Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Documents in the Case” as Want to Read:
The Documents in the Case
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

The Documents in the Case

3.89 of 5 stars 3.89  ·  rating details  ·  2,774 ratings  ·  82 reviews
The bed was broken and tilted grotesquely sideways. Harrison was sprawled over in a huddle of soiled blankets. His mouth was twisted ...

Harrison had been an expert on deadly mushrooms. How was it then that he had eaten a large quantity of death-dealing muscarine? Was it an accident? Suicide? Or murder?
The documents in the case seemed to be a simple collection of love notes
Paperback, 260 pages
Published December 1st 1984 by New English Library (first published 1930)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Documents in the Case, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Documents in the Case

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
mark monday
interesting, unusual entry in the dorothy sayers mystery cannon, one that surprisingly does not feature peter wimsey, harriet vane, or, alas, bunter. basically a series of letters, the mystery unfolds amongst much light satire and amusing character bits. it is intriguing to see how the various letters often contradict one another, rashoman-style.
1930, Dorothy L. Sayers & Robert Eustace
Epistolary novel concerning a possible murder, and the lengths a son goes to, to find out what really happened; slow-moving classic tale, not one of Sayers' best - three-and-one-half stars.

Told from a variety of viewpoints via letters and court documents, this is the sad tale of a mis-matched married couple, and the neighbors who turn their lives upside down. Mr. and Mrs. Harrison are a nice suburban couple - he rather older than she, and neither under
Considering this was in the 1001 Books to Read Before You Die list, I was not struck with its uniqueness. Telling a story entirely in documents and letters is not groundbreaking now, although in 1930 it may have been. Having just read a book of letters, these come across as far too verbose and writerly, and the statements filled with asides and inner thoughts just seem unlikely.

However, Sayers has the gift of subtlety and quiet humour that infuse her characters with definite qualities - likeabl
readinghearts (Lyn M)
Feb 16, 2010 readinghearts (Lyn M) rated it 3 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: biologists and science buffs
Shelves: borrowed, ccclib, 2010, mystery
I picked this book for several reasons. I like mysteries, I have always wanted to read something by Dorothy L. Sayers, it fit into a challenge I was doing, and the premise looked interesting. As it turns out, I was a bit disappointed as the book is completely different from what I expected. The book is a mystery told through documents that were submitted to the police for review. This method is interesting as it gives the points of view of several different characters who were involved to some d ...more
Nandakishore Varma
A very enjoyable read, and a good whodunit. For my actual review, please see my blog:

A Review of Documents in the Case
This was a very unsatisfying epistolary novel, as it had neither the sort of resonance about the difficulties of dealing with crime that I like, nor a mystery I found particularly mysterious -- things are very much as they seem, despite some suggestions that they might not be. It was well enough written, but I felt throughout that Sayers was more interested in the philosophical ideas of one of her narrators, which left the dynamics feeling artificial. It is hard to get at that, but I would say, ...more
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
This is an excellent depiction of how a person's point of view affects their opinion of others, and how they see events differently. I think I would have rated it higher if there had been even a little more focus on the likeable characters. As it was, all the story centered around the most pitiful and/or unlikable people I've ever read. The core mystery was possible the most creative of all Sayers work, but I had to force myself to finish reading it.
(view spoiler)
Yet another book confirming my very high opinion of Dorothy Sayers. This is her take on an epistolary novel, although it's not composed of letters only. As the title suggests, the novel consists of a range of documents which together form a prosecution brief. As is so often the case with Sayers, the mystery is only a part of what the book is about. While there is a mystery, the point of it is the "how" rather than the "who". The novel is also a dissertation on creation and the origin of life. I ...more
I love, love, love this book. It was a complete surprise, and not a novel I ever would have picked up on my own - it was bought for me as a teenager (that would be approximately two decades ago!) and something I put aside for years because at the time I'd never heard of Sayers. I read the back and thought "well *that* sounds dull!" And then one day I picked it up, read a few pages... and finished it the same day! Oh, the gift that books like that are to a reader! I could not now say how many tim ...more
This book is not a typical novel, which I did not know when I picked it up at the library. The Documents in the Case is laid out in a series of letters that have been addressed to an investigator in order to reexamine what seemed to be an accidental poisoning. The mystery unfolds as the reader is given insights into different characters' thoughts and recollections as told through their personal correspondence or statements.

