Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Nous autres” as Want to Read:
Nous autres
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

Nous autres

3.97 of 5 stars 3.97  ·  rating details  ·  31,753 ratings  ·  1,713 reviews
Nous autres évoque irrésistiblement le 1984 de George Orwell, lequel a d'ailleurs reconnu ce qu'il devait à l'auteur russe. La différence est qu'Orwell écrivait du temps du stalinisme, tandis que Zamiatine, véritable prophète, a imaginé son État Unique et son Bienfaiteur du temps de Lénine.
Paperback, coll. «L'Imaginaire», 232 pages
Published March 17th 1971 by Gallimard (first published November 26th 1921)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
It's been a decade since I first read Zamyatin's masterpiece, and even though this book remains unchanged for almost a century now, the person who read it is not. A decade later, I'm a very different person, no longer the wide-eyed undergraduate who thought she had the world all figured out. Physically, I still look under twenty (thanks, youthful genetics!) but mentally time has added a bit more life experience, an overdose of cynicism, a few collisions with the rougher edges of the universe, an ...more
- If it was utterly up to me, I'd actually think about classing this more as a "utopia" rather than a "dystopia" understanding that they're ultimately the same thing.
- Living in glass houses is the most terrifying part of this novel.
- I-330 is basically a manic pixie dream girl.
- The commentary on the Russian Revolution and Socialism are heavy, bro.
- Zamyatin had a FASCINATING life that very much influences this book.
- The writing style wasn't my thing. It was by no means bad, but it ju
Henry Avila
A city of glass, 1,000 years in the future, domed, with a green wall, to keep out all the undesirable, primitive life forms. Animal, human, vegetable or insect...A clean and sparkling place, for its millions of citizens, everything and everyone, has a schedule, the perfect "One State". No privacy, people have numbers for names, they dress (light blue uniforms) , and eat the same food, live in small, sparse apartments, which are transparent. No drinking or smoking, even sex regulated by, yes, an ...more
Well, I can see why We by Yevgeny Zamyatin was 'problematic' for the Soviet regime. It unequivocally debunks the utopian collective ideal. Communism (in practice, if not in theory) demands each of its fellow-travelers to exist on a purely atomic level. Good, responsible communists are mere corpuscles in a bland, unfulfilling social body. Sure, economic equality seems like a nice ideal, right? A cute ideal, even? But aside from being virtually impracticable (because humans will always be human), ...more
Zamyatin's real interest here is the impossibility of being fully human in a totalitarian society. His future is not technologically superior. There's very little that might be called high-tech. In the way it's both forward-looking and dated, the mood it inspires is rather like that of Fritz Lang's Metropolis. I liked that. It was like finding this artefact of world lit. A piece of the history of literary dystopias, and one that influenced Orwell. But it's worth reading for more than simply hist ...more
Jenny (Reading Envy)
Read again to discuss on SFF Audio; will link to podcast when it is posted.

This book has not been on my radar for long, but when something is considered to be "the best single work of science fiction yet written" (Ursula K. Le Guin) and the precursor of 1984 and Brave New World, not to mention the majority of current science fiction (Bruce Sterling introduction), I knew I couldn't put it off.

An interesting historical note - it was published in England (1921) long before it was published in Russi
This book has universal five stars among my Friend's and Follower's reviews, but I'm skeptical. Having read more than two dystopian novels in my life, what does this have to offer that's new, besides simply being the first? I get that totalitarian governments and loss of individual expression is bad, but what else?

(That wasn't rhetorical–someone who's read and loved this please explain to me the benefits of this one.)


Well, let's find out.


