Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our Future” as Want to Read:
Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our Future
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our Future

3.47  ·  Rating Details  ·  695 Ratings  ·  96 Reviews
Climate change, the energy crisis, nuclear proliferation—many of the most urgent problems of the twenty-first century require scientific solutions, yet America is paying less and less attention to scientists. For every five hours of cable news, less than one minute is devoted to science, and the number of newspapers with science sections has shrunk from ninety-five to thir ...more
Paperback, 240 pages
Published June 8th 2010 by Basic Books (first published 2009)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Unscientific America, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Unscientific America

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,869)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Jul 02, 2010 John rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
The subtitle of this book is something of a misnomer: the authors (rightly, in my opinion) take it for granted that the high (and, arguably, rising) rate of scientific illiteracy -- among the public in general but most importantly among politicians -- is damaging our society and, through the corresponding muddled thinking about such matters as AGW, threatening our future. Really, the subject of their book is what can be done to cure, or at least ameliorate the effects of, this dire situation.

Oct 16, 2015 Richard marked it as to-read-3rd  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Richard by: Down to a Science Science Café
Dunno if I'll make the time to read this. That 'Muricans are getting really bad at dealing with science is a truism; as someone whose daily entertainment time budget leans heavily towards science podcasts, I don't need any more lessons in how true this is.

But I can immediately see at least four reasons why this might be so, and other reviews inform me that the authors have ignored what I suspect are the most problematic.

First, does our education system do a decent job of laying the foundation? N
Feb 26, 2011 Mark rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction, science

I read this for a story I'm working on and to interview the author. It's about novella size, a quick read, and well articulated in its depiction of how woeful the state of our knowledge is on science, and perhaps more disturbing, how we have lost a basic respect for scientific inquiry and findings in present-day America and much of the western world.

Mooney, a science journalist, and Kirshenbaum, a scientist/writer, won my respect particularly in their sections about the conflicts between science
This book wasn't exactly what I expected, but I enjoyed it nonetheless. It made some good points about how little we as a society understand science.

I liked the non-polemical nature of the book - it wasn't just a cranky "you guys don't understand science" rant, followed by a variety of test results showing how ignorant society is. Instead, the book looks at the ways in which scientists and the science community don't do a good enough job of making their findings and their work relevant and acces
Tippy Jackson
I was really hoping for more from this short book. In the first chapter, the author identifies the rift between scientists and the American public. At first I was excited because rather than just pointing to statistics, the media and generally blaming the public for not caring, he identifies problems within the scientific community that also contribute to this divide. Many of the things he mentions I've personally encountered and they were things that have bothered me for a while. So, when he st ...more
Tracy Black
First, the subtitle, "How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our Future", is very misleading. It was not at all about scientific illiteracy. It focused entirely on America's view of science and scientists, i.e. how important it is to us, our level of trust of scientists, and our interest in staying up to date. Not what I expected, but still interesting.
The 2 stars is because most of the book focused on the scientist's inablility to communicate with politicians and the general public. I strongly dis
Oct 12, 2009 David rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Carl Sagan, in his 1995 book “The Demon-Haunted World,” issued this sober warning:

"We’ve arranged a global civilization in which most crucial elements profoundly depend on science and technology. We have also arranged things so that almost no one understands science and technology. This is a prescription for disaster. We might get away with it for a while, but sooner or later this combustible mixture of ignorance and power is going to blow up in our faces."

As Mooney and Kirschenbaum observe, “At
Dan Arel
Jul 09, 2012 Dan Arel rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: science, education
I had a tough time picking 3 or 4 stars. I decided to go with 4 because even though I didnt agree with everything said, I did find it well written and very much worth reading.

The Good: The authors spell out why America is so far behind in science. They show the problems with our education, our attention span, media coverage, politics and more. They make a great case to why science is important and talk a lot about how scientists need to be more outgoing in trying to connect with the general publ
Aug 08, 2009 Craig rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
In this tone-deaf and ineffectual booklet, authors Mooney and Kirshenbaum demonstrate a decidedly pro-science position, but are simultaneously nursing a strong disdain for its practitioners. This unfortunately serves to sabotage their efforts of providing any sort of enlightenment. The authors are often quite effective in identifying important problems regarding science in American society, but consistently miss the mark when it comes to placing blame or in suggesting solutions.

For example, the
Oct 03, 2009 Grace rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Lynda so she could give me her perspective
Forty-six percent of Americans believe the Earth is less than 10,000 years old.

Only 18 percent of Americans know a scientist personally and even fewer than that can name the government's top two scientific agencies.

When asked to name their scientific role models, 44 percent of Americans had no clue. Out of those who did respond, many chose Al Gore and Bill Gates.