This was my first Sayers mystery and while I wasn't really impressed with
A very clever mystery!

"The Documents in the Case" is well-written and slowly played out to reveal the interplay of personalities. The author's sympathy at first is engaged by reading letters written by the major characters of the book. Slowly the personalities emerge and the reader is pleasurably encouraged to change their own perspectives of the characters as their individual idiosyncrasies, temptations and motives are revealed.

For instance, take a look at Miss Milsom:

"Miss Milson has always se
I was strongly repulsed by this book. I found all the characters to be disgusting, and yet I could see how they might have been made more sympathetic with just a little more effort.

If this had truly become Sayers jaundiced view of humanity by this point, I think I can see why she abandoned fiction and turned to theology.
Brenda Clough
This is one of Sayers' less-well-known mysteries, and it'll never be as popular as a Lord Peter novel. But it has great charms. Constructed tightly, told (after the model of her favorite Wilkie Collins) by different narrators, and with a keen scientific twist in the center, it is the work of a master.
I didn't care enough about the characters to be bothered finishing this, which was a great disappointment as I loved the Peter Wimsey novels.

I don't have a problem with the story being told in letters, if only the letters were realistic. However Sayers decided to make one of her characters wax philosophical, at great length, in his letters to his fiancee. Is that what a man really has in mind when writing to his beloved? Those sections were so long, they dominated the narrative - and they were
Suzanne Fox
This stand-alone mystery by Sayers and co-author Robert Eustace has lots of delights. The interweaving of letters and documents is intricate and well done, the glimpses of life in and around the artsy London of the '20s are amusing, and Sayers clearly had a good time creating comic turns like Agatha Milsom, whose bizarre but somehow quite credible blend of madness and self-improvement is wonderfully if darkly funny.

Indeed, the entire book is dark: depressing perhaps, but interesting. Neither Pe
A unique Dorothy Sayers mystery novel -- it does not involve Lord Peter Wimsey. This one is interesting because although you don't have direct knowledge, it's pretty obvious who committed the murder; you just have to watch as the other characters figure out that the victim was murdered instead of dying accidentally or by suicide, who was responsible, and how he did it. It is written in the form of a collection of documents, including written statements from witnesses, personal letters, and newsp ...more
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
The plot of this book is so smart that it actually figured as a problem in one of my organic chemistry textbooks in college! One of those musty dusty tomes but still!!!

The brilliance of the science aside, it is truly an excellent book! Dorothy Sayers is a master at creating three dimensional characters that live and breathe. The book is written in an epistolary format and most incidents come across from two or more points of view, each so consistent and complete by itself that that alone would b
This is the second Sayers I've read (and reviewed) in two weeks, the other being 'Strong Poison'. My response is similar to 'Strong Poison': expertly written, interesting characters and absorbing enough to keep me reading throughout the day (in this case during the two halves of a lengthy return train journey). But as a novel of detection, surprisingly weak. Moreso indeed than 'Strong Poison'. This is a non-Peter Whimsey novel written in collaboration with Robert Eustace, a medical scientist lea ...more
Samarpita Dutta
I started reading this book as I thought it would be a good introduction to Dorothy L. Sayers' work without reading any of her LPW books. The story, written from the perspective of letters being presented as evidence in court in support of a son trying to prove his father was murdered by his scheming wife and her lover rather than having died of an accidental poisoning, was gripping. Sayers has the ability of changing her language to add flavour to her characters when telling the story from thei ...more
I nearly missed this little treasure by Dorothy L. Sayers, for as it does not include Lord Peter Wimsey, it did not show up on the bibliography I had been referring to as I progressed through her novels. I am so glad I caught on that this existed!

