The French Lieutenant's Woman
by John Fowles
|
|
Sign in to Goodreads to see your friends' reviews of The French Lieutenant's Woman.
discuss this book
friend reviews (0)
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
lists with this book
Where's the love? Add this book to your favorite list.
other reviews (showing 1-20 of 1577)
Read in January, 2008
I think the greatest strength of this book is the utter uniqueness of it. I don't think I've ever read a book like it. It is set in the Victorian year of 1867, and yet, the sensibility of the book is thoroughly grounded in the 1960s (when it was written). The language, metaphors, and focus of the book all come from the 1960s, and the actions of the characters are all given the lens of the highly visible author- who is in fact one of the major characters of the book (much in the style of Thackera...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in March, 2008
recommended to Jessica by:
Kevin Quinley
“Darwin’s phrase cryptic coloration: survival by learning to blend with one’s surroundings – with the unquestioned assumption of one’s age or social caste. Or we can explain this flight to formality sociologically. When one is skating over so much thin ice – ubiquitous economic oppression, terror of sexuality, the flood of mechanistic science – the ability to close one’s eyes to one’s own absurd stiffness was essential.” Page 145
This book was superb. Fowles draws the read...more
This book was superb. Fowles draws the read...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in October, 2007
I'm considering having t-shirts made.
They will either be a hodgepodge of John Fowles quotes that I find tremendously thought provoking and profound, a tour date of the freaky head-trips his books have put me on, or quite simply I (Heart) John Fowles.
I don't like this book nearly as much as the other two I've already read this year The Magus or The Collector, and I still think it's better...more
They will either be a hodgepodge of John Fowles quotes that I find tremendously thought provoking and profound, a tour date of the freaky head-trips his books have put me on, or quite simply I (Heart) John Fowles.
I don't like this book nearly as much as the other two I've already read this year The Magus or The Collector, and I still think it's better...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in November, 2007
Fantastic book, and not at all what I expected. I was expecting a contemporary Victorian novel - perhaps a "Scarlett Letter" written in the 1880s. Imagine my surprise upon finding out that, in fact, its this weird, fascinating, post-modern version of a Victorian novel written in the 1960s. So cool. The author narrates his story in an unusual way; it's funny because he goes out of his way to make you remember that it's not just a story, but a story he made up and that he is telling, c...more
Like this review?
yes
(2 people liked it)
add a comment
Read in January, 2008
As a genre, fiction signifies an implicit agreement between storytellers and readers wherein each surrenders to an abstraction of reality. To suggest literature is either created or read inside a vacuum is patently absurd, for instance any user of this site can generalize the interests of another based on their reading list. Consider JK Rowling writing her Harry Potter series in seclusion only to be released upon her death -- would this grant the books more artistic credibility as she was surely...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in March, 2008
This very intriguing post-modern Victorian story left me pleasantly puzzled. I might need to reread the last few chapters again! The author plays with the notion of what it means to be an author and a character in a novel. He even messes with the definition of the novel itself! He inserts himself as the authorial voice, but also a character, and, from time to time, his characters make decisions he didn't make for them. The male lead character, Charles, is endlessly analyzed and his deepest e...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in September, 2007
recommends it for:
anyone who loves victorian novels
The book is set in Lyme, England, with it's wind-swept promenade and small-town feel, as featured in Austen's Persuasion. Most of it's action is concerned really not so much with the wild and invigorating sea as the privacy and fecundity of the forest. The book itself reminds me more of Edith Wharton's The Age of Innocence. You have a young man, much like other young men, except that (like Newland Archer) Charles Smithson has a mind that longs for something beyond the ordinary. He feels an affin...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
I know this book is supposed to be all quirky post-modern/Victorian and that lots of people think it's amazing. Me... not so much. I just got the impression that the author was just a little too pleased with himself and his interjections into the story itself. While I recognize the merit/intelligence of said exposition, I guess I just really wanted a good, straight-forward fiction and not a lesson on the dichotomies of the Victorian psyche or the sly referneces to god, destiny, the power of the ...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in June, 2008
I didn't like this book at all. I don't even know why I finished reading it. I hated the way it was narrated by someone in the 20th century telling a story that takes place in the 19th century. It wouldn't have been so bad if he didn't analyze every difference between modern culture and Victorian culture. He was boringly descriptive with details that didn't even matter. The story was drawn out and I'm not exactly sure what point he was trying to get across. He was trying too hard to be prof...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in January, 1980
I've read and deeply admired three titles by John Fowles: The French Lieutenant's Woman, The Magus, and The Ebony Tower. The French Lieutenant's Woman is also one of those very rare cases where the movie rivals the book in quality.
