My rating:

add to my books

We

by Yevgeny Zamyatin

3.95 · rating details · 8,296 ratings · 796 reviews

In the One State of the great Benefactor, there are no individuals, only numbers. Life is an ongoing process of mathematical precision, a perfectly balanced equation. Primitive passions and instincts have been subdued. Even nature has been defeated, banished behind the Green Wall. But one frontier remains: outer space. Now, with the creation of the spaceship Integral, that...more

Mass Market Paperbound, 226 pages

Published August 1st 1993 by Penguin Books (first published January 1st 1920)

more details... edit details

Get a copy:

There is a good chance some of your friends read this book. Sign in to see!

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Lists with This Book

Best Utopian and Dystopian Fiction

38th out of 1,147 books — 6,125 voters

Dystopia!

16th out of 339 books — 885 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 18,273)

filter | sort: default (?) | rating details

Jul 13, 2011

Bird Brian rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: dystopias, russia, literature-20th-century

Author Yevgeny Zamyatin took part in two Russian Revolutions, hoping to overthrow the abusive and excessive Czarist system. He had joined the CPSU (Communist Party of the Soviet Union), and believed Lenin's promises of a more equitable society, where labor controlled the means of production. By 1920, he tried to remain hopeful, but it was becoming apparent that the country was going in the wrong direction. Three long years since the Revolution had not moved anyone closer to a "workers' para...more

like 45 likes

· see review

Aug 27, 2011

Simon rated it

Shelves: sf

One can see echoes of this story in other greats of dystopian SF such as Brave New World, Fahrenheit 451 and, of course, the great 1984. Written in the early 1920's it hadn't taken Zamyatin long to realise the logical consequences of the ideological reasoning behind his country's recent revolution. And this is precisely what is explored here, several hundred years in the future after the successful elimination of all opposition.

What would a society be like that had eliminated all notio...more

like 7 likes

· see review

Feb 25, 2010

Meaghan rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: read-in-2010, fantasy-futuristic, diaries, adult-novels

This is a superb work of science fiction, and I'm sorry it's not as well known as its dystopian counterparts 1984 and Brave New World. What the One State reminded me of, though, was not either of those books but rather the planet Camozotz in Madeleine L'Engle's book A Wrinkle In Time.

Besides the splendid, suspenseful plotting, the protagonist had one of the most distinctive literary voices I have ever seen. I had no idea one could do mathematics so poetically, and come up with such b...more

like 5 likes

· see review

Jan 04, 2010

Shannon rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: dystopian, sci-fi, 2009, classics

A thousand years in our future, D-503 is just one number among many in the One State. The One State is a city, a society, that revolves not around the individual but around the collective we, like a hive, with the Benefactor in God-like status at the centre. D-503 works as a constructor on the Integral, the ship that will take their ideology and philosophy of life to other planets, to civilise and free other species. When an article in the State Gazette calls for poems, manifestos etc. to go in ...more

like 12 likes

· see review

Apr 11, 2011

Hans rated it

Shelves: sci-fi, political, social-commentary, russian-literature

200 pages of an interminable balancing act between decision and indecision. A severely fractured protagonist suffering through the weight of unwanted responsibility. Hopelessly clawing at two realities with a narrow distinction between both and with the threats of his actions mercilessly ratcheting up the pressure.

The fragmented society in which he lives mirroring his own life; held together only by extinguishing and suppressing half of its humanity.

This book reminds me o...more200 pages of an interminable balancing act between decision and indecision. A severely fractured protagonist suffering through the weight of unwanted responsibility. Hopelessly clawing at two realities with a narrow distinction between both and with the threats of his actions mercilessly ratcheting up the pressure.

The fragmented society in which he lives mirroring his own life; held together only by extinguishing and suppressing half of its humanity.

This book reminds me of that vague desire of a unified self that no longer struggles against itself or its own nature. How truly tragic it would be if one side actually succeeded in overcoming the other.

I am impressed by Yevgeny's creative use of limited metaphors and descriptions to create a far off future that is believable, human and not lost to outdated ideas of technology. The focus is always on the characters and not the nifty contraptions of an advanced civilization, ultimately demonstrating how no matter how technologically developed humans become each generation will struggle with the same basic themes of what it means to be human.

Quotes I liked:

"Who knows who you are...A person is a novel: You don't know how it will end until the very last page. Otherwise, it wouldn't be worth reading to the very end..."

"That ancient legend about paradise... it, you see, was about us, about now. Yes! Think about that! Those two in paradise stood before a choice: Happiness without freedom or freedom without happiness; a third choice wasn't given. They, the blockheads, they chose freedom --and then what? Understandably, for centuries, they longed for fetters. For fetters--you understand: That was the cause of world sorrow. For centuries! Until we figured out how to return to happiness again. No, wait, wait, listen! We and the ancient God are side by side, at the same table. Yes! We have helped God to conquer the devil definitively-- It was this devil, you know, who urged people to violate what was forbidden and take a bite of that fatal freedom; he was the malicious snake. But our boot: on his head--Crrunch! and there: paradise is restored. Again we are simple-hearted innocents, like Adam and Eve."

