Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Women in Love” as Want to Read:
Women in Love
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview
Read Book* *Different edition

Women in Love (Brangwen Family #2)

3.65 of 5 stars 3.65  ·  rating details  ·  21,839 ratings  ·  684 reviews
Pojam ljubavi i slobode, individualnosti i pripadanja kolektivu, središnji su problemi u djelu D. H. Lawrencea. U "Zaljubljenim ženama" oni se prelamaju kroz četiri jake individualnosti: dvije emancipirane sestre, Gudrun i Ursulu i dva prijatelja, Geralda i Ruperta. Dok jedan par ostvaruje ipak harmoničan ljubavni odnos, odnos drugoga para završava tragično za muškarca.
Kindle Edition
Published (first published 1920)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Women in Love, please sign up.

Popular Answered Questions

Brianna Allen I would say no. But D.H. Lawrence is an interesting author, so it may help to be familiar with his work beforehand.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Steve Sckenda
Strip naked and wrestle like a gladiator with this octopus of a novel that challenges your endurance, tolerance, and reading skill. Brawny and awkward; lithe and feral; this novel celebrates the ambiguity that coexists in all reflective lovers. D. H. Lawrence’s words are “quick and slippery and full of electric fire.“ Bravely advance or hastily retreat from the force of his androgyny and sensual genius.

‘Women In Love” (“WIL”) defies interpretation and throws you off balance with its verbal, emo
Paul Bryant
Username : PBRYANT999

Password : Flibbertygibbet


Welcome to the GOODREADS AUTOREVIEW PROGRAM . Thank you for participating in this preliminary trial.

Please enter the title of the book you wish to review


Please enter the author name


Select type of work from the drop down menu


Select century this NOVEL was written in


Have you personally read any works by this author previously?


How much enjoyment did you derive from these works – please choose from drop down
Violet wells
Probably it’s always going to be a mistake to reread a book you loved in your youth. I haven’t read Lawrence for a long time. I believed I had his triumphs and failures pretty clear in my mind. Sons and Lovers, the early stories, The Rainbow and Women in Love all masterpieces; everything that followed going from bad to worse. So it was a shock to discover that Women in Love probably belongs in the latter category. There are, of course, flashes of his unique genius but they are few and far betwee ...more
I want to find you, where you don’t know your own existence, the you that your common self denies utterly. But I don’t want your good looks, and I don’t want your womanly feelings, and I don’t want your thoughts nor opinions nor your ideas—they are all bagatellas to me.

If you’ve already experienced gag reflex, then you know what to partly expect from this book. Yet to say this was all this book was about, would mean I did not take the time to read all of it.

After having had friendly debates
Edward Waverley
May 23, 2008 Edward Waverley rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: humans
Recommended to Edward by: David Lodge
Ever noticed how many people hate DH Lawrence? Often for opposite reasons by the way--there are those who condemn his misognyny, while others allege him to be too doting of the fair sex. Which is it? Sometimes he's damned for being too obscene, but elsewhere dismissed as overly fussy about flowers and horses. He even gets clubbed for creating self-absorbed characters, just after someone has taken a swipe at him for promoting a harmful ideal of sacrificial love. All of these folks can agree that ...more
This is another old review, written for another website back in 2003, my memory of this book is shoddy at best.

I believe D. H. Lawrence, despite writing constantly about men and women in a risqué manner for his time, is gay. Why do I say this? Because of the three Lawrence novels I've read to date in only one does he even get close to writing an authentic relationship between a man and a woman. It's not in the two novels I would expect though. In Lady Chatterly's Lover and in Women in Love Lawre
Mar 05, 2008 Liza rated it 3 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: thinkers, feelers
It is seemingly impossible to summarize a book such as Women in Love. The book innocuously begins with sisters Gudrun and Ursula Brangwen discussing marriage. Gudrun is an artist and Ursula is a school teacher, and their middle-class status is key in their ostracism from the high-society to which their lovers Geraldthe industrialistand Rupertthe disillusioned intellectual. Although these relationships would seem to be key, the complex relationship between Rupertmodeled after author D.H. Lawrence ...more
Carolyn F.
This is not just because the narrator talks too fast and is really hard to understand, it's also because I'm just too old for this book. In my idealistic youth I would have found the ramblings of these people inspiring but now I'm bored. They go on and on about how the world is awful and I just had enough and can't finish it.
Jul 08, 2008 Maureen rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: everyone
Shelves: novel
This book is like an Expressionist painting: you look at it once, and return and see something different. The writing is lush, and almost poetic at times. Lawrence uses the idea of the two sisters, Gudrun and Ursula, as his canvas to explore ideas about men and women, marriage and fidelity, and whatever else runs through his mind and on to the page.

