Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison” as Want to Read:
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison

4.19 of 5 stars 4.19  ·  rating details  ·  15,000 ratings  ·  476 reviews
Barely two hundred and fifty years ago man condemned of attempting to assassinate the King of France was drawn and quartered in a grisly spectacle that suggested an unmediated duel between the violence of the criminal and the violence of the state. This groundbreaking book by the most influential philosopher since Sartre compels us to reevaluate our assumptions about all t ...more
Paperback, 352 pages
Published April 25th 1995 by Vintage (first published 1975)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Discipline and Punish, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Discipline and Punish

The Devil in the White City by Erik LarsonFreakonomics by Steven D. LevittIn Cold Blood by Truman CapoteA Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill BrysonGuns, Germs, and Steel by Jared Diamond
Best Non-Fiction (non biography)
172nd out of 3,492 books — 5,425 voters
The Stranger by Albert CamusSiddhartha by Hermann Hesse1984 by George OrwellThe Little Prince by Antoine de Saint-ExupéryCrime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Best Philosophical Literature
108th out of 635 books — 1,950 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
NEW REVIEW [it took more than a few days to get back to this -- I hope someone reads it... lol]

I will add only a few additional comments to what I’ve already written (below and in the comments sections). It will be enough and more than enough.

I came at this book with decades of prejudice built-up – and it showed in my (essentially failed) reading of Madness and Civilization. I knew that Foucault was a fake and a charlatan before I ever cracked a page. So to speak…

So one can imagine my surprise a
This book begins with a bang – in fact, a series of bangs. That is the point, you see. We need to be shocked about what is, after all, our relatively recent past. We too easily forget that there was a time when ‘people like us’ actually span back in history for nearly as far as the mind could imagine. Now, we struggle to believe that people who lived 20 or 30 years ago where quite like us – even when we ourselves were those people. Today we cast off selves and disown past selves like our endless ...more
David Withun
I read this book while sitting in a prison at night, surrounded by sleeping prisoners locked in their cells, during the last few nights of the year I spent as a correctional officer in a Georgia prison. Each point made by Foucault in this book stood out in high relief all round me. So did the points he missed.

While Foucault's analysis here is, as always, insightful and fascinating, I think his own obsession with the idea of power led him to miss some points which he often seems to be very close
I've read this book three times: First time was in undergraduate, second time was in law school, third time was last week. I can honestly say that my understanding of this work has grown with each reading, but that growth in comprehension has come more from my reading of other books either discussing or related to Discipline and Punish.
Specifically, I would recommend Jurgen Habermas's critique of Foucault, although I now forget which book of his contains his critique. I would also recommend Goff
In many ways a response to the French government's penal codes of the 60s and 70s but also a continuation of Foucault's work in Madness and Civilization, the influence of D&P can be seen everywhere from Spielberg's Minority Report to Enemy of the State to Ted Conover's Newjack and most if not all critiques of surveillant governments. It's also a horrifying read, starting out as it does with an account of the ritualistic execution of a regicide, which Foucault compares favorably to the prison ...more
Nov 10, 2007 Jessica marked it as owned-for-years-but-still-not-read
Recommends it for: intellectuals who have done something bad
I started it. I didn't finish. And unless I one day find myself in a situation with extremely limited mobility and options, with a great deal of time (read: years) on my hands, it's conceivable that I never will.

I'd like to have read this book, since I'm very interested in the topics it addresses, but I don't know that I have the mind, stomach, or patience for Foucault. So while I'd like to have read it, I don't know that I'd like as much to read it, if you get what I'm saying. Well, maybe somed
Jan 10, 2008 Lex rated it 5 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: everyone
This book rearranged my brain. I have never read something that met my intuition half way, and then expanded my vision beyond all critical capacities I knew before. I will never conceive of power, structures, knowledge, statistics, or my cock the same way again. His anti-humanitarian, empirical, and nonuniversal critiques that follow the money and the violence are the perfect medicine for people who have been reading saggy assed media studies and cultural studies for too long. Saved my life.
I've had this book for nearly twenty years on myself. Before a couple weeks ago I never quite found myself in the "right" mood for a French post-structural look at power, prisons, and punishment. It is interesting reading this and thinking about how influential Foucault was in the modern criticisms of the penal system, and various areas of control (schools, hospitals, psychiatric facilities, the military and prisons).


I didn't realize until I read the prologue that the "Disciple" part of the titl
Another one of those Big Idea Books that I've only just now got around to reading.

Although I must express some doubts about Foucault's history of the prison system and its supposedly linear process from revenge to rehabilitation (in many parts of the United States, we're still big on violent punishment and mandatory minimum sentencing), the idea of certain societal institutions as means to force compliance and uniformity is a powerful idea.
Justin Mitchell
Every time I read Foucault, I leave asking myself "What am I supposed to do with this?"

