<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	
<book>
  <id>799865</id>
  <title><![CDATA[Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientific Revolution (New Histories of Science, Technology, and Medicine)]]></title>
  <isbn><![CDATA[0674022491]]></isbn>
  <isbn13><![CDATA[9780674022492]]></isbn13>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770m/799865.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770s/799865.jpg</small_image_url>
  <description><![CDATA[<p>  Alchemy can't be science--common sense tells us as much. But perhaps common sense is not the best measure of what science is, or was. In this book, Bruce Moran looks past contemporary assumptions and prejudices to determine what alchemists were actually doing in the context of early modern science. Examining the ways alchemy and chemistry were studied and practiced between 1400 and 1700, he shows how these approaches influenced their respective practitioners' ideas about nature and shaped their inquiries into the workings of the natural world. His work sets up a dialogue between what historians have usually presented as separate spheres; here we see how alchemists and early chemists exchanged ideas and methods and in fact shared a territory between their two disciplines.   </p><p>  <em>Distilling Knowledge</em> suggests that scientific revolution may wear a different appearance in different cultural contexts. The metaphor of the Scientific Revolution, Moran argues, can be expanded to make sense of alchemy and other so-called pseudo-sciences--by including a new framework in which &quot;process can count as an object, in which making leads to learning, and in which the messiness of conflict leads to discernment.&quot; Seen on its own terms, alchemy can stand within the bounds of demonstrative science.  </p>]]></description>
  <work>
  <best_book_id type="integer">799865</best_book_id>
  <books_count type="integer">1</books_count>
  <desc_user_id type="integer" nil="true"></desc_user_id>
  <id type="integer">785830</id>
  <media_type nil="true"></media_type>
  <original_language_id type="integer" nil="true"></original_language_id>
  <original_publication_day type="integer">1</original_publication_day>
  <original_publication_month type="integer">9</original_publication_month>
  <original_publication_year type="integer">2006</original_publication_year>
  <original_title>Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientific Revolution (New Histories of Science, Technology, and Medicine)</original_title>
  <rating_dist>total:8|5:4|4:2|3:1|2:1|1:0|</rating_dist>
  <ratings_count type="integer">8</ratings_count>
  <ratings_sum type="integer">33</ratings_sum>
  <reviews_count type="integer">14</reviews_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
</work>

  <average_rating><![CDATA[4.12]]></average_rating>
  <ratings_count><![CDATA[8]]></ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[0]]></text_reviews_count>
  
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/799865.Distilling_Knowledge_Alchemy_Chemistry_and_the_Scientific_Revolution]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/799865.Distilling_Knowledge_Alchemy_Chemistry_and_the_Scientific_Revolution]]></link>
  <authors>
    <author>
    <id>418899</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Bruce T. Moran]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/418899.Bruce_T_Moran]]></link>
    <average_rating>4.22</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>9</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>1</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>
    <reviews start="1" end="14" total="14">
      <review>
  <id>81050639</id>
    <user>
    <id>919590</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Anna Rae]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Lafayette, IN]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/919590-anna-rae]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1244443410p3/919590.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1244443410p2/919590.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">799865</id>
  <isbn>0674022491</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780674022492</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientific Revolution (New Histories of Science, Technology, and Medicine)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770m/799865.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770s/799865.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/799865.Distilling_Knowledge_Alchemy_Chemistry_and_the_Scientific_Revolution</link>
  <average_rating>4.12</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>8</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p>  Alchemy can't be science--common sense tells us as much. But perhaps common sense is not the best measure of what science is, or was. In this book, Bruce Moran looks past contemporary assumptions and prejudices to determine what alchemists were actually doing in the context of early modern science. Examining the ways alchemy and chemistry were studied and practiced between 1400 and 1700, he shows how these approaches influenced their respective practitioners' ideas about nature and shaped their inquiries into the workings of the natural world. His work sets up a dialogue between what historians have usually presented as separate spheres; here we see how alchemists and early chemists exchanged ideas and methods and in fact shared a territory between their two disciplines.   </p><p>  <em>Distilling Knowledge</em> suggests that scientific revolution may wear a different appearance in different cultural contexts. The metaphor of the Scientific Revolution, Moran argues, can be expanded to make sense of alchemy and other so-called pseudo-sciences--by including a new framework in which &quot;process can count as an object, in which making leads to learning, and in which the messiness of conflict leads to discernment.&quot; Seen on its own terms, alchemy can stand within the bounds of demonstrative science.  </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>2006</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="currently-reading" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Dec 14 21:47:51 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Dec 14 21:47:54 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/81050639]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/81050639]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>75479159</id>
    <user>
    <id>1542704</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Isseicreek]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Canada]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1542704-isseicreek]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1221804696p3/1542704.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1221804696p2/1542704.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">799865</id>
