Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Murder of King Tut” as Want to Read:
The Murder of King Tut
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Murder of King Tut

3.34 of 5 stars 3.34  ·  rating details  ·  5,727 ratings  ·  942 reviews
The Murder of King Tut adapts bestselling author James Patterson's New York Times bestselling novel. As we visit the Egyptian landscapes back in the time of the Boy King, we also follow the trials and tribulations of his discoverer, Howard Carter, as he searches tomb after tomb searching for what most other archeologists are certain doesn't exist - the Tomb of Tutankhamen ...more
Hardcover, 132 pages
Published November 30th 2010 by IDW Publishing (first published January 1st 2009)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Murder of King Tut, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Murder of King Tut

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Dec 31, 2009 Kevin rated it 1 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: No
Recommended to Kevin by: Linda Tepper
I'm half way through with the book and like a few of other reviewers have soon as I read how much time and effort went into the researching of this book, my cynical side came out...I'm thinking don't tell me how much time you put into it but let me gauge that for myself after I've read it....I'm no Egyptologist by any stretch but for a book that has been heavily researched it is definitely light on details...another thing I don't like is when the author places himself within the ...more
Put your seat belts on because this is going to be a bumpy review. In all his arrogance, Patterson claims to have done a great deal of research as he and Martin Dugard try to solve the mystery of the boy king, Tutankhamun. This is not non-fiction as it claims to be, but historical fiction. The tale is told on three levels: chapters highlighting how Patterson visited the recent controversial Tut exhibit that toured America a couple of years ago, chapters that introduce readers to the life of arch ...more
What is with Patterson's writing style? There were 25 chapters in the first hundred pages! I felt like I was a Big Girl reading a Chapter Book for the first time. Every time I turned around there was another chapter. These constant interruptions prevented me from getting into any of the three stories (Patterson's "I'm so great I wrote this book," Carter's discovery of the tomb, and Tut's life) taking place. Finally I gave up in disgust.
UNBELIEVABLE. The worst book I've ever read in my life. Laughably bad. This idiot thinks he was the first to consider that Tutankhamen may have been assassinated, and that he alone has "solved" his murder. I mean I don't think he ACTUALLY believes that, but I do think he believes it's easy as hell fool adults into believing that. Which by the way, is fucking insulting. It's painfully obvious that he considers his adult audience to be dumb as fuck. There are a million "chapters" in this shitty bo ...more
This has got to be the most awful book I have read in a long time, if not my entire life. I have never read a James Patterson book, never had an urge. The only reason I picked this one up was because it sounded interesting as an historical novel. He bills this book as a 'non-fiction thriller'. This is complete and utter bulls**t. I was a history major in undergrad. I have read PLENTY of non-fiction books. This is NOT one of them. Patterson is making crap up as he goes along. He's making these re ...more
To say Patterson writes ten books a year is supposed to be a compliment. It shouldn't be.

Obviously, his co-writers do most of the work and I suspect in this case Patterson merely wrote the self-serving self-descriptive entries and broke the book down into his famous "two page" chapters, because he thinks his readers are such numbskulls that they cannot concentrate for more than sixty seconds at a time.

He may be right, if you judge his readers by the writer.

Was Tutankhamun murdered? As an affici
I am not going to glorify this with any stars.

I got qualms about it when I came across the tomb building slaves being slaughtered in the desert. As the tomb builders were highly skilled artisans, this was a load of bollocks to start with. Ask John Romer... he excavated their village and wrote a book about them. Many of his finds are in the British Museum and I have seen them with my own eyes.

When I got to around page 52 and Ay (misspelled Aye) was ogling Nefertiti, only the fact that I had got t
I always have to remind myself after reading a James Patterson book that I have never liked any of his books so I should stop trying to read them! This book is supposed to be nonfiction and Patterson goes on about how he did so much research for this book, more than he has ever done for any other book. However, none of this research is evident. No footnotes, no end notes, no sources. He also mentions that his assistant did the bulk of the research (so not sure why he claims in other places he di ...more
Priča se izmjenjuje kratkim poglavljima u vrijeme kad je živio Tutankamon i u vrijeme kad ga je ''tražio'' i otkrio Howard Carter. Još i dan danas ostaje misterija kako je mladi jedva 18-est godišnji kralj naglo umro. Patterson smatra da su ga ubili i na tome se i bazira priča (za razliku od stvarnosti gdje znanstvenici imaju tezu da je poginuo ''nesretnim slučajem''). Budući da je njegov smrtni neprijatelj bio svećenik Ay smatra se da ga je on dao ubiti. Budući da nakon Tutankhamonove smrti su ...more
Nov 02, 2009 Tina rated it 2 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Older teens interested in Ancient Egypt
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
The writing in this book is abysmally poor and the historical inaccuracies were astounding. A certain level of bad writing might be worth overlooking if the plot were especially strong or if recent findings were revealed, but the plot is weak and the premise is not based on any archeological findings. This book is advertised as a nonfiction thriller, but it's really a fictional non-thriller.

