Mary Tudor: Princess, Bastard, Queen
She was the first woman to inherit the throne of England, a key player in one of Britain’s stormiest eras, and a leader whose unwavering faith and swift retribution earned her the nickname “Bloody Mary.” Now, in this impassioned and absorbing debut, historian Anna Whitelock offers a modern perspective on Mary Tudor and sets the record straight once and for all on one of hi...more
Hardcover, 432 pages
Published
September 7th 2010
by Random House
(first published May 17th 2010)
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
Community Reviews
(showing
1-30
of
2,226)
Jun 07, 2011
Michele
rated it
2 of 5 stars
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
non-fiction,
tudor-history
Ultimately I have to disagree with all the blurbs on the back of this non-fiction work on Mary Tudor. Historians such as David Starkey and Antonia Fraser rave about this debut of Whitelock, but I fail to see what all of the hoopla is about. It is a recitation of the known facts and that is all. I don't see where Whitelock uncovered any new material here. In fact, I feel she relies far too heavily on biased sources, such as the Spanish Ambassador of the time who would, of course, be far more symp...more
Mary Tudor I, is one of the most interesting historical figures to me. And no, I'm not a Catholic, Spanish nor do I think that she was justified in killing the almost 300 hundred protestants that occurred during her reign. I simply think that on a psychological level, she is not only a complex person, but sad. I also think that it is important that historians are now reassessing Mary's reign as Queen. While there is no denying there was bad, John Foxe's anti-Catholic propaganda has completely ta...more
My interest in Tudor history began early- I was booted off a tour of the Tower of London at age 13 for the running commentary I was sharing with my mother! Elizabeth has always been my focus, so I was very excited to see this book on Mary because she is so often treated as only a springboard to Gloriana. Unfortunately, this book just missed the mark for me.
Despite the wealth of information and historical references, this book never made Mary a person to me. The manuscript seemed disjointed, and...more
Despite the wealth of information and historical references, this book never made Mary a person to me. The manuscript seemed disjointed, and...more
Well written, interesting and thankfully, the author does a nice job of differentiating between all the same names! Charles, Henry, Mary,ect- wow -seems like 90% of the folks during the 16th Century had about 5 different names to choose from!
Very much enjoyed this book- gave me more info on the Tutors- a subject I am quite interested in- and continue to read about- Unlike the more famous Alison Weir- The author tells a story...she does not spend countless pages on minute details like Weir who c...more
Very much enjoyed this book- gave me more info on the Tutors- a subject I am quite interested in- and continue to read about- Unlike the more famous Alison Weir- The author tells a story...she does not spend countless pages on minute details like Weir who c...more
I liked it and found it very well written and researched. The author went to great lengths to portray Mary Tudor as more than just the "Bloody Mary" of the brief Catholic regime before Queen Elizabeth, her half-sister, took the throne. It also painted a more complete picture of the terrible situation Mary found herself in once King Henry was determined to divorce Queen Catherine.
Fascinating look at an often dismissed and overlooked monarch. She was the first Queen of England and helped establish...more
Fascinating look at an often dismissed and overlooked monarch. She was the first Queen of England and helped establish...more
She was the first woman to inherit the throne of England, a key player in one of Britain’s stormiest eras, and a leader whose unwavering faith and swift retribution earned her the nickname “Bloody Mary.” Now, in this impassioned and absorbing debut, historian Anna Whitelock offers a modern perspective on Mary Tudor and sets the record straight once and for all on one of history’s most compelling and maligned rulers. Though often overshadowed by her long-reigning sister, Elizabeth I, Mary lived a
...more
Oct 26, 2012
Louise
rated it
4 of 5 stars
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
biography,
british-bio-hist
Mary Tudor receives considerably less press than her more glamorous younger half-sister. Elizabeth's long reign, fascinating relationships and excellent self-promotion (i.e. Mary's death anniversary is celebrated as "Elizabeth's Accession Day") have been grist historians, novelists and movie directors. In contrast, Mary is often considered interim figure known primarily for her nick-name, deserved or not, "Bloody Mary".