  <isbn>0674022491</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780674022492</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientific Revolution (New Histories of Science, Technology, and Medicine)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770m/799865.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770s/799865.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/799865.Distilling_Knowledge_Alchemy_Chemistry_and_the_Scientific_Revolution</link>
  <average_rating>4.12</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>8</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p>  Alchemy can't be science--common sense tells us as much. But perhaps common sense is not the best measure of what science is, or was. In this book, Bruce Moran looks past contemporary assumptions and prejudices to determine what alchemists were actually doing in the context of early modern science. Examining the ways alchemy and chemistry were studied and practiced between 1400 and 1700, he shows how these approaches influenced their respective practitioners' ideas about nature and shaped their inquiries into the workings of the natural world. His work sets up a dialogue between what historians have usually presented as separate spheres; here we see how alchemists and early chemists exchanged ideas and methods and in fact shared a territory between their two disciplines.   </p><p>  <em>Distilling Knowledge</em> suggests that scientific revolution may wear a different appearance in different cultural contexts. The metaphor of the Scientific Revolution, Moran argues, can be expanded to make sense of alchemy and other so-called pseudo-sciences--by including a new framework in which &quot;process can count as an object, in which making leads to learning, and in which the messiness of conflict leads to discernment.&quot; Seen on its own terms, alchemy can stand within the bounds of demonstrative science.  </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>2006</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="to-read" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Oct 23 08:06:00 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Oct 23 08:06:00 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/75479159]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/75479159]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>75351927</id>
    <user>
    <id>2832666</id>
    <name><![CDATA[David]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Brookhaven, PA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2832666-david]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">799865</id>
  <isbn>0674022491</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780674022492</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientific Revolution (New Histories of Science, Technology, and Medicine)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770m/799865.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770s/799865.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/799865.Distilling_Knowledge_Alchemy_Chemistry_and_the_Scientific_Revolution</link>
  <average_rating>4.12</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>8</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p>  Alchemy can't be science--common sense tells us as much. But perhaps common sense is not the best measure of what science is, or was. In this book, Bruce Moran looks past contemporary assumptions and prejudices to determine what alchemists were actually doing in the context of early modern science. Examining the ways alchemy and chemistry were studied and practiced between 1400 and 1700, he shows how these approaches influenced their respective practitioners' ideas about nature and shaped their inquiries into the workings of the natural world. His work sets up a dialogue between what historians have usually presented as separate spheres; here we see how alchemists and early chemists exchanged ideas and methods and in fact shared a territory between their two disciplines.   </p><p>  <em>Distilling Knowledge</em> suggests that scientific revolution may wear a different appearance in different cultural contexts. The metaphor of the Scientific Revolution, Moran argues, can be expanded to make sense of alchemy and other so-called pseudo-sciences--by including a new framework in which &quot;process can count as an object, in which making leads to learning, and in which the messiness of conflict leads to discernment.&quot; Seen on its own terms, alchemy can stand within the bounds of demonstrative science.  </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>2006</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="non-fiction" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Oct 22 05:22:33 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Oct 22 05:22:33 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/75351927]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/75351927]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>68962989</id>
    <user>
    <id>2590622</id>
    <name><![CDATA[John ]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Jackson, MS]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2590622-john-ervin]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1249338160p3/2590622.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1249338160p2/2590622.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">799865</id>
  <isbn>0674022491</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780674022492</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientific Revolution (New Histories of Science, Technology, and Medicine)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770m/799865.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770s/799865.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/799865.Distilling_Knowledge_Alchemy_Chemistry_and_the_Scientific_Revolution</link>
  <average_rating>4.12</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>8</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p>  Alchemy can't be science--common sense tells us as much. But perhaps common sense is not the best measure of what science is, or was. In this book, Bruce Moran looks past contemporary assumptions and prejudices to determine what alchemists were actually doing in the context of early modern science. Examining the ways alchemy and chemistry were studied and practiced between 1400 and 1700, he shows how these approaches influenced their respective practitioners' ideas about nature and shaped their inquiries into the workings of the natural world. His work sets up a dialogue between what historians have usually presented as separate spheres; here we see how alchemists and early chemists exchanged ideas and methods and in fact shared a territory between their two disciplines.   </p><p>  <em>Distilling Knowledge</em> suggests that scientific revolution may wear a different appearance in different cultural contexts. The metaphor of the Scientific Revolution, Moran argues, can be expanded to make sense of alchemy and other so-called pseudo-sciences--by including a new framework in which &quot;process can count as an object, in which making leads to learning, and in which the messiness of conflict leads to discernment.&quot; Seen on its own terms, alchemy can stand within the bounds of demonstrative science.  </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>2006</published>