"Here I saw, with my own eyes, that laughter was the most terrible weapon: you can kill anything with laughter--even murder itself"

"I ask you: what have people--from the very cradle--prayed for, dreamed about, and agonized over? They have wanted someone, anyone, to tell them once and for all what happiness is--and then to attach them to this happiness with a chain.. what are we now doing, if it isn't this? The ancient dream about paradise...Remember: in paradise, they don't know desire, they don't know pity, they don't know love".(less)

like 8 likes

· see review

May 12, 2011

Shawn rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: read-lit, read-do-not-own, read-sci-fi

So, I was reading through my list of Zamyatin stories and thought, "well, here's a chance to get the one novel out of the way".

Famous for being the first "dystopian" novel, mentally this brings to mind images of Fritz Lang's METROPOLIS (*although I especially appreciated the Bruce Sterling's introduction suggestion to envision the characters in Soviet Constructivist Art-era costumes* - worked a treat!). The idea is pretty easy to grasp - a "projecto ad absurd...moreSo, I was reading through my list of Zamyatin stories and thought, "well, here's a chance to get the one novel out of the way".

Famous for being the first "dystopian" novel, mentally this brings to mind images of Fritz Lang's METROPOLIS (*although I especially appreciated the Bruce Sterling's introduction suggestion to envision the characters in Soviet Constructivist Art-era costumes* - worked a treat!). The idea is pretty easy to grasp - a "projecto ad absurdum" of Communist worker agit-prop into the far future (1000 years, in fact) - a future in which the One-State rules all, and all "ciphers" live by mathematical and logically precise conceptions - mere cogs in a single unit of "We" (but if there is a "We", who can "They" be?) serving the glorious one state in synchronized harmony, even if pesky human failings still rise up and get in the way every once in a while.

It's Zamyatin's satire of Soviet Russia's inhuman, anti-freedom practices, narrated to you as a memoir written by the chief architect of the Integral, the new worker-built spaceship that will soon launch and integrate the infinite equation of the universe with the yoke of reason ("Taming a wild zig-zag along a tangent towards the asymptote into a straight line" - it's like Darkseid's anti-life equation, for all you Kirby NEW GOD fans) - its belly full of writings to propagandize new, unruly worlds. But our "hero", D-503, is having problems, you see....

This was an interesting read - I'm not a big sci-fi fan but I can dig the historical stuff that's not written "in the genre". I;m sure oceans have been written about it already, not the least of all its effect on George Orwell. It's interesting because WE is a bit more fantastical than 1984, more given to flights of fantasy in its conception of a regimented future than the more serious, "realistic" Orwell text. Life in WE is ruled by geometry and equations - and D-503 is haunted by nightmares of the root of negative one, which is impossible....

Some minor points I found interesting: I liked the structure of the early satire, where D-503 presents his everyday, realistic life of future horrors and wonders in a blase narrative form. Since I'm a fan of the Futurist art movement, I liked the echoes of Futurism you can see here (although this was more about precise mathematics and science/logic, where Futurism was about brute energy and powerful force lines). It's interesting to see (in our modern world of dumbed-down, dualistic thinking) that Zamyatin's stinging satire not only strikes his obvious target, but seeks to critique the opposite number as well (organized religion's stupidities are slyly exposed, and one realizes that the inhuman regimentation of human workers, literally trained to work like machines following the process instigated by F.W. Taylor, was not only supported by the Russians but found a huge fan in the uber-Capitalist Henry Ford - the more things change...). The citizens of the One-State live in a panopticon, only allowed privacy on their pre-approved sex-hour (free love is another bonus of the future - you can sleep with anyone you'd like and no one is allowed to turn you down, or you turn anyone else down, of course). There's mathematical music (I couldn't help thinking of Basic Channel minimalist Techno), propaganda poetry and A Table of The Hours, a schedule that organizes all time efficiently (there's a wonderful bit where D-503 waxes rhapsodic over the "ancient literary legacy" of train schedules: "who is not made breathless when racing and tumbling through the pages of the schedule?"). In fact, the past seems to hold a subtle fascination for these perfectly balanced citizens of the future. And D-503 is still worried about his ugly, monkey hands....

The story moves through our main character's "unreasonable" fascination with I-330, a strange female who seems to flaunt her dislike of the status quo, occasionally smoking cigarettes or drinking alcohol. This drives a wedge between D and his frequent female companion 0-90. But D's investigation of I leads to further discoveries, including what really exists outside the Great Wall that separates the One State from the blasted wasteland (this sequence was particularly strong), the State's new operation which will insure happiness by surgically excising the imagination, and the existence of a rapidly forming underground movement committed to an outmoded and unlikely concept called "freedom". It may meander a bit at the 3/4 mark but the ending is very strong, as D-503 finally understands true happiness and why "reason should win."

Well worth your time.(less)

like 5 likes

· see review

Oct 10, 2009

Afoue rated it

· review of another edition

Absolutely brilliant.

We is the story of a future in which the citizens of a society, known as "digits", all maintain the same mindset: allegiance to the Do-Gooder. In this world, everyone stays inside the Green Wall, everyone wears a uniform, and everyone wakes and sleeps at the same time. Everything is mathematical; the "chaos" of past music has been refined to something more precise.

The digits have no problem with this way of living, including digit...more

like 5 likes

· see review

Aug 20, 2007

Jeff Toto rated it

· review of another edition

Recommends it for: Anyone who has read 1984 and Brave New World...

This was a very challenging read; in many ways I feel a second read will be necessary to better comprehend this book.

