Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Heartbreak House” as Want to Read:
Heartbreak House
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

Heartbreak House

3.76 of 5 stars 3.76  ·  rating details  ·  1,303 ratings  ·  53 reviews
Entertaining allegory examines apathy, confusion and lack of purpose as causes of major world problems.

One of the distinguished comic dramatist's more somber plays, this entertaining allegory examines apathy, confusion and lack of purpose as causes of major world problems, with larger-than-life characters representing the evils of the modern world.

The house could arguably
Paperback, 176 pages
Published January 1st 2001 by Penguin Classics (first published 1919)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Heartbreak House, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Heartbreak House

The Secret Garden by Frances Hodgson BurnettThe Metamorphosis by Franz KafkaPeter Pan by J.M. BarrieA Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man by James JoyceMy Antonia by Willa Cather
Best Books of the Decade: 1910's
59th out of 219 books — 351 voters
The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar WildeAngela's Ashes by Frank McCourtDubliners by James JoyceDracula by Bram StokerThe Collected Poems by W.B. Yeats
Best Irish Literature
90th out of 419 books — 478 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 2,467)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
1 pint of Amsterdam Blonde
2 bottles of Sleeman’s Cream Ale
2 gin and tonics
3 shots of rye on the rocks
1 glass of champagne
1 bottle of Moosehead

Such was my alcohol consumption this New Year’s Eve. And yet, as you can plainly see, I remain strangely, depressingly lucid, but with a haunting premonition of a bloated, gassy hangover and a sort of lingering foretaste of a vomitous breakfast in a greasy spoon among the pallid reflections of last night’s beautiful young things, some of them still wearing
Huda Aweys
(منزل القلوب المحطمة)
هي نبؤة او قل أمنية لبرنارد شو بالقضاء على نفوذ الرأسمالية في انجلترا حينذاك عمد من خلالها الى تعرية المجتمع الانجليزي و كشف مساوئه و عوراته ، و قد مثل انجلترا هنا بالسفينة أو بـ(منزل القلوب المحطمة)ذلك المنزل الذي تصور له ديكور و هيكل أشبه بما للسفينة
و من هنا يستطيع القارئ أن يحسن تأويل الشخصيات التي مثلت شرائح هي أحسن ما في المدنية الإنجليزية (من وجهة نظر برنارد شو كما أخبر بذلك داخل النص) .. كـ(مانجمان) رجل الأعمال و السمسار الرأسمالي الذي عبر برنارد شو من خلاله عن الوج
I was pleasantly surprised to open this play and find the author's Preface which was not entirely about the play itself. Refreshing, really, because those pesky Prefaces and Introductions can contain spoilers which leads to the reader feeling pretty bummed out. But then I read the Goodreads description of the book and was spoiled anyway because whoever wrote it SUCKS.

Do not be discouraged by the Preface. I almost was because it took me three nights just to read it which, in the long run, is sill
Ira Bespalova
The only reason I gave it four stars is that I'm not into plays very much. Still I realize that the book is one of the greatest of its time with loads of genuinely funny dialogs and monologues and effervescent jokes.
The action takes place on the eve of World War I. And as it had been previously mentioned "lampoons British society as it blithely sinks towards disaster". Somehow I don't quite agree with that. Even though the story deals with Britain and the British, the whole situation, the relati
This play starts out as a traditional British class comedy, then the twist happen. The twist is that [SPOILER ALERT:] the rest of the book is awful. Just consider the dialogue that ends the first act:
CAPTAIN SHOTOVER: What a house! What a daughter!
MRS HUSHABYE: What a father!
HECTOR: What a husband!
MH: What do men want? They have their food, their firesides, their clothes mended, and our love at the end of the day. Why are they not satisfied? Why do they envy us the pain with which we bring them
May 09, 2009 Fox rated it 3 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Fox by: School
Shelves: 2009, fiction
Heartbreak House was not what I would consider the best of George Bernard Shaw's plays. The Preface, in particular, was difficult to get through, but after a time it began to get interesting. The idea of the play was to write about World War I from a civilian's perspective -- the point of view of one seeing the War as a novelty rather than the tragedy that it truly was. The play takes place over (two? one?) night at a country manor in the shape of a ship, symbolic of a leisurely Europe sailing i ...more
This was an interesting blend of satire, drama, and political and social commentary. I saw this play performed at The Shaw Festival last season, and it was difficult enough to watch, let alone read.