My main issue is that I feel everything Foucault comes up with is ridiculously obvious. Of course power is the basis for all our social interactions. It's not a mind-blowing point. Of course public executions are demonstrations of power over crime. Of course the disciplinary systems of the prison, the rehabilitation concept, etc., are all rooted in power. It doesn't challenge anything to say that. If I write a
This reads like a dystopian novel, albeit with foucault's famously (infamously?) difficult language.

First I have to admit that I was probably provoked to read this because Steven Pinker said it was 'unconvincing' in his particularly unconvincing book 'The Better Angels of our Nature'. I was also a bit perplexed how such an apparently unconvincing book (this one) could get over 33, 000 citations on google academic. Also pretty great reviews by the goodreads non-scholars. So you know that strange
This was my first exposure to Michel Foucault. I'm not sure whether it is the fault of the translator or not, but I found Foucault's prose to be rather thick and elliptical at times, to the degree that it may have contributed to the fleeting impression this work left on me. It was interesting, and presented a view on the evolution of criminal punishment that I hadn't considered in such a light before - I find, however, that much of it has already slipped away from memory.

The principal thrust of
Jonathan-David Jackson
Apr 18, 2012 Jonathan-David Jackson rated it 3 of 5 stars
Recommended to Jonathan-David by: Diane
This book was the hardest book I've ever read. Generally I'll go through a 300 page book in two days - this one took me about a month. Perhaps its the style of the author, or something to do with the translation from French, but it was very difficult for me to finish it. Many times I found myself reaching the end of a page and realizing that I hadn't been able to concentrate on it so my mind had wandered and I hadn't actually taken anything in, so I'd have to start the page over, and then it wou ...more
Sean Chick
The first two chapters are interesting, although his defense of public torture is idiotic. His critique of modern society is a stunning case of postmodern claptrap. My god, prisons are meant to dissuade us from committing crime! You don't say! He essentially says Enlightenment reform was actually insidious and bad for humanity. In this way he is actually a conservative, by calling into question all the reasons for reform. The fact that the left embraced this book, which was a grand critique of l ...more
To be honest, this was the hardest book I've ever gotten through. This, however, isn't saying much as I don't tend to read books on social theory. Foucault is, to my taste, an overly-wordy, arrogant, intellectual. He seems to love to use words that he makes up mid-text with little or no explanation other than the context (i.e. panopticism). Though, I have to hand it to the guy, his theories, rarely backed by anything but his own pompous presuppositions, carry fundamental truths. After reading th ...more
Finally reading Foucault after reading a ton of stuff that was (supposedly) inspired by Foucault made me realize I like Foucault a LOT more than I like people who like Foucault.
i first trudged through this book when i was in high school. being 17, i realized that i wasn't really understanding what he was saying, but for the first time, felt like i was exposed to an analysis that transcended dominant thought in a way that i didnt know was possible. for the next 3 years i read a lot of foucault..his understanding of the co-productive nature of knowledge and power gave me tools to deconstruct our funny world and truths. not to be too corny, but this shit changed my life. ...more
Sam L
I ended up reading this by accident, having picked it up while waiting for something then getting strangely hooked.

Foucault's main idea in D&P is that the mechanisms which displayed and sustained power in the middle ages - in particular the localised, concentrated, violent spectacle of the public execution - transformed through the 18th and early 19th centuries, via the development of frameworks of discipline within institutions such as barracks, schools, workshops, and prisons, into someth
Admittedly, my expectations were quite high for this book. I've heard and read some whole-hearted praise for Discipline and Punish which compelled me to read it. I had gone through some of it in college and thought I'd tackle it again.

And, at the risk of being labeled obtuse, I'm not sure I get it.

Part I focuses on an ideological history of torture. The conclusions regarding the purpose and effect of torture by the sovereign are interspersed with anecdotal tales heightening the horror of such pu
Erik Graff
Jun 15, 2013 Erik Graff rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: everyone
Recommended to Erik by: Erik Badger
Shelves: history
This book was much less personally problematic than his first book about sexuality because prisons are, barring one night as a teen, beyond my experience. It did shake up some of the beliefs I'd obtained in elementary school about Patricia Mott and the prison reforms of the nineteenth century--reforms which were naturally part of the ever-progressive movement of the world led by the United States of America according to the secular religion we were inculcated with back then.

It is, however, a fin
When I finished reading this book, I broke out a tub of Ben and Jerry's Half Baked—chocolate and vanilla frozen yoghurt with brownie and cookie dough chunks seemed the only suitable reward after 300+ pages of Foucault's prose. Whether or not its his writing style or an effect of the translation, Discipline and Punish is a dense and at times frustratingly opaque book. That, coupled with Foucault's fondness for using minuscule, ahistorical details to justify large-scale abstractions, made this a v ...more
Rosa Ramôa
Michel Foucault (1926 – 1984)

Referência para estudantes de filosofia, história, sociologia, política, psicologia e quaisquer outras ciências humanas e sociais.Qualquer universidade do mundo tem a sua bibliografia...

Publicou vários livros.

Andou em esquinas.Em mundos e submundos.Nunca se encontrou...

Desceu e subiu escadas
Às vezes as mesmas
Sempre as mesmas

Usou máscaras...Foi prodigioso.