Zamyatin's protagonist, D-503, is a mathematician as well, and as such, he consciously eschews flowery language. Natasha Randall's translation is excellent, and she keeps Zamyatin's sentence fragments and sudden exclamations intact. Nestled among these, however, are descriptions of startling imagery ("Only a gaunt gray shadow is slowly crawling up the bluish star...more

like 10 likes

· see review

Jul 11, 2010

Amy Sturgis added it · review of another edition

Shelves: postapocalyptic-dystopia, science-fiction-vintage, 20th-century

This is the "granddaddy" of the modern dystopian novel, the book that influenced Huxley's Brave New World, Rand's Anthem, and Orwell's 1984: Yevgeny Zamyatin's We (1924). I've read it repeatedly and taught it, as well, and I always discover something new in the novel each time I turn to it. It's a brilliantly chilling depiction of a futuristic totalitarian regime that organizes its people's lives with almost scientific precision, as seen through the troubled eyes of one of its leading ...more

like 5 likes

· see review

Apr 27, 2011

Nate rated it

· review of another edition

Recommends it for: hairy hands reaching through the green wall

Recommended to Nate by: the illness of dreaming

Shelves: russia, interwar-maladies, dystopiary, doomed-heretics-of-the-revolution

1984 was published in 1949. Brave New World in 1931. Of course, long before either of these Brits could get spooked by machine-like totalitarian communism, Russians were already getting spooked by their own country. In the 20s, Mikhail Bulgakov and Sigizmund Krzhizhanovsky, to name a couple whose objections and subversiveness guaranteed that their finest works went unpublished in their lifetimes. And even earlier, only just after the revolution in 1920, Yevgeny Zamyatin anticipated much of that...more

like 4 likes

· see review

Jan 30, 2008

Joshua rated it

Recommends it for: Anyone interested on where 1984 got its ideas from

Shelves: classics, sci-fi-and-fantasy

Completed in 1921 and banned in it's native Russia for over 50 years, Yevgeny Zamyatin's We is generally considered the grandfather of dystopian literature. Before Orwell had his Big Brother, and before Huxley had his Brave New World , Yevgeny had We and the all-powerful Benefactor. Hugely inspirational to Orwell and Huxley, Yevgeny created a world that in my humble opinion, was better than the ones that followed.
The novel revolves around a man named "D-503" who lives in a t...more

like 6 likes

· see review

Dec 30, 2007

Deana rated it

· review of another edition

Recommends it for: Anyone interested in Utopian societies or mathematics

Recommended to Deana by: Alex

Shelves: 2007, borrowed

The particular translation I read of this book was by Mirra Ginsburg, and is a somewhat older translation.

I really enjoyed this book. But then, I've often enjoyed books about utopian societies. This one was apparently one of the first, if not THE first to theorize about a supposedly utopian/dystopian society, with 1984 and A Brave New World following in its footsteps.

The book was originally written in Russian, and there were times when I could tell that certain aspects of the...more

like 4 likes

· see review

Nov 01, 2008

Ben Loory rated it

· review of another edition

It is said there are flowers that bloom only once in a hundred years. Why should there not be some that bloom once in a thousand, in ten thousand years? Perhaps we never knew about them simply because this "once in a thousand years" has come only today?

Blissfully, drunkenly, I walked down the stairs to the number on duty, and all around me, wherever my eyes fell, thousand-year-old buds were bursting into bloom. Everything bloomed-- armchairs, shoes, golden badges, electric ...more

like 7 likes

· see review

May 02, 2008

Yulia rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: russian-translations

I'm still trying to decide which I preferred, this or 1984. Both had flawed writing, but does this get points for having been written first (1924 vs. 1949)? I believe so. Some mistake his having translated Orwell into Russian for his having been inspired by Orwell and not the reverse. It's unbelievable.

like 1 like

· see review

Dec 29, 2011

Tzeck rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: anti-utopia

Антиутопията на антиутопиите! Пред която се кланят и Оруел и Хъксли. "Ние" на Евгений Замятин. Книга-постулат е това. Чете се на един дъх, но този дъх е вледеняващ. Няма по-съвършено описана и представена антиутопия от това. Няма! Не е възможно да има по-смразаващ и ужасяващ всеки свободомислещ човек свят от този - светът на Световната държава! Свят, протичащ в непроменящ се ритъм. Свят без чувства, без личности, без имена. Светът на огромната всеобща човешка машина, в която индивидът ...more

like 1 like

· see review

Aug 08, 2011

Zzoeeeee rated it

A very good representation of what it would be like to be the first person to dream in a world without dreams. His imagination seems to permeate into his everyday life to the point of insanity and the reader begins to question whether this is worse than living with an entirely logical mind. The dichotomy D-503 faces between his vague urge for freedom and the security of being under OneState rule is possibly more interesting than the simple fear of discovery faced by Winston in 1984.