In this high-speed, instant world, we are losing the art of leisurely contemplation. D.H. Lawrence needs to be taken up, and put down, and taken up
I hate Lawrence. After reading the first 90 pages, I left this book in a youth hostel in Norway to think about how bad it was. I hope it froze.
Vi prego. Esisterà qualcosa tipo un soddisfatti o rimborsati, che ne so. Un sindacato dei lettori?
Ok, respira a fondo. Cerchiamo di calmarci e di mettere giù il libro, invece di continuare ad agitarlo pericolosamente così. Su, spostati dalla finestra. Da brava, così.

Donne innamorate è uno di quei libri che quando lo finisci di leggere, quando compi quel magnifico e agognato gesto di chiudere l'ultima pagina, fa nascere in te dell
Chiara Pagliochini
« Pah – l’amour. Lo detesto. L’amour, l’amore, die Liebe – lo detesto in ogni lingua. Donne e amore, non c’è tedio più grande » esclamò. Lei se ne sentì un po’ offesa. E tuttavia era la sua stessa, elementare sensazione. Uomini e amore, non c’era tedio più grande.

Non c’è cosa più irritante, io credo, che sentirsi troppo stupidi per capire un romanzo. Non c’è cosa più irritante che sentire che la distanza che ti separa dallo scrittore, in termini di complessità ideologica, di esperienze di vita e
Ugh - this book was no fun for me. There were some lovely moments and prose that I copied into my quote journal, and that's about all that kept me going. The introduction advised that "one should not begin one's study of Lawrence with Women in Love", and man, I guess that's right. I really can't stand purposefully obscure language, or a supposedly realist novel that's full of dialogue and emotional reactions that make no sense and bear no resemblance to how people actually talk or think. Maybe I ...more
The best book I probably will ever read. I think I fell in love with Lawrence and his ideas. Am I sick?
Superb! D.H. Lawrence at his best. Each character is utterly individual and nuanced but cannot stand alone, being fully realized only in relationship and response to each other. Having read the work one sees these people around one every day, and of course one also sees aspects of oneself in each of them as well. A terrific novel!
Georgia Smith
I found the book dreamy. I'm a sucker for beautiful language and Lawrence is a master at it; his unexpected vocabulary kept me hooked right throughout. The first half I adored, but the second half just seemed a bit of a drag - was it really necessary to have all those meaningless conversations? Likewise the philosophy in the first half was thought-provoking and lovely, but by the second half it had slipped to something of a showing-off; Lawrence seemed to be questioning everything thoughtlessly ...more
I was close to giving this a five, but with the profusion of loins, shanks and limbs scattered around the pretty prose which at times read like straight up harlequin romance i had to pull back the final star. also, despite my having more in agreement with some of the thoughts/ideas expressed in this novel, it shared the flaw of that work which i share far less intellectual common ground with - atlas shrugged. in both works characters can at times feel like lifeless mouthpieces for the authors ph ...more
Vit Babenco
“I detest what I am, outwardly. I loathe myself as a human being. Humanity is a huge aggregate lie, and a huge lie is less than a small truth. Humanity is less, far less than the individual, because the individual may sometimes be capable of truth, and humanity is a tree of lies.”
Novels by D.H. Lawrence possess the absolutely unique psychological climate and Women in Love is definitely his best one.
Women in Love and Point Counter Point by Aldous Huxley constitute an exhaustive portrayal of the e
Zoe Tuck
Spurred by my current Anaïs Nin obsession, I picked up Women in Love (Nin did a critical study of D.H. Lawrence early in her career). Burned through a third of it on a long plan ride from New Orleans to Oakland. I am in pursuit of a lineage and a vindication (permission?) for doing work that deals with emotions, relationships - that which is written "from the blood", as Lawrence would say.

