Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Would You Eat Your Cat?” as Want to Read:
Would You Eat Your Cat?
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Would You Eat Your Cat?

3.31 of 5 stars 3.31  ·  rating details  ·  213 ratings  ·  38 reviews
Philosophers have been devising conundrums and thought experiments to stretch the mind for more than two millennia. They are motivated by the idea that the way we try to solve such things tells us something about ourselves and how we see the world. Reflecting carefully upon a particular moral dilemma provides an insight into our overall views on morality and can affect the ...more
Paperback, 144 pages
Published April 25th 2010 (first published 2010)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Would You Eat Your Cat?, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Would You Eat Your Cat?

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 830)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
I won this book from a giveaway. I entered said giveaway because of the book title and cover photo. That little cat is so cute! But when I got the book and saw that it had to do with ethics, I started thinking I should stop picking my books based on the cuteness of the cover and actually read the description. However, everything turned out okay in the end.

Would You Eat Your Cat: Key Ethical Conundrums and What They Tell You About Yourself was a little book with a lot of punch. It
I received this book through the Goodreads First Reads program.

Perhaps my hopes were too high for this book. It certainly belongs nowhere near an Ethics classroom. The explanations of the philosophical schools of thought are at once too oversimplified and too extreme. The offered results to the proposed dilemmas are frustrating for all of the wrong reasons. The conundrums issued are mostly contrived to the point of being subjective, and the arguments are restrictive, deficient and leave the read
Brief vignettes explore ethical issues in entertaining thought-provoking ways. The vignettes (and questions they raise) form the first half of the book. The second half is devoted to examining the philosophical underpinnings of each conundrum. My only complaint would be with the format which forces the reader to flip back and forth a lot.

Outside of minor format issues, this would be a great book to use in teaching critical thinking skills. The entries are short and straightforward - but each in
Kristi Fenske
I received this book as part of Goodreads first reads giveaway.

I enjoyed philosophy thoroughly in college. By far was not my major but it plays very well into my career as a nurse. Would You Eat Your Cat? by Jeremy Stangroom brings a light and easy to digest introduction to philosophy and ethical decisions thankfully we are generally not faced with. From preventing the Holocaust to banning drunk sex this book both entertains and challenges your way of thinking. And to answer the
Jan 20, 2012 Elske rated it 2 of 5 stars
Shelves: own
For me, the best thing about the book is the cover.
It lacks depth and it discusses ethical dilemma's with a very black-and-white view of the world, while especially in these areas some subtlety is required. And next to that, it skips over a lot of arguments as well.

I wouldn't recommend this book to anyone, unless you want to have a book that looks cool in your bookcase.
Accessible and amusing little introduction to philosophy in regards to moral standards. Set up much like the quizzes in women's magazines, it has an amusing story illustrating a moral dilemma, then goes into the theories surrounding these dilemmas and give a quick rundown as to how these form part of our world views. Very easy and accessible read.
Rok Kralj
A simple outline of some key ethical dilemmas; the book could profit significantly from some more philosophical depth, yet it makes up for that with its clever wit.
Won on Goodreads Giveaways

Life is filled with moral and ethical dilemmas. Often times, these result in decisions which can be considered to be a double standard. What do these situations and the ways you handle them truly indicate? Jermy Stangroom tries to answer this question in “Would You Eat Your Cat? Key Ethical Conundrums And What They Tell You About Yourself”.

“Would You Eat Your Cat?” is not a standard philosophical or psychology book. Rather than present a scientific thesis (one can’t
What a title right?

I am giving this book two stars but here is my disclaimer: I did not find this a particularly thoughtful or meaningful book, but I am sure some people would thoroughly enjoy it.

I thought, initially, this book was going to teater the line between deeply thoughtful and poppy fluff. It ended up morphing into a 200 page magazine personality test, complete with answers in the back of the book.

