by
3.45 of 5 stars
This story takes place about 100 years in the future, when the earth's population is fed principally from the sea--on whale products or from plank... read full description

reviews

Jan 19, 2011
Erik rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Adding covers to GoodReads is particularly interesting when one comes up with one for a book read long ago. This one brings back memories.

I was fourteen, finishing up eighth grade at Lincoln Junior H.S. in Park Ridge when an infection arose under my left eyeball, causing a high fever and swelling that side of my face to such proportions that when my grandmother came to check in on me while Mother was at work, I saw her face react with horror before she regained her composure.
More...
0 comments like (1 person liked it)
Feb 21, 2010
Raj rated it: 2 of 5 stars
After a tragedy in space, Walter Franklin finds salvation in the depths of the ocean, becoming a warden of the whales, shepherding them as they grow until they are taken to the slaughter to provide food and other resources for the world.

This wasn't one of Clarke's better efforts, I'm afraid. I found the pace somewhat stilted and the style unengaging (although Clarke was a keen diver himself, he doesn't seem to have got his sense of wonder into this one). The book feels incredibly optim More...
Oct 18, 2010
Andrew rated it: 2 of 5 stars
I read almost all of the Arthur C Clarke books as a teenager and really loved them. Re-reading this book after all those years makes you realise how the world and yourself has changed. This book is science fiction, but it has really dated - hardly any of it is prophetic, in fact, quite the opposite. It was written in the late 1950's and is set at around 2020, however, it has 1950's values. Basically, it's about commercial whale farming - a concept that would be totally abhorrent today - alon More...
May 06, 2009
Petr rated it: 4 of 5 stars
It is very sad that the Ocean (which by words of some number guys takes up 72% of Earth surface) receives so little in the department of sci-fi literature. Yes, many stories includes Ocean as a background or even "ground", many uses it as a scenery, some even try to make it alien life from. But how many takes Ocean as a system "environment<=>human"? I'm not talking about scientific papers or longwinded dreams of "what if?", I'm talking about stories where auth More...
Oct 27, 2010
Judy rated it: 4 of 5 stars


This captivating story comes from Clarke's other life as a deep sea explorer. Though it is set in the future, when much of Earth's food supply comes from algae and farmed whales, it also falls in the category of extreme adventure.

Don Burley is a whale shepherd, keeping the herds safe from predators. He gets unwillingly pulled off that job and asked to train the mysterious Walt Franklin, a former spacer with some undisclosed past incident that left him subject to panic More...
Apr 19, 2011
Andreas rated it: 1 of 5 stars
In the future (as seen from 1957), submersible game wardens herd whales around underwater ranges. The whales are food animals which, along with equally farmed seaweed, have solved the world’s food supply problems. The story is about an ex-engineer on a spaceliner who suffered an accident and gets a new start as a warden.

This book has aged quite badly. While much of Clarke’s space based science fiction can be read with enjoyment today, this one is just plain tedious. So tedious, in fact More...
Jul 29, 2011
Andrew rated it: 2 of 5 stars
This story has some interesting ideas about the future (now) from a 1950s perspective. It is terrribly disjointed however, unable to find a clear direction. In broad terms I suppose it could be viewed as an overview of the life of a man unable to find satisfaction in anything he does.
Jul 31, 2009
Jake rated it: 4 of 5 stars
The Deep Range is an important Arthur C. Clarke novel because it is devoted to the ocean, as was Clarke all throughout his life. It’s been quite awhile since I read this one, but I remember really enjoying it. Again, the setting played a big part in my enjoyment. The vast oceans of Earth merit the same type of exploration we give the solar system.

As with other books, Clarke takes a stab at philosophy, leaving much to muse upon. Is killing a bug minding its own business amoral? If al More...
0 comments like (1 person liked it)
Nov 22, 2008
Kitty rated it: 2 of 5 stars
I read this one a long time ago, so I don't really remember it. My notes indicate that I only rated it "so-so", but that it did bring up some interesting environmental and vegetarian ideas.
Jul 30, 2011
Lyn rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Very good book, highly entertaining.
Jan 11, 2012
John rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Grade A.
Aug 16, 2011
Bill rated it: 3 of 5 stars
I can now say I've read a book by Arthur C Clarke. If I read more often for leisure, I'd probabloy read a few more.
Aug 27, 2008
Rae rated it: 2 of 5 stars
This was originally written in 1957 and I enjoyed the futuristic elements in the plot....but that's about all I liked. Clarke introduces plotlines that are quickly resolved or abandoned and the whole book seems to really go nowhere. I was disappointed because I had read another of his novels and enjoyed it.
Jun 05, 2009
Charles rated it: 4 of 5 stars
I believe I first read this novel in an omnibus edition of Clarke's work, under the title, From the Ocean, From the Stars. This one is the Ocean part of that.
Sep 16, 2008
Michael rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Meh. As usual, tons of fascinating ideas from Clarke But the story sort of meanders around. 3.5 stars, I'd say.
Sep 06, 2008
Ian rated it: 4 of 5 stars
All the the glory that is Arthur C. Clarke
Feb 12, 2012
Robert rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Feb 11, 2012
Evil rated it: 2 of 5 stars
Feb 10, 2012
Pt rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Feb 08, 2012
Carol rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Feb 07, 2012
Lysergius rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Feb 04, 2012
Tuomo rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Feb 03, 2012
Si marked it as to-read
Jan 31, 2012
The Mole's rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Jan 31, 2012
Susannah rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Jan 30, 2012
Brian rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Jan 29, 2012
Raf rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Jan 28, 2012
Gt rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Jan 28, 2012
David marked it as to-read
Jan 27, 2012
Joshua rated it: 3 of 5 stars