I started getting into adult literature—as many do—w
Shannon (Giraffe Days)
A thousand years in our future, D-503 is just one number among many in the One State. The One State is a city, a society, that revolves not around the individual but around the collective we, like a hive, with the Benefactor in God-like status at the centre. D-503 works as a constructor on the Integral, the ship that will take their ideology and philosophy of life to other planets, to civilise and free other species. When an article in the State Gazette calls for poems, manifestos etc. to go in ...more
We came before Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World and George Orwell’s 1984, and Yevgeny Zamyatin proved himself a master of the dystopian novel so popular today. The novel tells of the protagonist D-503 coming-of-age, becoming more and more aware of his desires, imagination and individuality, until the Operation returns him to the collective.


In We, the One-State removes its citizens’ individuality by assigning alphanumerical designations to them and so it dehumanizes them more than the governments
Yevgeny Zamyatin wrote his seminal dystopian novel We (1921) based on his personal experiences during the two Russian revolutions (1905 and 1917) and the first World War. The book ended influencing dystopian authors like Aldous Huxley and George Orwell. This book not only influenced the dystopian genre but could also be the influence towards the post-apocalyptic genre as this was set in a world where all was wiped out but “0.2% of the earth's population”. The book is set in ‘One State’ which has ...more
This review was written in 2003 for another website. I read the Clarence Brown Penguin edition of the book. I remember almost nothing about the book today, like the fact that the book takes place on a spaceship.

My alphabetical reading list is done. Yevgeny Zamyatin’s dystopian novel We takes up the tail end of my journey through the alphabet. This dismal piece of writing (and I’m not talking about the dystopian setting) is a perfect end for the self-imposed restrictions on my reading choices. Th
Amy Sturgis
This is the "granddaddy" of the modern dystopian novel, the book that influenced Huxley's Brave New World, Rand's Anthem, and Orwell's 1984: Yevgeny Zamyatin's We (1924). I've read it repeatedly and taught it, as well, and I always discover something new in the novel each time I turn to it. It's a brilliantly chilling depiction of a futuristic totalitarian regime that organizes its people's lives with almost scientific precision, as seen through the troubled eyes of one of its leading citizens. ...more
Transport yourself to OneState. Imagine a city, sealed off from the world by a Green Wall, inhabited by Numbers (each person is assigned a number rather than a name), all with their daily schedules planned out to the minute by a benevolent government. They live in transparent houses and wear identical uniforms and keep their heads shaved. The Benefactor has freed them from the bonds of freedom and bestowed upon them the blessings of homogeneity and collectivization.

We's main virtue is its abilit
When the creators of badass shit like ‘Logan’s Run’ and “1984” are eager to cite your output as significant and influential, you’ve got the goods. With “We”, Zamyatin earns those lofty credentials, and also wins the endearing faith from its readers.

With the 200-Years War in the remote past, a post-apocalyptic society known as OneState rises amidst the aftermath by embracing the tenets of efficiency expert Frederick Taylor and crafts a futuristic paradise, a new world built around the sensibili
For a small book this one took me much longer than I had anticipated. It is complex and evocative and fantastical and logical and very Russian.

Written in Russia in the 1920's during the Russian Civil War We is one of the first major dystopic works and went on to inspire writers like Aldous Huxley, George Orwell and Kurt Vonnegut.

It it set in the distant future in the nation (or city) of the One State, a totalitarian society where everything is structured around logic and mathematics. Everybody
This is one of those books that I knew I'd put off reviewing. When a book is classic, or popular, or iconic.. you just know you'll never find anything original to say that hasn't already been said, or that'll do the book justice.

We is set in a future utopian paradise, The One State, ruled by their glorious Benefactor. Everyone is a number, not a person, the emphasis is on cohesion, not individuality. Happiness has been reduced to an equation, but as such it it is solved, plug in the numbers and
The two stars is not meant to suggest that I don't appreciate the historical importance of this book. As is often noted, it is one of the earliest novels to depict a dystopian totalitarian future, written in 1924 -- before "1984" and "Brave New World." So while two stars may strike some as churlish, I admit that I found Zamyatin's narrative poorly executed and the portrayal of the totalitarian state one-dimensional and unbelievable.