Plus I fell a...more

like 4 likes

· see review

Oct 18, 2011

Denae rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: fiction-science-fiction, 1920s, author-russian, translated-from-russian, fiction-dystopian-or-speculative, satire, so-much-math, list-1001-core

Yevgeny Zamyatin described We as "my most jesting and most serious work." Having read nothing else by the author I cannot completely concur with the statement, but serious and jesting it certainly is. We describes a supposedly utopian society based on mathematics and a petroleum based food substance. (If the latter seems an odd choice, keep in mind that the book was written in 1920.) This society is the result of a two hundred year war in which all but 0.2% of humanity is wiped out and...more

like 2 likes

· see review

May 24, 2011

Brendan rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: classics, sci-fi

“They say there are flowers that bloom only once every hundred years. Why shouldn’t there be others, that bloom once every thousand—ten thousand—years. Maybe we never knew about them only because that once-every-thousand-years is today.”—We, Yevgheniy Zamyatin

Published 27 years before George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, Yevgheniy Zamyatin’s We could easily be mistaken as just a precursor of Orwell’s dystopian thriller. But Zamyatin is much more than a Russian Orwell—he introspective...more“They say there are flowers that bloom only once every hundred years. Why shouldn’t there be others, that bloom once every thousand—ten thousand—years. Maybe we never knew about them only because that once-every-thousand-years is today.”—We, Yevgheniy Zamyatin

Published 27 years before George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, Yevgheniy Zamyatin’s We could easily be mistaken as just a precursor of Orwell’s dystopian thriller. But Zamyatin is much more than a Russian Orwell—he introspectively explores the immovable human spirit that has led, throughout history, to rebellions and revolutions. He also illustrates, with painful eloquence, the power of a totalitarian society to warp and eventually crush such spirit. Readers looking for a subtle and philosophical analysis of individualism and dictatorship, as well as a gripping plot with exceptionally compelling characters, will be more than pleased with Zamyatin’s brilliant novel.

We follows D-503, an engineer for the totalitarian “United Nation” who has committed himself to writing a manual for the establishment of utopia on alien worlds. He lives a purely rational life—meaning, he believes that every phenomenon can be reduced to a formula and explained through purely mathematical terms. Compulsory service to the state is thus “rational” because one man is miniscule in importance compared to the larger whole of society. All of life in the United Nation is reduced to efficient, simple, and completely regulated actions—including sex, formerly “irrational” and “unmathematical,” now clean-cut, easy, and egalitarian. Throughout We, D-503 incessantly reminds the reader that this is the epitome of human civilization.

But D-503’s routine, his worshipful relationship with logic and the state, are all ended—by love. (Of course!) A messy, unclean thing which cannot be accounted for in any state’s economic calculations, in the United Nation love is considered outmoded, even archaic, and possibly a sign of disease. As D-503 falls further in love with the highly unorthodox woman I-330, he descends into a world of underground anarchist revolutionaries—led by the very woman of his dreams—and discovers that life, and humanity in particular, is too complex for one man (or even a whole United Nation of men) to calculate and control.

And that is We’s most scintillating characteristic, the idea which makes it stand out from other anti-totalitarian tales. The plot of We is innovative and original, particularly for its time, but the 20th century has seen much of Zamyatin’s predictions come to pass, and so a 21st century reader may view political ideals which were controversial in the 1920s Soviet Union with a more lukewarm attitude. (“Great, dictatorship is bad—where have I seen that before?”) What differentiates Zamyatin’s novel is that he does not make politics his central focus. Instead, he is much more concerned with what drives outsiders, outcasts, rebels, etc. What is this inner magic that causes certain people to react violently when oppressed, while others remain docile, happy slaves? Zamyatin’s answer is an intriguing one, stemming from millennia-old philosophical debates, with roots in the ideas of Friedrich Nietzsche, Plato, Aristotle, and the Enlightenment: imagination; passion; the ambiguities of interplay between the “rational” mind and the “irrational” body. Regardless of the amount of influence a society exerts over its constituent members, it will never be able to account for human will. D-503 is the product of a pro-totalitarian education—and yet he rebels. The cause is manifold: forbidden lust for a revolutionary; terror and excitement in the face of the unclean, irrational, uncontrollable world outside the orderly United Nation; and pure, simple, immovable choice. Like Aristotle’s Unmoved Mover—the hypothesized originator of all motion and action in the universe—D-503 makes choices, not because of his political-economic environment, as Marxists claim; nor because of the will of God, as the pious proclaim; nor “because” of anything necessarily held purely within the realm of ideas.

Rather, he chooses to rebel because he discovers that no matter what the “rational” commands of the mind—whether that mind is contained within the human brain or the head-of-state—there are certain facts, certain ambiguous and discomforting realities about the body, and about the natural world, which will not obey. Love, for instance, falls under the jurisdiction of no law.

But the tragedy of We is that this is no way to start a revolution. D-503’s conflict is apparent throughout the novel: he wishes to remain a part of the United Nation, but cannot suppress his lust, his needs, the realities of his life. The other revolutionaries he meets are fundamentally nihilistic, not caring for liberty, and instead demanding change, destruction, a paradigm shift for its own sake. They forsake the mind and pursue the bewildering pain of a life of pure hedonism, pure chaos. D-503 is caught in the middle, a part of neither the totalitarian camp nor the anarchist camp. He has discovered choice and the power of his own spirit to overcome indoctrination, but society has so disarmed him by eradicating any conception of freedom or individualism as to leave him entirely without defense. He is a blundering, tragic figure—a man who could have been a hero, if he had not been stunted from birth.

