Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Problema durerii” as Want to Read:
Problema durerii
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Problema durerii

4.11 of 5 stars 4.11  ·  rating details  ·  26,517 ratings  ·  931 reviews
For centuries people have been tormented by one question above all: If God is good and all-powerful, why does he allow his creatures to suffer pain? And what of the suffering of animals, who neither deserve pain nor can be improved by it?

The greatest Christian thinker of our time sets out to disentangle this knotty issue. With his signature wealth of compassion and insight
Paperback, 176 pages
Published 2007 by Humanitas (first published 1940)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Problema durerii, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Problema durerii

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Well, it's not like I really disagree with C.S. Lewis's argument here. I just think that the essential points are summed up rather more succinctly in the first few minutes of Monty Python's "Happy Valley" sketch:
STORYTELLER: Once upon a time, long, long ago, there lay in a valley far, far away in the mountains the most contented kingdom the world has ever known. It was called Happy Valley, and it was ruled over by a wise old king called Otto. And all his subjects flourished and were happy, and t

Pain posted a serious objection to Christianity (and to Heavenly authority in general), aggravated by claiming that Love is the essence of God. The Problem of Pain focuses on one question, but thoroughly argues on every aspect.
"If God were good, He would make His creatures perfectly happy, and if He were almighty He would be able to do what he wished. But the creatures are not happy. Therefore God lacks either goodness, or power, or both."

In other words, why would an all-knowing,
< -<-<- < -<-<- This or.... This or...this->->-->->-

Personally, I lean more towards the latter camp. Lewis does at least make a good, solid, and sophisticated effort to address the problem of: "Why does God allow so much pain and suffering, if He is really a loving God, and if He really does exist?"; - which is why Lewis gets 3 stars, even if I don't completely agree.

I remember quite liking his argument at the time I read it
Jarrod Jenkins
Apology for the existence of pain and suffering. Lewis's comfortable, easy style speaks to me in most all of his books. This is no exception.

Memorable quotes:

"Love, in its own nature, demands the perfecting of the beloved; that the mere 'kindness' which tolerates anything except suffering in its object is, in that respect, at the opposite pole from Love. When we fall in love with a woman, do we cease to care whether she is clean or dirty, fair or foul? Do we not rather then first begin to care?
It says something that after so many years C. S. Lewis is still one of the foremost Christian apologists of our time. The Problem of Pain is a difficult question every religion has to deal with, and one which has been especially difficult for Christianity. Some religions have the luxury of explaining pain as something deserved - a result of bad behavior from a previous life, or perhaps pain and suffering are caused by a malevolent deity in opposition to a good and loving God. Christianity has no ...more
I absolutely loved this book. I laughed, I blurted out loud "HA!"s between classes and generally forgot about time and place. It's very, VERY good book. My only concern with this review is on my side; I had a goal to get through it in three days, which I did. Thus, there were some parts I read through without the attention I probably should have devoted to it. I don't usually like writing reviews where the fault is with me; but alas, here I am.

As for content, CS Lewis has, as always, very well t
Amelia, the pragmatic idealist
*Just* as good as Mere Christianity, but not quite as easy to understand. I would say that this book is probably more relevant in our culture now than when it was first published.
I would recommend this book to absolutely everyone, because it seeks to give answers to questions that everybody asks at some point.

The idea behind this book is "why do we have pain in our life?" or more specifically, "If God is supposed to be good, and powerful, and "in charge," why does He allow suffering?" If you'r
Of the fourteen Lewis books that I've read (the others being The Chronicles of Narnia series, The Space Trilogy, Mere Christianity, The Screwtape Letters, and The Great Divorce), this is definitely the one of which I hold the most conflicted opinion. So much of what he said about the way the Lord uses difficulties in the lives of men to produce good in and for them, and about how dying to self is the only path to genuine life, was so true, and so well and beautifully expressed -- but I have huge ...more
4.5 stars. Nearly perfect.

One of my favorite quotes (not from the chapter "Heaven", in case you were wondering.)

"One can imagine a sentient picture, after being rubbed and scraped and re-commenced for the tenth time, wishing that it were only a thumb-nail sketch whose making was over in a minute. In the same way, it is natural for us to wish that God had designed for us a less glorious and less arduous destiny; but then we are wishing not for more love but for less.”

I started reading this on a
CS Lewis is held by many to be the premier Christian apologist of the 20th century. Unless one is morbidly naive, or has yet to encounter the counterarguments to Christianity in particular and theism in general, I honestly cannot see where his appeal lies.

How CS Lewis should have died.

The Problem of Evil is an insurmountable one for Christians (and all other theists who believe in a perfectly loving, all-powerful and all-knowing god). There have been inten
Maureen Wagner
As usual, Lewis's book doesn't disappoint. He gives interesting Christian perspectives on suffering without resorting to trite comments of "turn the other cheek" and "if God brings you to it, He'll bring you through it". A very worthwhile read, especially for Christians and C.S. Lewis fans.
Review was first posted on Booklikes:

I first read The Problem of Pain when I was an impressionable teenager in search of the meaning of life. How I got to C.S. Lewis, however, is a long story that I'll reserve for another post/review.

