Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Werelden in Botsing” as Want to Read:
Werelden in Botsing
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Werelden in Botsing

3.97  ·  Rating Details ·  586 Ratings  ·  51 Reviews
Worlds in Collision is a book written by Immanuel Velikovsky and first published on April 3, 1950. The book proposed that around the 15th century BCE, Venus was ejected from Jupiter as a comet or comet-like object, and passed near Earth (an actual collision is not mentioned). The object changed Earth's orbit and axis, causing innumerable catastrophes which were mentioned i ...more
Hardcover, 464 pages
Published 1971 by Uitgeverij Ankh-Hermes (first published 1950)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Werelden in Botsing, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Werelden in Botsing

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Dec 03, 2014 Vishal rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Well, the fact that this book of pseudo-science has respectable ratings and fairly positive reviews here, it appalls me. It makes the the ignorance and mysticism in general populace very evident that they, after failing to understand Science and scientific methods, have embraced the fantasy of pseudo-science which gives them the grandeur and connection with the cosmos which every human seeks.

In this book, author claims an explanation of the biblical events of Exodus; which include the Earth stan
Nox Prognatus
Jun 24, 2012 Nox Prognatus rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I read some of the previous reviews before reading myself. And whilst most were positive, there were some negative comments left by readers. Some even suggested this was a work of science fiction. Well my reply to those reviews is as follows....

I thought this was an excellently researched book. And while some of his theories seem, at first difficult to grasp. The reader has to be clear that Velikovsky was using hundreds of ancient texts, to formulate his theory and put forward as evidence his th
Apr 09, 2013 Lyrae rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I was compelled to read Worlds in Collision as it is the single piece of work that has inspired the work of the electric universe group, something that I follow with much interest. While the members of this group don't completely agree with all of Velikovsky's ideas the premise served as a springboard to launch new investigations into the electric model of the universe and new interpretations of mythology and its roots in catastrophe.

As I write this review, I must also add that I read Earth in
The first time I read about this book in Vine Deloria's work, I was kind of skeptical about it. After all, our science is very dogmatic and treated like a religion and stuff is crammed into our heads all our lives as gospel that has no real research or truth behind it, but it's SCIENCE so it's supposedly true.

This book actually kind of blew my mind. Even if it is not accurate (and the evidence presented makes a really compelling argument in favor of its veracity), the errors in our "superior mod
Jerry Kimbro
Jul 29, 2012 Jerry Kimbro rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history
Worlds in Collison is an unusual and controversial book and has been since it was published in the 1950's, Velikovsky was one of the first to challenge mainstream scince with his controversal theories of Catastrophism- or the theory that the Earth has been affected in the past by sudden, short-lived, violent events, possibly worldwide in scope. Before that the theory was one of Uniformitarianism. This view holds that the present is the key to the past, and that all things continue as they were ...more
Mike (the Paladin)
I was torn between 3 and 4 stars over this book. There is little chance that the scientific claims in this book will find anymore favor in the future than in the past...but it's a good read. You may think it's tripe or you may say wow there could be something to this (though the scientific community would disagree with you) but whatever you think you'll find this an interesting even fascinating read. Like Chariots of the Gods you agree or not but the read's okay.

The storm over this book was so
This was an interesting read. The idea that there were major catastrophic events that lead to many of the world myths is extremely fascinating. A lot of science has occurred in the sixty five or so years since the book was first written. It is a shame that there was not much, if any, efforts by the academic community to explore more these concepts. The authors citation methods make it hard to corroborate his sources and the author refers to texts that are no longer extant. All of this tends to m ...more
Jan 01, 2013 Joy rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Velikovsky's first book demonstrates that neither Earth nor our solar system is permanently stable. Scientists of the 19th century found it reassuring to consider it so, and they overturned all then-current theories based on the evidence of upended geologic strata, impact craters and quick-frozen mammoths. Ancient descriptions of moving mountains were dismissed as exaggerations, and detailed astronomical records that don't match today's planetary movements were condemned as ignorant.

