Jugadores Con Veto
Political scientists have long classified systems of government as parliamentary or presidential, two-party or multiparty, and so on. But such distinctions often fail to provide useful insights. For example, how are we to compare the United States, a presidential bicameral regime with two weak parties, to Denmark, a parliamentary unicameral regime with many strong parties?
...morePaperback, 409 pages
Published
December 28th 2006
by Fondo de Cultura Economica USA
(first published 2002)
There is a good chance some of your friends read this book. Sign in to see!
sign in »
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
This book is currently not featured on any Listopia lists.
Add this book to your favorite list »
Community Reviews
(showing
1-17
of
17)
Very interesting theory. Didn't read past the introduction and the first chapter - gets quite repetitive from thereon. The main thesis is clearly presented in that first part anyway. Short summary: if there are more agents in the system with power to influence policy (to change the status quo), there is more likely to be policy stability (e.g. US with three branches of government). This method of analysis allows for comparison between different state structures (presidential, parliamentary, two-...more
One of those "why I found grad school to be a waste of my time and money" books. Just because you throw out a lot of math doesn't mean you told me anything I didn't know before. This books isn't wrong. It's just unnecessary. I had forgotten that I read this book until looking through a book list on Goodreads and recognized the cover.
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Be the first to start one »

Loading...





