This is an experimental play. It starts out "normal" and then teeters into absurd, and then ultimately plummets into confusing. It's fascinating, and a few of the characters really stand out, but overall I found the play too confusing, a little preachy, and not as enjoyable as Shaw's other works (i.e
Heartbreak House by George Bernard Shaw
Not a smashing play

For various reasons, I am not a fan of George Bernard Shaw.
First of all, he was leaning to the left in politics. As far as I know, he went to the Soviet Union and instead of denouncing the communist policies he praised them.
This is serious for someone who has lived under a communist regime and knows what they did, I strongly believe that Shaw and others like him – famous and influent people who had firsthand knowledge of the soviet realit
Mar 16, 2010 Amanda added it
Shelves: owned-textbooks
This is actually a play which I read for my 20th Century British Lit. class. I wrote 2 papers using Literary Theory (Feminism and Psychoanalytic Theories) using this text, so I have read and re-read this several times.
It was enjoyable and full of wacky characters and weird situations. Taking place in the early 1900's in England during a time when they were involved in WWII. Shaw was against the war and known for being part of, and a big supporter of the Fabian Society.
J. Alfred
Complete with an author's introduction almost as long as the text of the play, Shaw shows his astonishing capacity to be very angry, very humanistic, and very funny at the same time. He's like a more modern Dr. Swift. The play itself is funny at parts but verges off into the weird and depressing by the end. But then he's trying to write an allegory for English society in war time, so I suppose weird and depressing is the way to be.
I'm disappointed in you, GBS. Your plays are usually awesome. This was utter filth. It was like a mixture of Victorian melodrama and modern teen angst. You must have been in a very bad mood.
Michael Meeuwis
Weird, not always lucid, and downright Beckettian at the end--it seems like everyone makes this point, but this has a lot of things unusual for a Shaw play. I want to go back and read it again, as there are things I don't think I quite understood. An unusually complex preface explaining Shaw's choice to withhold this play for production; the play, though, seems both to express but also exceed the preface. Just calling this an allegory--without explaining how that allegory works--seems to be the ...more
Oct 26, 2014 Helen rated it 4 of 5 stars
Shelves: 2014
This is the second Shaw play I've read, the first being Pygmalion. It's always funny reading scripts as I always try to imagine a performance in my head. This play all takes place in the one place, Heartbreak House, and is about a group of characters, mostly related, trying to know themselves and their desires through the actions of the play. Having read up about the play and Shaw's purpose, the characters seem to represent a microcosm of England before the war. The glory days of colonialism, th ...more

Shaw at his best as a critic of Western hypocrisy.
Timothy Kerrigan
The Captain may be my favorite character in all of literature.
A classic Shaw play dealing with humanity on the brink of war.
this is one of my favorite plays.

2.5 stars

Ellie Dunn, invited to visit Hesione Hushabye, finds a bewildering crew of would-be lovers and husbands among the guests. In the course of the day, she finds out more about them and herself.