</book>

    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Aug 26 10:06:07 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Aug 26 10:06:07 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/68962989]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/68962989]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>61195230</id>
    <user>
    <id>1064257</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Leah]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1064257-leah]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1232831853p3/1064257.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1232831853p2/1064257.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">799865</id>
  <isbn>0674022491</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780674022492</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientific Revolution (New Histories of Science, Technology, and Medicine)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770m/799865.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770s/799865.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/799865.Distilling_Knowledge_Alchemy_Chemistry_and_the_Scientific_Revolution</link>
  <average_rating>4.12</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>8</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p>  Alchemy can't be science--common sense tells us as much. But perhaps common sense is not the best measure of what science is, or was. In this book, Bruce Moran looks past contemporary assumptions and prejudices to determine what alchemists were actually doing in the context of early modern science. Examining the ways alchemy and chemistry were studied and practiced between 1400 and 1700, he shows how these approaches influenced their respective practitioners' ideas about nature and shaped their inquiries into the workings of the natural world. His work sets up a dialogue between what historians have usually presented as separate spheres; here we see how alchemists and early chemists exchanged ideas and methods and in fact shared a territory between their two disciplines.   </p><p>  <em>Distilling Knowledge</em> suggests that scientific revolution may wear a different appearance in different cultural contexts. The metaphor of the Scientific Revolution, Moran argues, can be expanded to make sense of alchemy and other so-called pseudo-sciences--by including a new framework in which &quot;process can count as an object, in which making leads to learning, and in which the messiness of conflict leads to discernment.&quot; Seen on its own terms, alchemy can stand within the bounds of demonstrative science.  </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>2006</published>
</book>

    <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="history" />
        <shelf name="science" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Fri Jul 03 05:44:11 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Jun 26 11:05:56 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Jul 03 05:44:11 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/61195230]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/61195230]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>56939341</id>
    <user>
    <id>1710685</id>
    <name><![CDATA[David]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Melbourne, Australia]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1710685-david]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">799865</id>
  <isbn>0674022491</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780674022492</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientific Revolution (New Histories of Science, Technology, and Medicine)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770m/799865.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770s/799865.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/799865.Distilling_Knowledge_Alchemy_Chemistry_and_the_Scientific_Revolution</link>
  <average_rating>4.12</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>8</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p>  Alchemy can't be science--common sense tells us as much. But perhaps common sense is not the best measure of what science is, or was. In this book, Bruce Moran looks past contemporary assumptions and prejudices to determine what alchemists were actually doing in the context of early modern science. Examining the ways alchemy and chemistry were studied and practiced between 1400 and 1700, he shows how these approaches influenced their respective practitioners' ideas about nature and shaped their inquiries into the workings of the natural world. His work sets up a dialogue between what historians have usually presented as separate spheres; here we see how alchemists and early chemists exchanged ideas and methods and in fact shared a territory between their two disciplines.   </p><p>  <em>Distilling Knowledge</em> suggests that scientific revolution may wear a different appearance in different cultural contexts. The metaphor of the Scientific Revolution, Moran argues, can be expanded to make sense of alchemy and other so-called pseudo-sciences--by including a new framework in which &quot;process can count as an object, in which making leads to learning, and in which the messiness of conflict leads to discernment.&quot; Seen on its own terms, alchemy can stand within the bounds of demonstrative science.  </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>2006</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Fri May 22 03:59:50 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri May 22 03:59:50 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/56939341]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/56939341]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>55336914</id>
    <user>
    <id>1387301</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Shawn]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Lake Orion, MI]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1387301-shawn]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1221690892p3/1387301.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1221690892p2/1387301.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">799865</id>
  <isbn>0674022491</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780674022492</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientific Revolution (New Histories of Science, Technology, and Medicine)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770m/799865.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770s/799865.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/799865.Distilling_Knowledge_Alchemy_Chemistry_and_the_Scientific_Revolution</link>