Some of the questions in the book include: Was it right to eat the cat? Is torture under
Marjorie Elwood
A fun book that presents various ethical choices and then delineates the different positions and arguments that there are around those choices. A little repetitive at times. The pictures of the cats are very cute.
So this was a pretty compelling read, I think it showed arguments for some great moral dilemmas. However what keeps this from being 5 stars is that the book lacks in the moral aptitude testing. There's no analysis based on your opinions of the arguments. Only analysis of the arguments themselves. I would have liked to see more in the way of what your answers say about you as a moral individual. The given "moral compass" is just a terse recap of the arguments given not in anyway a detailed analys ...more
Great book. It's fun to sit around with your friends and actually discuss it. It really makes you think. It's only 15$ and definitely one of my greater buys
Alannah Marie
I found this book fun, quirky and interesting. I love it. I even turned it into a game for my friends. My only wish is that there was more in it.
Adrian Jackson
Lots to think about. A great read!
I won this book in a goodreads first reads giveaway. I am not a big fan of philosophy and that seems to be the point of this book. Therefore, I was not a huge fan of this book. I do not like having to go from the front of the book to read the scenario to the back to read what is says about me morally. Also the quick decisions do not have any responses. I think this book should have combined the two sections and been a little more to the point. It was a quick read though!
Bea Bolinger
This book was a delight to read. I loved flipping back and forth from the questions to the responses, it reminded me of those choose-your-own-adventure stories. I can't wait to pass this book along and spend an evening discussing its various points. Great food for thought!
Oh, the Kelley!
I received this book from a First Reads giveaway. My husband and I were excited to delve into these moral dilemmas, but for the most part we weren't too enthused by what was in the book. Many of these dilemmas weren't as interesting or challenging as we were expecting. Although, despite that, it was still an entertaining, and somewhat thorough, book.
Dianne Landry
What a stupid book! The title caught my eye and I thought the premise would make it interesting. Boy, was I wrong. Not one of these so called ethical conundrums was even slightly plausible. I mean really, should androids be tried for murder? Fortunately, it was so small I had it read in under an hour.All in all a compete waste of paper and ink.
I received this book through the First Reads giveaway program on Goodreads.

An interesting read that shows some promise with interesting conundrums such as should we sacrifice one life to save five, but lacks the straightforward argument needed when looking at the philosophy of personality.

Stacey Franklin
What I liked & disliked most about this book was the same thing - the simplistic approach. On one hand, it makes these conundrums accessible to a wider audience, but on the other hand I found many examples frustratingly short of all the info I personally would need to make a decision. 2.5ish
Simplistic, and generally manages to dance around each issue. The moral barometer sections pigeonhole people based on very cursory assumptions. Interesting concept for a book, but more gloss than substance. It makes a better conversation piece than a philosophical read.
Molly G
Have not finished it cover to cover, but the introduction advises not to in one continuous go: keep returning to it throughout life. Having read much of it in sequence, and bits of it at random, alone for contemplation and in company for discussion, I'm taking a break.
Ignoring important issues and few interesting questions make for a very generous 2 star rating. This would be an ideal book for those who do not readily question themselves on how they think things through - admittedly not a weakness of mine.
Clever idea, but overly simplistic and a bit too McBook for me. It has too many pictures and graphics and such, making it like the short book version of "USA Today."
Yet another book of ethical conundrums. But the cover and title caught my eye and I like the presentation of the questions and "Response" evaluations.
Vanessa Wolf
Nice short philosophy book, not much of a range beyond Western philosophy, if you liked "Plato and the Platypus" you'll probably like it.
Kathleen Dixon
A nicely presented book. It's lightweight, not for a person seriously interested in studying ethics, but for a person interested in what it's about.
Helen Gallagher
You can't judge this one by its cover. It is a fascinating book about ethical decisions and the choices we make. Watch for my review next week.
Negar Bahadori
The brevity and simplicity of the ideas presented - appreciated, but some parts are overdone in terms of drama.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 27 28 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Science of Sin: The Psychology of the Seven Deadlies (and Why They Are So Good For You)
  • The Pig That Wants to Be Eaten: 100 Experiments for the Armchair Philosopher
  • Moral Origins: The Evolution of Virtue, Altruism, and Shame
  • Justice for Hedgehogs
  • Introducing Logic
  • A Very Bad Wizard: Morality Behind the Curtain
  • 101 Ethical Dilemmas
  • Second Nature: Brain Science and Human Knowledge
  • A Companion to Ethics (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy)
  • Heidegger and a Hippo Walk Through Those Pearly Gates: Using Philosophy (and Jokes!) to Explore Life, Death, the Afterlife, and Everything in Between
  • The Bailey Game
  • Life, Sex and Ideas: The Good Life Without God
  • Mayan Ouroboros: The Cosmis Cycles Come Full Circle: The True Positive Mayan Prophecy is Revealed
  • Selected Shorts and Other Methods of Time Travel
  • Normative Ethics
  • Scared Sick: The Role of Childhood Trauma in Adult Disease
  • Principia Ethica (Philosophical Classics)
  • The Secret Family: 24 Hours Inside the Mysterious World of Our Minds and Bodies
Jeremy Stangroom is a British writer, editor, and website designer. He is an editor and co-founder, with Julian Baggini, of The Philosophers’ Magazine, and has written and edited several philosophy books. He is also co-founder, with Ophelia Benson of the website 'Butterflies and Wheels'.
More about Jeremy Stangroom...
Do You Think What You Think You Think? Einstein's Riddle: Riddles, Paradoxes, and Conundrums to Stretch Your Mind Little Book of Big Ideas: Philosophy The Great Philosophers (From Socrates to Foucault) What Philosophers Think

Share This Book