This one is set in the era of Thomas Hardy, and the language used is such that I found it easy to imagine someone like Hardy reading it and understanding it perfectly. The very subtle blending of that bygone time with the modern time in ...more
This one is set in the era of Thomas Hardy, and the language used is such that I found it easy to imagine someone like Hardy reading it and understanding it perfectly. The very subtle blending of that bygone time with the modern time in ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in July, 2000
Date read should be pretty accurate. Had a professor that saw this as a book about evolution. Not sure I agree, but I enjoyed it nonetheless. Fowles has a maddening style at times, so if you like a straightforward book, this is not for you. I seem to recall Fowles being fond of this book, and there's good reason to be. His ability to capture the conflict between Victorian mores and Victorian action is quite keen, I think, without over-modernizing the players. Don't remember a lot about thi...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in June, 2007
This is the Fowles take on the Victorian novel. I've read reviews by people who were annoyed by the author making himself a character and adding comments about writing the book throughout the narrative, but I believe those are the things that make this book so damn interesting. Its Fowles comments on the Victorian age, looking back from the mid-20th century. I haven't watched the movie, and I don't plan to watch the movie. It may be good, but I really don't want to imagine Meryl Streep (ugh!...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Has a copy to sell/swap
—
Read in June, 2008
This book made my brain hurt. If only because it prefaces each chapter with poetry, uses footnotes, and the author throws himself into the story in a disconcerting way. It does defy what I thought was going to be a conventional "scarlet woman" story. I was intrigued enough with Knowles' style to put "The Magus" on my to-read list.
I did see the movie a few years ago. Why they thought it could be adapted I'll never know.
I did see the movie a few years ago. Why they thought it could be adapted I'll never know.
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in May, 2008
The French Lieutenant's Woman was fairly interesting, although there were an awful lot of coincidences, which I find rather irritating. What I really liked about the book was that it was written about the early 1800's with a 1950's writing style. This made for a better connection with the story and the characters. It also explained certain functions and aspects of society that are always either ignored or glossed over by the writers of that time period.
The ending was badly written, IMHO.
The ending was badly written, IMHO.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in May, 2008
I don't even know what to say about this book. It held no interest to me. Characters were bland despite the lengthy amount of time devoted to drawing them out. About once a chapter John Fowles would say something that was truly profound. It would kind of smack you in the face with its relevance and universality. Immediately following that sentence would be one so steeped in melodrama you would question whether or not you wished to continue reading.
I think I am going to stop now...
I think I am going to stop now...
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in November, 2007
recommended to Ryan by:
M.F.
This is a great story with excellent detail. Many contemporary stories move into the Victorian era and it's a fun time/place to be, but this tale has a narrator who guides the reader along, pointing out interesting sights and comparing our world with the Victorian. The way that the story evolves is interesting, especially chapter 13. I've read The Magus twice and loved it and seen The Collector once. I'm very impressed with all things Fowles so far.
Like this review?
yes
1 comments
Read in January, 2000
I can't remember how much I liked this book. But I think I did....
I loved this quote:
"I know my folly, my blindness to his real character, must seem to a stranger to my nature and circumstances at that time so great that it cannot be but criminal. I can’t hide that. Perhaps I always knew. Certainly some deep flaw in my soul wished my better self to be blinded. And then we had begun by deceiving. Such a path is difficult to reascend, once engaged upon."
I loved this quote:
"I know my folly, my blindness to his real character, must seem to a stranger to my nature and circumstances at that time so great that it cannot be but criminal. I can’t hide that. Perhaps I always knew. Certainly some deep flaw in my soul wished my better self to be blinded. And then we had begun by deceiving. Such a path is difficult to reascend, once engaged upon."
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in May, 2008
recommends it for:
people with hearts and lungs
despite the Victorian, impossibly long sentences, modifiers halfway down the page sentences, have to re-read the damn sentences numerous times to piece it together as intended sentences...Fowles nails the ideas of progress and evolution. He helped me understand Victorian ideal and repression and how that fits with human-ness in general, how substance and form do not go hand in hand.
slow to start, but bear with it. you won't be sorry.
slow to start, but bear with it. you won't be sorry.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in January, 2006
The play on the victorian novel is refreshing and fun, and it's a well realized work of fiction aside. I have a feeling I would've appreciated this more if I'd read it when it was first released, but by the time I'd gotten to it a lot of the neat tricks had already been beaten into the ground by hackish authors. Still, Fowels is a talented writer, and the neat tricks are just part of the novel. Excellent characters, pacing, and plot.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
I first read this book when two or three of my English professors named it as among their favorites. I think I need to read it at least three more times though to feel like I really understand what it's getting at. The most impressive thing about it is that halfway through, it totally changes genres. It's really something. I hate to use such a cliche, but I'm going to anyway...It blew me away! It's really an amazing book.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