Author Anna Whitelock presents a very sympathetic portrait of Mary. While she...more
Author Anna Whitelock presents a very sympathetic portrait of Mary. While she...more
Just like Marie Antoinette never said "let them eat cake", Mary, daughter of Henry VIII never really was "Bloody Mary". It's amazing how one sentence from a paper can follow you for 400 plus years.
Mary was born the beloved daughter of Catherine of Aragon and Henry VIII. She was a princess. In eight short years she was named a bastard and separated from her mother. There begins her journey. She was either villified or loved. She was seen as political toy. Her fortunes rose or fell accorrding to w...more
Mary was born the beloved daughter of Catherine of Aragon and Henry VIII. She was a princess. In eight short years she was named a bastard and separated from her mother. There begins her journey. She was either villified or loved. She was seen as political toy. Her fortunes rose or fell accorrding to w...more
Anna Whitelock brings an important element to history in this book which is both important and highly readable by the average person coming to this work. Historical figures, just like political figures today, are often defined by a few short sound-bites that summarize all of their impact. Mary Tudor, more than any other title is known as "Bloody Mary" and it is this moniker that has defined her. Add to this, one of the most influential books about this era, Foxes Book of Martyrs, and the upheava...more
This was dissapointing. I was hoping for a fresh insight into Mary I, to erode my previous bias against the Bloody Queen. The book was clearly in Mary's favour, almost idolising her at times, whilst demonising those who stood against her. Something guarenteed to turn me against her even more. I left this book with a worse impression that when I started. Perhaps she is just really that unlikable?
Still looking for a book on Mary not tinged with heavy bias so I can give her a fair chance.
Still looking for a book on Mary not tinged with heavy bias so I can give her a fair chance.
I have a love-hate relationship with books about history. While I have always been fascinated by specific periods of history, my reading on the subject is spotty. Mostly because I'll find something that works for me, then as I attempt to delve deeper I run into the Wall-O-Text materials meant for serious researchers and students armed with highlighters.*
Generally that leads to me wandering off in search of something else to do. Books should not be work in my opinion. Books should be enjoyable.
An...more
Generally that leads to me wandering off in search of something else to do. Books should not be work in my opinion. Books should be enjoyable.
An...more
Wow! What a story this is! Critics have said this book simply lists the known facts about Mary Tudor, without offering a new interpretation, but I believe the facts alone breathe fire (no pun intended!)
I cannot read about any of the key Tudor figures without either identifying with them on some level, or feeling strong emotional engagement with them.
Mary Tudor was a woman who eventually got what she wanted - but it was snatched away from her. She is such a poignant and controversial figure. She...more
I cannot read about any of the key Tudor figures without either identifying with them on some level, or feeling strong emotional engagement with them.
Mary Tudor was a woman who eventually got what she wanted - but it was snatched away from her. She is such a poignant and controversial figure. She...more
I came across
after attempting to listen to
on cd. When I started reading reviews that complained about the lack of truthfulness in Gregory's writing and that her research skills proved to be "creative", I decided to switch to a more true-to-history book. I do love a well researched historical fiction...Philippa Gregory should read Mrs. Diana Gabaldon's work for reference.
Whitelock proves to be a skilled biographer and researcher. She well documents her hard work by using quotes and embedded...more
after attempting to listen to
on cd. When I started reading reviews that complained about the lack of truthfulness in Gregory's writing and that her research skills proved to be "creative", I decided to switch to a more true-to-history book. I do love a well researched historical fiction...Philippa Gregory should read Mrs. Diana Gabaldon's work for reference.Whitelock proves to be a skilled biographer and researcher. She well documents her hard work by using quotes and embedded...more
I know what you may be thinking: that you love Elizabeth I and that Mary is just, well, her depressed older-half sister who as a staunch Catholic had 300 heretics burned. What you must realize is that Mary was a trailblazer as the first Queen of England, she paved the way for Elizabeth. There would be no Elizabeth without Mary. Mary was a fighter and fought for her throne: literally. Her coup was the most succesful revolt against central government in 16th-century England.
If you are interested i...more
If you are interested i...more
I've read a lot of biographies about the Tudors, and I have to say that this is by far the worst I have ever read.