Today, of co
Phred Padgett
Jul 26, 2008 Phred Padgett rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: science
I first read an excerpt of this book in the Colliers magazine in 1949. It haunted me. Then, when we took Mark to WSU, there was the book in the bookshop! I bought it! His three major books put new light/ideas onto space, earth and history, making sense of the clues left from all ages. He was the first (NOT Carl Sagan!!) to predict Venus to be hot, in the age when we still believed it to be similar to earth. He shows reasons, through the myths and legends of ancient peoples who also tried to make ...more
Jun 12, 2015 Katrinka rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I'm giving this a high score for pure pleasure in reading, and in witnessing someone being able to draw together global mythologies into a coherent narrative. As for the science/actual believability of it all? No clue, and I'm a born skeptic–but I'll admit, it was a really fun read. ...more
the book is touted as nonfiction and it may have been written that way. But believe me, it's SF. First off, of course, the details of the book are just not true. There's no doubt that there have been planetary collisions in our solar system's history. That's how the solar system formed. But many of the more dramatic speculations are just wild. Still, the book is interesting and kind of a compelling read. It also, as I understand it, inspired the pretty good novels of "When Worlds Collide" and "A ...more
Apr 09, 2014 Donna rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Immanuel Velikovsky is a physicist, and his writing talks about how certain biblical events happened in scientific terms, and what people of the day experienced as far as planetary movement, the planets Mars, Venus, and the Moon, and their elliptical orbits, and the formation of the current calendar. His books series a vast time period of planetary upheaval and earth related changes during those times--earthquakes, floods, asteroids hitting earth, solar flares, volcanic eruptions, and the fact t ...more
Jun 27, 2016 Jarrell rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Mind=blown. Definitely not light reading, this is a potential game changer. I found it severely enlightening. Velikovsky presents us with the notion that, in aeons past, planets collided and came within the orbit of each other, which resulted in global catastrophes, metamorphoses, and phenomena, some of which we see the remnants of today. The information he highlights in this book he provides evidence for, by consistently verifying his points with biblical passages (now interpreted metaphoricall ...more
Lorenzo Molossi
Jul 14, 2016 Lorenzo Molossi rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: favorites
Mundos em Colisão de Immanuel Velikovsky é facilmente uma das melhores coisas que já aconteceram em papel (ou mesmo em papel digital). Sua revisão da história antiga através de mitologia comparada produz uma das teorias mais cativantes e esmagadoras sobre a mecânica celeste de todos os tempos, e tudo se encaixa lindamente. Como se este trabalho inovador e complexo por si só não fosse importante o suficiente, o que aconteceu após a publicação do livro foi ainda mais importante: ele foi agressivam ...more
Ian Bar
Oct 27, 2014 Ian Bar rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I thoroughly enjoyed reading this work by Velikovsky. His new paradigm for the changes in the layout of our solar system, which according to him took place very recently, I found intriguing. Velikovsky looked at ancient texts from 1400 BC and approximately 800 BC revealing observations of the celestial sky that demonstrated close contact with Venus and Mars. These close contacts Earth had with these two celestial bodies explains the catastrophes of not only what took place during the Exodus, but ...more
Feb 07, 2015 David rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction
I noticed with interest recently that nomad planets are now thought by mainstream science to be quite numerous. Velikovsky's idea that Venus was ejected by Jupiter may be nonsense, but much of the rest of this work seems fairly coherent to me. Venus may have had an extremely high velocity and had a slight, skimming impact with Jupiter, or perhaps the entire idea is nonsense: I don't think it's possible to know for sure at the moment.
Ira Bauman
Jul 11, 2016 Ira Bauman rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Very thought provoking. V was lambasted as a pseudo scientist when he published this after decades of being a respected scientist. Only years later was the Catastrophe theory used to explain the demise of the dinosaurs. His theory was justified and it would be interesting to know how much more of his ideas will be proven true in the future.
Vrinda Pendred
Jan 10, 2014 Vrinda Pendred rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction
FASCINATING. And very convincing...until the ending. I wish these writers wouldn't get so reductionist. There was so much evidence for his ideas up to that point. When it got into the angels bit, I just've lost me. There's no evidence for this. You're just trying to find a way to make every story fit into your theory. But what's wrong with saying once people moved beyond a certain point in time, they changed tracks and these other stories we have from that later period comes from s ...more
Nancy Clark
Sep 01, 2010 Nancy Clark rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Nancy by:
I just couldn't make myself finish this book---read a few chapters in though. I tried because I had such an interesting and enlightening 2 hr. conversation (really mostly listened and learned) with an unusually kind and patient couple that I had just met---a retired NASA space engineer and his wife who both had such a memory for details, a lot of which they had learned through reading Velikovsky. They really encouraged me to read him as well. I don't know if it's because I do most of my reading ...more
Albert Meier
Aug 13, 2015 Albert Meier rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The concept is fascinating: What if all the similarities in ancient tales are derived from specific cosmological events? It's an intriguing hypothesis and Velikovsky amasses mountains of anecdotal evidence to support his position.