  <average_rating>4.12</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>8</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p>  Alchemy can't be science--common sense tells us as much. But perhaps common sense is not the best measure of what science is, or was. In this book, Bruce Moran looks past contemporary assumptions and prejudices to determine what alchemists were actually doing in the context of early modern science. Examining the ways alchemy and chemistry were studied and practiced between 1400 and 1700, he shows how these approaches influenced their respective practitioners' ideas about nature and shaped their inquiries into the workings of the natural world. His work sets up a dialogue between what historians have usually presented as separate spheres; here we see how alchemists and early chemists exchanged ideas and methods and in fact shared a territory between their two disciplines.   </p><p>  <em>Distilling Knowledge</em> suggests that scientific revolution may wear a different appearance in different cultural contexts. The metaphor of the Scientific Revolution, Moran argues, can be expanded to make sense of alchemy and other so-called pseudo-sciences--by including a new framework in which &quot;process can count as an object, in which making leads to learning, and in which the messiness of conflict leads to discernment.&quot; Seen on its own terms, alchemy can stand within the bounds of demonstrative science.  </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>2006</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="to-read" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Thu May 07 21:20:07 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu May 07 21:20:14 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/55336914]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/55336914]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>52785421</id>
    <user>
    <id>2205093</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Britt, Book Habitue]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2205093-britt-book-habitue]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1239298936p3/2205093.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1239298936p2/2205093.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">799865</id>
  <isbn>0674022491</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780674022492</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientific Revolution (New Histories of Science, Technology, and Medicine)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770m/799865.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770s/799865.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/799865.Distilling_Knowledge_Alchemy_Chemistry_and_the_Scientific_Revolution</link>
  <average_rating>4.12</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>8</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p>  Alchemy can't be science--common sense tells us as much. But perhaps common sense is not the best measure of what science is, or was. In this book, Bruce Moran looks past contemporary assumptions and prejudices to determine what alchemists were actually doing in the context of early modern science. Examining the ways alchemy and chemistry were studied and practiced between 1400 and 1700, he shows how these approaches influenced their respective practitioners' ideas about nature and shaped their inquiries into the workings of the natural world. His work sets up a dialogue between what historians have usually presented as separate spheres; here we see how alchemists and early chemists exchanged ideas and methods and in fact shared a territory between their two disciplines.   </p><p>  <em>Distilling Knowledge</em> suggests that scientific revolution may wear a different appearance in different cultural contexts. The metaphor of the Scientific Revolution, Moran argues, can be expanded to make sense of alchemy and other so-called pseudo-sciences--by including a new framework in which &quot;process can count as an object, in which making leads to learning, and in which the messiness of conflict leads to discernment.&quot; Seen on its own terms, alchemy can stand within the bounds of demonstrative science.  </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>2006</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="to-read" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Apr 15 11:00:19 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Apr 15 11:00:19 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/52785421]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/52785421]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>51547934</id>
    <user>
    <id>1105335</id>
    <name><![CDATA[♥☆~Lakshmi]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Dubai, The United Arab Emirates]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1105335-lakshmi]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1232991037p3/1105335.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1232991037p2/1105335.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">799865</id>
  <isbn>0674022491</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780674022492</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientific Revolution (New Histories of Science, Technology, and Medicine)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770m/799865.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770s/799865.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/799865.Distilling_Knowledge_Alchemy_Chemistry_and_the_Scientific_Revolution</link>
  <average_rating>4.12</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>8</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p>  Alchemy can't be science--common sense tells us as much. But perhaps common sense is not the best measure of what science is, or was. In this book, Bruce Moran looks past contemporary assumptions and prejudices to determine what alchemists were actually doing in the context of early modern science. Examining the ways alchemy and chemistry were studied and practiced between 1400 and 1700, he shows how these approaches influenced their respective practitioners' ideas about nature and shaped their inquiries into the workings of the natural world. His work sets up a dialogue between what historians have usually presented as separate spheres; here we see how alchemists and early chemists exchanged ideas and methods and in fact shared a territory between their two disciplines.   </p><p>  <em>Distilling Knowledge</em> suggests that scientific revolution may wear a different appearance in different cultural contexts. The metaphor of the Scientific Revolution, Moran argues, can be expanded to make sense of alchemy and other so-called pseudo-sciences--by including a new framework in which &quot;process can count as an object, in which making leads to learning, and in which the messiness of conflict leads to discernment.&quot; Seen on its own terms, alchemy can stand within the bounds of demonstrative science.  </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>2006</published>
</book>

