston, the 'co-'author, did most of the actual writing on
...more
Jeffrey
Apr 05, 2013 Jeffrey rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
This story was terrible. First off the characters were wooden, the motivations were transparent and predictable, the love story that was forcibly inserted into it was insipid. The story betrays Card's lack of knowledge on everything from policy procedure to medical ethics to research to biology. It was absolutely inane. It wasn't even particularly well written, with many of his fictional acronyms for non-existent government organizations either never been explained or being explained three chapt ...more
Mark McFaddyn
I didn't look closely enough at this book when I bought it: I thought it was by Card, with help from Johnstone. It is really a novel by Johnston based on a short story by Card. It is an interesting idea for a novel, and much of it is good and exciting and interesting. But it has some flaws: a bit contrived and predictable in some places, and unbelievable in others. Still, for Johstone's first novel, I suppose it is decent. I'll stick to OSC in the future though. From Reed Business Info:

In this i
...more
Rachel
Jan 06, 2008 Rachel rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: sciencefiction
It took me a few days to review this one -- I'm still not entirely sure what I thought of it. It gets points for being the creepiest book I've read in years (I usually avoid horror, but this is definitely bordering on it, if not crossing the line in spots), but loses points for being somewhat overblown in the writing, such that at times it seems more like a farce than a thriller. Probably comes of being written by a screenwriter.

The plot is based on one of Orson Scott Card's early short stories
...more
Maria
Aug 07, 2008 Maria rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
I had a really hard time giving this more than two stars. Not so much because the book was "bad," actually it was quite entertaining, but because I know how good of a writer Card can be, and thus it was a little disappointing. I had the most trouble getting into the characters. Card is usually a genius when it comes to adding depth and insight into his characters. I did not feel connected in any way to these characters. I felt almost emotionally detached, which is usually not the case when I rea ...more
Jenny GB
Sep 27, 2012 Jenny GB rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Well, it was quite clear that this novel started as a screenplay and was turned into a novel. I was largely disappointed with it for many reasons. The characters and plot were very much like a movie, which in this case is not a compliment. It lacked the depth and complexity of a lot of Card's novels. Also, as far as the genre of futuristic scientific thriller novels it wasn't top class. I much prefer Michael Crichton who tells you enough science and facts to make you believe in the incredible in ...more
Benjamin Spurlock
A very interesting read. Aaron Johnston lives up to the ambitious premise of his book- a new virus that promises nothing but death to those who catch it, while at the same time, a new cult in Los Angeles- known as the 'Healers'- use unknown and highly dangerous techniques to cure genetic diseases that society deems impossible to treat.

Dr. Frank Hartman is thrown into the middle of this, and the journey through the investigation is interesting. However, while the use of genetics and reprogrammin
...more
Will
Feb 28, 2010 Will rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
I found a new hardback version of this book at our local grocery store for $3.00, but hey, Orson Scott Card is one of the authors, so I had to get it. It was worth what I paid (and a little more), but it did read like a screenplay. In fact, sometimes while reading I felt like I was watching a season of 24. The lead character, Frank Hartman, is like a medical Jack Bauer (without the torture). The federal agency even seems kind of like CTU (and has a three letter abbreviation I can't remember). Ha ...more
Anne
Dec 25, 2007 Anne rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: specfic
I thought parts of the book would have done better on the screen; parts definitely did better in the book than they could ever have done on screen. The characters were well developed, and while some of the motivations were definitely "movie-ish", they were also well enough written that I cared about them anyway. The story was excellent and engaging and I didn't put it down even when I really should have. Some parts of the science were a little "Hollywood" as well, but the plot and characters wer ...more
Mason Kuhlmann
Oct 30, 2012 Mason Kuhlmann rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
In this book, a man named Galen has started a new religion of men, named by the public as Healers. They have no medical degree. They have little equipment. Yet somehow they are managing to create extremely dangerous viruses, that can heal a young man with sickle-cell, and kill a healthy full grown man. He is planning something big. He has recruited men and women off the streets, and is setting up for the procedures that he will preform on them. One boy named Jonathan, who is homeless and 18 has ...more
Annette
Aug 15, 2008 Annette rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: sci-fi
Basic Plot: Crazy evil scientist type creates a cult of personality and healing around himself and his techniques for individually tailored "super viruses" that can cure otherwise fatal diseases - or create super-humans. Next step: take over the world.

This book was not, IMHO, up to Card's usual standard of story telling, plot, pacing, or narrative.
In fact, it read like a movie script - or maybe one of those "based on the movie" novels that try to cash in on a popular film. Not to be too insult
...more
Dlora
I picked this book up anticipating an Orson Scott Card type of story, and the storyline really was intriguing, but I missed the interpersonal relationships that Scott Card is so good with. Invasive Procedures is based on a short story by Card. He and Aaron Johnston had lots of email conversations in the writing of the book, but I'd say this was more a Johnston book than a Card one, though Scott Card gets the bigger byline (probably so the book will sell better).
That said, it was a pretty good
...more
Debee
I really enjoyed this book. Interesting to note: I didn't know the background of how it came to be a book until the end....it was originally written as a short story then as a screenplay and then a book was written based on the screenplay...why i find that so interesting is that because the whole time I was reading it I kept thinking this would make a great movie! I kept seeing the scenes as if I was watching a movie...when I read that it had been adapted from a screenplay it suddenly made sense ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
  • Kiss Me Twice
  • The Trap
  • Orson Scott Card's InterGalactic Medicine Show
  • Endurance (Stardoc, #3)
  • Leviathans of Jupiter (The Grand Tour, #14)
  • Robota
  • Warhorse
  • Anniversary Day (Retrieval Artist, #8)
  • Farewell to the Master
  • Five Plays: Antigone, Eurydice, The Ermine, The Rehearsal, Romeo and Jeannette
  • The Dandelion Girl
  • Unforgettable
  • Changer's Moon (Duel of Sorcery, #3)
  • Evidence That Demands a Verdict, 2
  • The Reagan I Knew
  • Seventh Seal
  • The Lamb and the Fuhrer: Jesus Talks with Hitler (Great Conversations)
  • Timeless Healing
589
Orson Scott Card is the author of the novels Ender's Game, Ender's Shadow, and Speaker for the Dead, which are widely read by adults and younger readers, and are increasingly used in schools.
Besides these and other science fiction novels, Card writes contemporary fantasy (Magic Street, Enchantment, Lost Boys), biblical novels (Stone Tables, Rachel and Leah), the American frontier fantasy series Th
...more
More about Orson Scott Card...

Share This Book