The author begins the book with much pomp about how the materials were thoroughly researched so that the
I have never read any of Patterson's books. I see them every time I go to the library. They're all over the freaking book tables at Costco, and he takes up an entire bloody shelf at Borders. My only thought on an author that produces that many books that quickly is... How could all of his books possibly be that good without being repetitive?

When I saw this title at Costco, I jumped on it immediately. I've always loved archeology--Egyptian history was the trigger for my passion. So when I saw a b
I really had high hopes for this book, as I love history and am fascinated with all things Ancient Egypt....but was sorely disappointed. I was expecting something along the lines of Patricia Cornwell's investigation into the Jack the Ripper case, with a summary of evidence and supporting documentation. Patterson fro some reason chose to mask all of his "evidence" with a narrative that comes off as more of a fictionalized account. There are "scenes", including dialogue, between Tut and his family ...more
The Murder of King Tut has chapters covering the lives of the mysterious boy-king and those around him, the life of Howard Carter, the archaeologist who discovered his body, and a couple of chapters on James Patterson's own writing of the book. It's simple writing, easy to read, and I finished the whole book in an hour. It's a little sensational, of course, and caters to the lowest common denominator -- I don't think Nefertiti would have called Tutankhamen 'Tut', somehow. There were inconsistenc ...more
This is the last time I borrow a book from the library based only on its subject matter before checking goodreads first, that's for sure.

Though I put this book in my nonfiction shelf because that's how the library sorts it, this book is actually historical fiction. And I use the term historical loosely. Though the author might want us to believe he single-handedly solved the mystery of King Tut's death, his level of research indicates he did far less than that. I do not consider myself well-rea
This book is an insult to every other nonfiction book out there. James Patterson should stick to fiction, although after reading this I won’t be picking up another book by him.

I know that James has a following of fans, has been on the bestseller list for always, and puts out quite a few new books each year. He’s a machine. But he’s also arrogant, which is evidenced in his “present day” sections of this book. For example:

p. 7 “As I waited for Michael to come on the line – he usually take my calls
Never trust a "non-fiction" without footnotes.
James Patterson writes mysteries, and he writes them well. However, he claims this book is a “non-fiction thriller.” It reads well and would have been a great page-turner if the claim to non-fiction hadn’t irritated me so much. (Note to Kaydeen: It is actually catalogued in the 932.14s! Personally, I would have considered it fiction--sensational but risky speculation with no reference sources listed.) Even a novice such as I knows no one has discovered with certainty what (or who?) killed King T ...more
Review: Egyptology has always fascinated me and it is one of my biggest passions in life, which is why I snatched this book up in a heartbeat! King Tutankhamen (King Tut) is the most fascinating Pharaoh in my opinion because he has mystified us all.

Patterson wrote this as a three part story. It is told in present day by Patterson himself where he describes his journey in trying to learn and write about Tut as the boy king. The second story line takes place in the early 1900’s and is told by the
I think that I can count on one hand the number of times I've put down a book without finishing it. This is one of those books, so some may deem me unqualified to review it. Whatever, I had my reasons.

There's a difference between doing research and filling in the pieces with a little fictitious flare and doing what Patterson has done - written a story that's to his liking and filled in historical information when it went along with his own speculation. I don't consider myself an Egyptologist by
V. Briceland
I have never read any of Mr. Patterson's other books, and therefore can't state with certainty that they're all written as if for developmentally-challenged seventh graders. But this one certainly made me feel as if I were reading while riding on the short bus.