    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Apr 04 22:09:17 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Apr 04 22:09:17 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/51547934]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/51547934]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>50692121</id>
    <user>
    <id>1104823</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Saurabh]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Abu dhabi, The United Arab Emirates]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1104823-saurabh]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1233331896p3/1104823.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1233331896p2/1104823.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">799865</id>
  <isbn>0674022491</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780674022492</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientific Revolution (New Histories of Science, Technology, and Medicine)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770m/799865.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770s/799865.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/799865.Distilling_Knowledge_Alchemy_Chemistry_and_the_Scientific_Revolution</link>
  <average_rating>4.12</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>8</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p>  Alchemy can't be science--common sense tells us as much. But perhaps common sense is not the best measure of what science is, or was. In this book, Bruce Moran looks past contemporary assumptions and prejudices to determine what alchemists were actually doing in the context of early modern science. Examining the ways alchemy and chemistry were studied and practiced between 1400 and 1700, he shows how these approaches influenced their respective practitioners' ideas about nature and shaped their inquiries into the workings of the natural world. His work sets up a dialogue between what historians have usually presented as separate spheres; here we see how alchemists and early chemists exchanged ideas and methods and in fact shared a territory between their two disciplines.   </p><p>  <em>Distilling Knowledge</em> suggests that scientific revolution may wear a different appearance in different cultural contexts. The metaphor of the Scientific Revolution, Moran argues, can be expanded to make sense of alchemy and other so-called pseudo-sciences--by including a new framework in which &quot;process can count as an object, in which making leads to learning, and in which the messiness of conflict leads to discernment.&quot; Seen on its own terms, alchemy can stand within the bounds of demonstrative science.  </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>2006</published>
</book>

    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Mar 28 04:19:03 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Mar 28 04:19:03 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/50692121]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/50692121]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>48816443</id>
    <user>
    <id>2044667</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Deana]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Temecula, CA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2044667-deana]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1240342710p3/2044667.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1240342710p2/2044667.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">799865</id>
  <isbn>0674022491</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780674022492</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientific Revolution (New Histories of Science, Technology, and Medicine)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770m/799865.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770s/799865.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/799865.Distilling_Knowledge_Alchemy_Chemistry_and_the_Scientific_Revolution</link>
  <average_rating>4.12</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>8</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p>  Alchemy can't be science--common sense tells us as much. But perhaps common sense is not the best measure of what science is, or was. In this book, Bruce Moran looks past contemporary assumptions and prejudices to determine what alchemists were actually doing in the context of early modern science. Examining the ways alchemy and chemistry were studied and practiced between 1400 and 1700, he shows how these approaches influenced their respective practitioners' ideas about nature and shaped their inquiries into the workings of the natural world. His work sets up a dialogue between what historians have usually presented as separate spheres; here we see how alchemists and early chemists exchanged ideas and methods and in fact shared a territory between their two disciplines.   </p><p>  <em>Distilling Knowledge</em> suggests that scientific revolution may wear a different appearance in different cultural contexts. The metaphor of the Scientific Revolution, Moran argues, can be expanded to make sense of alchemy and other so-called pseudo-sciences--by including a new framework in which &quot;process can count as an object, in which making leads to learning, and in which the messiness of conflict leads to discernment.&quot; Seen on its own terms, alchemy can stand within the bounds of demonstrative science.  </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>2006</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Mar 10 11:16:12 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Mar 10 11:16:12 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/48816443]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/48816443]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>18785010</id>
    <user>
    <id>645715</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Jack]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Salina, KS]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/645715-jack]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-U-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">799865</id>
  <isbn>0674022491</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780674022492</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientific Revolution (New Histories of Science, Technology, and Medicine)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770m/799865.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770s/799865.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/799865.Distilling_Knowledge_Alchemy_Chemistry_and_the_Scientific_Revolution</link>