Many Americans cannot answer these true/false questions correctly:
"Electrons are smaller than atoms, true or false."
"The universe be
Nov 16, 2009 Bridgid rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction
Although the book scratched at the surface of compelling topics, I found it too slim to satisfy my interest. Very little is mentioned of George W Bush's policies (though that is likely addressed in Mooney's somewhat outdated 2005 title Republican War on Science). The authors tried to make an argument that Sagan was belittled by his colleagues because his public profile was too prominent, but they only devoted 2 pages to this. I agree with their central arguments that we don't need a general publ ...more
Craig Werner
May 26, 2015 Craig Werner rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: science
A decent conversation starter, but that's about it. The authors, a working scientist and a science journalist, correctly identify the proverbial "failure to communicate" as one of the primary causes of the worsening of the "two cultures" split (now a multi-culture split) that degrades the quality of public conversation about scientific issues in the U.S. While they argue against the "deficit model" of the problem, reflected in the laments over the scientific illiteracy of the general public eman ...more
Jul 24, 2014 Jordan rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Frankly speaking, this book was bullshit. From tired, sexist tropes about what scientists look and act like (unattractive! antisocial! white men!) that he obviously only researched from the Big Bang Theory to the entire point of the book being that scientists are mostly to blame for the scientific illiteracy of America. He was completely unwilling to put some of the blame on himself, even though the media plays a huge role in the lowered role of science. It completely glossed over the policy iss ...more
Joe Krudys
I really had trouble giving this one a rating. I didn't want to give it 3 stars, as I thought the book provided some interesting facts, and some well thought out insights, and I didn't want to pull down the overall rating of a book that addresses the problem of scientific literacy and science communication. However, I also didn't want to give it 4 stars, because I didn't think it deserved it. There were many things I didn't particularly agree with, which I'll get to in a little bit. So.....the G ...more
I picked this book up because several of my GR friends read or rated Unscientific America and because it was on display in the downtown library. I saw the book on the shelf, recognized it from GR friend reviews and thought to go ahead and read Mooney's book to better myself.

I agree with several other reviews here; the ostentatious title of this book is misleading. there is more information here about the rise and fall of scientific research here in the US of A than correlative statistics regardi
Jul 06, 2012 Dan rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
It is nice to know that someone else thinks the way I do. I, however, been to known to become rather combative when confronted with someone that is scientifically illiterate.
Daniel Willers
Feb 16, 2010 Daniel Willers rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This book is more polical than I thought, but overall I thought it was good. The premise of the book is that people in the US are not as literate in science as they really ought to be, or were a generation or two ago. It then goes on to lay a lot of blame for why this is.

While it blames the Bush administration (warning, this is pervasive, but not horribly so), the majority of the blame goes to the scientific community in general. The lack of communication skills; properly interfacing with politi
A short book that argues that while scientific illiteracy is a fact, there are many forces at work. It isn't just the education system or the media or government policy. Scientists themselves are encouraged to take responsibility for doing a better job of communicating complex ideas. The authors consider Carl Sagan to be the 'poster boy' for a scientist who could communicate with the public.

The book calls for communication training to be part of the education of young scientists.

If you tune into
Maughn Gregory
"Again and again, we find a disturbing disconnect between the knowledge contained in our greatest minds and how we live our lives, set our policies, define our identities, and inform and entertain ourselves." (p. 4)

I heard Mooney interviewed on a Point of Inquiry podcast ( and was so impressed that I ran out and read this book: a concise, insightful treatment of lots of topics that interest me, especially:

* How the work of science differs from that of pol
Tom Meyer
"A Brief Hagiography of Carl Sagan" and "Until the Last Republican Has Been Strangled by the Entrails of the Last New Atheist" would both have made superior subtitles. It's not that Kirshenbaum and Mooney are bereft of ideas, it's that they oversell their good ones while making fools of themselves otherwise.

Their two genuinely good ideas are to deflate the culture war aspects of science debate by appealing to the middle, and to vastly increase the number and quality of science ambassadors. Their
Mary Spiro
Jul 27, 2009 Mary Spiro rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The term science literacy often refers to how much we can remember from science class in high school. Journalist Chris Mooney and scientist Sheril Kirshenbaum, authors of Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future, contend that science literacy extends beyond whether we can name the planets or know how long it takes for the earth to revolve around the sun. Science, they say, should be as much a part of our everyday lives as shopping, work, leisure, and even worship.
In e
Nov 15, 2011 Cheryl rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction, science
This book brings three things I love together: science, politics and snark. It is an interesting history of the portrayal and perception of science.