Anyway, I loved the The Problem of Pain when I first read it. I couldn't put it down.

When I started clearing my bookshelves last year in attempt to de-clutter, I came across my old and dusty copy of the book again and started
First read September 12-14, 2001. The problem of pain is that it isn't a problem in the way we think it is when we first begin to look at the entire subject. The book reminded me of looking at the negative image of a familiar picture.

If I thought to read about pain to seek its alleviation, I might have saved myself the trouble. In my second reading of The Problem of Pain I was again surprised and impressed by Lewis. I could highlight most of the text. He pulls no punches, cuts me no slack. I lik
Chad Warner
Lewis addresses the problem of pain, which he describes in this way: "If God were good, He would make His creatures perfectly happy, and if He were almighty, He would be able to do what he wished. But the creatures are not happy. Therefore God lacks either goodness, or power, or both."

As a Christian, I've often wondered about this issue, especially when friends are diagnosed with cancer or the country suffers terrorist attacks. It's a difficult question, and although I accept the explanation thr
Julie Davis
If there is a God, then why is there so much suffering and pain in the world?

This is a common problem brought up by atheists and C. S. Lewis says it was a problem for him before he became Christian. Somehow it's not a question that ever bothered me whether I believed or didn't. So I welcomed the premise of the book since that's a question that always stops me in my tracks. I also was happy to see my library had it available on audio.

This is one of those books that pulls no punches. In his tradem
Sep 06, 2007 Wayno rated it 2 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: no one really
Shelves: religiousthemed
Very difficult work to follow, because of the language used. It not common english. For example, he overuses the word "numinious" which merely means "supernatural." Why use a word no one's familiar with?

Lots of word spins. The only real meat and potatoes is that sometimes Humans lock horns with God on the issue of self-sufficiency. God does everything to destroy our self-sufficiency, so we are dependent on him alone. That was the meat and potatoes I took from the book (on page 96 of the paperbac
Great discussion, but still so many unanswered questions. Reread in April 2015

You can tell this is one of Lewis's early books. Written in 1940, I could feel that he hadn't worked out a few of the specifics within his beliefs on Christianity yet. And some of his other ideas I flat-out disagree with (so sad to me whenever I see him trying to cram in Darwinian macro-evolution and discredit the creation story).

I can see why many feel inevitably dissatisfied with this read. But I think he does answer
This was my 50th read of the year, and it should have been my first. Well, I also read Mere Christianity this year, so perhaps this should have been my second. At any rate, wow. I was reading someone else's reviews (of a different book -- I don't remember which) where they stated that they only give 5 stars to "life changing" books. That is indeed what I am doing in this case, or at least, what I hope I am doing since only time will tell if my life has really been changed.

My wife has a chronic i
I can add no further review to any works of C. S. Lewis than other far more intelligent minds have already said but as for my personal response, I found it very thought-provoking, in such a way that I will have to read it again to really understand the depth of everything he has to say. The issue is so deep and all-consuming for humanity and Lewis' approach so detailed that I cannot possibly take it in all at once. He unabashedly asks tough questions and explains logically his positions so that ...more
The Problem of Pain by C.S Lewis is a very well written book. Many Christians struggle with the problem of pain. They ask themselves... if God is so good and powerful, why is there pain in the world? Lewis offers many points to this argument. This book was very difficult to read. I often had to re-read it two or three times in order to truly understand it. The language used was very uncommon and complex. But as challenging as this text was, I believe it is an important book to read. It offered s ...more
Mike (the Paladin)
One of the questions many Christians hear often is, "If there is a good and omnipotent God how can He allow pain and suffering?"

Here C.S.Lewis gives a cogent discussion of this "problem". While it will not satisfy all I suppose (especially in cases where the questioner doesn't wish to be satisfied) I believe for the thinking reader there will be some insight.

I know that for most Christian believers there is a great deal of insight and and some discussion of questions that most of us have run u
Megan Larson
(Note--this book really hangs somewhere on the under-side of three stars for me. Also, this review is written from an orthodox Christian standpoint--I'm not qualified to offer any other.)
"If God is good, why does he cause or allow us to experience painful circumstances? Perhaps he is not good. Or, perhaps he just isn't powerful enough to protect his creatures from pain." These are the difficult questions, natural to many of us, that C.S. Lewis attempts to address in this book. It is one of his e
Josh Hanke
I had problems staying alert (read: awake) during the first half of the book. The second half picked up a bit, but I still found myself thinking Thank God! once I reached the last ten pages.