But most importantly, he is a lesson, a warning to any society which thinks it right and proper to suppress the once-every-thousand-year blooms of the human spirit. Self-destruction is the only result of such injustice. Hopefully, the world has learned this by now. But, if not, it can always look back to Yevgheniy Zamyatin's brilliant masterwork.(less)

like 3 likes

· see review

Mar 24, 2011

William rated it

Shelves: russia, translation, fiction, dystopia

We (written 1920-21; suppressed in USSR until 1988) fits under the heading of retro-dystopias. Zamyatin's real interest here is the impossibility of being fully human in a totalitarian society. His future is not technologically superior. There's very little that might be called high-tech. In the way it is both forward-looking and dated, the mood it inspires it is rather like that of watching Fritz Lang's Metropolis. I liked that. It was like finding this artefact of world lit. A piece of the his...moreWe (written 1920-21; suppressed in USSR until 1988) fits under the heading of retro-dystopias. Zamyatin's real interest here is the impossibility of being fully human in a totalitarian society. His future is not technologically superior. There's very little that might be called high-tech. In the way it is both forward-looking and dated, the mood it inspires it is rather like that of watching Fritz Lang's Metropolis. I liked that. It was like finding this artefact of world lit. A piece of the history of literary dystopias, and one that influenced Orwell. But it's worth reading for more than simply historical reasons. In Cormac McCarthy's The Road we are in a post-technological future. In We science is neatly at the service of OneState. Thanks to "our glass," with its steel-like properties, buildings are transparent so one can see everything everyone else does. Except during sex when one can lower one's blinds, with prior authorization of course. The fictional patterning is strong throughout, but there are these inconsistencies of logic too. For instance, the spy agency of OneState known as the Guardians seems inanely feeble in comparison to, say, the efficient Stasi of 1984. But then Orwell was writing more than 25 years later when ideas like television were very much in the air. For D-503 everything is fine and dandy in his freedomless world of OneState. He begins by being a rather tiresome booster for its "ideals." He is happy sharing O-90's favors with R-13. He is happy with his work on the INTEGRAL (all caps) which is some sort of missile, time-capsule affair destined for other civilizations on other planets. (Later, when it flies, I was assailed by mental footage of Buck Rodgers' low-tech rocket jiggled on string before the camera.) Everything is fine with D-503 until he falls passionately in love with I-330, who is both beautiful and a willful transgressor of the conformity of One State. She is, in short, a revolutionary. Passionate love overthrowing one's otherwise well-ordered world is one of the great themes of world literature. Philip Roth's The Dying Animal springs to mind most readily, but the examples are vast. I-330 is constantly gaming the system. And because D-503 is head over heels in love with her, he's drawn into her crimes for which death appears to be the only possible punishment. There are a number of disconnected images, scenes that don't quite fit with the otherwise lucid patterning of the novel. It's as if the book never made it through it's final draft. But you've got to forgive that. It is after all an artefact. If you're seeking perfection this is not your novel.(less)

like 1 like

· see review

Sep 16, 2008

John rated it

The two stars is not meant to suggest that I don't appreciate the historical importance of this book. As is often noted, it is one of the earliest novels to depict a dystopian totalitarian future, written in 1924 -- before "1984" and "Brave New World." So while two stars may strike some as churlish, I admit that I found Zamyatin's narrative poorly executed and the portrayal of the totalitarian state one-dimensional and unbelievable.

This is also a problem that I ...more

like 6 likes

· see review

May 04, 2008

Chris rated it

When the creators of badass shit like ‘Logan’s Run’ and “1984” are eager to cite your output as significant and influential, you’ve got the goods. With “We”, Zamyatin earns those lofty credentials, and also wins the endearing faith from its readers.

With the 200-Years War in the remote past, a post-apocalyptic society known as OneState rises amidst the aftermath by embracing the tenets of efficiency expert Frederick Taylor and crafts a futuristic paradise, a new world built around...moreWhen the creators of badass shit like ‘Logan’s Run’ and “1984” are eager to cite your output as significant and influential, you’ve got the goods. With “We”, Zamyatin earns those lofty credentials, and also wins the endearing faith from its readers.

With the 200-Years War in the remote past, a post-apocalyptic society known as OneState rises amidst the aftermath by embracing the tenets of efficiency expert Frederick Taylor and crafts a futuristic paradise, a new world built around the sensibilities of timetables, predictability, and homogeneity. Surely, many people would call this bravest of new worlds a dystopia; populated by soulless automatons, blindly herded and corralled for fear of the infallible wrath of their authoritarian overseer, The Benefactor. Human emotion on the cusp of obliteration, man emulating his own machines, you slavishly labor for ‘work units’ instead of cash on the barrelhead, privacy and individuality concepts undreamt: and one thinks, “there can’t really be yet another book out there about the ultimate totalitarian state which emerges from near-extinctive global catastrophe in the distant future, can there be?” I could try a re-assurance tactic, by stating that Penguin (the publisher themselves, of this edition) claims this is the grand-daddy of them all, the progenitor of all the righteous stories in a similar vein to follow, but, seeing as I haven’t read every damn book in the world, I can’t really validate this claim. What I can say is this: don’t think of this as the worse thing that can happen to people/society/yo mamma, quit thinking of this genre as ‘dystopia’, most of it is simple and desperately needed social progress. I could be sold into moving here in about two minutes; “breeding is strictly regulated, children are reared by the state like livestock, you can register to fornicate with anyone of your choosing, poverty doesn’t exist, and silly and irrational ideas like free-thought and belief have been cast aside” says ID-10-T, the real estate agent. I briefly consider that I’ll never again have to think about crap like car insurance, calling my folks, making ends meet so I can feed my vicious pumas something besides Sam’s Choice Kitty Chomp, or f#cking ironing. No, instead I can give up the fruits of the imagination (which includes rubbish like the movie Gigli, The Bell Jar, the Bible) to voyeuristically get my groove on from any partner from a communal p@ssy pool and spend my time around a populous possessing uncharacteristic common sense and rational social planning. And the price of admission, laboring for a rancorous socially-manifested monstrosity called The Benefactor. Christ, I’ve settled for far less at every job I’ve ever had. That’s probably why I like this genre of story; but alas, someone always has to go and fuck it up.