Mr. Patterson's begins his investigation into the death of everyone's favorite ancient boy king with a prologue reminding readers (in all capital letters) that the role of the historian is never to embellish, but only to illuminate fact. H
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
One's enjoyment of this book will depend greatly on one's expectations. As a non-fiction thriller, it's utterly preposterous. Facts (the few that there are) are often grossly distorted, and the vast majority of the book is pure speculation. As a novel, it's slightly more successful, a bit less of a travesty, and not entirely without some entertainment value. Throughout most of the book, I pretended it was fiction, so was able to enjoy it to some degree. Unfortunately, outside my mind, it is bill ...more
I love books about Egypt, but Patterson tries to pass this off as non fiction after his investigation into what happened to King Tut. There are many historical fiction novels out there that address this mytery and frankly, do a better job. I read a book called "The Egyption" by Mika Waltari. So much better and Waltari was a much better writer. Patterson pumps out so many books that I wouldn't regularly read his novels. This book will disappoint if you don't like mass marketed overproducing autho ...more
Apr 20, 2014 Mary rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Anyone who likes true crime
Recommended to Mary by: Paperback Swap
Ascending to Egypt's most powerful throne at the tender age of nine, King Tutankhamen's reign sparked debate from the very outset. Behind the palace's veil of prosperity, bitter rivalries and jealousies raged among the Boy King's most trusted advisers, and after only nine years, King Tut suddenly perished, his name effectively purged from Egyptian history. To this day, his death remains shrouded in controversy - a secret buried for centuries.

Enthralled by the ruler's tragic story and hoping to u
Todd Stockslager
Uber-popular adventure/mystery author Patterson teams up with popular nonfiction author Dugard for this no-reason-for-existence "thriller" about how Egyptian Pharaoh Tut died. While billed as "nonfiction" there are no footnotes or bibliography to source any of the facts, and any facts used in the making of this story are buried in invented dialog and first-person description and thought.

The book moves forward along three parallel tracks - the Egyptian history of Tut, the early 20th-century disco
Melanie Swift
Blech. Patterson's egomania gets in the way of both stories, and neither story is well written. It reads as though his "co-author" probably did any and all actual research for the book, and Patterson lazily drafted these minichapters between manicures and lunches with his agent.
I picked up this book for 2 reasons: I love a good mystery, and I thought I'd experience the prolific Mr. Patterson. What I found, however, was a book designed for the bargain bins--a slap-dash effort that lacks any depth, let alone evidence. Extremely disappointing.
The author can kiss my ankh.

A lame exercise in historical fiction, larded with self-congratulatory crap about what a dedicated writer he is.
2.5 -2.75 stars

Rating this book is difficult. It is not that it is a terribly bad book. But it is not a great book. This is basically Patterson trying to determine who Murdered (if King Tut was really murdered) King Tut. I liken this book to books about Jack the Ripper where authors(especially crime/mystery writers) make an argument as to who they presume was Jack the Ripper. We will never know Ripper's identity just as we will never know if Tut died of a broken leg which became infected or if
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Does James Patterson always write like this? 10 51 Feb 15, 2015 04:20PM  
  • Bermuda Shorts
  • The Lazarus Pit
  • The Day America Told the Truth
  • Fallen Flowers
  • Churchill and America
  • The             Rome Affair
  • The War of the Crowns (Queen of Freedom, #2)
  • Secrets of the Lost Symbol: The Unauthorized Guide to the Mysteries Behind The Da Vinci Code Sequel
  • Cleopatra and Antony: Power, Love, and Politics in the Ancient World
  • Selene of Alexandria
  • Dancehall
  • The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus
  • The Assignment
  • Why Popcorn Costs So Much at the Movies: And Other Pricing Puzzles
  • Julian's House
  • Homework: A Novel
  • Gad's Hall (Gad's Hall, #1)
  • The Sight of the Stars
Offical US Site
Offical UK Site
Offical James Patterson Young Adult Site
Offical Site for James Patterson's Middle School Series

The subject of a Time magazine feature called, "The Man Who Can't Miss," James Patterson is the bestselling author of the past year, bar none, with more than 16 million books sold in North America alone. In 2007, one of every fifteen hardcover fiction books sold was a Patter
More about James Patterson...
Along Came a Spider (Alex Cross, #1) Kiss the Girls (Alex Cross, #2) 1st to Die (Women's Murder Club, #1) The Angel Experiment (Maximum Ride, #1) Suzanne's Diary for Nicholas

Share This Book