Lewis' gift and, in my opinion, sometimes fault is analogizing everything. It is often short, simple and insightful. Sometimes its painfully long and ineffective. His favorite use of grammar has to be the comma. It is difficult to find two sentences in a row without one:

"When I think of pain - of anxiety tha
Ampat Varghese
Most people today know C S Lewis only as the author of the Narnia Chronicles, that singular series of seven fantasy novels centred around the Lion-King Aslan, a thinly disguised representation of Jesus Christ, entering with a bang the space that Graham Greene called “the Pleasure Dome”. And closer watchers of Lewis and his heritage might also recall the 1993 film Shadowlands, loosely based on this Oxbridge Don’s relationship with and marriage to Joy Gresham, who later succumbs to bone cancer.
Wow, if there's one thing I'm an expert on it is pain. Physical and mental pain, I KNOW pain. We are WELL acquainted.

I'm not particularly an expert on C S Lewis, but I have read several of his books, and I was hoping for some great insight out of this book. Didn't happen.

He starts by admitting that he didn't especially feel that he had great insight into suffering, that there were probably others more qualified to talk about it than him, but I didn't really pay attention to that. Maybe this time
This book may as well have wings, as I've had to throw it from me in disgust so often to get through it. He starts with the assumption (which 'certainly' every one agrees with?) that the fear or awe of 'the numinous' can only have come from God, and never from the environment on earth. Having, thus, disregarded reason and the experience of those thousands who see 'the wild "red in tooth and claw"' as numinous, or the thousands who are taught of the numinous nature of life through meditation, sta ...more
This book was so interesting to me. I do not see myself as any great scriptorian or theologian by any stretch of the imagination, but I was surprised to see Lewis struggle with what I consider to be very, very basic truths about God the Father. He goes about addressing these issues in a very intellectual, logical manner but his conclusions lacked the depth and understanding that comes from the Restored Gospel. His misunderstanding of the nature of God, the creation, the Fall, and his notion of H ...more
3.5 Stars

The problem with this Lewis book, The Problem of Pain, is that it's hard to read and sometimes oftentimes, hard to understand. Hahaha!

Fortunately, this is not my first non-fiction of Lewis, or I might have not finished reading it. And as with any other Lewis, you don't read it by viewing it as a jargon as it is, a collection of words, with the aid of a dictionary or a thesaurus. But you read it on the whole context. Otherwise, you'd miss out on the message that CSL wants to deliver.

Horrible book. It's never a good idea to preface a book saying, "I didn't want to write this under my own name, but the publisher made me." I basically started reading the book thinking, "wow, he didn't even want to write this book, how can he make a good argument?" I'm not sure if there are any good ideas about why god has a plan for pain, but the evolutionary argument for it works just fine for me. To summarize the entire book, the real problem of pain was reading this book.
Norm Konzelman
[Maybe not amazing, but too few this good]
The Problem of Pain. I had heard a very little of C. S. Lewis through a radio program of Elisabeth Elliot's. She had read some out his work 'The ScrewTape Letters'. Just a little, and long before I took any notice of his work. The next I heard of him was because of the Narnia series of movies. That kind of put a bad taste in my mouth, though after hearing this book, that must be attributed to my ignorance.
I am forced to say that because hearing this book
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Pain as God's Megaphone 2 17 Jun 08, 2013 05:21PM  
Theodicy Problem 33 94 Feb 21, 2013 12:48PM  
the cover of this book 2 20 Jun 12, 2012 10:14AM  
  • The Everlasting Man
  • A Christian Manifesto
  • Making Sense Out of Suffering
  • The Cost of Discipleship
  • The Case for a Creator: A Journalist Investigates Scientific Evidence That Points Toward God
  • Evangelism & the Sovereignty of God
  • God, Freedom, and Evil
  • The Quotable Lewis
  • The Universe Next Door: A Basic Worldview Catalog
  • The Question of God: C.S. Lewis and Sigmund Freud Debate God, Love, Sex, and the Meaning of Life
  • When I Don't Desire God: How to Fight for Joy
  • Reasonable Faith
  • Knowing Scripture
  • Can Man Live Without God
  • Generous Justice: How God's Grace Makes Us Just
  • Love Your God with All Your Mind: The Role of Reason in the Life of the Soul
  • How Long, O Lord?: Reflections on Suffering and Evil
  • Institutes of the Christian Religion, 2 Vols
CLIVE STAPLES LEWIS (1898–1963) was one of the intellectual giants of the twentieth century and arguably one of the most influential writers of his day. He was a Fellow and Tutor in English Literature at Oxford University until 1954. He was unanimously elected to the Chair of Medieval and Renaissance Literature at Cambridge University, a position he held until his retirement. He wrote more than th ...more
More about C.S. Lewis...

Share This Book

“A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word 'darkness' on the walls of his cell.” 3643 likes
“Mental pain is less dramatic than physical pain, but it is more common and also more hard to bear. The frequent attempt to conceal mental pain increases the burden: it is easier to say “My tooth is aching” than to say “My heart is broken.” 1400 likes
More quotes…