Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Washington Rules: America's Path to Permanent War” as Want to Read:
Washington Rules: America's Path to Permanent War
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Washington Rules: America's Path to Permanent War

4.02  ·  Rating Details ·  886 Ratings  ·  127 Reviews
The bestselling author of The Limits of Power critically examines the Washington consensus on national security and why it must change

For the last half century, as administrations have come and gone, the fundamental assumptions about America's military policy have remained unchanged: American security requires the United States (and us alone) to maintain a permanent armed
Hardcover, 304 pages
Published August 3rd 2010 by Metropolitan Books (first published 2010)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Washington Rules, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Washington Rules

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Larry Bassett
Dec 28, 2014 Larry Bassett rated it really liked it
Shelves: political, history
I am a pacifist. That makes life easy for me. I do not have to decide which wars I support. It also makes me just as powerless as the jerk who thinks the solution to a problem is to bomb the enemy “into the stone age.” My “War is Not the Answer” is meaningless to the vast majority of Congress and probably meaningless to the majority of people in the world.
The era of American statecraft during the era that began with the U.S. entry into World War II and that culminates today with the Long War d
Oct 21, 2016 Eat.Sleep.Lift.Read. rated it it was ok

Doesn't come close to scratching the surface of the deceit and lies in Washington.

Maybe it's a good intro into the scam they call politics, for the liberal/leftist loon.

Feb 25, 2011 Bennet rated it really liked it
Heads up. The war in Iraq has officially ended but The Long War has not. Iraq and Afghanistan are but two fronts in an ever-expanding military campaign.

From page 193: "'Our conflicts tend to be timeless,'" Gen. Sir Rupert Smith wrote in his book The Utility of Force, "'even endless.' Sir Rupert thereby put his finger on one key element of the gradually emerging conventional wisdom in the U.S. military: An officer corps that had once resolved to avoid protracted war at all costs now (post 9/11)
Evil Cat
Mar 22, 2015 Evil Cat rated it really liked it
Washington Rules which have been in place since World War II:

The Credo.

"To lead, save, liberate and ultimately transform the world." Or, stated another way by Henry Luce, editor of Life magazine in Feb. 1941 "To accept wholeheartedly our duty to exert upon the world the full impact of our influence for such purposes as we see fit and by such means as we see fit."

The Sacred Trinity.

The minimum essentials of international peace and order required the United States to maintain a global military p
Nov 07, 2010 Bruce rated it liked it
This is rather a companion piece to William Pfaff’s recent book, The Irony of Manifest Destiny, both works providing incisive and devastating critiques of America’s current foreign policy and blindness to more constructive alternatives to our current futile and destructive course. Bacevich’s book is clearer and more lucid but less carefully argued and nuanced in its argument. Both cannot but depress the concerned reader and citizen. Neither leaves one with much cause for optimism or hope for sig ...more
Dec 07, 2010 Naeem rated it really liked it
Recommended to Naeem by: Martin
The main contribution of this book is the continuity that Bacevich shows in US foreign policy from Eisenhower to Obama, from Vietnam to Afghanistan, from Westmorland to Petraeus. The "Washington Rules" are designed to police the world regardless of which party is in power or which president is in the white house. This is what he wants us to see.