That being said, I'm not convinced. Among the ancient texts he used were the prophetic writing of the Old Testament (Isaiah, Amos, etc.). I'm familiar enough with these to be critical of his understanding and use of isolated passages. It makes me wonder if the other so
Apr 17, 2015 Yota rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
There is plenty of "awkward" historical evidence supporting Velikovskian ideas which routinely get swept under the rug. Ancient astronomer-priests recording erratic movements of planets? No way, they were primitive half-monkeys who didn't know how to count days or use a fixed point of reference, such as a TREE!

On the other hand, some of his other arguments are just embarrassing, particularly his reading of myths. Conflicts between imaginary characters are cited as evidence of planetary catastrop
Dwayne Roberts
Mar 16, 2014 Dwayne Roberts rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
If WiC were offered as a work of science fiction, I could rate it higher; but as science fact it's naught but rationalization. Poor rationalization at that.
Kenneth Burr
Feb 24, 2014 Kenneth Burr rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
one of the most influencal books I've ever read. I look at many thing differently then other people just because I've read this book.
Apr 14, 2013 Andrew rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
I read about this book in a copy of "Cosmos" magazine and thought "That title sounds familiar." on investigation I found it in my grandfather's bookcase. while the book at its release was surrounded by controversy, and presents a theory that is very hard to swallow, you have to respect the author for his creativity and sheer persistence. The hours that must have gone into researching and writing this book is astonishing. While the book is a bit of a slog to get through, I'm glad I read it, as it ...more
Amazing, fascinating, dry in places but incredible research and interesting conjecture
Jan 17, 2016 JD rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This book certaily brings up some unusual ideas and makes the read think.
Barry TurnerNewall
Hmm i had high hopes when I picked this up but the whole volume is predicated on the theory that Venus was once a comet. Impressive research though.
R Dean
May 16, 2014 R Dean rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Explains many things that are otherwise inexplicable. What was before will be again.
Neil Davies
Jun 06, 2014 Neil Davies rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Not the easiest read ever but fascinating. I think his reasoning is, at times, seriously flawed and he hasn't convinced me but he puts up a good argument with lots of evidence from ancient writings, if you take them literally. Very interesting and does make you think if nothing else.
An eyeopener
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Map of Worlds in Collision 1 5 Mar 30, 2015 11:28AM  
  • The Hidden History of the Human Race - The condensed edition of Forbidden Archeology
  • Civilization One: The World Is Not as You Thought it Was
  • When Time Began (The Earth Chronicles, Book V)
  • Serpent in the Sky: The High Wisdom of Ancient Egypt
  • From the Ashes of Angels: The Forbidden Legacy of a Fallen Race
  • The Egypt Code
  • Forbidden History: Prehistoric Technologies, Extraterrestrial Intervention, and the Suppressed Origins of Civilization
  • The Ancient Alien Question: A New Inquiry Into the Existence, Evidence, and Influence of Ancient Visitors
  • Gods of Eden
  • UFOs and the National Security State 1: Chronology of a Coverup 1941-73
  • The Interrupted Journey Two Lost Hours Aboard A Flying Saucer
  • From Atlantis to the Sphinx
  • The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
  • The Ancient Engineers
  • Underworld: The Mysterious Origins of Civilization
  • Atlantis: The Antediluvian World
  • The Spaceships of Ezekiel
  • Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings: Evidence of Advanced Civilization in the Ice Age
Immanuel Velikovsky was a Russian-born American independent scholar, best known as the author of a number of controversial books reinterpreting the events of ancient history, in particular the US bestseller Worlds in Collision, published in 1950. Earlier, he played a role in the founding of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Israel, and was a respected psychiatrist and psychoanalyst.

His books u
More about Immanuel Velikovsky...

Share This Book

“a law is but a deduction from experience and experiment, and therefore laws must conform with historical facts, not facts with law.” 7 likes
More quotes…