Written in an epistolary format, which I generally enjoy, it follows the the lives of several individuals sharing a maisonette in 1929 England. One apartment is occupied by a husband and wife and the wife's companion, the other by an author and artist
Karen B
I've read all of Sayers' Lord Peter Wimsey novels multiple times, but had always passed over this novel since it does not feature Lord Peter. I'm glad I've finally read it. It's a very well-crafted story. Perhaps in some of Sayers' Lord Peter works, the wonderfully enjoyable character of her sleuth outshines the skill of the author in crafting the mystery. In this novel, given the absence of Lord Peter, it highlights Sayers' excellence in writing and plotting.

I'm amazed at Sayers' skill! She pul
Pat F.
My sister-in-law thought that I might get a kick out of this one, given that it's an epistolary murder mystery set in England that uses science. She was right on all counts.

The epistolary format sometimes demands a little more from the reader, but it lends itself particularly well to this story. The novel opens with a man sending a series of documents to a nobleman and asking for his impressions of the "case." The reader is then led through the story based on letters, reports, and other document
Jeremy Preacher
This was really neat. It's an epistolary novel, mostly - it's presented as a collection of letters and documents related to a murder, although there are several long "statements" in unabashedly narrative form from two of the characters. From the beginning you know who will die, but it quickly becomes obvious that there are many people with a variety of reasons to kill him.

The pacing is a bit slow for my tastes - I could have done with about half as many letters from the batty housekeeper or the
I initially checked this out from the library mistaking it for a Lord Peter Wimsey mystery. It's not, but it still displays Sayers' ability to write believable characters and craft a mystery that keeps you involved to the last page. An expert in fungus has been found dead, poisoned by his own cooking. Was it a mistake? Suicide? Or murder? The mystery is uncovered through letters written by the deceased and those around him, which makes for a tricky bit of sleuthing as the reader tries to discove ...more
Sir Peter Whimsey is NOT in this mystery....and I love reading about him. I read this years ago, and of course, did not guess the name of the murderer. I think I will read it again soon.
DeAnna Knippling
A reread.

For some reason, the first time I read this book, I didn't care for it at all. However, this time--I looked at it not as a mystery for some reason, but as a study of POV, and how different characters could see actions differently. How far can different people see the same situation? Here, wildly differently. I empathized with all the POV characters except for one, but I was never meant to empathize with that one. I felt - very skillfully handled? I don't know. The mystery wasn't all th
Andrea Hickman Walker
I enjoyed this just as much as I did the first time round. I particularly enjoyed the way in which the information was presented, particularly as it gave one the opportunity to see the same incident from multiple viewpoints, a thing that I always find fascinating. I particularly enjoyed the solution, hinging as it did on chemistry (a subject I'm particularly fond of). Of course, there were very few of the characters that I liked, but it didn't really affect my enjoyment of the book. I think it's ...more
Hmm not what I was expecting. Based on a series of letters, and more of a character study than a crime mystery. It was certainly different but parts of it I did find too long winded and just wanted to get to the real action. The last third did feel worth the wait. Think I'll give an actual Sir Peter Whimsy book a go before I properly judge Dorothy Sayers
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • A Presumption of Death (Lord Peter Wimsey/Harriet Vane #2)
  • Death at the Bar (Roderick Alleyn, #9)
  • To Love and Be Wise (Inspector Alan Grant, #4)
Dorothy Leigh Sayers (Oxford, 13 June 1893 – Witham, 17 December 1957) was a renowned British author, translator, student of classical and modern languages, and Christian humanist.

Dorothy L. Sayers is best known for her mysteries, a series of novels and short stories set between World War I and World War II that feature English aristocrat and amateur sleuth Lord Peter Wimsey. However, Sayers herse
More about Dorothy L. Sayers...
Whose Body?  (Lord Peter Wimsey Mysteries, #1) Strong Poison (Lord Peter Wimsey Mysteries, #6) Unnatural Death (Lord Peter Wimsey Mysteries, #3) Murder Must Advertise  (Lord Peter Wimsey Mysteries, #10) Gaudy Night (Lord Peter Wimsey Mysteries, #12)

Share This Book

“Praise God (or whatever it is) from (if direction exists) whom (if personality exists) all blessings (if that word corresponds to any percept of objective reality) flow (if Heraclitus and Bergson and Einstein are correct in stating that everything is more or less flowing about).” 7 likes
More quotes…