Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Civil War” as Want to Read:
The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Civil War
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Civil War (Politically Incorrect Guides)

4.12 of 5 stars 4.12  ·  rating details  ·  186 ratings  ·  23 reviews
Get ready for a rousing rebel yell as best-selling author H. W. Crocker, III, charges through bunkers and battlefields, busting myths, shattering stereotypes, and revealing little-known truths. Crocker culminates his work in the most politically-incorrect chapter of all: "What If the South Had Won."
Audio, 6 pages
Published October 1st 2008 by Blackstone Audiobooks (first published 2008)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Civil War, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Civil War

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 438)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Nothing like publishing a book lauding the actions of a petty and tyrannical slaveocracy with a mass murderer on the cover. I can't wait for the next volume in the politically incorrect series: The Politically Incorrect guide to World War Two; potential chapters include: FDR the socialist tyrant, Hitler the misunderstood genius, and the truth behind the "Holocaust."

In all seriousness though these books are reprehensibly bad and pander to the far-right fringe lunatics who find rigorous academic w
Having already read the P.I.G. to American History, I thought I would read this book as an expansion of some of the themes covered during its own rendition of the Civil War. This book is a very interesting take of some of our most cherished beliefs about the Civil War and the many many characters and personalities of whom legends and villains are made. We are told in our 8th grade history class that the Civil War is about slavery, and are made to think of every southerner as backward and evil pe ...more
This is a great book, detailing so many of the misconceptions that we have as modern day Americans concerning the War Between the States. There is so much that is left untold. After reading this, I am compelled to believe that the Confederate States of America were standing on solid constitutional ground in seceding from the Union, and that it was the northern states that were the violators of the Constitution and morality in waging war against the south.

Had the south terminated slavery peaceful
Dan Arnold
Thoroughly researched 'dummies' type guidebook that gives a passionate and reasoned defense of the southern cause. Prepare to have many sacred cows and long-standing perceptions shattered by irrefutable quotes and documentation. The South may not rise again but Mr. Crocker certainly raises up the much maligned reputation of the brave patriots who gave all in defense of a noble cause.
David Robins
"If we were wrong in our contest, then the Declaration of Independence was a grave mistake, and the revolution to which it led was a crime.... If Washington was a patriot, Lee cannot have been a rebel; if the enunciation of the grand truths in the Declaration of Independence made Jefferson immortal, the observance of them could not have made Davis a traitor." (Gen. Wade Hampton)
James (JD) Dittes
As a lifelong "Union man" and one of the minority in my southern state who accepts the 13th-15th Amendments, I was skeptical when I downloaded this book, but this was no polemic.

Crocker outlines the South's case very succinctly and offers a sympathetic voice to Jefferson Davis, but the best part of this book are the fascinating anecdotes he mines. Not all Union Men were thrilled about freeing slaves, and not all Confederates necessarily saw slavery as something that must continue, Crocker points
As a person who seeks the truth of all matters, these Politically Incorrect Guides are like holy testaments. Sort of. Generally speaking, though, they really do 'tell the other side of the story' that we don't get in most history books, or really at all, anywhere.

I read this book (and the P.I.G. to the South) for a project I was doing for my English class back in my last year of school. Both of these books were wonderfully written, in a rather amusing style that reminisced a little of the Dummi
I decided to pick up The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Civil War because I didn't actually know much about the War for Southern Independence and I didn't think I have the staying power for Shelby Foote's series of books. Mr. Crocker does a good job of briefly explaining the causes, battles, and personalities of the Civil War without becoming dry ... he personalizes the experience, however, his use of language is sometimes less than flowing, and he has a tendency to repeat cliches; surely th ...more
I rated this lower because I felt the formatting of the content was horrible. For example, the early chapters provide a synopsis of the war and the political climate of the day, primarily from a pro-Confederate perspective, and then it dives into chapters concerning monumental battles, and it finishes with chapters that discuss the leaders of those battles. To me, it makes much more sense to introduce the players in the game before talking about the game itself. It seems like the outline of the ...more
Charles Phillips
Some of the factoids are interesting, but this is such a skewed version of civil war history that after a bit one begins to doubt much of what is written. Yes, it was a war about union, but slavery and union were inextricably intertwined. Read the declarations of secession. Slavery and secession were seen as a piece. The analogy between the American Revolution and Secession is quite a stretch. NY tried to insert a clause allowing secession in it's ratification of The Constitution, and it was dee ...more
I expected that this book, like other PIGs, would be a quick read, but it was actually a bit of a slog. Admittedly, I have no head for military strategy. There was a lot of interesting information though; I just wish I could keep straight which general did what and where.
Good book. Unfortunately for me, most of the information in here I have read elsewhere. The book does cover the North and the South protagonists of the war. This book did spark and interest in Robert E. Lee and Grant. I have added some of those books to my list.

Some of the subject are not for those who buy into the "only one side of the story" theory. If you read this with an open mind and put aside the pro-South agenda of the book, you may walk away with at a minimum, a different view. I wish t
A more complete view of the Civil War and it's most famous generals. Things are not black and white but various shades of gray.
Did my best to keep an open mind...for don't really care for those that pander to the far fringes of both sides. Though he did make some interesting points and the occasional eye-opener...he flat out had it wrong on so many points I will actually RUN it back to the library. Nice try on Nathan Bed Forrest, Mr. Apologist.
I was impressed with how much this book made me reconsider what I thought I already knew well. I will never see the war the same way, now that I know a lot of these background details and more of the international and historical context. Very worthwhile.
Whew, finally finished this book. It went back and forth from very interesting to boring and back again, many times. I do have a better understanding of the civil war though, and I am very glad that I read it.
Brendan Martin
I found myself very much enjoying some sections while having to force myself through others. The final chapter is very interesting.
A great eye-opener for those taught the pc version in public schools.
Kait Nolan
Enjoyable and intelligent account.
Clint Flatt
A must read for history fans
Jun 02, 2010 Robby marked it as reference  ·  review of another edition
Ted Kennedy is a racist.
Emily marked it as to-read
Dec 22, 2014
Jeffrey C
Jeffrey C marked it as to-read
Dec 22, 2014
David Addiss
David Addiss marked it as to-read
Dec 25, 2014
Maha marked it as to-read
Dec 17, 2014
Ethan Weaver
Ethan Weaver marked it as to-read
Dec 12, 2014
Dwayne Mchottie
Dwayne Mchottie marked it as to-read
Dec 06, 2014
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 14 15 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Politically Incorrect Guide to The South: (And Why It Will Rise Again)
  • The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History
  • The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution
  • The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Founding Fathers
  • The Politically Incorrect Guide to Capitalism
  • The Politically Incorrect Guide to Science
  • The Politically Incorrect Guide to Western Civilization
  • The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism  And Intelligent Design
  • The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming: And Environmentalism
  • The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Bible
  • The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)
  • The Politically Incorrect Guide to English and American Literature
  • The Politically Incorrect Guide to Socialism
  • The South Was Right!
  • The Civil War (American Heritage)
  • The Heritage Guide to the Constitution
  • Lincoln Unmasked: What You're Not Supposed to Know About Dishonest Abe
  • Lincoln's Code: The Laws of War in American History
Triumph: The Power and the Glory of the Catholic Church Robert E. Lee on Leadership: Executive Lessons in Character, Courage, and Vision Don't Tread on Me: A 400-Year History of America at War, from Indian Fighting to Terrorist Hunting The Politically Incorrect Guide to the British Empire The Old Limey

Share This Book