Viveu vidas...

Viveu limites e extremos...
This is not the kind of book you read in one sitting or forty for that matter. I did read the section that intrigued me and brought me to the novel in the first place and that was the Spectacle of the Scaffold. It was brilliant. The transition from monarchy imposed punishment to the state is outlined beautifully.

For my particular interest in comparing the spectacle, human sacrifice, devotion and distance it was an excellent resource. Thus my rating is based on this portion of the book. I intend
Sep 03, 2011 Salma marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
أشعر بالغيظ، فقد قلبت مكتبتي مرتين و أنا أبحث عنه عبثا، أذكر أني خبأته في مكان ما... و لكني نسيت أين خبأته... فقط لحسن الحظ أني لم أخبئ معه نقودي و إلا كانت ضاعت هي الأخرى معه... و لكني طمأنت نفسي بأنه ربما من حسن الحظ أكثر أن ليس لدي نقود تستحق أن أخبئها فأنسى أين وضعتها هي الأخرى فتضيع علي
راودتني نفسي بقراءة النسخة الالكترونية
و لكني تراجعت عنها لأني كنت سأشعر بالغيظ مرتين من نفسي لأني سأكون أضعته مرتين حينها، مرة حين خبأته و مرة حين اشتريت النسخة الورقية عبثا و لم أقرأها... حسنا سأحاول البحث م
Janne Peltola
Foucault applies his thinking about power to the corrective system. He frames power as a human game for control and the prison system as an example of societal control. The corrective system is not only a way to protect citizens from dangerous individuals, but also a way to assert control over these individuals. The modern corrective system doesn't aim to punish, but to ensure that wayward individuals are reformed into societal norms.

Any reading of Foucault expands one's mind, but this one in pa
The Awdude
This book marks Foucault's transition from an archaeological posture to a genealogical one, a theoretical shift which allows him to begin theorizing about the frighteningly inescapable dynamics of power. The writing is beautiful, haunting, and poetic in all the right ways, and the aesthetic grace with which he deploys his ideas almost eclipses the terrifying implications of their content. But not quite. There is no escaping the Panopticon of power! The technology of discipline and the diffuse me ...more
Any reader of Foucault knows that he is outside of the realm of philosophy "proper." Although some of his works are not entirely convincing (though always thought provoking), this one I found to be an excellent analysis of the transformation of the concept of the prison - and makes for a great compliment to his extensive and most intense study "The History of Madness."

One could easily take the writings of Foucault as sociological or historical analyses, place them within an ontic framework and
Ally de Padua
Foucault for Historians, Foucault as Historian

"It’s true that I prefer not to identify myself, and I’m amused by the diversity of the ways I’ve been judged and classified. Something tells me that by now a more or less approximate place should have been found for me, after so many efforts in such various directions…I have to be convinced that their inability to situate me has something to do with me."

Michel Foucault, Interview with Paul Rabinow

Discipline and Punish is difficult when considered as
Наглядати і карати
Після прочитання перших кількадесят сторінок ця книга може здатися студією з історії тортур, страт та в'язниць. І справді, на сторінках книги ми неодноразово подибуємо описи жахливих тортур і в'язничних звичаїв, проте було б помилково зводити суть книги до опису еволюції страхітливих практик правосуддя. Насправді Мішель Фуко прагне показати, і на моє переконання, йому це блискуче вдається, що відмова від тортур, "гуманізація" покарань і створення системи пенітенціарних установ
Oliver Bateman
I can't believe I waited so long to read this book. Even in translation, Surveiller et punir is a thrilling work. Foucault constructs an elaborate argument about the development of the disciplines, the evolution of modern Western legal codes, and the shifting locus of "corrective" punishment, in the process using a fair assortment of primary sources to buttress his claims (more than in the History of Sexuality series, anyway...but perhaps not enough for many professional historians). What is mos ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Enduring Critical Value of Discipline & Punish? 5 109 May 23, 2012 05:51PM  
  • Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life
  • Writing and Difference
  • Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia
  • Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism
  • Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste
  • The Arcades Project
  • Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of "Sex"
  • The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society
  • Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments
  • The Practice of Everyday Life
  • Écrits
  • Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism
  • The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge
  • The Parallax View
  • Selections from the Prison Notebooks
  • The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays
Michel Foucault was a French philosopher, social theorist and historian of ideas. He held a chair at the Collège de France with the title "History of Systems of Thought," and lectured at the University at Buffalo and the University of California, Berkeley.

Foucault is best known for his critical studies of social institutions, most notably psychiatry, medicine, the human sciences and the prison sys
More about Michel Foucault...
The History of Sexuality 1: An Introduction Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences The Archaeology of Knowledge & The Discourse on Language The History of Sexuality 2: The Use of Pleasure

Share This Book

“The 'Enlightenment', which discovered the liberties, also invented the disciplines.” 48 likes
“There is no power relation without the correlative constitution of a field of knowledge, nor any knowledge that does not presuppose and constitute at the same time power relations” 41 likes
More quotes…