This is also a problem that I have with 1984. It would be more e
200 pages of an interminable balancing act between decision and indecision. A severely fractured protagonist suffering through the weight of unwanted responsibility. Hopelessly clawing at two realities with a narrow distinction between both and with the threats of his actions mercilessly ratcheting up the pressure.

The fragmented society in which he lives mirroring his own life; held together only by extinguishing and suppressing half of its humanity.

This book reminds me of that vague desire of
One can see echoes of this story in other greats of dystopian SF such as Brave New World, Fahrenheit 451 and, of course, the great 1984. Written in the early 1920's it hadn't taken Zamyatin long to realise the logical consequences of the ideological reasoning behind his country's recent revolution. And this is precisely what is explored here, several hundred years in the future after the successful elimination of all opposition.

What would a society be like that had eliminated all notion of the i
Jeff Toto
Aug 20, 2007 Jeff Toto rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Anyone who has read 1984 and Brave New World...
This was a very challenging read; in many ways I feel a second read will be necessary to better comprehend this book.

Zamyatin's protagonist, D-503, is a mathematician as well, and as such, he consciously eschews flowery language. Natasha Randall's translation is excellent, and she keeps Zamyatin's sentence fragments and sudden exclamations intact. Nestled among these, however, are descriptions of startling imagery ("Only a gaunt gray shadow is slowly crawling up the bluish stariway, sketched in
Ben Loory
It is said there are flowers that bloom only once in a hundred years. Why should there not be some that bloom once in a thousand, in ten thousand years? Perhaps we never knew about them simply because this "once in a thousand years" has come only today?

Blissfully, drunkenly, I walked down the stairs to the number on duty, and all around me, wherever my eyes fell, thousand-year-old buds were bursting into bloom. Everything bloomed-- armchairs, shoes, golden badges, electric bulbs, someone’s dark,
Author Yevgeny Zamyatin took part in two Russian Revolutions, hoping to overthrow the abusive and excessive Czarist system. He had joined the CPSU (Communist Party of the Soviet Union), and believed Lenin's promises of a more equitable society, where labor controlled the means of production. By 1920, he tried to remain hopeful, but it was becoming apparent that the country was going in the wrong direction. Three long years since the Revolution had not moved anyone closer to a "workers' paradise" ...more
David Lentz
Genius is an overworked term and should be used discriminately but We is truly the masterpiece of a real genius. Zamyatin was certainly well qualified to write this parable of a totalitarian dystopia, given his creative repression by Soviet censors during the time of Stalin. Zamyatin must be given credit for his courage to write Stalin and request self-exile since publication was impossible inside Communist Russia. And Stalin was wise to grant it because this novel is a powerhouse as a diatribe ...more
“They say there are flowers that bloom only once every hundred years. Why shouldn’t there be others, that bloom once every thousand—ten thousand—years. Maybe we never knew about them only because that once-every-thousand-years is today.”—We, Yevgheniy Zamyatin

Published 27 years before George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, Yevgheniy Zamyatin’s We could easily be mistaken as just a precursor of Orwell’s dystopian thriller. But Zamyatin is much more than a Russian Orwell—he introspectively explores
Anastasia Fitzgerald-Beaumont
This is not a review as such, more an appreciation of the author.

I love Russian literature almost as much as I love English literature, though the two are as different as is possible to imagine. Writing, either in the form of prose or poetry, goes a long way to defining the character of a nation. Though this is generally true it's perhaps truest of all in relation to Russia and the spirit of the Slav people. I would go so far as to suggest that its impossible to achieve a full understanding of n
This is a superb work of science fiction, and I'm sorry it's not as well known as its dystopian counterparts 1984 and Brave New World. What the One State reminded me of, though, was not either of those books but rather the planet Camozotz in Madeleine L'Engle's book A Wrinkle In Time.

