Women with Mustaches and Men without Beards: Gender and Sexual Anxieties of Iranian Modernity
Drawing from a rich array of visual and literary material from nineteenth-century Iran, this groundbreaking book rereads and rewrites the history of Iranian modernity through the lens of gender and sexuality. Peeling away notions of a rigid pre-modern Islamic gender system, Afsaneh Najmabadi provides a compelling demonstration of the centrality of gender and sexuality to t...more
Paperback, 377 pages
Published April 25th 2005 by University of California Press
(first published 2005)
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
(showing 1-30 of 233)
Feb 10, 2013 Michael rated it 4 of 5 stars Recommends it for: Feminists, Historians, Students of the Middle East
Recommended to Michael by: Karen Hagemann
I read this book late in my career as a grad student in history, and it was one of the better recent studies I saw demonstrating the use of gender as a category of analysis where previous scholars had found little to say about gender or even women. "The sources," feminist historians are frequently told, "are all about men." Najmabadi turns this conception of its head, as she demonstrates that Iranian notions of gender, gender-desire, and the role of women were far more fluid traditionally, and o...more
Najmabadi draws upon visual and literary material from nineteenth-century Iran during the Qajar period to demonstrate the centrality of gender and sexuality to the shaping of modern culture and politics in Iran. Najmabadi’s book has transformed and moved beyond the traditional historiography of gender in Muslim societies. Unlike other feminist historians of Iran who have traditionally been dedicated to exploring the role of women and their agency within heterosexual and patriarchal relations of...more
Apr 12, 2008 Amy rated it 4 of 5 stars Recommends it for: Women's/Gender/Sexuality Studies, historians
Recommended to Amy by: Read it for "History of Masculinities" with Louise Newman
This book's argument is pretty convincing, engaging, interesting, etc., but it's not the most well-written or well-organized book I've ever read. I think she uses too much passive voice and should have moved this one chapter to the back, but whatever.