Whitelock leaves SO much out. She barely touches on how Mary (understandably) refused to acknowledge Elizabeth as princess, and then did not mention at all about how when Anne Boleyn was condemned and Elizabeth bastardized, Mary reached out to her sister in support. She barely touches on Elizabeth's existence until Mary is crowned Queen, despite the fact that they were close.
Whiteloc...more
Whitelock leaves SO much out. She barely touches on how Mary (understandably) refused to acknowledge Elizabeth as princess, and then did not mention at all about how when Anne Boleyn was condemned and Elizabeth bastardized, Mary reached out to her sister in support. She barely touches on Elizabeth's existence until Mary is crowned Queen, despite the fact that they were close.
Whiteloc...more
History has vilified her as Bloody Mary. Why? Because she burnt over 300 heretics in her reign. She tried to stem the tide of Protestantism in England, to return the country to the Catholicism that reigned at her birth and until her father's lust (for both power and women) got the better of him. Unable to produce an heir, the crown returned to a Protestant (Queen Elizabeth I) and Mary was consequently vilified on religious grounds.
I had always thought that Elizabeth was the first queen of Englan...more
I had always thought that Elizabeth was the first queen of Englan...more
I was hoping this book was more of a fiction but its not. I liked it because usually people want to write about Queen Elizabeth and it was interesting to get a different point of view on "Bloody Mary". However, this book set out to tell a story of a different Mary than the history books do and I think it failed on that part. I still think she was pretty evil as she wanted to be granted rights to worship as she wanted (different from the king) and when she became ruler, burned people at the stake...more
Mary grew more and more reclusive, sitting in one place for hours at a time, wrestling with depression and anxiety, neither leaving her chamber nor giving audience to anyone. To those who saw her she looked pale and ill, weeping and praying that her labor pains begin. Her prayer book survives, the pages worn and stained around a page bearing a prayer for the safe delivery of a woman with child.
A King's Wife chapter is heartbreaking. I think another reason why Mary married Philip II was to get cl...more
A King's Wife chapter is heartbreaking. I think another reason why Mary married Philip II was to get cl...more
Felt this book was very unevenly written. Minute details would be written about things such as Mary’s coronation while other important events (Mary’s handling of Jane Grey, the loss of Calais, etc.) would be glossed over too quickly. As I was reading it I wondered if I was being fair considering I do have a strong background in this topic or was it truly poor writing or editing. Unfortunately, I was left with a bit of a negative view (again, not sure if it was writing or editing) when Mary’s dea...more
May 03, 2011
Kevin Reekie
rated it
4 of 5 stars
·
review of another edition
Recommended to Kevin by:
reekiekorky@aol.com
I thought this was a very interesting account of Queen Mary. It seems that she was somewhat overshadowed by little Sis and this book attempted to address the balance.
It portrays Mary as a deeply religious, intelligent person, keen to serve her people. This changed later in her reign under considerable pressure from Prince Philip and Spain. Don't forget women had rarely ruled with this authotity before and it must have been very difficult.
It is clear that Mary would have never fully recovered fro...more
It portrays Mary as a deeply religious, intelligent person, keen to serve her people. This changed later in her reign under considerable pressure from Prince Philip and Spain. Don't forget women had rarely ruled with this authotity before and it must have been very difficult.