Bacevich is a former colonel turned academic. His interpretations of various generals, various policies, and various wars have the ring of an insider's i
Dec 04, 2011 Darwin8u rated it it was amazing
Shelves: 2011, aere-perennius
I'm in danger of becoming a serious Bacevich acolyte. There are few books I feel everyone needs to read. If you are Christian, sure probably a good idea to read the Holy Bible: King James Version. If you are Mormon, I'd imagine there should exist a certain amount of social pressure to read The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ. If you are an atheist, you need to at least be familiar with Dawkins, Hitchens, etc. If you give a crap about our country, this little book, along with Ba ...more
J. Gibson Hartley
Dec 28, 2015 J. Gibson Hartley rated it really liked it
Bacevich's exploration of contemporary American foreign policy and its surprising consistency over the past 70 years makes this book an important read for anyone interested in understanding the United States in relation to the broader world today (and yesterday). Bacevich does an excellent job in demonstrating how our world today is filled with problems that the American credo of world leadership is ill-equipped to face. We are dire need of thorough self-reflection and critical examination of th ...more
Oct 31, 2010 Randy rated it it was amazing
Andrew Bacevich has paid his dues to the flag as a West Point graduate, career army officer and father of a son killed in Iraq. He writes books critical of American foreign policy, in this case a set of "Washington Rules" which dictate the creepy way that we behave around the world which has been consistent since the end of WWII and has been supported by all Presidents from Harry Truman to Barrack Obama.
Here are the Washington Rules:
1. The world must be organized (shaped) or chaos will reign.
Bob Mayer
Dec 27, 2010 Bob Mayer rated it it was amazing
The reality of the ruling elite of our country. They care only about making money. We are in a perpetual state of war. Ask yourself, really, what are we going to accomplish in Afghanistan? What did we accomplish in Iraq? No WMDs. But oil. But where are the profits we were supposed to get off that oil? No one speaks of that any more. We paid off the bad guys and they waited for us to leave. Unfortunately, the same won't be true in Afghanistan. Just more death and more profits for the warmakers.
Aug 15, 2010 David rated it really liked it
A brief history of the national security state since 1945, with a strongly amti-interventionist view.

Briskly written and heartfelt, this book by a retired West Pointer is a non-leftist indictment of armed missionary folly.

An important book.
Todd Martin
Oct 03, 2016 Todd Martin rated it liked it
Shelves: culture-politics
“We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex.”
- President Dwight D. Eisenhower

“Maybe it would profit us to concentrate on our own democracy instead of trying to inflict our own particular version of it” on others.
- J. William Fulbright

The late half of the 20th century was, in the words of magazine magnate Henry R. Luce, “the American century”. A time characterized by the global primacy and peak influence of the U
Blake Donley
Dec 28, 2016 Blake Donley rated it it was amazing
Andrew J. Bacevich from this book, which is outstanding...

Fixing Iraq or Afghanistan ends up taking precedence over fixing Cleveland or Detroit, because:
1. The U.S. spends as much or more on its military than the rest of the world’s nations combined.
2. The U.S. has 300,000 troops stationed abroad (not including 90,00 sailors at sea) – more than the rest of the world’s nations combined.
3. In 2008, U.S. troops used 761 sites in 39 foreign countries (this does not include any sites in Iraq or Afgha
Ian Divertie
Dec 10, 2016 Ian Divertie rated it it was amazing
An older book but very relevant to right now and Trumps ascedancy. The first chapter is a must, the last chapter an eye opening review of both the military and econonomic results if we continue as we are. Let me remind you this is a book of the "American Empire" series and although still very powerful it faces an economic decline over the next 20 to 40 years it can't avoid. Further, the problems of the "Long War" taking place in the Middle east currently are estimated to last 50 to 100 years. Th ...more
Dec 27, 2016 Andrew rated it it was amazing
Great cursory history of America's post WWII foreign policy from a military perspective. Bacevich is rightly upset and makes a compelling case for America coming home.
Matthew Trevithick
Sep 24, 2010 Matthew Trevithick rated it really liked it
I just finished reading Bacevich’s latest book, entitled “Washington Rules: American’s Path to Permanent War.” As always, Bacevich delivers a concise read that is informative and inspiring.

This book opens with Bacevich discussing his own “turning point” in his understanding about America and its involvement with the world in the last 50-60 years. He briefly describes a long walk he took with some fellow soldiers in East Germany after the collapse of the Berlin Wall in the early 1990s. On this wa
Sep 23, 2010 Gordon rated it it was amazing
This is one of the most devastatingly effective critiques of the United States foreign policy and defense strategy that I have ever read. More remarkably still, it's written by a career Army officer, who retired in the early 1990's as a full colonel. Andrew Bacevich is clearly a man with many regrets about the system he worked for much of his career to support.

