Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Pemberley Shades” as Want to Read:
Pemberley Shades
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Pemberley Shades

3.58  ·  Rating Details ·  508 Ratings  ·  59 Reviews
Originally published in 1949, the unusual plot takes the Darcys into the realm of the Gothic.

Mr. Darcy must appoint a new rector at Pemberley, which affords the author the opportunity to introduce a host of new characters to mingle with the beloved and familiar ones of Jane Austen.

A delightfully witty plot, full of surprises:

"Who could have foretold that Dr. Robinson, who
ebook, 0 pages
Published September 1st 2008 by Sourcebooks, Incorporated (first published 1949)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Pemberley Shades, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Pemberley Shades

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
It is with great pleasure that I learned that the classic Pride and Prejudice sequel, Pemberley Shades by Dorothy Alice Bonavia-Hunt, would be re-issued in September by Sourcebooks. Originally published in 1949, it was the second Jane Austen sequel ever to be written and not easily available for purchase unless you were lucky enough to find a small boutique publisher’s edition or a second-hand copy offered at outrageous prices for a first edition. Having existed as the ultimate mysterious and al ...more
Meredith (Austenesque Reviews)
Unlike some sequels that start immediately where "Pride and Prejudice" ends, in "Pemberley Shades" we drop in on the Darcy's during their third year of marriage. We see that things haves settled nicely for them, they have established a routine, and learned much about each other. In the midst of this "happily ever after" Darcy searches for a new rector for his parish and has trouble finding anyone who can measure up to his standards (he most likely will not choose anyone who gives any resemblance ...more
Sheila Majczan
May 20, 2015 Sheila Majczan rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Sep 09, 2015 Katherine rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
The writing style of this author was great! The way Darcy and Elizabeth's marriage was portrayed was just perfect - in character, in time period and realistic. Darcy must pick a new vicar for Pemberley and the one recommended to him by an old friend is a mystery in himself. I wouldn't describe this novel as gothic but a slight mystery - nothing too shocking. Some of my suspicions proved true whereas others did not so I enjoyed the novel. Very well written! I'd love to read so,wing by this author ...more
Pemberley Shades, originally published in 1949, is widely considered to not only be the first Pride and Prejudice sequel, but first published form of FanFiction. Bonavia-Hunt’s writing style is great; she conjures up beautiful images of Pemberley and the surrounding area, and characters that are true and believable because they are all flawed, all well-developed.

Yet, I thought the story was lacking that spark, that something special that kept it moving. It’s get dull at times with too many walks
Dec 26, 2013 Lynn rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Pemberley Shades by D. A. Bonavia-Hunt is subtitled “a lightly Gothic tale of Mr. and Mrs. Darcy,” but very little happens that could justifiably be termed as sinister or bizarre. There is a mystery about one character’s true identity, but we are informed of that almost immediately and Bonavia-Hunt is unable to create a sense of danger or suspense; even when the person who is not Stephen Acworth is making improper declarations or has one or another of the ladies alone. The depiction of character ...more
Georgiana 1792
A few SHADES, more lights

Pemberley Shades fu pubblicato per la prima volta nel 1949 ed è il secondo sequel in assoluto di Orgoglio e Pregiudizio. Al contrario di Old Friends and New Fancies — il primo sequel di Sybil G. Brinton, scritto nel 1913 — D. A. Bonavia-Hunt poteva dare un volto ai suoi protagonisti. L’immaginario collettivo, infatti, poteva immaginare Mr Darcy come Sir Laurence Olivier ed Elizabeth Bennet come Greer Garson.
Non sappiamo se la Bonavia-Hunt abbia visto il film — molto poco
Jul 19, 2011 Loralee rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Jane Austen fans
Recommended to Loralee by: Laurie
Shelves: chick-lit
I have read Pride and Prejudice several times. It's my favorite Jane Austen book (I've read everything she's written.) When my sister-in-law told me about this sequel, I was intrigued. Who doesn't want to know the "rest of the story?"

This book picks up a few years after Elizabeth and Darcy are wed. They now have a precocious 2 year old son. They are living together very happily, in spite of Aunt Catherine's dire predictions that their marriage is doomed. However, the need to hire a new rector a
Feb 17, 2010 Monica rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Two words to describe this sequel: simplistic and refreshing.