  <average_rating>4.12</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>8</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p>  Alchemy can't be science--common sense tells us as much. But perhaps common sense is not the best measure of what science is, or was. In this book, Bruce Moran looks past contemporary assumptions and prejudices to determine what alchemists were actually doing in the context of early modern science. Examining the ways alchemy and chemistry were studied and practiced between 1400 and 1700, he shows how these approaches influenced their respective practitioners' ideas about nature and shaped their inquiries into the workings of the natural world. His work sets up a dialogue between what historians have usually presented as separate spheres; here we see how alchemists and early chemists exchanged ideas and methods and in fact shared a territory between their two disciplines.   </p><p>  <em>Distilling Knowledge</em> suggests that scientific revolution may wear a different appearance in different cultural contexts. The metaphor of the Scientific Revolution, Moran argues, can be expanded to make sense of alchemy and other so-called pseudo-sciences--by including a new framework in which &quot;process can count as an object, in which making leads to learning, and in which the messiness of conflict leads to discernment.&quot; Seen on its own terms, alchemy can stand within the bounds of demonstrative science.  </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>2006</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="currently-reading" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Mar 27 13:51:13 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Mar 27 13:51:13 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/18785010]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/18785010]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>15207009</id>
    <user>
    <id>898970</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Adam]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Cambridge, MA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/898970-adam]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">799865</id>
  <isbn>0674022491</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780674022492</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientific Revolution (New Histories of Science, Technology, and Medicine)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770m/799865.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770s/799865.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/799865.Distilling_Knowledge_Alchemy_Chemistry_and_the_Scientific_Revolution</link>
  <average_rating>4.12</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>8</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p>  Alchemy can't be science--common sense tells us as much. But perhaps common sense is not the best measure of what science is, or was. In this book, Bruce Moran looks past contemporary assumptions and prejudices to determine what alchemists were actually doing in the context of early modern science. Examining the ways alchemy and chemistry were studied and practiced between 1400 and 1700, he shows how these approaches influenced their respective practitioners' ideas about nature and shaped their inquiries into the workings of the natural world. His work sets up a dialogue between what historians have usually presented as separate spheres; here we see how alchemists and early chemists exchanged ideas and methods and in fact shared a territory between their two disciplines.   </p><p>  <em>Distilling Knowledge</em> suggests that scientific revolution may wear a different appearance in different cultural contexts. The metaphor of the Scientific Revolution, Moran argues, can be expanded to make sense of alchemy and other so-called pseudo-sciences--by including a new framework in which &quot;process can count as an object, in which making leads to learning, and in which the messiness of conflict leads to discernment.&quot; Seen on its own terms, alchemy can stand within the bounds of demonstrative science.  </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>2006</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Feb 11 20:29:39 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Feb 11 20:29:39 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/15207009]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/15207009]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>9764652</id>
    <user>
    <id>651063</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Ohthebether]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Dekalb, IL]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/651063-ohthebether]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-U-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">799865</id>
  <isbn>0674022491</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780674022492</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientific Revolution (New Histories of Science, Technology, and Medicine)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770m/799865.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178487770s/799865.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/799865.Distilling_Knowledge_Alchemy_Chemistry_and_the_Scientific_Revolution</link>
  <average_rating>4.12</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>8</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p>  Alchemy can't be science--common sense tells us as much. But perhaps common sense is not the best measure of what science is, or was. In this book, Bruce Moran looks past contemporary assumptions and prejudices to determine what alchemists were actually doing in the context of early modern science. Examining the ways alchemy and chemistry were studied and practiced between 1400 and 1700, he shows how these approaches influenced their respective practitioners' ideas about nature and shaped their inquiries into the workings of the natural world. His work sets up a dialogue between what historians have usually presented as separate spheres; here we see how alchemists and early chemists exchanged ideas and methods and in fact shared a territory between their two disciplines.   </p><p>  <em>Distilling Knowledge</em> suggests that scientific revolution may wear a different appearance in different cultural contexts. The metaphor of the Scientific Revolution, Moran argues, can be expanded to make sense of alchemy and other so-called pseudo-sciences--by including a new framework in which &quot;process can count as an object, in which making leads to learning, and in which the messiness of conflict leads to discernment.&quot; Seen on its own terms, alchemy can stand within the bounds of demonstrative science.  </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>2006</published>
</book>

    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Nov 30 10:56:24 -0800 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Nov 30 10:56:24 -0800 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/9764652]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/9764652]]></link>
</review>
    </reviews>
  <popular_shelves>
          <shelf name="to-read" />
          <shelf name="currently-reading" />
          <shelf name="non-fiction" />
          <shelf name="history" />
          <shelf name="science" />
      </popular_shelves>
  <book_links>
    <book_link>
  <id>8</id>
  <name><![CDATA[WorldCat]]></name>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book_link/follow/8?book_id=799865</link>
</book_link>
  </book_links>
</book>
</GoodreadsResponse>