It has also been a long while since I have read a novel from what might glibly be called the age of novels
Richard Lodge
It is Lawrence's most complete statement. He argues with himself all through it: struggling to find a way to define what he wants to know about the individual and others. The characters are intense, fierce, intelligent, combative. They clash; they pound into each other. Lawrence explores ideas through the fist-tight dialogue and the bold imagery. And he quests for answers in his insistent narrative too. Ursula remains the real centre of the book, but Birkin, Gudrun and Gerald all get close-up fo ...more
First of all, this book should be called something more like "I Hate You With the White Hot Intensity of a Thousand Suns" instead of it's actual title. If people are really walking around with the thoughts that Lawrence writes of in this novel, I AM PERSONALLY TERRIFIED! With that being said, the novel was a great read lol. My husband commented at one point, "I've never seen you so caught up in a book." I really couldn't put it down. I will also add that though the title would seem to indicate t ...more
I'm sorry, I just don't 'get' DH Lawrence. I think he is the most over-rated novelist I've ever read. And I have tried. I'm sure he broke the boundaries of what was permitted to be discussed in the novel BUT, besides the chapter involving the boating trip and resulting accident, nothing impressed me or remains with me from the book other than intense irritation with all of the characters. The women are unrealistic and the men, arrogant and dull. I wanted to slap the lot of them and tell them to ...more
This is a book about the relationships between two sisters and their, how shall we say, lovers.

It's written so that each chapter has dominant symbol (a rabbit, a scared horse, a wrestiling match), and I thought the symbols he chose were compelling (picture a man forcing a terrified horse to stand in place, only feet away from the first train it's ever seen as the train roars by). I especially liked the end, where they all go on a a vacation retreat in some remote and snowy mountains in northern
So, I loved this book through about the first half. I was ready to call it one of my favorite books, but then the characters changed into people that I could no longer stand to hear about. I still have to say that the book was really well-written with amazingly developed characters. Lawrence creates a profound connection between the readers and the characters because he allows you into the innermost thoughts of the characters. It is also an excellent portrayal of the ideas running through Europe ...more
The book is a slog to get through, the film version with Alan Bates is much better.
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Kaitlyn Barrett
Egotistical and full of himself. Insufferably narcissistic. Full of talk to hear himself talk, which they now call a “modern” style.

I preferred Lady Chatterly's Lover but perhaps I like the subject matter better. I think DH wants to feed sex into everything and doesn’t care about love. He thinks love’s an overworn subject, so much so that he wanted to write this book about it and give it the last word and then bury it. But it’s a subject too big for him, a fact that probably kept him up at nigh
Tyler Steele
Holy crap what a miserable book. If your Emo or wannabe Emo this is the book for you. You hear people complain that Tolkien will write about a tree for 3 pages, well in this book the author will describe the same thought for 3 pages and then goes absolutely no where with it! My wife explained it best. There is no one in this book to root for. You just end up wishing all the characters would hold hands and jump off a bridge.

the author is obviously trying to make you think about sacrifice and love
"It was all so hard to understand."

Overwhelming, but some random thoughts:

* So glad I never took to Nietzche. Philistine that I am, I am quite happy the character I identify most strongly with here is Will Brangwen. Although whenever I take spell and feel the urge to blather philosophically it will be good to have Ursula now on a shoulder whispering "word bag."

* In an opposite sex marriage but involved in same sex relationships: Wilde, Woolf, Cheever, Collette, George Sand...and Rupert and Geral
Bryn Hammond
Two stars for a certain writing quality but I am averse to most of what Lawrence thinks.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Goodreads Librari...: Alternate book cover 2 18 Aug 03, 2014 12:15AM  
Goodreads Librari...: Multiple issues with Women in Love 3 37 Mar 11, 2014 01:52AM  
Is it more about the problems of Men in Love or Women in Love? 1 27 Mar 06, 2013 05:26PM  
  • Studs Lonigan
  • Zuleika Dobson
  • The Old Wives' Tale
  • The Wings of the Dove
  • Parade's End
  • A Dance to the Music of Time: 3rd Movement
  • The Magnificent Ambersons (The Growth Trilogy, #2)
  • The Way of All Flesh
  • The Big Money (U.S.A., #3)
  • Nostromo
  • The Wapshot Chronicle
  • A High Wind in Jamaica
  • Point Counter Point
  • Loving
  • The Alexandria Quartet  (The Alexandria Quartet #1-4)
David Herbert Richards Lawrence was an English writer of the 20th century, whose prolific and diverse output included novels, short stories, poems, plays, essays, travel books, paintings, translations, literary criticism and personal letters. His collected works represent an extended reflection upon the dehumanizing effects of modernity and industrialisation. In them, Lawrence confronts issues rel ...more
More about D.H. Lawrence...

Other Books in the Series

Brangwen Family (2 books)
  • The Rainbow

Share This Book

“But better die than live mechanically a life that is a repetition of repetitions.” 217 likes
“I should feel the air move against me, and feel the things I touched, instead of having only to look at them. I'm sure life is all wrong because it has become much too visual - we can neither hear nor feel nor understand, we can only see. I'm sure that is entirely wrong.” 208 likes
More quotes…