Besides the splendid, suspenseful plotting, the protagonist had one of the most distinctive literary voices I have ever seen. I had no idea one could do mathematics so poetically, and come up with such breathtaking
Yevgeny Zamyatin has impeccable credentials as one of the most influential early critics of totalitarian governments, industrialization, and the crushing of individual will by the state. The author was involved with the Bolsheviks, exiled to Siberia after the First Russian Revolution in 1905, escaped to become a naval engineer, worked in the UK shipyards supervising construction of ice breakers, witnessed the communist October Revolution, wrote numerous stories satirizing and ridiculing the Sovi ...more
Absolutely brilliant.

We is the story of a future in which the citizens of a society, known as "digits", all maintain the same mindset: allegiance to the Do-Gooder. In this world, everyone stays inside the Green Wall, everyone wears a uniform, and everyone wakes and sleeps at the same time. Everything is mathematical; the "chaos" of past music has been refined to something more precise.

The digits have no problem with this way of living, including digit D-503, the story's protagonist. When D-503
Feb 09, 2009 Micha rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Zoe, Rod, Ajit, Evison?, Danielle, BRANDON, Tod
Recommended to Micha by: Ben the clever one
Shelves: books-2009
"What have you learned while reading this novel?"
I learned that Ayn Rand is a plagiarist and George Orwell had a crackerjack publisher.

For me, what really stood out in this novel, and perhaps in many of the really GREAT ones, were not the main characters of D & I (beginning of alphabet..) but it's "side" characters. Those who were overlooked. We never really see this future from their perspective, yet we do get a glimpse of it and one can sense that they feel something is wrong.
We see so
Jan 30, 2008 Joshua rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Anyone interested on where 1984 got its ideas from
Completed in 1921 and banned in it's native Russia for over 50 years, Yevgeny Zamyatin's We is generally considered the grandfather of dystopian literature. Before Orwell had his Big Brother, and before Huxley had his Brave New World , Yevgeny had We and the all-powerful Benefactor. Hugely inspirational to Orwell and Huxley, Yevgeny created a world that in my humble opinion, was better than the ones that followed.
The novel revolves around a man named "D-503" who lives in a totalitarian soci
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
The "S-shaped man" 4 72 Oct 28, 2014 03:44PM  
O and Baby 3 35 Oct 19, 2014 02:34AM  
KC - Book Club /int/: Book #3 We - Yevgeny Zamyatin 4 23 Sep 06, 2014 05:04PM  
Miévillians: WE discussion thread 4: From Record 31 up to END 10 17 Apr 20, 2014 11:37PM  
Miévillians: WE discussion thread 3: From Record 21 up to Record 30 12 19 Apr 19, 2014 03:47AM  
  • The Slynx
  • Petersburg
  • Envy
  • The Iron Heel
  • The Foundation Pit
  • Moscow to the End of the Line
  • Heart of a Dog
  • Star Maker
  • War with the Newts
  • Memories of the Future
  • Mockingbird
  • Buddha's Little Finger
  • Sofia Petrovna
  • Bend Sinister (Penguin Modern Classics)
  • Level 7
  • News from Nowhere and Other Writings
  • Cancer Ward
  • Red Cavalry
Евгений Замятин
Yevgeny Zamyatin (Евгений Замятин) Russian novelist, playwright, short story writer, and essayist, whose famous anti-utopia My (1924, We) prefigured Aldous Huxley's Brave New World (1932), and inspired George Orwell's 1984 (1949). The book was considered a "malicious slander on socialism" in the Soviet Union, and it was not until 1988 when Zamyatin was rehabilitated. In the English
More about Yevgeny Zamyatin...
The Dragon: Fifteen Stories Islanders And, The Fisher Of Men О дивный новый мир A Soviet Heretic Frühe Erzählungen

Share This Book

“A man is like a novel: until the very last page you don't know how it will end. Otherwise it wouldn't be worth reading.” 316 likes
“You are afraid of it because it is stronger than you; you hate it because you are afraid of it; you love it because you cannot subdue it to your will. Only the unsubduable can be loved.” 208 likes
More quotes…