His doubts began in the early 1990’s when he toured East Germany shortly after the Wall came down. It quickly became clear that this supp
Joseph Stieb
Jul 20, 2016 Joseph Stieb rated it liked it
Once again I find myself liking Bacevich's critiques of American culture (Breach of Trust, New American Militarism) more than his critiques of foreign policy. I mostly agreed with the thesis of this book, but I found that it just didn't explain very much and left a lot of important things out. Bacevich's tendency to be too caustic and harsh stood out in this book to the detriment of his main argument.

The main argument in this book is that a consensus about America's role in the world has dominat
Jeremy Hickerson
Apr 01, 2013 Jeremy Hickerson rated it really liked it
In "Washington Rules" retired Army Colonel Andrew Bacevich challenges and largely refutes the idea that Presidents of the United States have much effect on our country's use of military force. This is a startling idea and on the face seems false, but he makes a strong case that there is a bipartisan (or maybe non-partisan) consensus in favor of military intervention among the Washington players which is accepted by the American public. Reading Bacevich you come away thinking that even the Cheney ...more
Oct 20, 2010 Wanda rated it really liked it
This book should be read by every U.S. citizen. In this short extended historical essay cum reflection, Andrew Bacevich traces and assesses America's overreliance on military power from the administration of Woodrow Wilson to the present. He analyzes the folly of national and foreign policies that have led us into the business of confrontation, power projection, and war, time and time again. And he asks the devastating question: Why are we squandering U.S. wealth and future on armed misadventure ...more
Mike Hankins
Apr 23, 2012 Mike Hankins rated it liked it
In Washington Rules, former Army Officer Andrew Bacevitch traces the history of the United States from Truman to the present day, arguing that after World War Two, Washington (as in, policy makers and government as a whole) have created a system of "rules" dedicated to American Imperialism. Essentially he argues that America has become militaristic, using force to impose it's will upon the rest of the globe. He vehemently calls for an end to this type of imperialism, wanting desperately for Amer ...more
Feb 22, 2013 Marks54 rated it really liked it
This is an impassioned and informed analysis of the persistence of the fundamental assumptions in the US defense establishment, even in the face of defeats and even the dissolution of the principal threat. He sees these rules as perpetuating a defense establishment, high and wasteful spending, and a propensity to intervene in the affairs of other nations that border on imperial expansionism. The story is very critical, although it rings true with the history of the times. Many of the arguments w ...more
James Murphy
Nov 07, 2010 James Murphy rated it liked it
Bacevich says he grew up only in middle age. At that time in his life, as an Army officer, he began to see that the conventional wisdom about America's military projection might not be entirely true. Apparently this revelation came about by being exposed to the reality of Soviet military preparedness. By seeing how weak they were relative to the U. S. and NATO, he began to think our strength and expenditures toward military development as unnecessary. His argument is that the feverish competitio ...more
Though it sometimes lacks nuance and occasionally strays into hyperbole or clichés regarding what some might call the "imperial hubris" of the United States, Bacevich's Washington Rules makes the straightforward and compelling case that the American "military-industrial complex," so feared and derided by the libertarian crowd, has been progressively expanding its clout vis-a-vis the civilian authorities since the Second World War, and consequently threatens to swallow up American civic culture. ...more
Nov 02, 2011 Joe rated it it was amazing
In nineteen-thirty-nine a war broke out that effected the entirety of the human race. America entered this war two years later, in nineteen-forty-one. This war, with it’s world-wide battleground, became known as World War Two. In ‘Washington Rules’ by Andrew Bacevich, America’s global policy is described in a straightforward manner. After WWII, America had just felt a real victory. It had come out as the leading military power of the day, and it sure wanted to stay that way. Bacevich follows th ...more
Oct 20, 2014 Rachel rated it really liked it
Madeleine Albright on 60 Minutes

During the Clinton administration, then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright made a statement that sums up everything that is wrong with U.S. foreign policy:

Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?

Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price--we think the price is worth it.
Aug 23, 2010 Rick rated it really liked it
Over the past decade, Andrew Bacevich has written and spoken with increasing intensity about a darker side to America's self-proclaimed role as an exemplar of what is good and noble about humananity. He traces our current involvement in "endless war" in the Middle East as part of a continuum of increasingly aggressive policies asserting that U.S. force (primarily military, but also economic and cultural) must be continually augmented, projected and utilized throughout the world, even if it comes ...more
Apr 01, 2013 David rated it really liked it
This is my third Andrew Bacevich foreign policy book and they are all worth reading. In this work he shows the continuity of American foreign policy since the end of WWII through the Obama administration. The presidents change but the posture of America toward the world does not. He explains that our fundamental national credo is America is the savior of the world. We support this credo with the trinity of global military presence (300,000 troops overseas in over 100 countries), global power pro ...more
Jan 07, 2013 Tony rated it really liked it
What are the Washington Rules?

War can break out at any time. We need to be prepared for that.
We reserve the right to have military establishments all over the world.
We don't have to wait for someone to attack us. We reserve the right to pre-emptively attack anyone if we think they will conflict with our interests.

Somewhere back in the '50's, in the aftermath of World War II, it was determined that the US must stand up to anyone and everyone else in the world, militarily, in making the world safe
Apr 21, 2012 Jonathan rated it it was amazing
As someone who identifies with a non-interventionist foreign policy I was initially surprised to find out that Dr. Bacevich was one as well. And quite a forceful one at that.

Having not only read this particular selection but also dissecting and writing specific points for future reference. The point behind this book as well as Bacevich's other books is to shed light on our foreign policy, in particular our foreign policy since the end of the Second World War. He criticizes our need to exercise
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Chat with Andrew Bacevich on Sept. 24! 1 6 Sep 13, 2010 11:09AM  
  • Dismantling the Empire: America's Last Best Hope (American Empire Project)
  • Bomb Power: The Modern Presidency and the National Security State
  • The Deaths of Others: The Fate of Civilians in America's Wars
  • House of War: The Pentagon and the Disastrous Rise of American Power
  • The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times
  • High Steel: The Daring Men Who Built the World's Greatest Skyline
  • Cultures of War: Pearl Harbor/Hiroshima/9-11/Iraq
  • A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation from the Cold War to the War on Terror
  • Michelle Obama: In Her Own Words
  • The End of Reform: New Deal Liberalism in Recession and War
  • Rights Gone Wrong: How Law Corrupts the Struggle for Equality
  • Killing Hope: U.S. Military and C.I.A. Interventions Since World War II
  • Empire's Workshop: Latin America, the United States, and the Rise of the New Imperialism
  • Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism
  • The Shadow Factory: The Ultra-Secret NSA from 9/11 to the Eavesdropping on America
  • Democracy Is in the Streets: From Port Huron to the Siege of Chicago
  • Confront and Conceal: Obama's Secret Wars and Surprising Use of American Power
  • Intelligence: From Secrets to Policy
Andrew J. Bacevich, a professor of history and international relations at Boston University, retired from the U.S. Army with the rank of colonel. He is the author of Washington Rules: America's Path to Permanent War and The Limits of Power: The End of American Exceptionalism and The New American Militarism. His writing has appeared in Foreign Affairs, The Atlantic Monthly, The Nation, The New York ...more
More about Andrew J. Bacevich...

Share This Book

“I began to appreciate that authentic truth is never simple and that any version of truth handed down from on high-whether by presidents, prime ministers, or archbishops-is inherently suspect.” 16 likes
“The folly and hubris of the policy makers who heedlessly thrust the nation into an ill-defined and open-ended 'global war on terror' without the foggiest notion of what victory would look like, how it would be won, and what it might cost approached standards hitherto achieved only by slightly mad German warlords.” 11 likes
More quotes…