In this Russian account from the 1920s, that person is I-330, a complete bitch and miscreant. She belongs to an underground organization with the single goal of undermining the benevolent designs of The Benefactor, and this group has to strike while the anvil is hot, as OneState is undertaking a mission of extraordinary magnitude; to spread their wisdom into space on the space-rocket-thing INTEGRAL!! Holy f#cking shit!! Heaven forbid! That’s right, the plan that OneState has to get their message out there is to load up a space vessel with their history, governing laws, and recommendations for sensible living…and let the cosmos beware. In order to prevent The Benefactor from spreading his poisonous dogma into the reaches of space, this renegade group is going to need an inside man, a saboteur of unbelievable station: D-503, a firm believer in the inherent righteousness of his society, and the Dude-In-Charge of all operations involving the INTEGRAL.

The question is, how does the resistance movement sway an acolyte of this society’s greatness to join their ranks? The answer is simple, with the same thing that tempted Herod to deliver John the Baptist’s head on a platter, the same thing that’s been used to lure men to unspeakable ends since the dawn of time: P@ssy. For anyone who doesn’t believe me, go back to your silly scriptures and realize that Cain was icing Abel for one reason alone: to improve the p@ssy quotient. This shit is true, I’m not clever enough to make that up.

So, I-330’s allure is infecting our main man, D-503, and he’s slowly succumbing to her antisocial whims; he’s skipping work, checking out vestiges of the past, and writing a journal (you’d think OneState would be a little less sloppy in matters of security, especially when it concerns the Dude-In-Charge overseeing their latest technological advancement). Is D-503 willing to go the last step, to help bring upon the demise of the society that’s previously seemed so rational and sensible? Is he ever going to actually get to tap I-330’s ass or is she just going to string him along endlessly? Is he going to get busted for his burgeoning involvement with the resistance and get some fatal face time with the Benefactor? How about you read the fucking book.
(less)

like 11 likes

· see review

Feb 13, 2008

Isaac rated it

There is something charming about this book, the familiarity of the ideas and the way you can see its influence twining through 20th century literature, but like a lot of pioneering works it's more interesting for what it says than what it is, I think. This could be the fault of a rather dreary translation which does not think of comprehensibility as one of its goals, or possibly just the fact that everything the book espouses has been gnashed over so much in our culture in the 80 year...more

like 1 like

· see review

Feb 03, 2008

Seabury rated it

· review of another edition

Recommends it for: fans of anything recognized as dystopian

This book is the prototype for many of the books that are well known. It predates the Adolexus Huxley's Brave New World by several years. It is George Orwell's inspiration for 1984, and was thought to be the main inspiration for Brave New World, until Adolexus Huxley claimed that he wrote Brave New World before hearing of this. Well, reading this book almost makes me doubt Huxley, such are the parallels between the novels. We describes a completly industrialised society. This society is based ...more

like 6 likes

· see review

Apr 23, 2011

Tracey rated it

· review of another edition

Recommends it for: those interested in early science fiction

Shelves: no-longer-owned

I picked up We a few months ago after seeing it in several different Best Science Fiction-type lists.

The book is written in the form of a journal, recording the thoughts and actions of D-503, the Builder of the Integral. He hopes to include this journal when the spaceship is launched, in order to bring the beliefs of the One State to any possible extra-terrestrials. The One State provides happiness through reason and logic; strictly controlling all aspects of daily life. Those who tra...more

like 3 likes

· see review

Feb 09, 2009

Micha rated it

Recommends it for: Zoe, Rod, Ajit, Evison?, Danielle, BRANDON, Tod

Recommended to Micha by: Ben the clever one

Shelves: books-2009

"What have you learned while reading this novel?"
I learned that Ayn Rand is a plagiarist and George Orwell had a crackerjack publisher.

For me, what really stood out in this novel, and perhaps in many of the really GREAT ones, were not the main characters of D & I (beginning of alphabet..) but it's "side" characters. Those who were overlooked. We never really see this future from their perspective, yet we do get a glimpse of it and one can sense that they ...more "What have you learned while reading this novel?"
I learned that Ayn Rand is a plagiarist and George Orwell had a crackerjack publisher.

For me, what really stood out in this novel, and perhaps in many of the really GREAT ones, were not the main characters of D & I (beginning of alphabet..) but it's "side" characters. Those who were overlooked. We never really see this future from their perspective, yet we do get a glimpse of it and one can sense that they feel something is wrong.
We see something vital where O is concerned, but I would have really liked to have gotten to know R & S more. I found it interesting that the author chose to name these characters from the end of the alphabet. I'm sure he meant something terribly smart by this, but I am not adept enough to catch it.