The writing style and storyline had a simple elegance to it. And while the plot was predictable in places, it was straightforward and believable. As this sequel was published in 1949, the author had no preconceived movie version of Darcy and Elizabeth, and therefore character development stemmed purely from her interpretation of Austen's original work. It was a nice change of pace to read a story written for the original characters an
Oct 14, 2012 Victoria rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: austen, reviewed
I loved it! I thought the prose was excellent, but this may have a lot to do with the story being written in 1949 as well as Bonavia-Hunt's life experiences. I deeply enjoyed the "mystery", and was most please about the conclusion. I was surprised with the omission of characters we regularly see in sequels, such as Col. Fitzwilliam, but I liked the new characters very much. I was most impressed with Bonavia-Hunt's characterization of the original characters, it was very authentic and captivating ...more
May 15, 2017 Kimberly rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
For all those that love Jane Austen, this is a must read. Thoroughly enjoyed.
Aug 25, 2008 Becky rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
What can I say about this one? Me, the skeptic who remains ever-doubtful that the perfect sequel exists? I loved this one! I did! Last week, I talked about what I expected out of an Austen sequel..."I don't expect the writer to be Jane Austen. I don't expect her to try to channel Austen when she's writing. I don't expect her to match Austen's literary style or her wit. Just a teeny tiny smidgen of it is good. If she can capture just a small trace of the charm or humor (or both) then that's enoug ...more
Jan 16, 2010 Hannah rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
After all the disastrous results of trying Jane Austen sequels, prequels and other "fanfiction", I was ready to go through yet another cringe-worthy experience when my sister picked this up for me from her school library. Surprisingly, I found this one the most enjoyable Pride and Prejudice sequel I had ever read.

Experience had taught me to lower my expectations and accept that authors would be hard pressed to produce a work that matches Austen's literary style, tone, wit, and also stay generall
I'm not really sure about the "lighty gothic tale", because the gothic theme is only very very veeeery light. But ignoring that, this book is a really good sequel to Pride and Prejudice. I was able to guess most of the plotlines, but it was written in an engaging way and the author managed to stay true to Jane Austen style.

If you're looking for a calm nice return to the world of Pride and Prejudice, then I can higly recommend reading this book.
Jul 26, 2016 Gypsi rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: books-i-own, reviewed
To me Pemberly Shades is the best Jane Austen continuation/imitation that I have read so far. And, being a Jane Austen fanatic, I've read a lot of them! This one has the humor, character depth and interesting plot, not to mention slow, rambling narration style, of Miss Austen herself.

Ms. Bonavia-Hunt set the Austen style on the first page:
"Who could have foretold that Dr. Robinson, who had done nothing of note in all his lifetime should, by the common and natural act of dying, set in motion a t
Apr 17, 2016 Judith rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: jane-austen
This review is based on a different edition (Laughing Man Publications, 2007). I ordered it from a US bookseller via Amazon as it was otherwise unavailable. I had read good reviews and thought I'd give it a try.

I did not expect much, but I was very pleasantly surprised. No, it is not Jane Austen, though the style is similar enough. There were typos and typeset errors in this edition, which makes it apparent that it was self-published and not properly edited.

This aside: I liked it a lot. There is
Carol Perrin
Nov 24, 2014 Carol Perrin rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Pemberley Shades: Pride and Prejudice Continues

Deception and lies do not get passed the Darcys and Gardiners. The Personage is in need of a new Rector of Pemberley. Many responses come to Darcy, including one from Mr. Collins, and Darcy is having difficulties choosing a candidate. One name stands out and Darcy goes to London to interview him. Unbeknownst to Darcy, Stephen Acworth has a brother born from a French actress and his father. Their father dies before he could change his will to include
Apr 30, 2014 Katerina rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: p-p-variations
Now this was fun! According to my knowledge this is the second sequel to Jane Austens novels ever to be written. And I must say this is the first one I really enjoyed reading.
The characters are sort of true to the original characters of Pride and Prejudice, though given the time difference they did developped a bit. Not only Darcy is severe when it comes to propriety but it seems that Elisabeth got that from him also and speaks like a book and seems to be quite unforgiving in situations where I
Dec 16, 2013 Helen rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The first of the P&P "sequels" I've read that really seemed to capture the characters - and produce a story that didn't make me roll my eyes. There's no teeth-clenching passages of Elizabeth admiring Darcy's sexiness, or vice versa; nor does the author seek to punish the characters she dislikes. Instead, this is an at times melodramatic, but surprisingly believable, story of Elizabeth and Darcy dealing with a man who is not what he seems on top of the everyday problems that come from running ...more
Hichelle Håkedal
This novel has a very strong beginning with well-drawn characters. I especially liked the dialogue between Elizabeth and Darcy, and their relationship was believeable. I enjoyed the build up of tension when Mr. Acworth went to stay with them and their reactions to his character.

However, I feel that pacing in middle was way too slow and there are scenes in the book which add nothing at all to overall narrative. This, not doubt, added to the slowing down of the pace and it almost became boring if
Oct 19, 2016 Karen rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
I picked this up because it was such an early (1949) example of a continuation of Pride & Prejudice. It started out quite well. The characters were as they were in P&P, but without much depth. The author told us, rather than really showed us, how attractive and witty Elizabeth is, and how forbidding yet fair and polite Mr. Darcy is. Actually she did show us Mr. Darcy's politeness several times, I'll give her that.