However, in Part 2, the snark soon becomes bitter and accusatory. The first author, who is a journalist, seems upset that ScienceDebate2008, which was put on by two Hollywood writers, wasn't as successful as he hoped it would be. Justifiable, but it comes out sounding whiny and as if from a child throwing a tantrum. He plays to stereotypes and calls
Sep 20, 2009 Erin rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
A discussion of the acceptance of science by the American general public. It explains how we went from the gung-ho days of post-Sputnik science promotion to the current situation, in which people distrust science and think evolution is dangerous to their religions. It appears that the culprits are scientists themselves, who have tendencies to be abrasive (like the New Atheists movement) or unwilling/unable to successfully share their work with the public, and the media, which have cut science re ...more
Mar 19, 2010 Jane rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Caitlin, Marlene, Margy, Sarah
Scientists' lack of skills in communicating the importance of their discoveries, and the media's lack of attention to science because it can't be encapsulated in sound bites, have starved the public of information on which our future depends, claim the authors.
Americans are more interested in a final product than in the scientific process and are suspicious of deep intellectual pursuits. (Read Richard Hofstader's 1962 book "Anti-Intellectualism in American Life"). The media conglomerates, answer
Brette Chapin
The title of this book, “Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future”, is misleading. I expected the authors to take a pro-scientist, pro-education approach, but for most of the book I felt that they were playing the blame-game. More surprising still is that they seem to find scientists heavily at fault. They start out by discussing the “demotion” of Pluto from its status as a planet and criticizing this decision as largely based on semantics. They also object to the dec ...more
C. Derick
Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum's book Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy threatens our future is both interesting and odd. The book has generated much controversy, many negative reviews, and actually many themes in the book have been further and more clearly developed in Mooney and Kirshenbaum's blogging and article writing in the last year. If anything my complaints are that the book is too short and thus several interesting themes are undeveloped, data seems rhetorically mull ...more
Sep 18, 2012 earthy rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: nonfiction
Intriguing (and scary!) look at the divide between science and politics. While the overall concept is absolutely vital to our world (science and, more specifically, WHY IT MATTERS, needs to be conveyed far more accurately and regularly to the general public) the authors didn't go as deeply as I would've liked into what should actually be done. Other than touting their own grassroots attempt to get politicians to debate science issues in 2008 (which garnered only moderate attention), the text see ...more
Sep 22, 2013 J.P. rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
It was a decent book. It didn't really go into too much depth in regards to the problems America faces in it's stance on science & how it is viewed & consumed by the general public. The books is very brief. It also doesn't hesitate to criticize on some missed opportunities by those in the scientific community itself, a good example being it's reaction to Carl Sagan & his popularization of science. They get mad that the public doesn't understand it but when someone makes that task a l ...more
Feb 12, 2010 Brad rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
This book had an excellent premise, but ultimately failed to completely deliver. The authors, whose shared blog I have long enjoyed, make a convincing, if intuitive, argument of the embarrassing grasp of basic science in America today. The arguments regarding polling data, the failing of the media, and the influence of fundamental religion are sound and have long since been the concern of many astute observers. The authors deserve kudos for their artful articulation. Further, I personally have a ...more
Danielle Spitzer
Dec 09, 2013 Danielle Spitzer rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
In their novel Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our Future, Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum analyze the various causes of plight of mainstream scientific literacy and the consequences it will have on our nation in the near and distant future. In particular, they discuss the rifts science has formed with politics, the press, the entertainment industry, and the religious community. Mooney and Kirshenbaum do not fall into the biased trap of many scientists, who solely ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 62 63 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Don't Be Such a Scientist: Talking Substance in an Age of Style
  • Fool Me Twice: Fighting the Assault on Science in America
  • Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud
  • Denialism: How Irrational Thinking Hinders Scientific Progress, Harms the Planet, and Threatens Our Lives
  • The Borderlands of Science: Where Sense Meets Nonsense
  • Experiment Eleven: Dark Secrets Behind the Discovery of a Wonder Drug
  • Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science
  • Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy
  • The Skeptic's Dictionary: A Collection of Strange Beliefs, Amusing Deceptions, and Dangerous Delusions
  • The Science of Liberty: Democracy, Reason and the Laws of Nature
  • A Field Guide for Science Writers: The Official Guide of the National Association of Science Writers
  • Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk
  • March of the Microbes: Sighting the Unseen
  • The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance, and Strangeness of Insect Societies
  • Nobel Prize Women in Science: Their Lives, Struggles, and Momentous Discoveries
  • Terror Incorporated: Tracing the Dollars Behind the Terror Networks
  • Only a Theory: Evolution and the Battle for America's Soul
  • Scientists Confront Creationism: Intelligent Design and Beyond

Goodreads is hiring!

If you like books and love to build cool products, we may be looking for you.
Learn more »
Chris Mooney is a science and political journalist, blogger, podcaster, and experienced trainer of scientists in the art of communication. He is the author of four books, including the New York Times bestselling The Republican War on Science and the forthcoming The Republican Brain: The Science of Why They Deny Science and Reality (April 2012). He blogs for "Science Progress," a website of the Cen ...more
More about Chris C. Mooney...

Share This Book