There's quite a long and philosophical preface to this place, explaining why it wasn't published during the war (WW I), and giving Shaw a chance to lay out his views about capitalism, socialism, country society, and a range of other things. It's dated and not entirely consiste
Heartbreak House is a good introduction to Shaw’s plays, boldly asserting his views. Although never subtle, Shaw became more skilled at the presentation of his ideas in later plays. Heartbreak House is in your face. The Preface is essentially a long editorial about World War I from a civilian’s perspective. Clearly this is an anti-war play:
Heartbreak house was far too lazy and shallow to extricate itself from this palace of evil enchant
Aviso que en cuestión de teatro soy más de dramas o tragedias que de comedias (no me pasa lo mismo con las películas o las series de televisión). Y aviso que cuando empiezo una reseña con “aviso” es que el libro en cuestión no me ha acabado de gustar. Al principio, ‘La casa de los corazones rotos’ empieza como una farsa. Y es muy divertida. Y genial. Una serie de personajes insatisfechos, aquejados de spleen en mayor o menor grado, se encuentran en una casa de campo que pertenece a una familia e ...more
This was my least favorite of the four of Shaw's plays that I have read. However, it was aptly named. It seems that in this play, everyone was in love with the wrong person and everyone continuously spun elaborate lies. It was hard to keep up with who loved whom and what was true or false. Then it felt as if the play ended rather abruptly, leaving me with many questions and qualms as to what had just taken place.
Brilliant and prophetic although slow in the second act. His characters are so humanly oblivious and morally bankrupt. They rush in and out of rooms in a confused manner, never quite sure of who they are or even of who they should be. That's our common dilemma, I suppose. We've jettisoned our "should be" and now have no moorings.

Shaw belongs in the absurdist camp with this play, if you want to stick him somewhere. Although he uses language coherently (no thanks to Becket, who just drivels), his

Going to see it on Saturday and will post my review after that with hopefully a sneaky picture of the set!
Nov 07, 2007 Lydia rated it 5 of 5 stars
Shelves: plays
I just love Shaw. I love his crazy long prologues that are often even longer than his plays. I love his stage directions that take up an entire page. I love his wit and his feminist-celibate-vegetarian-tee-totelling-self. It's difficult in comedy, especially domestic comedy, to really be able to make you think above the humor, if that makes any sense. But Shaw does. His characters are nutty, but their stories bring up such important issues that you find yourself considering your own thoughts as ...more
Hmmm... Not quite as engaging as George Bernard Shaw's Major Barbara, but it still has its moments. But the ending... Oh, the ending... A WTF moment if Shaw ever wrote one. Yes, that's it: the ending ruined it for me and left a weird taste in my mouth.
The essays at the beginning of the book were more interested than the actual play itself. The play itself has some funny scenes, and if you look at it as a play on memory rather than a play on 'life away from the frontlines' I can probably appreciate it more. However, it is definitely not Shaw's best work.
Apr 26, 2014 Susan rated it 3 of 5 stars
Shelves: drama
I didn't give this a fair chance: I read it chopped up, in several different sessions, and kept forgetting who was who. And after all, it's a play, which should be watched rather than read. I think it is a play I'd enjoy seeing if I had the opportunity.
Interesting, deserving of a second read or so, but a good read nonetheless. A good play laced with politics, although at the end of it only did I understand it was a comedy it is more funny in the way the play is witty than actual actions in the play. A good read.
Mike Jensen
Have I ever read a Shaw play that seemed 5 star? Proabably not, but that may be because his world view and mine are so different. He was very clever, and his work is alway challenging. Read it and think about the sort of person you are.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 82 83 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Way of the World
  • The Playboy of the Western World & Riders to the Sea
  • Six Characters in Search of an Author and Other Plays
  • The Plough and the Stars
  • The Miser and Other Plays: A New Selection
  • The Lady from the Sea
  • The Price
  • Camino Real
  • Edward II
  • The White Devil
  • Talley's Folly
  • Three Plays: Desire Under the Elms / Strange Interlude / Mourning Becomes Electra
  • The Clean House
  • Miss Julie and Other Plays
  • The Beggar's Opera
  • This is Our Youth
  • The Revenger's Tragedy
  • The Coast of Utopia (Box Set)
George Bernard Shaw was an Irish playwright, socialist, and a co-founder of the London School of Economics. Although his first profitable writing was music and literary criticism, in which capacity he wrote many highly articulate pieces of journalism, his main talent was for drama. Over the course of his life he wrote more than 60 plays. Nearly all his plays address prevailing social problems, but ...more
More about George Bernard Shaw...
Pygmalion Pygmalion and Three Other Plays Pygmalion & My Fair Lady Arms and the Man Saint Joan

Share This Book

“You'll never have a quiet world till you knock the patriotism out of the human race.” 107 likes
“Shall I turn up the light for you?

No, give me deeper darkness. Money is not made in the light.”
More quotes…