The original characters were decent and reasonable, nothing really special.
May 01, 2011 Rachel rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
I was eager to read this book. I was curious to see what happened to Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy. While this story was interesting in its own right, it was very difficult to get into. It moved slowly. And though easier to read than Pride and Prejudice, it felt like I was being talked at as opposed to enjoying the ride along with the characters. I wish there had been more dialogue as those sections moved quickly and were far more enjoyable to read.
If you are curious about what may have happened to El
I enjoyed this sequel of P&P. It takes place three years after the marriage so we find Elizabeth secure and in charge as Mistress of Pemberely.

The banter between her and Darcy was fun to read and the way Bonavia-Hunt wrote the dialog between them left me in no doubt they were still as much in love and understood each other very well.

I wish Elizabeth hadn't been so slow figuring things out - that made her seem a little dunce. But, seeing as she was SO busy keeping guests, I guess I won't comp
A general comment of the book is that is not bad, or at least it follows the Austen path of characters and places. So, it is a good sequel which is not turned into something too modern, as I have read in some other occasions. Anyway, it is a bit slow. There are too many walks and they are too long, so I guess this book could have been a bit better with less walking around :P What I found strange is that the Bennet family is not much considered, maybe it would have been nice to see Elizzabeth's p ...more
This was an enjoyable P&P sequel. The author did a good job in maintaining the style, language and personalities of the characters P&P fans know and love. The story was interesting, although not really much of a mystery in what occurred, and the new characters that were added were a nice counterpoint to the familiar ones.

There was some fun dialogue between Darcy and Elizabeth, as well as between Elizabeth and several other characters. If you are a Pride & Prejudice fan, I would reco
Sep 15, 2011 Becky rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The author continues the story of Elizabeth Bennet, now married to Mr Darcy. I wasn't expecting to like this story very much, as I imagine it difficult to achieve the literary excellence of Jane Austen. However, the characters were very engaging & the story was fun. Mystery, folly, and manners are very similar to Pride & Prejudice. There are elements of romance but, in my opinion, not nearly as "delicious" as written into Pride & Prejudice. The use of "vintage vocabulary" is aptly ap ...more
Tracie Nichols
Nov 01, 2015 Tracie Nichols rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I somewhat literally stumbled on this title as I was shelving books in a part of the library where we house infrequently circulated older fiction books. The author has mostly achieved the tone and pacing of an Austen work, and the story was not inconsistent with something that might have happened subsequent to the events detailed in Pride & Prejudice. For me, it was an altogether pleasant and well-done read.
Aug 14, 2009 tree rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2009, stars-2
i don't quite understand why this sequel has retained such a legendary status amongst austen fen. the writing isn't bad, but the story itself is predictable. and elizabeth calling darcy "fitz"? please. this edition definitely does a disservice to the author as it's riddled with errors -- missing or randomly inserted punctuation, as well as erroneous and extraneous words -- that made reading a less than enjoyable task.
Gothic? Not so much. One Byronic character and a plot twist given away on the back cover do not a Gothic novel make. A decent P&P sequel? Yes. No vagaries of modern language thrown in willy-nilly here. No Elizabeth-doing-things-that-would-have-her-firmly-tossed-from-society. No random horrible events for the sake of random horrible events. It's fairly light, a quick read, and has some sparkles of wit about it.
Lisa Houlihan
This was actually fine. I read it with pleasure instead of with loathing for both self and text. Perhaps an unrepeatable advantage for this author was to be educated and write before 1950. The plot was reasonable; neither Kitty's nor Georgiana's de-riguer marriage felt forced; Lydia and Mrs. Bennett were absent, which is wise because inimitable; and though also inimitable, Mr. Bennett was in fine form; best of all, conversations between Darcy and Elizabeth rang truthyish.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Darcy Cousins
  • Darcy and Anne
  • A Match For Mary Bennet: Can A Serious Young Lady Ever Find Her Way To Love?
  • First Impressions: A Tale of Less Pride & Prejudice
  • Darcy's Temptation: A Sequel to Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice
  • Pemberley Manor
  • Willoughby's Return: A Tale of Almost Irresistible Temptation
  • Mr. Darcy's Little Sister
  • The Darcys Give a Ball: A Gentle Joke, Jane Austen Style
  • Mrs Darcy's Dilemma
  • Affinity and Affection
  • Darcy and Fitzwilliam: A Tale of a Gentleman and an Officer (Darcy and Fitzwilliam, #1)
  • Old Friends and New Fancies: An Imaginary Sequel to the Novels of Jane Austen
  • Mr. Darcy's Daughter (The Pemberley Chronicles, #5)
  • Presumption: An Entertainment: A Sequel to Pride and Prejudice
  • Mr. Darcy and the Secret of Becoming a Gentleman
  • A Marriage Worth The Earning: ~To Have And To Hold~
  • Letters from Pemberley: The First Year

Share This Book