It is clear that Mary would have never fully recovered fro...more
After the many books on Henry VIII, Anne Boleyn, and Elizabeth I, here is a fascinating read about Henry's eldest daughter, Mary. History lovers, Tudor aficionados, and fans of the tv show "The Tudors" will enjoy this biography, as it's written in a style that is easy to read. Each chapter is short, but there's quite a thorough amount of information within the sections. On a side note, "Tudors" fans might be interested to know that numerous key lines from the show were lifted straight from histo...more
Since the other players in this time period have been written about so extensively (with the exception of Edward VI), it was interesting to read a sympathetic biography of a historical figure who has been portrayed as humorless, small-minded and intolerant. Whitelock does a good job of showing her to be intelligent, politically savvy, and a real survivor. Her life after 17 was a nightmare of persecution, and Whitelock makes a good case that Mary, as the first female to rule as sovereign in Engla...more
This was a very good book.The author attempted to put an end as to how she is known: "Bloody Mary". I also found it interesting that the author did not try to place someone else in the role of the villian. With the exception of Anne Boleyn, most major people in Queen Mary's life were shown without an attempt to victimize Mary or blame anyone else for her actions. Mary was a "trailblazer" as the first Queen of England and "she paved the way for Elizabeth." There would have been no Elizabeth witho...more
Bloody Mary! If history has ever painted any English monarch, then it certainly daubed a large brush, dipped in bright red gloss, all over Mary Tudor. Well, quite right too, wasn't she the daughter of Henry VIII who reversed daddy's break with Rome? Chopped the head off that pretty 19 year old Queen Jane? Set fire to heretics up and down the land like there was no tomorrow? Married the catholic Phillip of Spain for god's sake, and was nothing but nasty to the fair protestant princess Lizzy. If a...more
This was a very good book. The writing style was easy to read; not at all dry and boring like most biographies. I always find reading biographies concerning English nobility difficult because names and titles are always different from each other and it is often that both are not used in every instance. Whitelock sought to lift the "Bloody Mary" image of the first Queen Regnant of England, which I thought she accomplished marvelously. I found it interesting that Whitelock also did not attempt to...more
A very accessible and sympathetic biography of Mary. Far from painting her as the bloody tyrant she is commonly depicted as, this biography gives a well-rounded overview of a woman who—usually to her detriment—often ruled with her heart rather than her head. Still, Mary comes across as a well-meaning woman in spite of her intractability of character and religious extremism. I would have liked to have seen more detailed information on the Catholic/Protestant split in England at the time (this wou...more
This is a fantastic book and a really compelling read in a way that history books really ought to be. I came away not only knowing more factual information about this much maligned figure but understanding her motivations in a way that made much more sense than the rather incomplete treatment of her in most books on the Tudors. Considering the current hype and romanticization of Anne Boleyn, knowing the true story of Mary (and her mother) is very interesting and a good balance to inject a little...more
Once again, Phillippa Gregory sparks some historical interest for me. My knowledge of Queen Mary is almost nil, so this book shouldn't be a recitation of facts.
Hope it's not overwhelmingly dry.
---
Dude, why on earth did Showtime end The Tudors with Henry? You're telling me they couldn't continue it with the amazing story of Bloody Mary and Elizabeth? That's such shit.
I am absolutely amazed at this author. Such detail, and it's not dry and boring. So intensely enjoyable. I would read any other his...more
Hope it's not overwhelmingly dry.
---
Dude, why on earth did Showtime end The Tudors with Henry? You're telling me they couldn't continue it with the amazing story of Bloody Mary and Elizabeth? That's such shit.
I am absolutely amazed at this author. Such detail, and it's not dry and boring. So intensely enjoyable. I would read any other his...more
Very readable for the general student, and also very interesting. I did feel that a more complete psychological portrait of Mary should've been given, especially regarding her feelings regarding the individual loyalties of the heretics themselves, and toward the burnings as particular action toward the Protestants (as individuals). Another thing I felt slightly lacking was a more in-depth discussion of the political dynamics between Mary and her consort Philip of Spain, who sought a greater role...more
May 13, 2013
Eddy Allen
rated it
4 of 5 stars
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
arts-and-historical
She was the first woman to inherit the throne of England, a key player in one of Britain’s stormiest eras, and a leader whose unwavering faith and swift retribution earned her the nickname “Bloody Mary.” Now, in this impassioned and absorbing debut, historian Anna Whitelock offers a modern perspective on Mary Tudor and sets the record straight once and for all on one of history’s most compelling and maligned rulers.
Though often overshadowed by her long-reigning sister, Elizabeth I, Mary lived a...more
Though often overshadowed by her long-reigning sister, Elizabeth I, Mary lived a...more
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Be the first to start one »
Anna Whitelock gained her PhD in History from Corpus Christi College, Cambridge in 2004 with a thesis on the court of Mary I. Her articles and book reviews on various aspects of Tudor history have appeared in publications including the Guardian, the Times Literary Supplement and BBC History. She has taught at Cambridge University and is now a lecturer in Early Modern History at Royal Holloway, Uni...more
More about Anna Whitelock...
Share This Book
No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

Loading...





view all 17 comments



