Another aspect I enjoyed was the protagonists obvious adoration for this future world. So often the element of the novel is to see from the eyes of those who WANT [the:] change, but here we have someone who really feels comfortable in this terrifying system. Not just comfortable, but someone who would probably CHOOSE to be there (by my understanding, it is indicated that this wasn't just social conditioning but by D's own decision). I found that really fascinating, but of course it became something other than just a record - a 'love' story - and the development became less prominent.

A note on the ' love story: While I feel this particular execution does take away from the evolution of the plot, in some ways, it also creates a path for others to include their stories (O, being the greatest example; S being the subtle one). Without it, those elements (which became my favourites) might not have been included in the novel.

Overall though, this novel was very clever, well thought out, obviously cathartic on some level to the author (I enjoy this in a novel) and quite funny in some places. It is written by an author in the early 20th century from the perspective of someone in our century (the far off future) for their ancestors. You don't find out that is the premise until much later. It is never exactly detailed how our protagonist plans to bequest this record, but I'm awfully glad it made it! It is still a wonderful read, regardless of some minor elements I felt didn't work.

For those who are considering a read, a WARNING: It is not light. It isn't exactly heavy either; but it is Russian, so it is not allowed to be white bread.

I would recommend it, but I don't know that everyone would catch some of the humor if they weren't well read/knew about history. I'm not being pedantic, (there are likely bits that should have been clever and witty that soared right over my head) really, it's just that I suspect one probably won't find it funny if they don't know what the author is talking about when he makes an obscure, albeit funny, reference to some text or event.
Having said that, I do hope many others read and enjoy it.

Some other similar works (or feeling or texts): Fahrenheit 451, The Giver, Anthem, 1984 (yeah yeah), Huxley/Brave New World... (less)

like 6 likes

· see review

Feb 08, 2009

веселин власакиев rated it

тая книжка също си я закупих на шести. влиза в to-read, щото много станаха в currently-reading, пък и не я. разбрах че алекс (жена) не е стигнала до руските утописти, но ето на сега я провокирам да си закупи копие. осем кинта от всяка книжарница (предполагам).

сега и ако фама ми пуснат някой лев ...

това място колкото и да е досадно, скучно и тъпо и не в България и на български може да се използва за книголог (хо-хо-хо). така или иначе хората се кефят на социалния тип мрежи...more

like 2 likes

· see review

Jan 19, 2009

Aimee rated it

I read this book in my college literature class. It's written in the same tone and subject as Orwell's 1984 and Huxley's Brave New World. Written in the form of a diary, it takes place in an urban setting, the entire population (nation) being separated from nature by the "Green Wall" and all buildings being made almost entirely of glass. No one has a name, only an assigned number, pink coupon books are issued and used for the times they have sex with their selected/assigned partner....more

like 3 likes

· see review

Jan 12, 2009

Mary added it · review of another edition

I first read this eerie novel in 2006 -- a library copy, and unfortunately didn't write down the name of the translator. Now I've reread my own copy -- every page marked & cross-referenced -- in the most recent translation by Natasha Randall. Also X-ref it with the excerpts in THE UTOPIA READER and translated by Gregory Zilboorg. Of the thousand images/metaphors Zamyatin employs, my favorite is glass -- the people live in a walled city made entirely of transparent glass.

"... a s...moreI first read this eerie novel in 2006 -- a library copy, and unfortunately didn't write down the name of the translator. Now I've reread my own copy -- every page marked & cross-referenced -- in the most recent translation by Natasha Randall. Also X-ref it with the excerpts in THE UTOPIA READER and translated by Gregory Zilboorg. Of the thousand images/metaphors Zamyatin employs, my favorite is glass -- the people live in a walled city made entirely of transparent glass.

"... a section of the circular street at the foot of the Green Wall. From the boundless green ocean behind the Wall, a wild tidal surge of roots, flowers, twigs, leaves was rolling toward me, standing on its hind legs, and had it flowed over me I would have been transformed from a person -- from the finest and most precise of mechanism -- into ...
"But, happily, between me and this wild, green ocean was the glass of the Wall. Oh, the great, divinely bounding wisdom of walls and barriers! They may just be the greatest of all inventions. Mankind ceased to be savage when we built the Green Wall, when we isolated our perfect, machined world, by means of the Wall, from the irrational, chaotic world of the trees, birds, animals ... " (82-3)

"...I don't know: which is dream and which is reality. Irrational quantities are sprouting through everything solid, usual, and three-dimensional, and instead of hard, polished planes, something gnarled and shaggy is surrounding me ...
"To every equation, to every formula in the surface world, there is a corresponding curve or mass. We don't know the corresponding masses to irrational formulas, to my square root of minus one -- we haven't ever seen them...But the very horror of it all is that these masses -- invisible masses -- do exist. They necessarily, inevitably must exist because mathematics is like a screen on which the whimsical, prickly shadows of irrational formulas cross before us. Mathematics and death: neither makes mistakes. And if these masses are not evident in our world, on the surface, then it's inescapable: they must have their own entire, enormous world there, behind the surface... " (90)
(less)

· see review

Feb 04, 2012

Tony rated it

Shelves: science-fiction

WE. (1924). Eugene Zamiatin. ****.
Zamiatin was a Russian writer whose works were banned in Russia. In order to pursue his dreams of writing but considering his situation under the then current regime in regard to his writings, he wrote a letter to Stalin requesting a visa to visit Europe, where he could continue his writing. Surprisingly, the visa was granted, and Zamiatin left Russia for Europe. He ultimately ended up in France. This work, although written in Russian, was never pu...moreWE. (1924). Eugene Zamiatin. ****.
Zamiatin was a Russian writer whose works were banned in Russia. In order to pursue his dreams of writing but considering his situation under the then current regime in regard to his writings, he wrote a letter to Stalin requesting a visa to visit Europe, where he could continue his writing. Surprisingly, the visa was granted, and Zamiatin left Russia for Europe. He ultimately ended up in France. This work, although written in Russian, was never published there. The first printing was of a Czech translation which was then translated into English. The book is probably a perfect example of a satiric Utopian novel. It is recognized as the inspiration for George Orwell’s, “1984.” The setting is some time in the future, after the “Two-Hundred Year’s War.” All of the roads have been destroyed during the war, and only green fields – impassable by the surviving people – remain. Only about 20% of the people of the world managed to survive the war, so that most of the problems stemming from over-crowding disappeared. Cities and towns have been isolated from each other, surrounded as they are by the green fields which hold unknown and unnamed dangers. The story is told in diary form by D-503, a man living in one of the remaining cities. He ultimately explains the beliefs of the citizens of his world as separating “I” from “We.” The earlier practice of personal ownership has been abolished. The survivors have realized that freedom and happiness are incompatible. Most men now believe that their freedom is more than a fair exchange for a high level of materialistic happiness. No one in this new society has a name. All are known by their combination of letters and numbers. Vowels plus a number equals a woman. Consonants plus a number equal a man. Our writer is known as D-503. The problems begin when he becomes attracted to I-330. Normally, relations between men and women are controlled by the issuance of a pass from the state that permits a man and woman to meet for one hour a week in his apartment, and to close the curtains. Any woman or any man can apply for a pass for any other person. This is not “free love,” but more like free opportunity. Unfortunately, D-503 and I-330 develop an attraction to each other that goes beyond opportunity, and they begin to share other thoughts and ideas. I-330 leads D-503 to The Ancient House, a part of the vast museum kept up by the state to show what previous centuries were like. There, the two explore relics and feelings of the past, to their ultimate downfall. When their secret liaisons are discovered, they become subject to punishment by “The Well-Doer,” the giver and taker of privileges. It is amazing how close Orwell’s book was to this one. Well written, the book tends to drag a bit in the middle as the author tries to make sure that we get all of his philosophical ramblings about the new society. Other than that, it is surprisingly readable by today’s standards, and still relevant to man’s situation. Recommended.
(less)

like 1 like

· see review

Dec 16, 2011

Gina rated it

-The number next to me glanced to the left, at me, and snorted. Somehow, a vivid memory remains: a tiny bubble of saliva blew out on his lips and burst. The bubble sobered me. I was myself again.
-Today, poetry is no longer the idle, impudent whistling of a nightingale; poetry is civic service, poetry is useful.
-Through the glass the blunt snout of some beast stared dully, mistily at me; yellow eyes, persistently repeating a single, incomprehensible thought. For a long time we stare...more

· see review

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … 609 610 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

topics	posts	views	last activity
Orwell	6	58	Sep 10, 2011 05:57pm
I-330 and D-503's relationship	2	36	Aug 14, 2011 06:58am

combine
Other Editions (74)

More editions...

Genres

Science Fiction

250 users

Science Fiction > Dystopia

234 users

Classics

177 users

Cultural > Russia

135 users

Literature

60 users

Literature > Russian Literature

53 users

Novels

25 users

Literature > 20th Century

14 users

Politics

14 users

Science Fiction Fantasy

15 users

See top shelves...

Readers Also Enjoyed

About Yevgeny Zamyatin

Yevgeny Zamyatin (Евгений Замятин) Russian novelist, playwright, short story writer, and essayist, whose famous anti-utopia My (1924, We) prefigured Aldous Huxley's Brave New World (1932), and inspired George Orwell's 1984 (1949). The book was considered a "malicious slander on socialism" in the Soviet Union, and it was not until 1988 when Zamyatin was rehabilitated. In the English-speak...more

More about Yevgeny Zamyatin...

Books by Yevgeny Zamyatin

More…

Share This Book

Facebook Twitter Your website

Pin It

Trivia About We

5 trivia questions

More quizzes & trivia...

Quotes from We

“You are afraid of it because it is stronger than you; you hate it because you are afraid of it; you love it because you cannot subdue it to your will. Only the unsubduable can be loved.” — 108 people liked it

“A human being is like a novel: until the last page you don't know how it will end. Or it wouldn't be worth reading...” — 51 people liked it

More quotes…

Groups That Shelved We

Ex Libris

74 members

last activity Feb 10, 2012 05:58am

shelf: currently-reading

Boxall's 1001 Books You ...

10997 members

last activity 5 hours, 12 min ago

shelf: read

title link	preview: We
avg rating	preview: We Goodreads rating: 3.95 (8296 ratings)
small image	preview: click here [close]
med image	preview: click here [close]
BBCode	[url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/76171.We?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book][img]http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1321919581m/76171.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/76171.We?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book]We by Yevgeny Zamyatin[/url]

We

Friend Reviews

Community Reviews

Readers Also Enjoyed

Share This Book

Share This Book on Your Website